Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Oh, right...this has been "confirmed" just like the "Trump is a muh Russian asset aka Russia collusion" hoax story was "confirmed". And how it was "confirmed by 50 intelligence officials" that Hunter's laptop was "fake" and "Russian disinformation". And just like it's been "confirmed" that there was "no fraud whatsoever in the 2020 election".hokiewolf said:
*Chef's kiss* for you two "debunking" this story that's been confirmed by the White House, and the CIA Director confirmed he was on the Signal chat. But hey, the Jews, right?
Heads need to roll. One of the people on this chat was in Russia at the time. It's crazy that you guys don't think this is a national security issue. They didn't use the proper channels. This same type of stuff is what happened in the Biden administration and nothing was done when it did. Trump, rightly so, was elected because he said this wasn't going to happen in his administration without accountability. Well, now is the test on that. I expect a 0% chance that anyone will be reprimanded for this egregious error.
Isn't reading only left wing sources just fueling confirmation bias?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Why is The Atlantic trustworthy here? Moreso than Pete Hegsteth?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…TVPack said:caryking said:The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…hokiewolf said:Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.Oldsouljer said:It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.hokiewolf said:you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?hokiewolf said:
Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??
American war planning usually takes place in highly secure facilities. But the Trump administration planned its strikes on the Houthis using a group chat—and accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, @JeffreyGoldberg. https://t.co/jvBzeJwEuy
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) March 24, 2025
" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.
And we need more of it. "
What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…
An open chat text message that included a reporter..
At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.
The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.
How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?
***
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach
A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.
"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…
Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?
The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
Are you providing scrutiny of sources that tell you what you want to hear???
Because the Whitehouse has corroborated the story. And they have evidence. Even his former colleagues at Fox are laughing at Hegseth's denial.
Yes I scrutinize the sources I read. I also read a range of sources that come at issues from right, left l, and center.
Reading only right wing sources is just fueling confirmation bias. It may feel good but it doesn't make you informed
Exclusive: learn how the nothing burger Signal leak scandal and today’s hearings are tied to Jeffrey Epstein and foreign Intel agencies. pic.twitter.com/7z081wBasG
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) March 25, 2025
Werewolf said:🚨 BREAKING: EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced he canceled $2 billion that went toward an NGO with ties to Stacey Abrams.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 24, 2025
Wow.pic.twitter.com/EzJWIM40yO
hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Oh, I take the whole matter seriously, no doubt. But I think what you're really asking me is if I deem the entire story factually correct and that someone/thing associated with Trump screwed up in cataclysmic fashion and by extension all that Trump does is 100% deleterious to the national welfare, and no, I don't see it that way.hokiewolf said:Well the Administration has already verified the authenticity of the story, so now will you take it as seriously as it is needed?Oldsouljer said:Well, perhaps so, though I don't remember the last time I picked up that rag.hokiewolf said:Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.Oldsouljer said:It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.hokiewolf said:you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?hokiewolf said:
Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??
American war planning usually takes place in highly secure facilities. But the Trump administration planned its strikes on the Houthis using a group chat—and accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, @JeffreyGoldberg. https://t.co/jvBzeJwEuy
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) March 24, 2025
" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.
And we need more of it. "
What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
NOW🔥: President Trump just signed a Presidential Memorandum requiring the immediate declassification of all FBI files relating to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation...we waited 16 years for this. 🔥🇺🇸🔥👍 pic.twitter.com/TD3yIhnOlR
— BandOfBrothersQ (@BandOfBrothersQ) March 25, 2025
I agree. I posted with some doubt, based on something I watched. Since then, I've read a few articles and some semblance of a screw up appears to happen, according to Trump.Oldsouljer said:Oh, I take the whole matter seriously, no doubt. But I think what you're really asking me is if I deem the entire story factually correct and that someone/thing associated with Trump screwed up in cataclysmic fashion and by extension all that Trump does is 100% deleterious to the national welfare, and no, I don't see it that way.hokiewolf said:Well the Administration has already verified the authenticity of the story, so now will you take it as seriously as it is needed?Oldsouljer said:Well, perhaps so, though I don't remember the last time I picked up that rag.hokiewolf said:Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.Oldsouljer said:It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.hokiewolf said:you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?hokiewolf said:
Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??
American war planning usually takes place in highly secure facilities. But the Trump administration planned its strikes on the Houthis using a group chat—and accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, @JeffreyGoldberg. https://t.co/jvBzeJwEuy
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) March 24, 2025
" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.
And we need more of it. "
What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
caryking said:Isn't reading only left wing sources just fueling confirmation bias?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Why is The Atlantic trustworthy here? Moreso than Pete Hegsteth?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…TVPack said:caryking said:The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…hokiewolf said:Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.Oldsouljer said:It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.hokiewolf said:you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?hokiewolf said:
Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??
American war planning usually takes place in highly secure facilities. But the Trump administration planned its strikes on the Houthis using a group chat—and accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, @JeffreyGoldberg. https://t.co/jvBzeJwEuy
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) March 24, 2025
" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.
And we need more of it. "
What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…
An open chat text message that included a reporter..
At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.
The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.
How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?
***
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach
A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.
"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…
Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?
The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
Are you providing scrutiny of sources that tell you what you want to hear???
Because the Whitehouse has corroborated the story. And they have evidence. Even his former colleagues at Fox are laughing at Hegseth's denial.
Yes I scrutinize the sources I read. I also read a range of sources that come at issues from right, left l, and center.
Reading only right wing sources is just fueling confirmation bias. It may feel good but it doesn't make you informed
BTW, I didn't provide my position; rather, I said I heard something that caused me some doubt. Doubt doesn't mean affirmative, does it? So you know what I listened to, here goes…
Werewolf said:Quite humorous as is the new clown that has showed up here to espouse reading and listening to a broad spectrum of news sources. It's how he ended up injecting himself with 4 or 5 mRNA jabs laced with poisons.GuerrillaPack said:
Here's what's so stupid about this Jeffrey Goldberg fake "leak" nothing burger...
So we're supposed to believe that Waltz or Hegseth are "intentional leakers" and therefore are SECRET ENEMIES OF TRUMP??!
Lmao
If that were true, then you commie libtards should be happy to keep Waltz and Hegseth in their positions, right?JUST ANNOUNCED -The symbols are everywhere, hidden in plain sight. But years of autopilot living have lulled the masses into a deep trance.
— ID.Beast System (@BeastSystemID) March 25, 2025
They don’t see, they don’t question and when someone points it out, they get defensive, clinging to comfort over truth. #Neurowarfare pic.twitter.com/M6JE5XD9hO
I used to read a bit on Reason. Not much anymore. I've determined the Libertarian mindset has its flaws and they are typically very Libertarian.IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Isn't reading only left wing sources just fueling confirmation bias?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Why is The Atlantic trustworthy here? Moreso than Pete Hegsteth?IseWolf22 said:caryking said:Yes, I read some and I've seen those things mentioned as well. Remember what I said above, it is what it is…. And, I have "some doubt", not that I totally disbelieve this story. Also, Pete Hegsteth has said, I believe, that it's not a real text. So, at this point, I'm ambivalent…TVPack said:caryking said:The Atlantic is a 100% biased news site. Now, I've been watching a few people and the whole idea of this being something it's not, could be real. Think about some of the storylines on this…hokiewolf said:Respectfully, that's exactly what you shouldn't do,. You should read the article and I'd love to know where the reporting is biased. Because I don't think it is, and it's an issues of the highest order of national security.Oldsouljer said:It's the Atlantic. They're reflexively anti-Trump, so yes, I probably going to ignore it even though I'm definitely not what you'd call a Trump bro.hokiewolf said:you Trump bros just going to ignore this egregious and very scary error? Whom should be held accountable? No one?hokiewolf said:
Who hasn't accidentally included the wrong person on a group text??
American war planning usually takes place in highly secure facilities. But the Trump administration planned its strikes on the Houthis using a group chat—and accidentally included The Atlantic’s editor in chief, @JeffreyGoldberg. https://t.co/jvBzeJwEuy
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) March 24, 2025
" I think the word we hear more often now is ACCOUNTABILITY.
And we need more of it. "
What if this reporter wasn't as cautious and then it cost American lives? People could've been killed because of this breach.
Roughly two hours before the strike happened, these people were discussing whether we should do this and making a decision…
An open chat text message that included a reporter..
At this point, it is what it is; however, I have some doubt. Not to say the reporter is lying; rather, he may being played by somebody.
The government confirmed that this was a real text thread. See quotes below from a Fox News article. It's understandable to be skeptical because it's so reckless and incompetent. The reporter himself thought it was a hoax for that reason.
How would you have reacted to this if it had been the Biden admin or Harris admin who committed this kind of blunder?
***
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-officials-accidentally-text-atlantic-journalist-about-military-strikes-apparent-security-breach
A National Security Council spokesperson told Fox News Digital it was reviewing the matter but acknowledged the breach.
"This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain," NSC spokesperson Brian Hughes said. "The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security."
Regarding Biden, he was just a blunder waiting to happen, everyday…
Why is Hegsteh trustworthy here? Moreso than the Atlantic?
The Atlantic has had major issues, but low quality, non-factual news is spammed here daily. Yall aren't providing any scrutiny on sources that tell you what you want to hear
Are you providing scrutiny of sources that tell you what you want to hear???
Because the Whitehouse has corroborated the story. And they have evidence. Even his former colleagues at Fox are laughing at Hegseth's denial.
Yes I scrutinize the sources I read. I also read a range of sources that come at issues from right, left l, and center.
Reading only right wing sources is just fueling confirmation bias. It may feel good but it doesn't make you informed
BTW, I didn't provide my position; rather, I said I heard something that caused me some doubt. Doubt doesn't mean affirmative, does it? So you know what I listened to, here goes…
Yes, reading only leftwing media would give you the same problem.
I love Reason. I still check their reporting against other sources and find points of disagreement.
Not necessary…IseWolf22 said:Werewolf said:Quite humorous as is the new clown that has showed up here to espouse reading and listening to a broad spectrum of news sources. It's how he ended up injecting himself with 4 or 5 mRNA jabs laced with poisons.GuerrillaPack said:
Here's what's so stupid about this Jeffrey Goldberg fake "leak" nothing burger...
So we're supposed to believe that Waltz or Hegseth are "intentional leakers" and therefore are SECRET ENEMIES OF TRUMP??!
Lmao
If that were true, then you commie libtards should be happy to keep Waltz and Hegseth in their positions, right?JUST ANNOUNCED -The symbols are everywhere, hidden in plain sight. But years of autopilot living have lulled the masses into a deep trance.
— ID.Beast System (@BeastSystemID) March 25, 2025
They don’t see, they don’t question and when someone points it out, they get defensive, clinging to comfort over truth. #Neurowarfare pic.twitter.com/M6JE5XD9hO
Y'all should be accountabilibudies! You can call each other every morning to remind the other to take your Meds
I guess I'm still missing a piece of the story…DrummerboyWolf said:
Waltz is saying he has never talked to Goldberg and does not know him. Now could a possible staff member have put him in his phone? Let's remember that Goldberg has hated Trump for a long time. He was wrong about Russia Collusion. He was wrong about "The very fine people on both sides" argument from Charlottesville. And finally he was wrong about "Military is for losers and suckers" comment that Trump supposedly made.
Now could it have been a screw up? Sure, I imagine everybody here as accidentally CC'd somebody on an email chain or in a group chat said something that one person was not to be in on.
I will give Goldberg credit for not saying anything until the mission was over, but with his history of misinformation during the first Trump term, then this could all be bogus too. Perhaps there is a leaker on staff with either Waltz or somebody else on the chat chain. I don't believe anything classified was released and we will see where it goes.
Trump has already acknowledged that Waltz is not being fired. Flynn had to get out early in 2017 for another bogus BS charge, so it would not surprise me if the left and the Deep State would try something nefarious again.
yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
BREAKING 🚨 D.O.G.E. announced they have now cleaned out 7 Million Social Security Numbers 🔥
— MAGA Voice (@MAGAVoice) March 25, 2025
These people were 120+ years old. Now they are all marked as “deceased”
Now do Voter Rolls pic.twitter.com/5blPUkHlaZ
Did USAID corruption enlighten you?
— Cal Layton Jr. (@LaytonCal) March 23, 2025
Wait till the US CENSUS Corruption is revealed.
Mandate In person, one day voting With paper ballots.🇺🇸🥇🫡
Ok, I have to ask... Is there something specific you're referring to? Because I definitely missed that.hokiewolf said:
*Chef's kiss* for you two "debunking" this story that's been confirmed by the White House, and the CIA Director confirmed he was on the Signal chat. But hey, the Jews, right?
Heads need to roll. One of the people on this chat was in Russia at the time. It's crazy that you guys don't think this is a national security issue. They didn't use the proper channels. This same type of stuff is what happened in the Biden administration and nothing was done when it did. Trump, rightly so, was elected because he said this wasn't going to happen in his administration without accountability. Well, now is the test on that. I expect a 0% chance that anyone will be reprimanded for this egregious error.
just people doing wrong, getting caught and then lying about it. It all goes both ways these days I supposeSmaptyWolf said:Ok, I have to ask... Is there something specific you're referring to? Because I definitely missed that.hokiewolf said:
*Chef's kiss* for you two "debunking" this story that's been confirmed by the White House, and the CIA Director confirmed he was on the Signal chat. But hey, the Jews, right?
Heads need to roll. One of the people on this chat was in Russia at the time. It's crazy that you guys don't think this is a national security issue. They didn't use the proper channels. This same type of stuff is what happened in the Biden administration and nothing was done when it did. Trump, rightly so, was elected because he said this wasn't going to happen in his administration without accountability. Well, now is the test on that. I expect a 0% chance that anyone will be reprimanded for this egregious error.
/facepalmhokiewolf said:just people doing wrong, getting caught and then lying about it. It all goes both ways these days I supposeSmaptyWolf said:Ok, I have to ask... Is there something specific you're referring to? Because I definitely missed that.hokiewolf said:
*Chef's kiss* for you two "debunking" this story that's been confirmed by the White House, and the CIA Director confirmed he was on the Signal chat. But hey, the Jews, right?
Heads need to roll. One of the people on this chat was in Russia at the time. It's crazy that you guys don't think this is a national security issue. They didn't use the proper channels. This same type of stuff is what happened in the Biden administration and nothing was done when it did. Trump, rightly so, was elected because he said this wasn't going to happen in his administration without accountability. Well, now is the test on that. I expect a 0% chance that anyone will be reprimanded for this egregious error.
the SSA Administration is the most heavily audited government agency. Call me when you find actual fraud, because you'll find very little of it.Werewolf said:
^ It will be amusing to watch #daGobbler be wrong one more time, LOL. Do we need to start a list?
I'm not sure the tariffs will be the major or direct factor involved here, but I agree that if deflation gets underway in an unstoppable surge, jobs will be lost and tariffs might be a contributor to that. My take is that Trump, even more than Eisenhower, is going to deport the crap out of all the illegal job thieves to mitigate unemployment, though that may not be enough.hokiewolf said:yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
Lol, man. Listening to Oldsouljer flex his Trump University economics PhD actually causes me physical pain.Oldsouljer said:I'm not sure the tariffs will be the major or direct factor involved here, but I agree that if deflation gets underway in an unstoppable surge, jobs will be lost and tariffs might be a contributor to that. My take is that Trump, even more than Eisenhower, is going to deport the crap out of all the illegal job thieves to mitigate unemployment, though that may not be enough.hokiewolf said:yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
hokiewolf said:yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
Oldsouljer said:I'm not sure the tariffs will be the major or direct factor involved here, but I agree that if deflation gets underway in an unstoppable surge, jobs will be lost and tariffs might be a contributor to that. My take is that Trump, even more than Eisenhower, is going to deport the crap out of all the illegal job thieves to mitigate unemployment, though that may not be enough.hokiewolf said:yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
I don't believe in magic beansGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:yes because the tariffs imposed will cost 10x the amount of jobs gainedGulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Shoot, it was 1500 jobs yesterday. What happened?Werewolf said:
Restoring the wealth of our country is well underway.Hyundai announces plans to invest $21 billion in the US creating 1,300 new jobs in Louisiana, strengthening the supply chain in America. pic.twitter.com/oY8K7qCqbv
— Politically Stripped ™️ (@politstrip) March 24, 2025
Is this a bad thing in your opinion?
Bro, you should email the WH. You are just the guy this country has been looking for!1
