RFK Jr. implores you to resist digital ID and CBDCs.

"They are putting in place all of these technological mechanisms for control... that will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide."

"Digital currency that will allow them to punish us from a distance and cut off… pic.twitter.com/OCYRqxSHvR

— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media) October 15, 2025

No taxation without representation.

Being taxed by the UN would be far more offensive than the taxes imposed by Great Britain against the American colonies more than 250 years ago.

Those taxes sparked the American Revolution.

The UN should be defunded, not seeded with new… pic.twitter.com/D8rdVhN5iX

— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) October 14, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Might be trans, but not wrong.

Moreover, Democrats could've made permanent the enhanced subsidies when they controlled the govt in 2021-2022. Its a bit disingenuous to underfund their expensive law, enact only temporary fixes, and then blame the other party for balking at extending those costs.

— Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦 (@JessicaBRiedl) October 14, 2025

---

Yeah, bullsh**. Republicans have worked to ratfu** the ACA every step of the way, and completely removed one of the three legs of the stool, the mandates, which was key to widening the risk pool and making the affordability math work. Since then the ACA has been limping along with subsidies. Biden's expanded subsidies barely scraped through with the "help" of Joe Manchin, who was a massive tool who insisted that they not be permanent. So here we are.

---

Let's put aside the merits of funding the ACA, for a moment…

did you support the concept of government compelling a person to buy something?

---

The ACA mandate didn't apply to anyone who couldn't afford it, and there were a bunch of other loopholes, but no, it wouldn't have been my first choice. Single payer would have been a lot better... and somehow Americans can deal with taxes a lot better than "OMG being forced to buy something".

But despite the MAGA fan fiction Obama was almost pathologically bipartisan. He could have rammed through single payer, but he mistakenly thought Republicans would embrace their own "free market" health care idea more. So he took RomneyCare, rebranded it, and voila! The mandates were a Republican idea, because it's the only way to make risk pools work while keeping existing insurance company middlemen intact. Of course Republicans rejoiced! Just kidding... by sundown their own health care plan became Marxism.

Anyway, I take it you want to go back to "the good ol days"?

• Health care costs spiraling to oblivion even faster
• Being denied health insurance at all for an ever growing list of preexisting conditions
• Being dumped from your insurance the second you get sick, generally being forced to declare bankruptcy while dealing with cancer

Of course you do.

Between gutting the expanded ACA subsidies and trashing Medicaid in general, all Republicans have managed to accomplish is dramatically increasing the number of people who will now use the emergency room as their primary care doctor. Great work!

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Nicely done DOGE

🇺🇸 The E.P.A. canceled a $20M flood protection grant for Alaska’s Native village of Kipnuk in May, calling it “wasteful DEI spending.” On Sunday, Kipnuk was devastated by floods that destroyed homes and left residents stranded. - NYT pic.twitter.com/pCVFLmxYqI

— Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) October 15, 2025

---

wolf howl said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Nicely done DOGE

🇺🇸 The E.P.A. canceled a $20M flood protection grant for Alaska’s Native village of Kipnuk in May, calling it “wasteful DEI spending.” On Sunday, Kipnuk was devastated by floods that destroyed homes and left residents stranded. - NYT pic.twitter.com/pCVFLmxYqI

— Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) October 15, 2025

---

I've got zero insight into what this is but knowing enough about contracts, $20M ain't even going to touch stopping that flooding.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Might be trans, but not wrong.

Moreover, Democrats could've made permanent the enhanced subsidies when they controlled the govt in 2021-2022. Its a bit disingenuous to underfund their expensive law, enact only temporary fixes, and then blame the other party for balking at extending those costs.

— Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦 (@JessicaBRiedl) October 14, 2025

---

Yeah, bullsh**. Republicans have worked to ratfu** the ACA every step of the way, and completely removed one of the three legs of the stool, the mandates, which was key to widening the risk pool and making the affordability math work. Since then the ACA has been limping along with subsidies. Biden's expanded subsidies barely scraped through with the "help" of Joe Manchin, who was a massive tool who insisted that they not be permanent. So here we are.

---

Let's put aside the merits of funding the ACA, for a moment…

did you support the concept of government compelling a person to buy something?

---

The ACA mandate didn't apply to anyone who couldn't afford it, and there were a bunch of other loopholes, but no, it wouldn't have been my first choice. Single payer would have been a lot better... and somehow Americans can deal with taxes a lot better than "OMG being forced to buy something".

But despite the MAGA fan fiction Obama was almost pathologically bipartisan. He could have rammed through single payer, but he mistakenly thought Republicans would embrace their own "free market" health care idea more. So he took RomneyCare, rebranded it, and voila! The mandates were a Republican idea, because it's the only way to make risk pools work while keeping existing insurance company middlemen intact. Of course Republicans rejoiced! Just kidding... by sundown their own health care plan became Marxism.

Anyway, I take it you want to go back to "the good ol days"?

• Health care costs spiraling to oblivion even faster
• Being denied health insurance at all for an ever growing list of preexisting conditions
• Being dumped from your insurance the second you get sick, generally being forced to declare bankruptcy while dealing with cancer

Of course you do.

Between gutting the expanded ACA subsidies and trashing Medicaid in general, all Republicans have managed to accomplish is dramatically increasing the number of people who will now use the emergency room as their primary care doctor. Great work!

---

I think the mandate was for anyone not insured. If you couldn't afford Insurance, you received it for free and on the backs of taxpayers.

RomneyCare was a joke, just like ObamaCare. I don't remember hearing anyone supporting RomneyCare when they learned about it, except big government ideologues...

Now, I'm not opposed to some simple laws managing how Insurance Providers operate. What they are? I'm not sure. Personally, I'd like to see a complete overhaul of all laws governing Insurance and start over with something simple.

Single payer doesn't work anywhere, unless you dont spend money on other things, like Military. For all these great country's you will call out, I bet they damn near completely rely on the US for defense.

Smapty, is health insurance a right? If so, how does a person get that right?

Understand, I am separating Health Insurance from Health Care as they are two different things. One is a means of performing a service for sickness and the other is a payment method. Don't conflate the two...

---

packgrad said:

---

Let's go.

🚨 BREAKING: Supreme Court signals it is poised to STRIKE DOWN race-based VRA Congressional districts that heavily favor Democrats, per NYT

The net swing could be Republican+24 Congressional districts in the US House of Representatives
🔴 Republican: +12
🔵 Democrat: -12

"The… pic.twitter.com/osY48PO3R4

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 15, 2025

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Might be trans, but not wrong.

Moreover, Democrats could've made permanent the enhanced subsidies when they controlled the govt in 2021-2022. Its a bit disingenuous to underfund their expensive law, enact only temporary fixes, and then blame the other party for balking at extending those costs.

— Jessica Riedl 🧀 🇺🇦 (@JessicaBRiedl) October 14, 2025

---

Yeah, bullsh**. Republicans have worked to ratfu** the ACA every step of the way, and completely removed one of the three legs of the stool, the mandates, which was key to widening the risk pool and making the affordability math work. Since then the ACA has been limping along with subsidies. Biden's expanded subsidies barely scraped through with the "help" of Joe Manchin, who was a massive tool who insisted that they not be permanent. So here we are.

---

Let's put aside the merits of funding the ACA, for a moment…

did you support the concept of government compelling a person to buy something?

---

The ACA mandate didn't apply to anyone who couldn't afford it, and there were a bunch of other loopholes, but no, it wouldn't have been my first choice. Single payer would have been a lot better... and somehow Americans can deal with taxes a lot better than "OMG being forced to buy something".

But despite the MAGA fan fiction Obama was almost pathologically bipartisan. He could have rammed through single payer, but he mistakenly thought Republicans would embrace their own "free market" health care idea more. So he took RomneyCare, rebranded it, and voila! The mandates were a Republican idea, because it's the only way to make risk pools work while keeping existing insurance company middlemen intact. Of course Republicans rejoiced! Just kidding... by sundown their own health care plan became Marxism.

Anyway, I take it you want to go back to "the good ol days"?

• Health care costs spiraling to oblivion even faster
• Being denied health insurance at all for an ever growing list of preexisting conditions
• Being dumped from your insurance the second you get sick, generally being forced to declare bankruptcy while dealing with cancer

Of course you do.

Between gutting the expanded ACA subsidies and trashing Medicaid in general, all Republicans have managed to accomplish is dramatically increasing the number of people who will now use the emergency room as their primary care doctor. Great work!

---

I think the mandate was for anyone not insured. If you couldn't afford Insurance, you received it for free and on the backs of taxpayers.

RomneyCare was a joke, just like ObamaCare. I don't remember hearing anyone supporting RomneyCare when they learned about it, except big government ideologues...

Now, I'm not opposed to some simple laws managing how Insurance Providers operate. What they are? I'm not sure. Personally, I'd like to see a complete overhaul of all laws governing Insurance and start over with something simple.

Single payer doesn't work anywhere, unless you dont spend money on other things, like Military. For all these great country's you will call out, I bet they damn near completely rely on the US for defense.

Smapty, is health insurance a right? If so, how does a person get that right?

Understand, I am separating Health Insurance from Health Care as they are two different things. One is a means of performing a service for sickness and the other is a payment method. Don't conflate the two...

---

The "joke" was the years of "repeal and replace" nonsense you guys tried after ObamaCare. You never could figure out the "replace" part, because affordable health care isn't simple.

There still is no Republican plan, outside of hoping that a sizeable percentage of the population will be fine watching their kids die with no access to health care and then not eventually revolt and shove your fat heads through a guillotine. Looks like MAGA has decided to take their chances with that "plan". Good luck!

---

Exaggerate much?

---