I’m a guest on Joe Rambo’s Show tomorrow. Follow him @BrainStorm_Joe 1pm Eastern https://t.co/LcbmMmByhs

— MustangMedic (@MustangMedicX) April 17, 2024

💥BREAKING💥

Due to ret. 3-star 🇺🇸General McInerny🇺🇸 it‘s worse
than 🇺🇸@RudyGiuliani🇺🇸 has told us so far :https://t.co/D6zYDtY0df pic.twitter.com/LybWkTCC2H

— 🔆Nick 777🔆 IFB (@realNick_777) December 13, 2020

Lt. General Thomas McInerny with some telling words! Listen pic.twitter.com/R6fjmW4vzW

— 🅐🅜🅨★🇺🇸 (@Steelhead_Amy) January 9, 2021

Right-Wing Media BLATANTLY LIES to Their Audience about the Most Important Issues Imaginable, and We All Know It

After the 2020 Election, numerous RW Media companies brazenly LIED to the American public about the security of US election software. In April of 2023, Fox News… pic.twitter.com/QQdckRDkVp

— South Dakotans for Political Integrity (@southdintegrity) April 19, 2024

Dems,
I'll stop referencing the '20 election if u can answer either of these 2 questions:
1. Why was the vote count halted in at least 6 states at midnight and who gave that order?
2. Why were 99% of the "found" 4AM votes for Biden?
Please explain this statistical impossibility.

— Philip Schuyler (@FiveRights) September 17, 2023

This was at midnight.
So virtually all of the "found" 4AM votes had to be for Biden, a statistical impossibility. Pls explain, Dems. pic.twitter.com/Q9cjOuU9OG

— Philip Schuyler (@FiveRights) September 16, 2023

🚨🚨 ELECTION FRAUD

🚨🚨 BREAKING: VoterGA's Garland Favorito, going over his audit of the Fulton County election in the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, says they found 200k duplicate-scanned 2020 ballots, but ongoing research has bumped that… pic.twitter.com/wz3gOpR0ZK

— 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA (@JDunlap1974) April 22, 2024

About one in five mail-in ballots in the last election was fraudulent, handing Biden the presidency. We know this because the people who committed the fraud have admitted it in a new poll. pic.twitter.com/fxHL9hT4sw

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) April 26, 2024

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

When they do you and rest of your comrades scream "fake news!!", "conspiracy theories.."

Etc...

As a matter of fact I posted several lies from Sleepy Joe numerous times... you and the rest of your blind following sheep ignore them and scream "something, something TRUUUMMMMPPPP!!!"

And you damn well know that is a FACT.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

When they do you and rest of your comrades scream "fake news!!", "conspiracy theories.."

Etc...

As a matter of fact I posted several lies from Sleepy Joe numerous times... you and the rest of your blind following sheep ignore them and scream "something, something TRUUUMMMMPPPP!!!"

And you damn well know that is a FACT.

---

This. Biden lies repletely. It's almost never reported on.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

When they do you and rest of your comrades scream "fake news!!", "conspiracy theories.."

Etc...

As a matter of fact I posted several lies from Sleepy Joe numerous times... you and the rest of your blind following sheep ignore them and scream "something, something TRUUUMMMMPPPP!!!"

And you damn well know that is a FACT.

---

This. Biden lies repletely. It's almost never reported on.

---

You just said it's reported on plenty by right-leaning media.

Do you see Fox, OAN, and Newsmax taking Trump to task for all the stupid **** he does and says?

If not, why not? Why not hold them to the same standard you apparently hold MSNBC to?

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

When they do you and rest of your comrades scream "fake news!!", "conspiracy theories.."

Etc...

As a matter of fact I posted several lies from Sleepy Joe numerous times... you and the rest of your blind following sheep ignore them and scream "something, something TRUUUMMMMPPPP!!!"

And you damn well know that is a FACT.

---

This. Biden lies repletely. It's almost never reported on.

---

You just said it's reported on plenty by right-leaning media.

Do you see Fox, OAN, and Newsmax taking Trump to task for all the stupid **** he does and says?

If not, why not? Why not hold them to the same standard you apparently hold MSNBC to?

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Because a lot of the legacy media leans left. Same reason why Fox and OAN and Newsmax don't call out Trump's buffoonery. This isn't news.

Good thing there are plenty of both left- and right-leaning news sources so Americans can choose to consume news from across the spectrum if they want.

And if we're keeping score, only right-leaning media has been successfully sued to smithereens for completely and knowingly fabricating bull**** news to appease their thirsty audience.

---

Have we found the folks who ate Biden's uncle?

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Yes, he's honest with some of what he says. And he gets some stuff wrong. And he grossly overstates or just makes some stuff up.

I don't have an expectation that every news source deliver centrist news. American media has never been that way. Hell, the partisan bias is a lot better now than it was 140 years ago. Go read about the partisan history of American news in the 1800's if you want a good chuckle.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Because a lot of the legacy media leans left. Same reason why Fox and OAN and Newsmax don't call out Trump's buffoonery. This isn't news.

Good thing there are plenty of both left- and right-leaning news sources so Americans can choose to consume news from across the spectrum if they want.

And if we're keeping score, only right-leaning media has been successfully sued to smithereens for completely and knowingly fabricating bull**** news to appease their thirsty audience.

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Because a lot of the legacy media leans left. Same reason why Fox and OAN and Newsmax don't call out Trump's buffoonery. This isn't news.

Good thing there are plenty of both left- and right-leaning news sources so Americans can choose to consume news from across the spectrum if they want.

And if we're keeping score, only right-leaning media has been successfully sued to smithereens for completely and knowingly fabricating bull**** news to appease their thirsty audience.

---

They don't call out his buffoonery because it's there for the public to see, and being good journalists, they understand that it is not for them to interpret for their viewers, what those viewers can see for themselves.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Yes, he's honest with some of what he says. And he gets some stuff wrong. And he grossly overstates or just makes some stuff up.

I don't have an expectation that every news source deliver centrist news. American media has never been that way. Hell, the partisan bias is a lot better now than it was 140 years ago. Go read about the partisan history of American news in the 1800's if you want a good chuckle.

---

The media has always been partisan, that's for sure. " Grossly overstates or just makes some stuff up " so lying? I'll give you credit, you got close to calling Biden a liar though.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Because a lot of the legacy media leans left. Same reason why Fox and OAN and Newsmax don't call out Trump's buffoonery. This isn't news.

Good thing there are plenty of both left- and right-leaning news sources so Americans can choose to consume news from across the spectrum if they want.

And if we're keeping score, only right-leaning media has been successfully sued to smithereens for completely and knowingly fabricating bull**** news to appease their thirsty audience.

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

barelypure said:

---

You do realize the guy was talking about a poll right. So for Tucker to verify the poll he would have had to conduct another poll. But since all Tucker does is lie there would need to be a poll to verify that poll. So where does it end.

When other talking heads have on people who have conducted polls do you ask them to verify the poll or are they just giving the poll taker a platform to report the results of the poll.

I think you have a Tucker problem more than a problem with the poll. IOW had this been on someone else's show you would have been more receptive

---

The Tucker problem is that he is an admitted liar. So yes, I question most of what he says and what he has on his show. If we are going to hold the left to a standard and call them out for lying, why not hold the same standard to our side?

---

That's a start. Now if you guys hadn't been trained to distrust fact checkers, Google, science, or any other external source of truth, you might discover all of the un-admitted liars that shape your worldview, too.

---

LOL... I'm still waiting on the " fact checkers " on Biden and his crap that comes out of his mouth daily. And folks wonder why people don't trust the media.

---

It would sell, so why is anyone waiting on anything?

Why haven't the right-leaning media done the fact checking and then profited?

---

Right wing media does. To your first question, you can answer as to why MSM doesn't go out of their way, even though they get herded out repletely by his handlers. Anything to protect Biden. One other thing, do you think Biden is honest with what he says and therefore no need for fact checkers?

---

Because a lot of the legacy media leans left. Same reason why Fox and OAN and Newsmax don't call out Trump's buffoonery. This isn't news.

Good thing there are plenty of both left- and right-leaning news sources so Americans can choose to consume news from across the spectrum if they want.

And if we're keeping score, only right-leaning media has been successfully sued to smithereens for completely and knowingly fabricating bull**** news to appease their thirsty audience.

---

They don't call out his buffoonery because it's there for the public to see, and being good journalists, they understand that it is not for them to interpret for their viewers, what those viewers can see for themselves.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Changing subjects, the left should be proud about what's happening on some of these places of " higher " learning. Taking over buildings by force, making threats to others, and having classes closed for in person. Strange this happens in election years? I guess it's a happen chance.

---