2024 Elections

380,843 Views | 4050 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Werewolf
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:38p, 2/9/24
Poor civ. Sticking to his old bull**** Dem propaganda defense. The tides are turning though. His propaganda network is even beginning to turn on Biden, so civ will soon too.


Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:42p, 2/9/24
Vote Democrat for more open borders, open robberies, and open shootings.

Reply Quote
4
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 4:10p, 2/9/24
packgrad said:
Poor civ. Sticking to his old bull**** Dem propaganda defense. The tides are turning though. His propaganda network is even beginning to turn on Biden, so civ will soon too.

What's propaganda? Saying investigators and prosecutors don't avoid charges because a defendant is forgetful?

That's not propaganda. It's common ****ing sense.

If investigators and prosecutors think a forgetful dude murdered somebody and they've got the evidence to prove it, that dude is getting charged with murder no matter how forgetful he is. It would be complete negligence on their part to handle that any other way.

Biden isn't getting charged because they don't have the evidence to proceed.

And I've been saying on here for years that Biden is unfit to be President so you can save that CNN line for somebody else.
Reply Quote
1
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 4:32p, 2/9/24
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Poor civ. Sticking to his old bull**** Dem propaganda defense. The tides are turning though. His propaganda network is even beginning to turn on Biden, so civ will soon too.

What's propaganda? Saying investigators and prosecutors don't avoid charges because a defendant is forgetful?

That's not propaganda. It's common ****ing sense.

If investigators and prosecutors think a forgetful dude murdered somebody and they've got the evidence to prove it, that dude is getting charged with murder no matter how forgetful he is. It would be complete negligence on their part to handle that any other way.

Biden isn't getting charged because they don't have the evidence to proceed.

And I've been saying on here for years that Biden is unfit to be President so you can save that CNN line for somebody else.


No. He isn't getting prosecuted for the reasons stated. Comparing it to murder is hilarious and simple minded. Trump is being prosecuted because of TDS. You suffer from it. You should recognize the symptoms.

You voted for Biden so save your duplicity for someone else.
Reply Quote
4
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 5:08p, 2/9/24
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
3
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 5:28p, 2/9/24
hokiewolf said:
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction

Correct.

And if he had compelling enough evidence he'd be able to get a conviction.

No investigator or prosecutor worth a damn would avoid pursuing a strong case because the defendant is "forgetful."

He's got a weak case or else he'd pursue it.
Reply Quote
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 5:35p, 2/9/24
Civilized said:
hokiewolf said:
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction

Correct.

And if he had compelling enough evidence he'd be able to get a conviction.

No investigator or prosecutor worth a damn would avoid pursuing a strong case because the defendant is "forgetful."

He's got a weak case or else he'd pursue it.
no, that's also not what he said, he said he has a now sympathetic defendant who was not cooperative and therefore didn't feel he could prosecute and convict. The case is strong based on the definition of willful negligence
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
3
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 6:13p, 2/9/24
hokiewolf said:
Civilized said:
hokiewolf said:
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction

Correct.

And if he had compelling enough evidence he'd be able to get a conviction.

No investigator or prosecutor worth a damn would avoid pursuing a strong case because the defendant is "forgetful."

He's got a weak case or else he'd pursue it.
no, that's also not what he said, he said he has a now sympathetic defendant who was not cooperative and therefore didn't feel he could prosecute and convict. The case is strong based on the definition of willful negligence
I think he's stating that no matter the crimes of Biden and their seriousness, he'd never be found competent to stand trial. Which interestingly, put Biden in a pick your poison situation. No wonder the White House was POed
Reply Quote
3
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 6:24p, 2/9/24
hokiewolf said:
Civilized said:
hokiewolf said:
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction

Correct.

And if he had compelling enough evidence he'd be able to get a conviction.

No investigator or prosecutor worth a damn would avoid pursuing a strong case because the defendant is "forgetful."

He's got a weak case or else he'd pursue it.
no, that's also not what he said, he said he has a now sympathetic defendant who was not cooperative and therefore didn't feel he could prosecute and convict. The case is strong based on the definition of willful negligence
Are you reading the report or just excerpts or sound bites from Hur?

From the very first page of Hur's report:

Quote:
"...We conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

How strong could the evidence possibly be if the investigator doesn't feel it's strong enough to prove Biden's guilt?

He went on to describe how jurors would undoubtedly compare Biden's actions favorably to Reagan's handling of his own diaries and docs, and use that comparison to conclude Biden acts with the notebook weren't sufficiently willful.

He said the same thing about the classified docs (insufficient evidence to prove willful intent).

And he clearly said Biden was cooperative, which was a mitigating factor relative to the aggrevating nature of Trump's alleged conduct:

Quote:
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution,
Mr.Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.

In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department o of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.

Hur's report felt very even and fair. It detailed the ways Biden ****ed up, postulated reasons why, made relevant historical comparisons to past presidents' handling of docs, ultimately concluded the evidence was insufficient to bring charges, added further mitigating factors that would hinder prosecution, and other relevant observations.

This thing people are seizing upon (comments about Biden's memory) is chum in the political waters but it's not something we didn't already know. His decline has been obvious and his electoral weakness as a result of his apparent/possible/likely senility was well-established before this report was published.
Reply Quote
1
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 7:28p, 2/9/24
Civilized said:
hokiewolf said:
Civilized said:
hokiewolf said:
That's not what Hur said. He said he isnt getting charged because he doesnt think he can get a conviction

Correct.

And if he had compelling enough evidence he'd be able to get a conviction.

No investigator or prosecutor worth a damn would avoid pursuing a strong case because the defendant is "forgetful."

He's got a weak case or else he'd pursue it.
no, that's also not what he said, he said he has a now sympathetic defendant who was not cooperative and therefore didn't feel he could prosecute and convict. The case is strong based on the definition of willful negligence
Are you reading the report or just excerpts or sound bites from Hur?

From the very first page of Hur's report:

Quote:
"...We conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

How strong could the evidence possibly be if the investigator doesn't feel it's strong enough to prove Biden's guilt?

He went on to describe how jurors would undoubtedly compare Biden's actions favorably to Reagan's handling of his own diaries and docs, and use that comparison to conclude Biden acts with the notebook weren't sufficiently willful.

He said the same thing about the classified docs (insufficient evidence to prove willful intent).

And he clearly said Biden was cooperative, which was a mitigating factor relative to the aggrevating nature of Trump's alleged conduct:

Quote:
Most notably, after being given multiple chances to return classified documents and avoid prosecution,
Mr.Trump allegedly did the opposite. According to the indictment, he not only refused to return the documents for many months, but he also obstructed justice by enlisting others to destroy evidence and then to lie about it.

In contrast, Mr. Biden turned in classified documents to the National Archives and the Department o of Justice, consented to the search of multiple locations including his homes, sat for a voluntary interview, and in other ways cooperated with the investigation.

Hur's report felt very even and fair. It detailed the ways Biden ****ed up, postulated reasons why, made relevant historical comparisons to past presidents' handling of docs, ultimately concluded the evidence was insufficient to bring charges, added further mitigating factors that would hinder prosecution, and other relevant observations.

This thing people are seizing upon (comments about Biden's memory) is chum in the political waters but it's not something we didn't already know. His decline has been obvious and his electoral weakness as a result of his apparent/possible/likely senility was well-established before this report was published.
"Hur's report felt very even and fair."

Kamala Harris doesn't think so, and neither does her boss. :B
Reply Quote
1
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:53p, 2/9/24
Here's a fun fact for the "OMG THE DOJ IS PART OF THE DEEP STATE" crowd:

In the past 30 years EVERY special counsel or independent prosecutor we've had has been a Republican. All of them. Not a single Democrat, ever. Isn't that weird?

Turns out Dems always appoint Republicans because they know they are innocent and want to look as fair as possible. Republicans could give a crap about that and always appoint Republicans, too.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:16p, 2/9/24
Vote Democrat in 2024 to support cheating fascists. Motto is "worked in 2020. Will work in 2024 because our supporters are sheep."

Reply Quote
1
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:19p, 2/9/24
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 7:47a, 2/10/24
stay tuned........"2020, it's not over yet".

This guy, Juan O'Savin, that I follow sings subtly this short little verse at times. Miike Gill, the guy that was assassinated in DC a week or so ago, after reporting $1 trillion laundered money thru New Hampshire and having the evidence says he's not sure if Juan's pecking order is above or below General Flynn in our movement.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
3 edits
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 9:49a, 2/10/24
LOLOL

That math's not mathing.

So Heartland, an institute already known for their shoddy and biased work, taps Rasmussen, a right-leaning pollster, to conduct a poll that relies exclusively on self-reporting, a methodology that's well-established as both biased and insufficient on its own, and then wildly extrapolates from that data to make splashy headlines.

Heartland has been around for years and consistently pushes crap. They are consistently derided by media fact-checkers as a highly Questionable source.

"A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence.. Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source."

So yeah, study seems legit. Definitely on-brand for the alternative facts crowd. You should definitely scream this wisdom from the rooftops and bring the establishment to its knees.

Reply Quote
1
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:36a, 2/10/24
Will the Republicans trade up too?

Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 5:07p, 2/11/24
#daSieve, u r crushing me pal ;-)
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:07p, 2/11/24
Whooo! Given that the weaponized DOJ is already going after Kennedy, this ought to have the Bidenites defecating flaming blue napalm.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/robert-kennedy-jr-group-airs-super-bowl-ad-mimicking-jfk-s-1960-spot/ar-BB1i83Nf
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldsouljer • 9:58p, 2/11/24
Oldsouljer said:
Whooo! Given that the weaponized DOJ is already going after Kennedy, this ought to have the Bidenites defecating flaming blue napalm.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/robert-kennedy-jr-group-airs-super-bowl-ad-mimicking-jfk-s-1960-spot/ar-BB1i83Nf

Oh is that what caused the flaming blue napalm? I assumed it was the fajitas.
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:32p, 2/13/24
Trying to find somethin' for #daSieve to post. This is the closest thing I could find.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:37p, 2/14/24
Vote Democrat for more violent illegal immigrants in 2024.

Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:51a, 2/15/24
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:34p, 2/16/24
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:11a, 2/17/24
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:56a, 2/17/24
Nikki calls Trump the incumbent.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:13p, 2/17/24
It's disgusting and a massive insult to our intelligence to see all these Leftist talking heads smearing conservatives and Trump as "tyrants" who "wage war on democracy" and "wage war on the constitution and rule of law".

This is the ultimate projection, and the Democrats accusing the right of what THEY (the Left) are actually doing and guilty of. It is the communist Democrats who do not believe in democracy. They are trying to take Trump off of the ballot in all these states, and prevent people from being able to vote for the candidate of choice. How is that not a direct attack on democracy? And the communist Democrats (with their traitorous Marxist RINO allies) who are blatantly rigging elections (via mail-in ballot fraud, rigged voting machines, etc). That's the most serious "attack on democracy".

And it's the communist Democrats who are clearly the tyrants waging war against the Constitution. The Democrats are open and flagrant enemies of Second Amendment guns rights, fanatically working 24/7/365 to do as much as they can to eviscerate our gun rights. And they also are now open enemies of freedom of speech and the First Amendment, with Leftists doing everything they can to censor and silence conservatives everywhere they have power (college campuses, Leftist-run Big Tech, etc). And look at how the Biden regime, for example, colluded with Big Tech to try to silence anyone speaking against the "official" narrative on the covid scamdemic.

The Communist Democrats are the flagrant tyrants. They are using the courts to attempt to persecute their main political opposition - ie, these witch hunt trials against Trump, the tragic persecution of the peaceful January 6th protesters. They wanted to force people to take poison injections or lose their jobs. That's not tyranny? They are rigging elections everywhere. They hate this country and are destroying it with open borders and trying to undermine the Constitution and our freedoms.

The Communist Democrats are the enemies of this nation. THEY are flaming tyrants, and the threat to this country. It's a total inversion of reality for them to falsely paint conservatives as the "threat to the nation". Conservatives are the ones trying to save this country from being destroyed by these communist scum.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
4
5 edits
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 12:20p, 2/17/24
Yeah man, got to open your eyes to these mustard lies.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:37p, 2/17/24
hokiewolf said:
Yeah man, got to open your eyes to these mustard lies.
Yes, I'm asleep. Eyes fully closed. I need to be awakened and get "woke" like communist libtards who have been enlightened to the 70 genders, that men can become women, murdering unborn children is a "sacred right", and that it's a "great thing" for schools to force children to attend drag shows and get lap dances from drag queens, or force 8-year old girls to share a locker room and showers with 40 year old transgender men.

Libtards have their eyes so open. So woke. So much more enlightened and intelligent than those right wing bigoted fascists who hate the constitution.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
2
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:44p, 2/17/24
And that's another massive projection. Communist leftist libtards are not "woke"...of course. They are the most completely blinded people, who cannot see reality at all. They are zombies -- unthinking NPCs brainwashed by Lamestream media, Hollywood, and the Marxist school system -- who cannot think for themselves, but can only parrot what they are spoon fed to believe.

Newsflash leftists...the communist Leftist ideology that you have swilled down has blinded you from reality. So that now all you believe are the lies that the Satanic communist elites want you to believe, which are designed to destroy and enslave you. But many of you already know this, and you love it. You love believing lies. You hate God and what is good. You have embraced the dark side. You are now nihilists who want to see other people suffer, and wickedness gain power and take society down the tubes. Misery loves company.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
1
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 1:06p, 2/17/24
Right! Colors show after the moon, I should go see you in June. Your way?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:24p, 2/18/24
Election rigging ahead, once again.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:41p, 2/21/24
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:39a, 2/23/24
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:56p, 2/23/24
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/oh-no-big-deal-just-a-survey-showing-haley-beating-biden-58-percent-to-42-percent/
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
2
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 2:12p, 2/23/24
Cool. I bet if they did one with Mickey Mouse he'd beat Biden by even more. Equally irrelevant.
Reply Quote
1
First Page Last Page
Page 18 of 116 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.