Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

"Whatever it takes" in your blue team vs TRUMP!!!!!! battle bot episode, right Civ?

It’s true - we just turned over documents to Capitol Hill to be made public showing the FBI told DOJ they did not have probable cause for raiding President Trump’s home in Mar A Lago but DOJ “didn’t give a damn” and did it anyway. https://t.co/qIlShYTd5V

— FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) December 16, 2025

---

LOLOLOL

Love how y'all slurp down serious police work...errrr...social media blasts from Keystone Cop Kash so eagerly, but this is colossally lame and misleading nonsense.

Evidently the FBI was wrong and the DOJ was right. They got a search warrant didn't they? The DOJ didn't grant themselves that search warrant, a judge did. They presented an affidavit and evidence to the judge, and he saw fit to grant the warrant based on his review of evidence and determination there was probable cause.

This is like you trying to pick apart an internal office disagreement inside a prosecutor's office about whether to pursue charges in a case that they ultimately pursued and won.

And then, once the search warrant was granted they found hundreds classified docs including top secret docs at MAL, after Trump refused to cooperate with the National Archives like Biden, Pence, Hillary, and every other leader from whom the archives ever requested cooperation did, and instead moved the documents around and an apparent attempt to hide them and then played the defiantly inept "Yeah I had them, but I declassified them" card.

You really think you're going to now convince people PC was lacking legally when the DOJ went through proper channels, got a warrant, served the warrant, and found exactly what they believed they'd find after they raided the place?

Anything to distract from the ****ty economy, doubling health insurance premiums, and the upcoming potential mid-term disaster.

Good luck with all that!

---

Civ, let's have a debate over your TDS. This post is exactly why you get called out.

---

Which is y'all's standard line when you can't dispute the facts surrounding a topic, and those facts undercut your argument.

This time with zero editorializing, just facts:

Did Trump obstruct the Archives' attempts to obtain documents after he left office, and move documents around MAL? Yes.

Are there any past examples of similar behavior from others from whom the archives has sought to obtain potentially sensitive or classified documents after they leave office? No.

Did the DOJ follow proper legal channels to conduct a search? Yes.

Did the DOJ obtain a proper search warrant to search MAL? Yes.

Did the DOJ execute the warrant and search MAL and find hundreds of classified and dozens of top-secret documents? Yes.

Can we agree about these basic facts? If not, which ones specifically do you disagree with?

---

Very respectfully Civ, I think your TDS comes out not in the well articulated points you make but rather your somewhat childish insults and overused race bait.

---

Let's also not forget that Civ wants due process for terrorists, gang members, and drug dealers. But not for Trump. That's a pretty big one.

---

Liberals did not care one bit about due process as 10 million flooded into country but they want due process to kick them out??

---

One of the best examples of all. Just like illegals weren't supposed to be getting SNAP benefits, but now we got another "activist judge" ruling that they can't be taken away from them for another 120 days if a "Blue State" wants it to be that way. Suck our real taxpayers dry to support Dems hoping to buy future votes.

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

I don't disagree, he should've just stayed silent on it.

The "affordable" care act was the best thing to ever happen to health insurance companies and the worst to middle class Americans.

This truth bomb brought to you by @RepJasonSmith https://t.co/yTtnN2XRAd

— Tim Burchett (@timburchett) December 17, 2025

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Yeah, I would have rather he not make that post. I didn't like it either. I don't care though about liberal outrage about it. They have said, and continue to say, much worse about conservative living and dead.

packgrad said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Yeah, I would have rather he not make that post. I didn't like it either. I don't care though about liberal outrage about it. They have said, and continue to say, much worse about conservative living and dead.

---

Amen to that.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

The time for pearl clutching is not now even if you have balls.

I understand a Russian 'dark' tanker may be headed to Venezuela. Could be some excitement on the horizon.

🚨 JUST IN 🚨

🇷🇺 Russian shadow tanker HYPERION has entered Caribbean waters after departing Murmansk, reportedly bound for Venezuela’s José Terminal 🇻🇪

⚠️ Under U.S. sanctions
⚠️ Tied to the sanctions-evasion oil network

But I’ll say what THEY won’t……..

🕵️ Shadow fleets… pic.twitter.com/JareuYvYtv

— {Matt} $XRPatriot (@matttttt187) December 17, 2025

You think it's about trafficking narcotics into our country? You think it's about years of election theft?

Yes, it is. But it's also broader and strikes at the heart of a much greater global problem. Stay tuned, it may take a number of months to address the broader part of the problem.

pic.twitter.com/8G3EcfsW4i

“Underneath Obama, he had 500 strikes, 3,700 individuals were killed. There wasn't a big show about this. What you guys are all upset about is the hemisphere that it's working in”

The left isn’t upset about military strikes they are mad that it’s the…

— Sam 🇺🇸 (@SamMoline1) December 17, 2025

Rob Reiner has a lot more skin in the game than some here DON'T understand. I suspect Trump's comments were intended to draw attention. We've seen that time and again only for the likes of #daNappy and others to be drawn in for disclosure and effect. It has been fun. #SunTzu

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

"Whatever it takes" in your blue team vs TRUMP!!!!!! battle bot episode, right Civ?

It’s true - we just turned over documents to Capitol Hill to be made public showing the FBI told DOJ they did not have probable cause for raiding President Trump’s home in Mar A Lago but DOJ “didn’t give a damn” and did it anyway. https://t.co/qIlShYTd5V

— FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) December 16, 2025

---

LOLOLOL

Love how y'all slurp down serious police work...errrr...social media blasts from Keystone Cop Kash so eagerly, but this is colossally lame and misleading nonsense.

Evidently the FBI was wrong and the DOJ was right. They got a search warrant didn't they? The DOJ didn't grant themselves that search warrant, a judge did. They presented an affidavit and evidence to the judge, and he saw fit to grant the warrant based on his review of evidence and determination there was probable cause.

This is like you trying to pick apart an internal office disagreement inside a prosecutor's office about whether to pursue charges in a case that they ultimately pursued and won.

And then, once the search warrant was granted they found hundreds classified docs including top secret docs at MAL, after Trump refused to cooperate with the National Archives like Biden, Pence, Hillary, and every other leader from whom the archives ever requested cooperation did, and instead moved the documents around and an apparent attempt to hide them and then played the defiantly inept "Yeah I had them, but I declassified them" card.

You really think you're going to now convince people PC was lacking legally when the DOJ went through proper channels, got a warrant, served the warrant, and found exactly what they believed they'd find after they raided the place?

Anything to distract from the ****ty economy, doubling health insurance premiums, and the upcoming potential mid-term disaster.

Good luck with all that!

---

Civ, let's have a debate over your TDS. This post is exactly why you get called out.

---

Which is y'all's standard line when you can't dispute the facts surrounding a topic, and those facts undercut your argument.

This time with zero editorializing, just facts:

Did Trump obstruct the Archives' attempts to obtain documents after he left office, and move documents around MAL? Yes. That is purely subjective and should follow the legal channels with ultimately the Supreme Court deciding. Did that happen?

Are there any past examples of similar behavior from others from whom the archives has sought to obtain potentially sensitive or classified documents after they leave office? No. Why not? There are sensitive documents we have found all over the place.

Did the DOJ follow proper legal channels to conduct a search? Yes. Isn't that exactly the whole point?

Did the DOJ obtain a proper search warrant to search MAL? Yes. Again, isn't that exactly the whole point?

Did the DOJ execute the warrant and search MAL and find hundreds of classified and dozens of top-secret documents? Yes. See my answer to the initial response

Can we agree about these basic facts? If not, which ones specifically do you disagree with? No!! We come at this from different perspectives. I think yours is from a TDS perspective.

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

El Lobo Loco said:

---

Payback is a *****.

Perhaps those who are acting offended by DJT's comments should reflect on the public discourse after Charlie Kirk's murder. Perhaps they should also consider Rob Reiner's comments after Rush Limbaugh passed.

I don't recall the outrage from those folks then. Can anyone help me with that?

---

If liberals didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all

---

Liberals can be closet liberals too. They usually sit in silence and silently judge others. Too many handwringers and pearl-clutchers can lose our country. It's time to buckle up because it's time.

I wonder what would have happened if George Washington didn't cross the Delaware that night but sat idly wringing his hands and fretting.

How about George Patton and his extended march to the Ardennes. He could have huddled up for the snow and cold........but he did not. He'd actually already started his troops in that direction before receiving official orders.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Back to my question. Why are conservatives ALWAYS required to not respond and liberals are free to say and do whatever they want?

No disrespect to you but I'm tired of it. RR was a vile and disgusting man. I don't care if some double standard (not necessarily you) liberal is offended anymore.

Feel free to disagree.

---

Look, I understand the thought process and agree to an extent. We see vile things slung at both sides from all over the place. Its escalated in the last 4-5 months as well which is one of the reasons Ive stepped back from the political ledge, because it just awful at this point and does nothing but put me in a bad mood.

At the end of the day, I can only control my actions and I try to do the best that I can (mostly).

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

They want to humiliate the county and its people. https://t.co/28j8H8zveg

— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) December 16, 2025

---

I have never seen a political party work so hard against a President. The democrats offer absolutely nothing but resistance.

---

Lol, you mean except for every single time Republicans are in the minority? The scary thing is I don't think you're joking.

Man, the "up is down" delusion on here really has become constant over the last few days. I suspect deep down you're starting to realize that your fantasy civil war is falling on its face.

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Perhaps people should look at this through the lens of Trump...

The amount of crap that's been thrown his way is just outstandingly horrible. So, lets take the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax... Rob Riener was out there churning up that debunked story (debunked from the very beginning) and making it very personal towards Trump. So, I may disagree with Trump saying anything, I can also see where he has a "No Love Lost" mentality towards the guy. Reiner started the mess and Trump thinks he got the last word. Its that simple...

El Lobo Loco said:

---

Payback is a *****.

Perhaps those who are acting offended by DJT's comments should reflect on the public discourse after Charlie Kirk's murder. Perhaps they should also consider Rob Reiner's comments after Rush Limbaugh passed.

I don't recall the outrage from those folks then. Can anyone help me with that?

---

Rob Reiner was not one that was making horrible comments about Charlie Kirk's death. In fact, he was very thoughtful in remarks he made...

I don't remember his comments about Rush.

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Back to my question. Why are conservatives ALWAYS required to not respond and liberals are free to say and do whatever they want?

No disrespect to you but I'm tired of it. RR was a vile and disgusting man. I don't care if some double standard (not necessarily you) liberal is offended anymore.

Feel free to disagree.

---

Look, I understand the thought process and agree to an extent. We see vile things slung at both sides from all over the place. Its escalated in the last 4-5 months as well which is one of the reasons Ive stepped back from the political ledge, because it just awful at this point and does nothing but put me in a bad mood.

At the end of the day, I can only control my actions and I try to do the best that I can (mostly).

---

This isn't a new phenomenon over the past 4-5 months. This rhetoric has been horrible for a long time. From my perspective, all one has to do is start around 2008 and you will see the rhetoric ramping up big time.

caryking said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Perhaps people should look at this through the lens of Trump...

The amount of crap that's been thrown his way is just outstandingly horrible. So, lets take the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax... Rob Riener was out there churning up that debunked story (debunked from the very beginning) and making it very personal towards Trump. So, I may disagree with Trump saying anything, I can also see where he has a "No Love Lost" mentality towards the guy. Reiner started the mess and Trump thinks he got the last word. It's that simple...

---

I don't care about Trumps Truth Social post. Frankly he can say whatever he wants, I find him to be extremely petty. However, releasing this post on other official White House channels is beneath the dignity of the office and shouldn't have been done.

In my mind there is a clear distinction there.

Just more conspiracy theory. ;-)

Here it is:

It turns out the only COLLUSION was between Hillary Clinton, Russia and the Pizzaman.

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton accepted a $3 million bribe from the Kremlin. Simultaneously, her top advisor and campaign chairman, John Podesta, received a $35 million… pic.twitter.com/MzMU3u3IOr

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) December 16, 2025

caryking said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Back to my question. Why are conservatives ALWAYS required to not respond and liberals are free to say and do whatever they want?

No disrespect to you but I'm tired of it. RR was a vile and disgusting man. I don't care if some double standard (not necessarily you) liberal is offended anymore.

Feel free to disagree.

---

Look, I understand the thought process and agree to an extent. We see vile things slung at both sides from all over the place. Its escalated in the last 4-5 months as well which is one of the reasons Ive stepped back from the political ledge, because it just awful at this point and does nothing but put me in a bad mood.

At the end of the day, I can only control my actions and I try to do the best that I can (mostly).

---

This isn't a new phenomenon over the past 4-5 months. This rhetoric has been horrible for a long time. From my perspective, all one has to do is start around 2008 and you will see the rhetoric ramping up big time.

---

Agreed, I just think its really gotten pretty vile in that time frame. Been taking a lot of steps to remove things from my life (social media is probably the biggest one) in that time frame that dont add to my life and while I still keep up with it because I like to know whats going on, I dont read nearly as much as I used to unless its something that really catches my attention

caryking said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wonder why they had to stage fake top secret photos if there was so much overwhelming evidence??

What matters is loyalty, Civ!! Baaaaaa.

💯 pic.twitter.com/4muhEpRvQf

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) December 16, 2025

---

Dude has to get an in depth email from somewhere every morning, telling him what today's talking points are supposed to be... it's just way too coordinated with everything else out there to be just his own personal opinion.

---

It's definitely programming. I see people posting on X posting very similarly and also using the same nicknames. Ironic that they used to cry about Russia!!! and are so easily misled by Russian bots.

---

I have noticed democrats attempting to manufacture outrage over President Trumps remarks regarding Rob Reiner.

---

To be fair, what he said was pretty abhorrent regardless of what Reiner said about him. Two wrongs dont make a right.

Its the type of thing that people who arent all in on MAGA who still voted for him say, "you know, maybe take his phone away from him every now and again"

---

Fair enough, I respect your opinion. I ask why are conservatives ALWAYS required to turn the other cheek and liberals say and do whatever they want?

Have you called out RR for the things he said?

---

If I had to call out every instance of someone saying something awful about Trump (or any politician for that matter), it would be the only thing I do all day.

My point goes to what jk said, you dont have to comment on everything. Sometimes its completely fine to just let things go. Not everything deserves a response

---

Back to my question. Why are conservatives ALWAYS required to not respond and liberals are free to say and do whatever they want?

No disrespect to you but I'm tired of it. RR was a vile and disgusting man. I don't care if some double standard (not necessarily you) liberal is offended anymore.

Feel free to disagree.

---

Look, I understand the thought process and agree to an extent. We see vile things slung at both sides from all over the place. Its escalated in the last 4-5 months as well which is one of the reasons Ive stepped back from the political ledge, because it just awful at this point and does nothing but put me in a bad mood.

At the end of the day, I can only control my actions and I try to do the best that I can (mostly).

---

This isn't a new phenomenon over the past 4-5 months. This rhetoric has been horrible for a long time. From my perspective, all one has to do is start around 2008 and you will see the rhetoric ramping up big time.

---

This is 100% correct. The difference between now and then though is that the left doesn't control all of social media, and quite frankly in this case NC State message boards. The right actually has a voice now and that is why rhetoric seems worse. We don't just have to take it anymore. Although the left still tries to shut down message boards and the like.