TRUMP 2024

613,380 Views | 7171 Replies | Last: 11 min ago by caryking
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoping they follow through.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Special Delivery for my ole naysayer pay, #daStorm. #EnjoyDaShow

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Hoping they follow through.


I'll miss Cap'n Crunch.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, you and #Nappy don't like this guy do you?

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ contrary to our US Military servicemen's viewpoint, this NATO dude doesn't find favor with Elon.

#Discernment can go a long way sometimes towards forming an opinion........so............

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon

Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lol. Gold.

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Secretary of Education Linda McMahon


She's perfect for taking down that department…
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.


Still stings, doesn't it? You were told to believe Harris was going to win only to have her get blown away in a landslide victory for your President Trump.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure, just really wanted to post the gif though.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone!!!!

Just watch this and put yourself in this ladies position…. For me, this is so hard to watch. That said, everyone should watch and ask yourself how you would deal with this if something happened to your family.


SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.


Still stings, doesn't it? You were told to believe Harris was going to win only to have her get blown away in a landslide victory for your President Trump.
I mean, sure, Trump only won 49.89% of the popular vote, and it looks like Republicans may actually lose a House seat or two, but I get it, the MAGA dumpster fire actually winning anything must feel like a major landslide.

You guys should definitely go hog wild with your HUGE mandate. If Social Security hasn't been DOGE'd out of existence by next year then you're a bunch of betas.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.


Still stings, doesn't it? You were told to believe Harris was going to win only to have her get blown away in a landslide victory for your President Trump.
I mean, sure, Trump only won 49.89% of the popular vote, and it looks like Republicans may actually lose a House seat or two, but I get it, the MAGA dumpster fire actually winning anything must feel like a major landslide.

You guys should definitely go hog wild with your HUGE mandate. If Social Security hasn't been DOGE'd out of existence by next year then you're a bunch of betas.


Haha hahahaha haha! It's going to be a glorious four years watching you become more and more unhinged.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know if that's possible.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.


Still stings, doesn't it? You were told to believe Harris was going to win only to have her get blown away in a landslide victory for your President Trump.
I mean, sure, Trump only won 49.89% of the popular vote, and it looks like Republicans may actually lose a House seat or two, but I get it, the MAGA dumpster fire actually winning anything must feel like a major landslide.

You guys should definitely go hog wild with your HUGE mandate. If Social Security hasn't been DOGE'd out of existence by next year then you're a bunch of betas.


Haha hahahaha haha! It's going to be a glorious four years watching you become more and more unhinged.

I've already stocked up on four years worth of popcorn... wanted to get it before the tariffs kick in.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Bububut the committee!!!!'

LOL at y'all conflating "choosing not to press charges for sex trafficking" for "found to have done nothing wrong."

Seems obvious Republicans on the Hill that are vowing not to confirm wouldn't be up in arms if Gaetz had "done nothing wrong."
I don't know Civ,… didn't the legal system work. You're all about letting the system work. Well, part of that system is innocent until proven guilty. If the DOJ didn't find enough evidence to to charge him, well…

The DOJ and Ethics Committee don't have the same purviews.

The Ethics committee hasn't found evidence of sex trafficking either I'm strongly suspecting, but they apparently have heard evidence of other wrongdoing or ethical violations that fell outside the DOJ's scope.

Gaetz is nominated to be the top cop in the land. Its not asking too much to understand whether he is legally or ethically compromised.

And again, why do we have Congressional Republicans highly concerned about Gaetz if he's "done nothing wrong."
Civ, that's the world view difference we have…. At some point, I get tired of all the investigations against Republicans. My hunch is that there isn't anything there (could be wrong) and this is all to do with some type of vendetta.

Is Gaetz squeaky clean? Probably not! Are you, Civ, squeaky clean? Probably not!

At this point, anymore, I don't even care. I want the person that is going to deconstruct whatever part, of the Federal Government, they are appointed to do. I believe we have a rot in our system that is not good. So, put the person in there that will eradicate that rot.

Now, if you don't think we have a rot in our Federal Agencies, then you will probably see different than me. That said, we won, you lost!!

The Republicans that are speaking up about Gaetz have a vendetta? What would that vendetta be?

Look at Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Did they get investigated?

Think maybe that was because they seemed clean?

You finally nailed it though. You don't care and neither does most of Congress or more than half of voters. All accusations, no matter how credible, are a witchhunt, and Pubs are perpetual victims.

I'm looking forward to Trump's attempts at retribution over the next four years. They'll be a great reminder that investigations have to have actual evidence to proceed.
Civ, I have been very consistent, unlike you, that Republicans are part of the rot, in DC. Yes, they are speaking out because he might be a threat to their being. They all are butt-boys with Kevin McCarthy. Kevin was axed by Gaetz…. So, yes… they have a vendetta.

Civ, take your head out of your ass and accept the fact we have rot, in both parties, in DC!
Obviously the solution to the "rot" in DC is to hand it over entirely to self-dealing crooks and unqualified and/or morally compromised cronies. They'll fix it right up!

It's stinks that most of you guys aren't mentally capable of appreciating what an Orwellian masterpiece the MAGA movement really is. I just hope Trump renames the Justice Department the "Ministry of Justice" before he goes after the cops.


Still stings, doesn't it? You were told to believe Harris was going to win only to have her get blown away in a landslide victory for your President Trump.
I mean, sure, Trump only won 49.89% of the popular vote, and it looks like Republicans may actually lose a House seat or two, but I get it, the MAGA dumpster fire actually winning anything must feel like a major landslide.

You guys should definitely go hog wild with your HUGE mandate. If Social Security hasn't been DOGE'd out of existence by next year then you're a bunch of betas.


Haha hahahaha haha! It's going to be a glorious four years watching you become more and more unhinged.
Social security…there's huge problems in its future if Congress doesn't do something but it's not gonna be DOGEd.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will be good to have the adults back in charge. WWIII may be averted, Dems be damned.

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

It will be good to have the adults back in charge. WWIII may be averted, Dems be damned.





SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

It will be good to have the adults back in charge. WWIII may be averted, Dems be damned.


Yes, I can hardly wait for four more years of Trump on TV groveling beside his alpha wolf, Putin.

I'm sure Trump will negotiate another one of his signature deals where he gives Putin everything he ever wanted for nothing in return (aside from a bunch of election bomb threats and god knows what else).
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

packgrad said:

It will be good to have the adults back in charge. WWIII may be averted, Dems be damned.


Yes, I can hardly wait for four more years of Trump on TV groveling beside his alpha wolf, Putin.

I'm sure Trump will negotiate another one of his signature deals where he gives Putin everything he ever wanted for nothing in return (aside from a bunch of election bomb threats and god knows what else).



packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

packgrad said:

It will be good to have the adults back in charge. WWIII may be averted, Dems be damned.


Yes, I can hardly wait for four more years of Trump on TV groveling beside his alpha wolf, Putin.

I'm sure Trump will negotiate another one of his signature deals where he gives Putin everything he ever wanted for nothing in return (aside from a bunch of election bomb threats and god knows what else).






Lol!! That guy is a nutjob. Mentally ill.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ that's a fool right there.... a bona fide fool.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like The View realizes the smear campaign is up.


Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!




When are you joining up?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!

LOL exactly.

So Trump wins the election, bragging the whole while that he's basically already negotiated an end to the war with his buddy Putin, but then immediately Russian State TV cucks Trump and blasts Melania pr0n all over the Russian state airwaves, and then Putin launches the biggest missile strike of the war against Ukraine, and these are supposed to be evidence of Trump's having Putin on a leash?

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wanna know why Sieve, Gobbler and Nappy don't want Gaetz at the DOJ? They all three support the conduct of this guy.

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!

LOL exactly.

So Trump wins the election, bragging the whole while that he's basically already negotiated an end to the war with his buddy Putin, but then immediately Russian State TV cucks Trump and blasts Melania pr0n all over the Russian state airwaves, and then Putin launches the biggest missile strike of the war against Ukraine, and these are supposed to be evidence of Trump's having Putin on a leash?




So much TDS. Seek help, wacko.

Too bad you're not going to get a war though. We know how much Dems hate the military and police.

Fortunately the rest of the world knows a strong president is coming in now. Not these woke betas you support. Your kind would destroy the country and subsequently the world.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#SIeve, #Gobbler & #Nappy, Gaetz is going to bring down the criminals in DC that you all three are so fond of.

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!




When are you joining up?

Lol, you really think Russia would ever attack the United States in a billion years? Did I mention Russia has the GDP of Mexico? They literally were about to lose the war in Ukraine if not for Trump, who is about to throw them a lifeline.

Is this newfound bed-wetting about standing up to our adversaries just a partisan thing? Or maybe you guys have a homoerotic fixation with Putin? Or is it some sort of cognitive dissonance to help justify Trump's obviously bizarre long-time fealty? Maybe all three?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Biden agrees to give Ukraine anti-personnel mines

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2d1lj3nwqo.amp

- - -

Democrats trying desperately to start WW III before President Trump takes office.

OH NO! Biden might make Russia mad! Sure, they have the GDP of MEXICO and are currently getting their butts kicked by Ukraine, but Putin is just so strong and powerful! Somebody hold me!




When are you joining up?

Lol, you really think Russia would ever attack the United States in a billion years? Did I mention Russia has the GDP of Mexico? They literally were about to lose the war in Ukraine if not for Trump, who is about to throw them a lifeline.

Is this newfound bed-wetting about standing up to our adversaries just a partisan thing? Or maybe you guys have a homoerotic fixation with Putin? Or is it some sort of cognitive dissonance to help justify Trump's obviously bizarre long-time fealty? Maybe all three?


So you're not going to join up?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Folks, you really need to quit responding to the imbecile in here. If you can't quit responding, please quit quoting,..
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just getting rid of a few old files.........yeh, that's it.

First Page
Page 204 of 205
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.