#Nappy, #Gobbler & #SIeve don't need the test, they need the cure, LOL.

#Nappy, another jab or two could be a cure.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR JUAN WILLIAMS... pic.twitter.com/Ax0qbAmkQ3

— Tt TWSTR (@TtTWSTR) January 7, 2025

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

Trump spit balling:
"Rename the Middle East the American East."
"Russia might want to be a state."
"Shoulda kept Vietnam a state."
"We own Antarctica."
"The Moon can be a state."
"Mars. We have the most rovers." pic.twitter.com/L1GV45TuRh

— Stan (@Stanzupforit) January 8, 2025

This is all so stupid.

Enjoy a laugh at the Water Cooler! Heck, we do it at the water cooler at the office, can't we have one or two here?

Lol can always use a good laugh. I was meaning renaming the Gulf of Mexico etc.

Gotcha.

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

https://instagr.am/p/DEdzxDqNV6q

Trump is using tariffs like a weapon. He says he will tariff Denmark at a high level if they don't go along with him and he tells us why he wants Greenland plainly:
China and Russia have moved in on the country.

"People don't even know if Denmark has any right to it. They should… pic.twitter.com/7JgsWjsUBv

— Green Lives Matter (@Ultrafrog17) January 7, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

Trade negotiations that TDS people won't acknowledge even if successful.

You think trannies are not mentally ill. Pretty much renders your TDS opinion on "sanity" worthless. M

Saw this tweet after posting and it got a good chuckle. Appropriate.

The best part about Trump press conferences is that he drops 4-5 headline making statements that send the entire left into convulsions.

"We're buying Greenland, but first I'm conquering Canada, and the Gulf is now the Gulf of America. Gonna take Panama Canal back, too."

🤣😂☠️

— Brenden Dilley (@WarlordDilley) January 7, 2025

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

Watching you guys seamlessly transition from "I declaya! Biden is gonna start WW3 if he helps Ukraine!!!" to "We should invade the EU to prepare for war with China!" in the matter of a month is awe inspiring. It's like you're a little wind up toy, marching whichever direction they point you.

P.S. We can already use Greenland's ports all we want, and if China or Russia invade Greenland (a.k.a. Denmark, a NATO ally) we're at war anyway.

P.P.S. The Panama Canal is also a pretend issue.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

I thought we were isolationists now and didn't want war and countries should take care of themselves, thus avoiding things that could provoke wars, no?

You're making a RINO globalist point here.

hokiewolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

I thought we were isolationists now and didn't want war and countries should take care of themselves, thus avoiding things that could provoke wars, no?

---

I thought you did support war with Russia sending billions and more men (not you) to Ukraine to prolong the fight, no?

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

Is that a distress code like "SOS", for people who don't know anything but want to debate?

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

RUSSIA!!!!

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

Is that a distress code like "SOS", for people who don't know anything but want to debate?

---

Why debate with a moe-ron like you? I just enjoy watching you outrage with nearly every post.

packgrad said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

RUSSIA!!!!

---

Oligarchs!
Something Elon!
RUSSIA!

….drink everyone

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

Gulfstream4 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

RUSSIA!!!!

---

Oligarchs!
Something Elon!
RUSSIA!

….drink everyone

---

Yep, that's pretty much all that will be happening for the next 4 years... Oligarchs! Something Elon! And RUSSIA! Oh, and a big tax cut (for Elon) paid for with your Medicare, and of course you guys in tears toward the end because he didn't actually clear all of the Spanish-speaking people out of your McDonalds.

packgrad said:

---

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

---

We could have our own real life Westeros but instead of the wall at the north we have it to the south to keep the wildlings out.

hokiewolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

I thought we were isolationists now and didn't want war and countries should take care of themselves, thus avoiding things that could provoke wars, no?

You're making a RINO globalist point here.

---

I don't know where the truth lies in all this, however, here is what's being said, I think:

• Panama Canal was built by the US (after failed attempts by others) for goods transportation. Supposedly, the cost for using the canal has gotten expensive. Trump claims China is running some or all of the operations. The giving of the Canal was meant for others to run it; so, he wants change for the usage of the canal.
• Greenland has natural materials that can be of value for economic growth. I think he is saying we should get there before China does, if they haven't already. Additionally, Russia has a fleet (this is being said) that would move past the area. Strategically, the land has great value Militarily.

Now, I think most of this is speaking about possibilities and he is pushing hard, only to negotiate a reasonable outcome for the US. It didn't take long after he expressed significant tariffs for the whole Canadian government to fall in turmoil. Cause and effect? You can decide that for yourself.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

Is that a distress code like "SOS", for people who don't know anything but want to debate?

---

Why debate with a moe-ron like you? I just enjoy watching you outrage with nearly every post.

---

Agree! Just quit quoting him/her…

ncsualum05 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

---

We could have our own real life Westeros but instead of the wall at the north we have it to the south to keep the wildlings out.

---

I don't think anybody really wants Canada. I know I don't! That would change the outcome of the last election, potentially!

Now, Canada has to start defending its own land with their own military. Also, we have got to quit sending so much money around the world without a significant return.

I agree with Trump on the auto industry in Canada. They are our US companies building there. Change the regulatory environment and bring them home. It's time to start back our Industrial Revolution. You know, we do a ton of Federal Workers that need jobs soon…

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

I would say it's just his typical dominance ritual where he says something completely insane that 98% of the time he'll never actually do, just to get everyone to say "My god, he can't do that! Wait, can he do that?! Why don't the rules apply to him?!" Rinse and repeat.

But in this case, since Trump Rule #1 always seems to be "How can we help Putin today?", it probably has more to do with giving Russia cover over the war in Ukraine. We can't be mad at Russia for taking territory by force if we're actively threatening to do the same thing. Should make the "give Putin everything he wants" negotiations easier.

---

T
D
S

---

Is that a distress code like "SOS", for people who don't know anything but want to debate?

---

Why debate with a moe-ron like you? I just enjoy watching you outrage with nearly every post.

---

Agree! Just quit quoting him/her…

---

Lol, you could just not read what's in the gray box when you see my name. I thought you guys bawled your eyeballs dry over censorship?

Waaaaait, were you tricking us with all of the endless "working the refs" crap just to make all of social media a right wing disinformation safe space?

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

I thought we were isolationists now and didn't want war and countries should take care of themselves, thus avoiding things that could provoke wars, no?

You're making a RINO globalist point here.

---

I don't know where the truth lies in all this, however, here is what's being said, I think:

• Panama Canal was built by the US (after failed attempts by others) for goods transportation. Supposedly, the cost for using the canal has gotten expensive. Trump claims China is running some or all of the operations. The giving of the Canal was meant for others to run it; so, he wants change for the usage of the canal.
• Greenland has natural materials that can be of value for economic growth. I think he is saying we should get there before China does, if they haven't already. Additionally, Russia has a fleet (this is being said) that would move past the area. Strategically, the land has great value Militarily.

Now, I think most of this is speaking about possibilities and he is pushing hard, only to negotiate a reasonable outcome for the US. It didn't take long after he expressed significant tariffs for the whole Canadian government to fall in turmoil. Cause and effect? You can decide that for yourself.

---

Why would Trump do that? That would provoke Russia and China. I thought that's not what we do anymore. I'm so confused by what the actual policies are going to be.

caryking said:

---

ncsualum05 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

---

We could have our own real life Westeros but instead of the wall at the north we have it to the south to keep the wildlings out.

---

I don't think anybody really wants Canada. I know I don't! That would change the outcome of the last election, potentially!

Now, Canada has to start defending its own land with their own military. Also, we have got to quit sending so much money around the world without a significant return.

I agree with Trump on the auto industry in Canada. They are our US companies building there. Change the regulatory environment and bring them home. It's time to start back our Industrial Revolution. You know, we do a ton of Federal Workers that need jobs soon…

---

We should take over Canada for the simple fact they push that "Canadian Bacon" bull***+ on the rest of the world.

caryking said:

---

ncsualum05 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

---

We could have our own real life Westeros but instead of the wall at the north we have it to the south to keep the wildlings out.

---

I don't think anybody really wants Canada. I know I don't! That would change the outcome of the last election, potentially!

Now, Canada has to start defending its own land with their own military. Also, we have got to quit sending so much money around the world without a significant return.

I agree with Trump on the auto industry in Canada. They are our US companies building there. Change the regulatory environment and bring them home. It's time to start back our Industrial Revolution. You know, we do a ton of Federal Workers that need jobs soon…

---

I'd take the prairie provinces, and I think they'd like to be part of the USA as well. BC, Ontario and points east can be their own nation.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Trump wouldn't rule out using military force against a NATO ally to get Greenland today. What a knee-slapper!

Gonna be a long, stupid four years.

---

Can anyone on here explain the thinly veiled genius of Trump saber-rattling about Greenland and the Panama Canal and making America's hat a 51st state, all three of which being issues that wouldn't even remotely be on the radar of any other sane politician on the planet?

---

Owning both would give the U. S. significant strategic advantages.

War is coming with China at some point.

---

I thought we were isolationists now and didn't want war and countries should take care of themselves, thus avoiding things that could provoke wars, no?

You're making a RINO globalist point here.

---

I don't know where the truth lies in all this, however, here is what's being said, I think:

• Panama Canal was built by the US (after failed attempts by others) for goods transportation. Supposedly, the cost for using the canal has gotten expensive. Trump claims China is running some or all of the operations. The giving of the Canal was meant for others to run it; so, he wants change for the usage of the canal.
• Greenland has natural materials that can be of value for economic growth. I think he is saying we should get there before China does, if they haven't already. Additionally, Russia has a fleet (this is being said) that would move past the area. Strategically, the land has great value Militarily.

Now, I think most of this is speaking about possibilities and he is pushing hard, only to negotiate a reasonable outcome for the US. It didn't take long after he expressed significant tariffs for the whole Canadian government to fall in turmoil. Cause and effect? You can decide that for yourself.

---

Why would Trump do that? That would provoke Russia and China. I thought that's not what we do anymore. I'm so confused by what the actual policies are going to be.

---

How would it provoke anyone? You do see the difference in this vs. sending money and weapons use to kill thousands of Russian citizens?

I feel this move would let China/Russia know to NOT eff up.

---

That last sentence is provocation

ncsualum05 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Solid

Oh yeah, also we're reclaiming the Panama Canal and renaming it the South Mississippi River.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 8, 2025

---

We could have our own real life Westeros but instead of the wall at the north we have it to the south to keep the wildlings out.

---

Crazy to think of the potential changes in leadership coming. We are going from a senile old man who poops himself to Trump while Canada is dumping a guy who was bullied by Chandler (Friends) growing up