TRUMP 2024

769,193 Views | 8578 Replies | Last: 18 min ago by TheStorm
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harry reminds me of #daSieve.



#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolf5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prices of groceries hasn't gone down. Ukraine war still going on. Damn really thought Trump would've fixed this like he said would. Huh.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:


Is that the same Saudi Arabia that gave Jared Kushner $2 BILLION for no apparent reason? Hmmmm, someone should look into that. Anyway, that murderous prince must really like Trump for some reason.

It must be hard for you guys to not have Joe Biden to bawl about anymore. Too bad someone deleted the Biden thread... maybe you could have kept it going somehow.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.


Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to "All persons born or naturalized in the United States," thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.

Another equally important provision was the statement that "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.

On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio, the primary author of the first section of the 14th Amendment, intended that the amendment also nationalize the Bill of Rights by making it binding upon the states. When introducing the amendment, Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan specifically stated that the privileges and immunities clause would extend to the states "the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments." Historians disagree on how widely Bingham's and Howard's views were shared at the time in the Congress, or across the country in general. No one in Congress explicitly contradicted their view of the amendment, but only a few members said anything at all about its meaning on this issue. For many years, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment did not extend the Bill of Rights to the states.

Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality. Citizens petitioned and initiated court cases, Congress enacted legislation, and the executive branch attempted to enforce measures that would guard all citizens' rights. While these citizens did not succeed in empowering the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, they effectively articulated arguments and offered dissenting opinions that would be the basis for change in the 20th century.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not accusing Trump of anything, the information just interested me. In reality, Biden hasn't done much better with our allies.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.

Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to "All persons born or naturalized in the United States," thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.

Another equally important provision was the statement that "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.

On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio, the primary author of the first section of the 14th Amendment, intended that the amendment also nationalize the Bill of Rights by making it binding upon the states. When introducing the amendment, Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan specifically stated that the privileges and immunities clause would extend to the states "the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments." Historians disagree on how widely Bingham's and Howard's views were shared at the time in the Congress, or across the country in general. No one in Congress explicitly contradicted their view of the amendment, but only a few members said anything at all about its meaning on this issue. For many years, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment did not extend the Bill of Rights to the states.

Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality. Citizens petitioned and initiated court cases, Congress enacted legislation, and the executive branch attempted to enforce measures that would guard all citizens' rights. While these citizens did not succeed in empowering the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, they effectively articulated arguments and offered dissenting opinions that would be the basis for change in the 20th century.


lol. 42 decades of precedent, this will be a 9-0 ruling. Maybe DOGE can figure out how much money was wasted on this silliness
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

...
lol. 42 decades of precedent, this will be a 9-0 ruling. Maybe DOGE can figure out how much money was wasted on this silliness
You were just saying that Biden declaring that the ERA was officially an amendment is an impeachable offense.

Is declaring birthright citizenship illegal when you clearly know that's unconstitutional also impeachable? Or explicitly declaring that he wouldn't enforce a law he's legally required to enforce? Or declaring two national emergencies that patently don't exist? Or unilaterally renaming an international body of water he has no authority to rename? Or promising to "take back" the Panama Canal, a clear treaty violation in defiance of both domestic and international law? And that was just DAY ONE. So is all of that impeachable, too? Asking for a friend.

Apparently Trump's relentless daily lawbreaking, just like last time, is totally different.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's go!
El Lobo Loco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.

Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to "All persons born or naturalized in the United States," thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.

Another equally important provision was the statement that "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.

On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio, the primary author of the first section of the 14th Amendment, intended that the amendment also nationalize the Bill of Rights by making it binding upon the states. When introducing the amendment, Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan specifically stated that the privileges and immunities clause would extend to the states "the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments." Historians disagree on how widely Bingham's and Howard's views were shared at the time in the Congress, or across the country in general. No one in Congress explicitly contradicted their view of the amendment, but only a few members said anything at all about its meaning on this issue. For many years, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment did not extend the Bill of Rights to the states.

Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality. Citizens petitioned and initiated court cases, Congress enacted legislation, and the executive branch attempted to enforce measures that would guard all citizens' rights. While these citizens did not succeed in empowering the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, they effectively articulated arguments and offered dissenting opinions that would be the basis for change in the 20th century.


lol. 42 decades of precedent, this will be a 9-0 ruling. Maybe DOGE can figure out how much money was wasted on this silliness
What are you talking about? This country hasn't even been around for 42 decades.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Oldsouljer said:

These actions must be carried out by COB today (1/22/25). Today should be an interesting day at my agency.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/federal-dei-workers-placed-on-leave/ar-AA1xEs8e?ocid=BingNewsVerp


Good
I finally saw an all-hands email at 5:30 PM, well after COB, sent out by whomever Trump supposedly has acting as OPM chief until his main man gets confirmed by the Senate. It announced closure of DEIA offices which I expected. It also dropped an email address, a snitch line, for any employee who knows of, and reports covert retention of any DEI personnel or activity, and I expected that. What I didn't expect was blunt language referring to DEI as divisive, racist, and un-American, which was welcome nonetheless and tells me that whomever sent the communique was clearly a Trump person.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Catherine Herridge at Camp Justice (YMCA - smiling about the Village People) at GITMO. Courtesy of RUMBLE.com.

GITMO- Update from Catherine Herridge - 1 21 2025
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Lobo Loco said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866, and ratified July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment extended liberties and rights granted by the Bill of Rights to formerly enslaved people.

Following the Civil War, Congress submitted to the states three amendments as part of its Reconstruction program to guarantee equal civil and legal rights to Black citizens. A major provision of the 14th Amendment was to grant citizenship to "All persons born or naturalized in the United States," thereby granting citizenship to formerly enslaved people.

Another equally important provision was the statement that "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The right to due process of law and equal protection of the law now applied to both the federal and state governments.

On June 16, 1866, the House Joint Resolution proposing the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was submitted to the states. On July 28, 1868, the 14th amendment was declared, in a certificate of the Secretary of State, ratified by the necessary 28 of the 37 States, and became part of the supreme law of the land.
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio, the primary author of the first section of the 14th Amendment, intended that the amendment also nationalize the Bill of Rights by making it binding upon the states. When introducing the amendment, Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan specifically stated that the privileges and immunities clause would extend to the states "the personal rights guaranteed and secured by the first eight amendments." Historians disagree on how widely Bingham's and Howard's views were shared at the time in the Congress, or across the country in general. No one in Congress explicitly contradicted their view of the amendment, but only a few members said anything at all about its meaning on this issue. For many years, the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment did not extend the Bill of Rights to the states.

Not only did the 14th Amendment fail to extend the Bill of Rights to the states; it also failed to protect the rights of Black citizens. A legacy of Reconstruction was the determined struggle of Black and White citizens to make the promise of the 14th Amendment a reality. Citizens petitioned and initiated court cases, Congress enacted legislation, and the executive branch attempted to enforce measures that would guard all citizens' rights. While these citizens did not succeed in empowering the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction, they effectively articulated arguments and offered dissenting opinions that would be the basis for change in the 20th century.


lol. 42 decades of precedent, this will be a 9-0 ruling. Maybe DOGE can figure out how much money was wasted on this silliness
What are you talking about? This country hasn't even been around for 42 decades.
English common law included.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

...
lol. 42 decades of precedent, this will be a 9-0 ruling. Maybe DOGE can figure out how much money was wasted on this silliness
You were just saying that Biden declaring that the ERA was officially an amendment is an impeachable offense.

Is declaring birthright citizenship illegal when you clearly know that's unconstitutional also impeachable? Or explicitly declaring that he wouldn't enforce a law he's legally required to enforce? Or declaring two national emergencies that patently don't exist? Or unilaterally renaming an international body of water he has no authority to rename? Or promising to "take back" the Panama Canal, a clear treaty violation in defiance of both domestic and international law? And that was just DAY ONE. So is all of that impeachable, too? Asking for a friend.

Apparently Trump's relentless daily lawbreaking, just like last time, is totally different.
no, ignoring the law with the TolTok ban is impeachable. He ignored his oath - on day one! Edit: to clarify, I believe this is the case with the TikTok ban.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love seeing the TDS quars cry about all of this winning.

Trump following though on his campaign promises. Working like a machine knocking these suckers out.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Love seeing the TDS quars cry about all of this winning.

Trump following though on his campaign promises. Working like a machine knocking these suckers out.
hey, I'll tell you one I'm very interested in and like - the executive order eliminating DEI offices from federal departments includes provisions to include this order for federal contracts and grants. That is basically aiming the nuclear weapon at higher education . It's potentially massive.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Love seeing the TDS quars cry about all of this winning.

Trump following though on his campaign promises. Working like a machine knocking these suckers out.
Gonna be an extremely entertaining 4 years seeing these guys hyperventilate on a daily basis.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkpackfan said:

packgrad said:

Love seeing the TDS quars cry about all of this winning.

Trump following though on his campaign promises. Working like a machine knocking these suckers out.
Gonna be an extremely entertaining 4 years seeing these guys hyperventilate on a daily basis.
I was more commenting about the Biden hyperventilating. Trump being a lawless moron is baked into the cake at this point. I'm only half tuned in to the performative bullsh**, honestly, and most of my lefty friends could care less.

Watching you guys strut around like you're finally getting your civil war is extremely entertaining, though. For fun I tried to count Werewolf's posts today... lost count around 50! I think he's going to jerk himself to death.

Anyway, this is your moment! Go nuts, guys! The more definitely not sieg heils, the better!
flylike44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bleat bleat bleat bleat bleat bleat
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Check this out, #Nappy made the news.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:


Experts all around you…

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The same minions that cry about a Nazi salute said JD Vance was "weird". These minions are not the type of people that benefit society.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

jkpackfan said:

packgrad said:

Love seeing the TDS quars cry about all of this winning.

Trump following though on his campaign promises. Working like a machine knocking these suckers out.
Gonna be an extremely entertaining 4 years seeing these guys hyperventilate on a daily basis.
I was more commenting about the Biden hyperventilating. Trump being a lawless moron is baked into the cake at this point. I'm only half tuned in to the performative bullsh**, honestly, and most of my lefty friends could care less.

Watching you guys strut around like you're finally getting your civil war is extremely entertaining, though. For fun I tried to count Werewolf's posts today... lost count around 50! I think he's going to jerk himself to death.

Anyway, this is your moment! Go nuts, guys! The more definitely not sieg heils, the better!
Q says "you cannot tell them, you must show them". Q wasn't talking about the hopelessly brainwashed.....and that you are.

The Q operation and #devolution had a number of goals - with a return to a Constitutional Republic as the primary one. Another principal goal was to educate the people and to rid us of the 'cancer' (guys like you).

One side of the #devolution" coin was to wake up the people slowly and to AVOID a CIVIL WAR. We have done that and the #'s of your side are now small enough that civil unrest can be put down readily easily. Chinese infiltrators here to help you may be more problematic.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:


This was a great move. This lady totally missed the point of the mission of the Coast Guard. Hint: it's in the name of the agency
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was looking to post this on the Harris thread, I don't see it. I no longer see the Biden thread either. That's a lot of intentionality to remove a thread as I see many others that are much older and much less used.

Convenient don't ya think? Who do we owe thanks to?

Here goes................ with one more last laugh at the lefties here.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Went to the retirement home, just like Biden
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Send em packing

First Page
Page 245 of 246
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.