🚨NEW: Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, testifies that he voted against certifying the 2020 election because the county did not verify the signatures on 147,000 mail-in ballots.

"I asked what did we do for signature verification? And the comment I got back… pic.twitter.com/pLeoT7WbZ4

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) April 2, 2024

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

BBW12OG said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

If he did he would disappear like he does/and has already here. When faced with facts he does what every chicken sheeyat liberal does. Run and hide.

Says a lot about their character.

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

I have not. That's what the courts will decide. I've heard enough to form an opinion. What's yours?

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

I have not. That's what the courts will decide. I've heard enough to form an opinion. What's yours?

---

I've listened to the entire call. First, applying the context, he did not ask for them to find new ballots and overturn the election. Trump believes, based on what I've seen and listened to, that the elections was fraudulent in many ways. No Civ, I do not want to rehash that point…

So, Trump was asking the Secretary of State to look into the election issues because it wouldn't take many fraudulent ballots to overturn the election. Anybody, that is truly a serious person, that listens to the call, will come to the same conclusion about Trumps intent.

Just an FYI…. I'm not saying I agree or not, with Trumps assertion; however, I am saying, that he did not ask and/or tell the Secretary of State to overturn the election, like the media narrative.

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

I have not. That's what the courts will decide. I've heard enough to form an opinion. What's yours?

---

I've listened to the entire call. First, applying the context, he did not ask for them to find new ballots and overturn the election. Trump believes, based on what I've seen and listened to, that the elections was fraudulent in many ways. No Civ, I do not want to rehash that point…

So, Trump was asking the Secretary of State to look into the election issues because it wouldn't take many fraudulent ballots to overturn the election. Anybody, that is truly a serious person, that listens to the call, will come to the same conclusion about Trumps intent.

Just an FYI…. I'm not saying I agree or not, with Trumps assertion; however, I am saying, that he did not ask and/or tell the Secretary of State to overturn the election, like the media narrative.

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

I have not. That's what the courts will decide. I've heard enough to form an opinion. What's yours?

---

I've listened to the entire call. First, applying the context, he did not ask for them to find new ballots and overturn the election. Trump believes, based on what I've seen and listened to, that the elections was fraudulent in many ways. No Civ, I do not want to rehash that point…

So, Trump was asking the Secretary of State to look into the election issues because it wouldn't take many fraudulent ballots to overturn the election. Anybody, that is truly a serious person, that listens to the call, will come to the same conclusion about Trumps intent.

Just an FYI…. I'm not saying I agree or not, with Trumps assertion; however, I am saying, that he did not ask and/or tell the Secretary of State to overturn the election, like the media narrative.

---

Do you think a sitting President should be calling a Sec of State to discuss anything regarding state election results? Would you be ok with Biden calling the Democrat SOS for Michigan in November if he lost in 2024?

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

The guy Trump called and tried to convince to find 11000 plus votes was and still is a Republican.

---

Wufskins, I'll bet you never listened to the entire call, have you?

---

I have not. That's what the courts will decide. I've heard enough to form an opinion. What's yours?

---

I've listened to the entire call. First, applying the context, he did not ask for them to find new ballots and overturn the election. Trump believes, based on what I've seen and listened to, that the elections was fraudulent in many ways. No Civ, I do not want to rehash that point…

So, Trump was asking the Secretary of State to look into the election issues because it wouldn't take many fraudulent ballots to overturn the election. Anybody, that is truly a serious person, that listens to the call, will come to the same conclusion about Trumps intent.

Just an FYI…. I'm not saying I agree or not, with Trumps assertion; however, I am saying, that he did not ask and/or tell the Secretary of State to overturn the election, like the media narrative.

---

Trump thought the caucus that be lost vs. Cruz in 2016 was fraudulent too, with obviously zero basis in reality.

He just believes what he wants to believe because his ego can't handle taking an L.

Idiots don't get a pass for acting illegally based on their childish and baseless beliefs, no matter how much they believe them.

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

I don't need to listen to the full call to know what he asked of the GA SOS. He's been indicted for said call. I've made up my mind and you have as well. Let's let the courts decide.

---

Pattern continues

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

I don't need to listen to the full call to know what he asked of the GA SOS. He's been indicted for said call. I've made up my mind and you have as well. Let's let the courts decide.

---

Pattern continues

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

BBW12OG said:

---

barelypure said:

---

The question I've never heard an answer to is why is it the same counties in the same states that there appear to be irregularities in the past several elections. At what point do the election officials do something to solve the problem. Or with these counties being run by Democrats is it being done on purpose. IDK

---

Yes..... you have to wonder why it is always the SAME areas and the SAME demographic in charge....

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

All it was was the same bunch of lies repeated ad nauseam. Dead voters, people being denied their vote because someone had supposedly already voted in their name, hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots mysteriously dropped off late at night. I knew that if I listened for another 50 minutes would just be the same things repeated five times more.

Now answer one for me please. Instead of requiring everyone to listen to an hour of that crap, why not pick out whatever it is you think gives an innocent context to the statement about finding another 11,790 votes. I'll hang up and listen.

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

All it was was the same bunch of lies repeated ad nauseam. Dead voters, people being denied their vote because someone had supposedly already voted in their name, hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots mysteriously dropped off late at night. I knew that if I listened for another 50 minutes would just be the same things repeated five times more.

Now answer one for me please. Instead of requiring everyone to listen to an hour of that crap, why not pick out whatever it is you think gives an innocent context to the statement about finding another 11,790 votes. I'll hang up and listen.

---

I've said this before to others… we all hear what we want to hear. We all believe what we want to believe. People have different world views.

Now, this country is at an inflection point and someone has to WIN. I pray, my side wins. If they don't, well… it is what it is…

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

All it was was the same bunch of lies repeated ad nauseam. Dead voters, people being denied their vote because someone had supposedly already voted in their name, hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots mysteriously dropped off late at night. I knew that if I listened for another 50 minutes would just be the same things repeated five times more.

Now answer one for me please. Instead of requiring everyone to listen to an hour of that crap, why not pick out whatever it is you think gives an innocent context to the statement about finding another 11,790 votes. I'll hang up and listen.

---

I've said this before to others… we all hear what we want to hear. We all believe what we want to believe. People have different world views.

Now, this country is at an inflection point and someone has to WIN. I pray, my side wins. If they don't, well… it is what it is…

---

This country is way too divided. Which is sad in my opinion.

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Buzzosborne said:

---

caryking said:

---

Wufskins said:

---

"What I want to do is this. I just want to find, uh, 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the state."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Raffensperger_phone_call#:~:text=On%20January%202%2C%202021%2C%20during,from%20the%202020%20presidential%20election.

---

Let's continue this debate when "you" actually listen to the full call. Until then, this is really a waste of my time.

---

You do realize that the people doing the investigations have in fact listened to the entire call, right? And in what possible context can the Trump quote about finding 11, 000 more votes NOT be considered criminal?

---

Just go listen to the entire call and let's talk…

---

Do you think you're the guy that can see what no one else can? None of the lawyers, investigators, or journalists on all sides of the political spectrum can see so clearly what is obvious to you? Hell, you should be famous.

Edit to add: just listened to the first 10 minutes of the phone call. My god, it's much much worse than I'd even imagined. No wonder they're going after the DA and prosecutor, that's their only hope.

---

Give me one segment of the 10 minutes and I'll go listen to it again.

BTW, I am famous. I'm omnipotent. I'm the purveyor of truth. I'm an idol!

---

One of these days, I'm gonna have to get your autograph.

---