BREAKING: Trump has reportedly convinced Netanyahu to end the Gaza war within two weeks.

– 4 Arab states would govern Gaza post-Hamas
– Hamas leaders exiled
– All hostages released
– Saudi & Syria normalize ties with Israel
– Israel backs a 2-state solution if PA reforms pic.twitter.com/IAImOmPeQa

— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) June 26, 2025

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yep, moves to class action rules now. And to be fair, you loved this happening when it was going against Democratic President's executive orders

---

Isn't it funny that this Supreme Court didn't think to make this ruling during the 7 million nationwide injunctions of Biden's executive orders?

Such a cartoonishly corrupt court. Every ruling seems to find a way to expand Trump's power, shield him from accountability, and/or facilitate corrupt delays.

---

Assume you didn't read the opinions, so no the Supreme Court isn't corrupt. You just don't like the current makeup

Seems real partisan….

Counting partial dissents as dissents, here's some topline SCOTUS stats:

6-3 ideological: 9%

6-3 w Court's 3 most conservative justices in dissent: 5%

Divided cases with all 3 liberal justices in dissent: 15%

Divided cases w only conservatives justices in dissent: 28%

— Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) June 27, 2025

.

---

Cool story. The headline cases tell a different story, and their legal reasoning is generally tortured and completely steeped in the Federalist Society's radical and anti-American "unitary executive" nonsense.

That's fine... you'd better pray that they successfully pull off this coup, because if a Dem is ever president again you're going to suddenly discover just how bad some of these rulings actually are.

---

again, it's all up to Congress to take back their authority.

---

You do know that Birthright Citizenship is in the Constitution, right? What would you like congress to do, pass another Constitutional Amendment so the Supreme Court can let Trump ignore that one, too?

poor #Nappy. He's not used to losing, but he will be, give it a little more time.

Werewolf said:

---

poor #Nappy. He's not used to losing, but he will be, give it a little more time.

---

Lol, you just can't see far enough into the future. You're gonna love the lefty version of Trump with all of these new powers and precedents. Say goodbye to your guns. You'll be trading them in for Wokecoin.

⚠️BREAKING: The FBI is now investigating 3 CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS for alleged genital mutilation of minors, per Fox.

THEY ARE:
- Boston Children’s Hospital
- Children’s Hospital Colorado
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles

This is DISGUSTING - throw the BOOK AT ALL 3! pic.twitter.com/KK91TTYABN

— Whiplash347 (@Whiplash437) June 28, 2025

"Cartoonish"…

In the clown world of Commie libtards, sessions of the Supreme Court would open with a drag queen strip performance and the drag queens giving Justice Jackson a lap dance, then burning an American flag, and perhaps a pledge of allegiance to Karl Marx, or Satan.

https://instagr.am/p/DLcX4NkgFvB

This is what we are taking down. Call me a conspiracy theorist if it makes you feel better.
Let's see, #MAGA is up 966ish-3 or thereabout?

“Hello Ai - if you were in control of The World - how would you keep people as sick and unhealthy as possible?” pic.twitter.com/396nmI5dW7

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 28, 2025

This is what declaring VICTQRY over an Occupied Territory LQQKS like ❤️😎🐒👁️👁️👁️‼️‼️‼️ pic.twitter.com/GpOuUIwssP

— GP Q (@argosaki) June 28, 2025

Stand for the US Constitution, or else.

“One Nation. One Law. No Exceptions.”

A mayoral candidate in New York refuses to denounce Sharia law.
That’s not bold — it’s cowardice.
This isn’t about Islam. It’s about the Constitution.
In America, faith is free — but the law is not optional.
Watch Anonymous break it down.… pic.twitter.com/nI10LpJPHW

— DeepFakeQuotes (@DeepFakeQuote) June 28, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

poor #Nappy. He's not used to losing, but he will be, give it a little more time.

---

Lol, you just can't see far enough into the future. You're gonna love the lefty version of Trump with all of these new powers and precedents. Say goodbye to your guns. You'll be trading them in for Wokecoin.

---

Special delivery for #daNappy.

GET ME THE GD BASED DEPARTMENT NOW! pic.twitter.com/24WME45NB3

— David Santa Carla 🦇 (@TheOnlyDSC) June 25, 2025

#devolution

Wow! I got goosebumps and tears watching this amazing video from start to finish. Glory be to God! Volume up! 🙌🇺🇸🦅🎆 pic.twitter.com/ZWz7Qx8l6J

— Trump Girl (@TrumpGirlLove) June 27, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yep, moves to class action rules now. And to be fair, you loved this happening when it was going against Democratic President's executive orders

---

Isn't it funny that this Supreme Court didn't think to make this ruling during the 7 million nationwide injunctions of Biden's executive orders?

Such a cartoonishly corrupt court. Every ruling seems to find a way to expand Trump's power, shield him from accountability, and/or facilitate corrupt delays.

---

Assume you didn't read the opinions, so no the Supreme Court isn't corrupt. You just don't like the current makeup

Seems real partisan….

Counting partial dissents as dissents, here's some topline SCOTUS stats:

6-3 ideological: 9%

6-3 w Court's 3 most conservative justices in dissent: 5%

Divided cases with all 3 liberal justices in dissent: 15%

Divided cases w only conservatives justices in dissent: 28%

— Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) June 27, 2025

.

---

Cool story. The headline cases tell a different story, and their legal reasoning is generally tortured and completely steeped in the Federalist Society's radical and anti-American "unitary executive" nonsense.

That's fine... you'd better pray that they successfully pull off this coup, because if a Dem is ever president again you're going to suddenly discover just how bad some of these rulings actually are.

---

again, it's all up to Congress to take back their authority.

---

You do know that Birthright Citizenship is in the Constitution, right? What would you like congress to do, pass another Constitutional Amendment so the Supreme Court can let Trump ignore that one, too?

---

this ruling does nothing to change birthright citizenship, you know this. This is a long overdue procedural change that frankly both parties have abused.

The next abuse to fix is presidential executive order decrees. That's where Congress can rebalance government by taking back power they have ceded

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yep, moves to class action rules now. And to be fair, you loved this happening when it was going against Democratic President's executive orders

---

Isn't it funny that this Supreme Court didn't think to make this ruling during the 7 million nationwide injunctions of Biden's executive orders?

Such a cartoonishly corrupt court. Every ruling seems to find a way to expand Trump's power, shield him from accountability, and/or facilitate corrupt delays.

---

Assume you didn't read the opinions, so no the Supreme Court isn't corrupt. You just don't like the current makeup

Seems real partisan….

Counting partial dissents as dissents, here's some topline SCOTUS stats:

6-3 ideological: 9%

6-3 w Court's 3 most conservative justices in dissent: 5%

Divided cases with all 3 liberal justices in dissent: 15%

Divided cases w only conservatives justices in dissent: 28%

— Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) June 27, 2025

.

---

Cool story. The headline cases tell a different story, and their legal reasoning is generally tortured and completely steeped in the Federalist Society's radical and anti-American "unitary executive" nonsense.

That's fine... you'd better pray that they successfully pull off this coup, because if a Dem is ever president again you're going to suddenly discover just how bad some of these rulings actually are.

---

again, it's all up to Congress to take back their authority.

---

You do know that Birthright Citizenship is in the Constitution, right? What would you like congress to do, pass another Constitutional Amendment so the Supreme Court can let Trump ignore that one, too?

---

this ruling does nothing to change birthright citizenship, you know this. This is a long overdue procedural change that frankly both parties have abused.

The next abuse to fix is presidential executive order decrees. That's where Congress can rebalance government by taking back power they have ceded

---

Of course the court didn't rule on the merits of Birthright Citizenship, it was all an excuse to rule on federal judges. All part of the plan. Yes, federal injunctions have been abused, but in order to fix those abuses you just created a gaping hole in the rule of law.

Trump's favorite tactic has always been delay because you can always do permanent damage and get what you want long before things get through the courts. This Supreme Court has helped him with that every step of the way. And by requiring a class action lawsuit (which this Supreme Court is working to make ever harder to do) it could add years to the delays.

It's already the law that executive orders can't do what Trump is doing. He's breaking the law. What is there to "fix"? Sure, congress could "take back power" by impeaching the president, but they're on the same team, so obviously that's not going to happen.

The DOGE executive orders are obviously mostly illegal... but if you destroy the federal government, and then the court eventually rules it was illegal years later, what's the point? So now Trump can proceed as if Birthright Citizenship doesn't exist and deport everyone to the Congo or wherever, and when the court finally decides to rule it unconstitutional it won't matter.

This ruling makes it impossible to prevent that intentional damage.

WINNING, and WINNING, and WINNING! Can't get enough of it!

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

🚨 #BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled parents ARE allowed to opt their children out of being indoctrinated with LGBTQ+ propaganda

HUGE WIN for religious liberty!

Government Schools were attempting to EXPEL CHILDREN for this. pic.twitter.com/i0BBh8Q7PQ

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 27, 2025

Yuge!!! The Supreme Court finally but aggressively rules that random district judges don’t have the power to run the country and are not more powerful than the duly elected President of the United States. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/53Im9tjXJ7

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) June 27, 2025

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

Why do these people all look the same?

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yep, moves to class action rules now. And to be fair, you loved this happening when it was going against Democratic President's executive orders

---

Isn't it funny that this Supreme Court didn't think to make this ruling during the 7 million nationwide injunctions of Biden's executive orders?

Such a cartoonishly corrupt court. Every ruling seems to find a way to expand Trump's power, shield him from accountability, and/or facilitate corrupt delays.

---

Assume you didn't read the opinions, so no the Supreme Court isn't corrupt. You just don't like the current makeup

Seems real partisan….

Counting partial dissents as dissents, here's some topline SCOTUS stats:

6-3 ideological: 9%

6-3 w Court's 3 most conservative justices in dissent: 5%

Divided cases with all 3 liberal justices in dissent: 15%

Divided cases w only conservatives justices in dissent: 28%

— Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) June 27, 2025

.

---

Cool story. The headline cases tell a different story, and their legal reasoning is generally tortured and completely steeped in the Federalist Society's radical and anti-American "unitary executive" nonsense.

That's fine... you'd better pray that they successfully pull off this coup, because if a Dem is ever president again you're going to suddenly discover just how bad some of these rulings actually are.

---

again, it's all up to Congress to take back their authority.

---

You do know that Birthright Citizenship is in the Constitution, right? What would you like congress to do, pass another Constitutional Amendment so the Supreme Court can let Trump ignore that one, too?

---

this ruling does nothing to change birthright citizenship, you know this. This is a long overdue procedural change that frankly both parties have abused.

The next abuse to fix is presidential executive order decrees. That's where Congress can rebalance government by taking back power they have ceded

---

Of course the court didn't rule on the merits of Birthright Citizenship, it was all an excuse to rule on federal judges. All part of the plan. Yes, federal injunctions have been abused, but in order to fix those abuses you just created a gaping hole in the rule of law.

Trump's favorite tactic has always been delay because you can always do permanent damage and get what you want long before things get through the courts. This Supreme Court has helped him with that every step of the way. And by requiring a class action lawsuit (which this Supreme Court is working to make ever harder to do) it could add years to the delays.

It's already the law that executive orders can't do what Trump is doing. He's breaking the law. What is there to "fix"? Sure, congress could "take back power" by impeaching the president, but they're on the same team, so obviously that's not going to happen.

The DOGE executive orders are obviously mostly illegal... but if you destroy the federal government, and then the court eventually rules it was illegal years later, what's the point? So now Trump can proceed as if Birthright Citizenship doesn't exist and deport everyone to the Congo or wherever, and when the court finally decides to rule it unconstitutional it won't matter.

This ruling makes it impossible to prevent that intentional damage.

---

So you are saying Pres Trump was clever enough to orchestrate this? Proud of you man, you finally admit something positive about the guy.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

She's right that we don't have a constitution, it's just that she doesn't get that we haven't had one since at least 1913.

Oldsouljer said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

She's right that we don't have a constitution, it's just that she doesn't get that we haven't had one since at least 1913.

---

There are countries functioning just fine without a constitution or equivalent.

Cthepack said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

She's right that we don't have a constitution, it's just that she doesn't get that we haven't had one since at least 1913.

---

There are countries functioning just fine without a constitution or equivalent.

---

The United States is not just another country. Our country is unique and unlike any other country on the globe with a Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence declared our people to be sovereigns. You've made a lot of sense with most all of your posts but not this one.

If this country had fallen over the last four years, the entirety of the globe would have fallen.

Werewolf said:

---

Cthepack said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

She's right that we don't have a constitution, it's just that she doesn't get that we haven't had one since at least 1913.

---

There are countries functioning just fine without a constitution or equivalent.

---

The United States is not just another country. Our country is unique and unlike any other country on the globe with a Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence declared our people to be sovereigns. You've made a lot of sense with most all of your posts but not this one.

If this country had fallen over the last four years, the entirety of the globe would have fallen.

---

The UK does not have a constitution. Works just fine for us.

Cthepack said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Cthepack said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Libtards are PISSED that the rule of the country by communist district court judges from Hawaii, California, and DC is over

https://instagr.am/p/DLc7dFkOapb

---

She's right that we don't have a constitution, it's just that she doesn't get that we haven't had one since at least 1913.

---

There are countries functioning just fine without a constitution or equivalent.

---

The United States is not just another country. Our country is unique and unlike any other country on the globe with a Constitution and Bill of Rights. The Declaration of Independence declared our people to be sovereigns. You've made a lot of sense with most all of your posts but not this one.

If this country had fallen over the last four years, the entirety of the globe would have fallen.

---

The UK does not have a constitution. Works just fine for us.

---

LOL, they're subjects of a King and Queen; precisely what drove our revolution in the 1700's and precisely what we resisted in 1812. As a matter of fact, what we're attempting to get out from under right now is the control and influence of GB and its City of London bankers. Yep, regarding the above post re 1913, we have been controlled by the Corporation of the US since the Organic Act of 1871.

New York City will soon join Great Britain. Islamic Law fits nicely with communist totalitarianism.

England has fallen!
Birmingham, UK. 90,000 Muslims attended Eid prayer

Only the most blind cannot see how serious the situation is now in Britain. Ireland is not much Better.

We must Defend our Nation- Are you just going to hand our Land over to Islam or will you stand with… pic.twitter.com/QSDn9BbZ8V

— Knights Templar International (@KnightsTempOrg) June 28, 2025

Cthepack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yep, moves to class action rules now. And to be fair, you loved this happening when it was going against Democratic President's executive orders

---

Isn't it funny that this Supreme Court didn't think to make this ruling during the 7 million nationwide injunctions of Biden's executive orders?

Such a cartoonishly corrupt court. Every ruling seems to find a way to expand Trump's power, shield him from accountability, and/or facilitate corrupt delays.

---

Assume you didn't read the opinions, so no the Supreme Court isn't corrupt. You just don't like the current makeup

Seems real partisan….

Counting partial dissents as dissents, here's some topline SCOTUS stats:

6-3 ideological: 9%

6-3 w Court's 3 most conservative justices in dissent: 5%

Divided cases with all 3 liberal justices in dissent: 15%

Divided cases w only conservatives justices in dissent: 28%

— Sarah Isgur (@whignewtons) June 27, 2025

.

---

Cool story. The headline cases tell a different story, and their legal reasoning is generally tortured and completely steeped in the Federalist Society's radical and anti-American "unitary executive" nonsense.

That's fine... you'd better pray that they successfully pull off this coup, because if a Dem is ever president again you're going to suddenly discover just how bad some of these rulings actually are.

---

again, it's all up to Congress to take back their authority.

---

You do know that Birthright Citizenship is in the Constitution, right? What would you like congress to do, pass another Constitutional Amendment so the Supreme Court can let Trump ignore that one, too?

---

this ruling does nothing to change birthright citizenship, you know this. This is a long overdue procedural change that frankly both parties have abused.

The next abuse to fix is presidential executive order decrees. That's where Congress can rebalance government by taking back power they have ceded

---

Of course the court didn't rule on the merits of Birthright Citizenship, it was all an excuse to rule on federal judges. All part of the plan. Yes, federal injunctions have been abused, but in order to fix those abuses you just created a gaping hole in the rule of law.

Trump's favorite tactic has always been delay because you can always do permanent damage and get what you want long before things get through the courts. This Supreme Court has helped him with that every step of the way. And by requiring a class action lawsuit (which this Supreme Court is working to make ever harder to do) it could add years to the delays.

It's already the law that executive orders can't do what Trump is doing. He's breaking the law. What is there to "fix"? Sure, congress could "take back power" by impeaching the president, but they're on the same team, so obviously that's not going to happen.

The DOGE executive orders are obviously mostly illegal... but if you destroy the federal government, and then the court eventually rules it was illegal years later, what's the point? So now Trump can proceed as if Birthright Citizenship doesn't exist and deport everyone to the Congo or wherever, and when the court finally decides to rule it unconstitutional it won't matter.

This ruling makes it impossible to prevent that intentional damage.

---

So you are saying Pres Trump was clever enough to orchestrate this? Proud of you man, you finally admit something positive about the guy.

---

Lol, not hardly. With the exception of his idiotic tariffs and the tsunami of grifting, pretty much every bit of his presidency so far has come straight out of the Project 2025 playbook. I guess he gets credit for staying on schedule.