TRUMP 2024

2,431,451 Views | 21889 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by Werewolf
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** this guy, we don't need his type in the MAGA Government!

" With the support of his boss, Noschese wrote a detailed, four-page document to justify his employment. He described how he had helped save taxpayers more than $10 million by using his nearly two decades of experience as an HVAC technician to identify efficiencies and find a cost-effective way to extend the life of the air handling units that circulate air through the 43-building, 1.5 million-square-foot campus. Lovell serves 90,000 patients each year, including veterans, active-duty service members and their dependents, along with the nearly 50,000 recruits who pass through the Navy's only boot camp each year at the adjacent Naval Station Great Lakes."

" But after they sent the justification memo up the chain, they got a curt response: The document was too long. He should sum up his position in no more than three sentences.

Noschese was told that a member of hospital leadership did that, but it made no difference. He had to turn in his badge and go home."

" "I'd never loved a job this much," Noschese said in an interview on Monday, before learning that his firing had been put on hold. "Everything that I did, from the moment I stepped into that position to the moment I was forced out.""

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/mar/23/they-were-fired-in-the-name-of-efficiency-based-on/


Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" Ricky Noschese was looking forward to bringing back an apprenticeship program to get veterans into good jobs and replace employees who are nearing retirement. "

So inefficient!
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
Well, perhaps so, though I don't remember the last time I picked up that rag.
Well the Administration has already verified the authenticity of the story, so now will you take it as seriously as it is needed?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
Well, perhaps so, though I don't remember the last time I picked up that rag.


Reading sources you disagree with is a good thing and makes you more informed.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

#Gobbler is good at reinventing himself. He's seeing which way the wind is blowing and adjusting accordingly. He's been on the other side of fence 90% of the time.
When is the field trip to Fort Knox happening?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:


And you want to discuss real news or policy…. Come on Hokie, consider why you got the name Pinocchio…. Don't be what people accuse you of being.
TVPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.


The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.

How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?

***

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach

A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come on, that was funny!
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TVPack said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.


The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.

How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?

***

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach

A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…

Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Come on, that was funny!
Which post? The one about you living up to your name?
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Come on, that was funny!
Which post? The one about you living up to your name?
no, the Trump Tesler one!
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

TVPack said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.


The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.

How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?

***

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach

A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…

Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…


Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?

The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

caryking said:

TVPack said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.


The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.

How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?

***

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach

A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…

Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…


Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?

The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
Why is The Atlantic trustworthy here? Moreso than Pete Hegsteth?

Are you providing scrutiny of sources that tell you what you want to hear???
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feminazi cat-lady sAvInG tHe WoRlD fRoM fAsCiSm!!!!

ReSiSt!!!!!

https://instagr.am/p/DHm2yfpxYzQ
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Feminazi cat-lady sAvInG tHe WoRlD fRoM fAsCiSm!!!!

ReSiSt!!!!!

https://instagr.am/p/DHm2yfpxYzQ


Liberalism is a disease
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

IseWolf22 said:

caryking said:

TVPack said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.
Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.

What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…

Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…

An open chat text message that included a reporter..

At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.


The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.

How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?

***

https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach

A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.

"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…

Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…


Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?

The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
Why is The Atlantic trustworthy here? Moreso than Pete Hegsteth?

Are you providing scrutiny of sources that tell you what you want to hear???


Because the Whitehouse has corroborated the story. And they have evidence. Even his former colleagues at Fox are laughing at Hegseth's denial.

Yes I scrutinize the sources I read. I also read a range of sources that come at issues from right, left l, and center.

Reading only right wing sources is just fueling confirmation bias. It may feel good but it doesn't make you informed
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Feminazi cat-lady sAvInG tHe WoRlD fRoM fAsCiSm!!!!

ReSiSt!!!!!

https://instagr.am/p/DHm2yfpxYzQ


Liberalism is a disease
But they are just SOOOO "tolerant" and only want to "coexist" with you!!!

Unless you are a Christian or MAGA supporter or don't want to live under communism. Then you are a "muh fAsCiSt" and deserve to be fired from your job and have your property destroyed and car fire-bombed by them.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regarding this thing with Jeffrey Goldberg…

Jeffrey Goldberg used to be a dual citizen of the terrorist state of fake "Israel", and served in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). I'm listening to Alex Jones' show and Alex says that Goldberg is possibly Mossad.

If Goldberg is working for the Israelis/Mossad, he has the means to get information (via spying capabilities).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Goldberg

Quote:

Goldberg left college to move to Israel, where he served in the Israel Defense Forces during the First Intifada as a prison guard at Ktzi'ot Prison, where Palestinian participants arrested in the uprising were held.

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??


you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?


" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.

And we need more of it. "
The other half of this story isn't even being discussed.

The way our government is supposed to work is everything an administration says and does (no matter how secret) is recorded and ends up in the national archives. They're supposed to work for the people.

The Trump admin has chosen to do their business with the Signal app, sacrificing any real security from foreign agents, in order to keep what they're doing secret from US.

Mobster rule.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alex Jones says that this "Signal" is NOT private, and that intelligence agencies (Mossad, CIA, MI6) have the capability to spy on this thing, and also to "hack in" and "spoof" (pretend to be someone) … similar to how they also can plant information to frame people (such as planting child porn on someone's computer, etc).
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good job you unhinged commie libtarded cult member lunatics. You really are winning hearts and minds here.

Keep it up.

https://instagr.am/p/DHm4LYvNz8x
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Attempts to hamstring the Executive Branch will continue, I'm sure.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIes by the Atlantic or spoofing by MAGA enemies.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alex Jones thoughts on this nothing burger from Jeffrey Goldberg...

Apparently Waltz and Hegseth are denying that they added Jeffrey Goldberg to their "Signal" chat. Alex Jones says he believes Waltz and Hegseth are telling the truth. And apparently Trump is issuing a PR statement of "they made a mistake, lesson learned" as a STRATEGIC move....because by saying that they can just move on and not have to have it drag out any more than it needs to (with potential "investigations" to show that Waltz or Hegseth are "lying", etc).

This is all a big nothing burger by the "Deep State" (using likely Mossad agent Jeffrey Goldberg), trying to create a fake "leak" scandal, as another way to bog down and hinder the work of the Trump administration.

What most likely occurred here is that the "Deep State" (bad actors in CIA, or Mossad) hacked into this Signal ap, and then spoofed that Jeffrey Goldberg was "added" in there.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's what's so stupid about this Jeffrey Goldberg fake "leak" nothing burger...

So we're supposed to believe that Waltz or Hegseth are "intentional leakers" and therefore are SECRET ENEMIES OF TRUMP??!

Lmao

If that were true, then you commie libtards should be happy to keep Waltz and Hegseth in their positions, right?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Here's what's so stupid about this Jeffrey Goldberg fake "leak" nothing burger...

So we're supposed to believe that Waltz or Hegseth are "intentional leakers" and therefore are SECRET ENEMIES OF TRUMP??!

Lmao

If that were true, then you commie libtards should be happy to keep Waltz and Hegseth in their positions, right?
Quite humorous as is the new clown that has showed up here to espouse reading and listening to a broad spectrum of news sources. It's how he ended up injecting himself with 4 or 5 mRNA jabs laced with poisons.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or...if the Deep State (Democrat) intent of this fake "leak" nothing burger is to allege that Waltz and Hegseth are "incompetent" for their positions...

Since when do the communist Democrats care about our national security, or the strength and welfare of our military??

Communist Democrats are OPEN ENEMIES of our national security...prime example being TOTALLY OPENING UP THE BORDER and AIDING AND ABETTING tens of millions of invading illegal aliens to pour in.

But sure, we totally believe you commie libtarded Democrats when you clutch your pearls pretending to care about our national security. Rrriiiiiight
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HUGE: Barack Obama Was Using USAID to Pretend to Send 'Aid' Overseas But Was Laundering It to Train 'Rent-a-Riots' Instead
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only way this Deep State / Democrat fake "leak" nothing burger works for the Deep State is if they can successfully trick conservatives and Republicans into believing that this actually happened and that therefore have us believe that Waltz and/or Hegseth are "incompetent"...and then kowtow to the Deep State / Democrat goal of having these men removed from their positions.

Because the communist Democrats don't really care about America or our national security at all. They are for total open borders and tens of millions of people invading to destroy the country. They just know that conservatives ACTUALLY DO care about America and about our national security and our military. So they want us to turn on Waltz and Hegseth.

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
*Chef's kiss* for you two "debunking" this story that's been confirmed by the White House, and the CIA Director confirmed he was on the Signal chat. But hey, the Jews, right?

Heads need to roll. One of the people on this chat was in Russia at the time. It's crazy that you guys don't think this is a national security issue. They didn't use the proper channels. This same type of stuff is what happened in the Biden administration and nothing was done when it did. Trump, rightly so, was elected because he said this wasn't going to happen in his administration without accountability. Well, now is the test on that. I expect a 0% chance that anyone will be reprimanded for this egregious error.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
First Page Last Page
Page 373 of 626
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.