TheStorm said:
caryking said:
DrummerboyWolf said:
Catherine Englebrecht on with Steve Bannon talking about the massive win against Elias, Abrams, and the DOJ. Voter rolls are in complete chaos and this win in court gives citizens the chance to help clean them up. But again there is no fraud going on. If you keep believing that BS then there is no hope for you.
https://rumble.com/v44zeft-catherine-englebrecht-discusses-favorable-ruling-in-georgia-voter-role-laws.html
The voter rolls are the easiest thing to clean up, and… ineptness has left them vulnerable!
Civ would call cleaning up the voter rolls "voter suppression"...
No I wouldn't, not as long as the"clean up" efforts are in good faith and not unnecessarily aggressive and executed in such a way that allow for due process and for reasonable inconsistencies like address changes, misspellings, house/apartment number presentation format, etc. to be accommodated without preventing such voters from voting.
Wouldn't call voter ID laws voter suppression either.
I'm fine with taking reasonable steps to ensure election security, like we already do. Our elections are already some of the most democratic and secure in the world.
What I'm not fine with is doing what some Republicans around the country continue trying to do, which is to inhibit votes from being cast not for reasons related to potential malfeasance, but for reasons glaringly and obviously related to the voters in question being likely to vote Democrat.
I'm not fine with Republicans trying to eliminate or prevent polling locations at colleges; for standing in the way of election materials being translated into Spanish and other languages, as is required by law; unnecessarily reducing the number of polling places in minority neighborhoods; or any other embarrassingly transparent attempts to simply prevent their political opponents from voting.
What I'm also not fine with is sloppy and in some cases intentionally dishonest mislabeling of tightening up election processes as being evidence of past consequential, outcome-determinative election fraud when there has not ever been evidence of such, like some people do on here.
There are multiple, layered processes that have been in place for eons that prevent widespread or consequential fraud, even in locations where voter rolls need to be cleaned up, or were there was extensive mail-in balloting in 2020.
Wanting to make sure processes are as tight as they can be, without inhibiting the reasonable ability of the poor, the elderly, the disabled, ESL, minorities, and young people to vote is fine.
But that desire to "clean up" processes is an altogether separate issue from actually finding evidence of such processes leading to actual fraud in past elections.