TRUMP 2024

583,687 Views | 7004 Replies | Last: 18 min ago by Werewolf
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

packgrad said:

It's fascinating to watch Democrats threats to democracy.
Trying to over turn the "people's vote".

Is Biden unfit or not?

If he's unfit he needs to step down.

If he's fit to govern for the next four years, what have y'all been complaining about?

You can't have it both ways.


He's been unfit. This didn't happen overnight.

I've been saying for years on here that I don't think either of the candidates are fit and what our country needs. There are better options than two geriatrics that can't speak well, one of whom is a felon and sex assaulter that tried to overturn an election.

From the outside Biden' health seemed steady state for most of his term though. And with him having pieced together a great staff and an unusually successful term legislatively, his supporters were hopeful (naively) that a mid-late 80's Biden could continue working effectively until and through the end of the next prospective term.

What's different according to a ton of reports is that his acuity has seemingly taken a nosedive recently, to an extent that has shocked people that have spent time around him.


I'm not buying the nosedive. The only difference now, he isn't being protected and sheltered. The Dems want him out for whatever reason and they are throwing him under the bus. With the help of their friends in the media.


Agree. This is not a new and developing issue. Anyone paying attention for the last four or five years could see Biden's condition deteriorating.


Same with Trump, his seeming decline just isn't exacerbated by a speech impediment.

He speaks like an elementary schooler now. Go listen to him talk 20 or 30 years ago. It's shocking how bad he's gotten at forming cogent thoughts and talking.

Read this article, from 2017. It's gotten much worse since. Watch the embedded video from 1987. His talking straight up sucks now by comparison. He just distracts from it with his angry, pugilistic style.

Trump wasn't always so linguistically challenged. What could explain the change?

Quote:

In interviews Trump gave in the 1980s and 1990s (with Tom Brokaw, David Letterman, Oprah Winfrey, Charlie Rose, and others), he spoke articulately, used sophisticated vocabulary, inserted dependent clauses into his sentences without losing his train of thought, and strung together sentences into a polished paragraph, which and this is no mean feat would have scanned just fine in print. This was so even when reporters asked tough questions about, for instance, his divorce, his brush with bankruptcy, and why he doesn't build housing for working-class Americans.

Trump fluently peppered his answers with words and phrases such as "subsided," "inclination," "discredited," "sparring session," and "a certain innate intelligence." He tossed off well-turned sentences such as, "It could have been a contentious route," and, "These are the only casinos in the United States that are so rated." He even offered thoughtful, articulate aphorisms: "If you get into what's missing, you don't appreciate what you have," and, "Adversity is a very funny thing."

Now, Trump's vocabulary is simpler. He repeats himself over and over, and lurches from one subject to an unrelated one, as in this answer during an interview with the Associated Press last month:
"People want the border wall. My base definitely wants the border wall, my base really wants it you've been to many of the rallies. OK, the thing they want more than anything is the wall. My base, which is a big base; I think my base is 45 percent. You know, it's funny. The Democrats, they have a big advantage in the Electoral College. Big, big, big advantage. … The Electoral College is very difficult for a Republican to win, and I will tell you, the people want to see it. They want to see the wall."

For decades, studies have found that deterioration in the fluency, complexity, and vocabulary level of spontaneous speech can indicate slipping brain function due to normal aging or neurodegenerative disease. STAT and the experts therefore considered only unscripted utterances, not planned speeches and statements, since only the former tap the neural networks that offer a window into brain function.

That's not to even speak of his criminality and attempts to overthrow the election.

If you want to hold Biden accountable for his mental decline, hold Trump to the same standard.

At least with Biden, his team has four years of serious, competent governance and legislative successes. His campaign at least had that track record to point to in spite of him not being as fit as he was decades ago.

Trump's last term was characterized by the inability to get legislation passed, installing his family members as senior advisors, and leaving a historically high number of positions in his government unfilled.

What makes you think he'll govern differently the second time around?



Lol-respectfully, just stop.

Most of your post is CNN talking points and I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you.

Look, Trump is an abrasive NY yankee loud mouth, you ever met one that wasn't? But he's in much better shape to be President than Biden.

Sorry facts that penetrate your Trump bubble offend you.

According to y'all Biden is a vegetable so Trump could be "in better shape" than Biden and not be worth a damn.

Neither of these guys should be anywhere near the White House for the next four years.


Respectfully, you are not having a good day my friend.

According to who? A bunch of dudes lining up to vote for a sex-assaulting felon that talks like a second grader and tried to overturn an election?

LOLOL.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can we have a discussion without but? Lol
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

packgrad said:

It's fascinating to watch Democrats threats to democracy.
Trying to over turn the "people's vote".

Is Biden unfit or not?

If he's unfit he needs to step down.

If he's fit to govern for the next four years, what have y'all been complaining about?

You can't have it both ways.


He's been unfit. This didn't happen overnight.

I've been saying for years on here that I don't think either of the candidates are fit and what our country needs. There are better options than two geriatrics that can't speak well, one of whom is a felon and sex assaulter that tried to overturn an election.

From the outside Biden' health seemed steady state for most of his term though. And with him having pieced together a great staff and an unusually successful term legislatively, his supporters were hopeful (naively) that a mid-late 80's Biden could continue working effectively until and through the end of the next prospective term.

What's different according to a ton of reports is that his acuity has seemingly taken a nosedive recently, to an extent that has shocked people that have spent time around him.


I'm not buying the nosedive. The only difference now, he isn't being protected and sheltered. The Dems want him out for whatever reason and they are throwing him under the bus. With the help of their friends in the media.


Agree. This is not a new and developing issue. Anyone paying attention for the last four or five years could see Biden's condition deteriorating.


Same with Trump, his seeming decline just isn't exacerbated by a speech impediment.

He speaks like an elementary schooler now. Go listen to him talk 20 or 30 years ago. It's shocking how bad he's gotten at forming cogent thoughts and talking.

Read this article, from 2017. It's gotten much worse since. Watch the embedded video from 1987. His talking straight up sucks now by comparison. He just distracts from it with his angry, pugilistic style.

Trump wasn't always so linguistically challenged. What could explain the change?

Quote:

In interviews Trump gave in the 1980s and 1990s (with Tom Brokaw, David Letterman, Oprah Winfrey, Charlie Rose, and others), he spoke articulately, used sophisticated vocabulary, inserted dependent clauses into his sentences without losing his train of thought, and strung together sentences into a polished paragraph, which and this is no mean feat would have scanned just fine in print. This was so even when reporters asked tough questions about, for instance, his divorce, his brush with bankruptcy, and why he doesn't build housing for working-class Americans.

Trump fluently peppered his answers with words and phrases such as "subsided," "inclination," "discredited," "sparring session," and "a certain innate intelligence." He tossed off well-turned sentences such as, "It could have been a contentious route," and, "These are the only casinos in the United States that are so rated." He even offered thoughtful, articulate aphorisms: "If you get into what's missing, you don't appreciate what you have," and, "Adversity is a very funny thing."

Now, Trump's vocabulary is simpler. He repeats himself over and over, and lurches from one subject to an unrelated one, as in this answer during an interview with the Associated Press last month:
"People want the border wall. My base definitely wants the border wall, my base really wants it you've been to many of the rallies. OK, the thing they want more than anything is the wall. My base, which is a big base; I think my base is 45 percent. You know, it's funny. The Democrats, they have a big advantage in the Electoral College. Big, big, big advantage. … The Electoral College is very difficult for a Republican to win, and I will tell you, the people want to see it. They want to see the wall."

For decades, studies have found that deterioration in the fluency, complexity, and vocabulary level of spontaneous speech can indicate slipping brain function due to normal aging or neurodegenerative disease. STAT and the experts therefore considered only unscripted utterances, not planned speeches and statements, since only the former tap the neural networks that offer a window into brain function.

That's not to even speak of his criminality and attempts to overthrow the election.

If you want to hold Biden accountable for his mental decline, hold Trump to the same standard.

At least with Biden, his team has four years of serious, competent governance and legislative successes. His campaign at least had that track record to point to in spite of him not being as fit as he was decades ago.

Trump's last term was characterized by the inability to get legislation passed, installing his family members as senior advisors, and leaving a historically high number of positions in his government unfilled.

What makes you think he'll govern differently the second time around?



Lol-respectfully, just stop.

Most of your post is CNN talking points and I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you.

Look, Trump is an abrasive NY yankee loud mouth, you ever met one that wasn't? But he's in much better shape to be President than Biden.

Sorry facts that penetrate your Trump bubble offend you.

According to y'all Biden is a vegetable so Trump could be "in better shape" than Biden and not be worth a damn.

Neither of these guys should be anywhere near the White House for the next four years.
You will 100% vote for Biden again, so please dispense with this newest faux stance of yours...

Absolutely. Obviously.

Assuming Biden stays on the ticket there are only two choices and I'd vote for the old guy with the good staff that's not a criminal and doesn't try to overturn elections 10 times out of 10.

I'm not happy about it but none of us can reinvent the system or change the ticket. We can only vote for one of the two deficient candidates but we have to choose.

And I love how y'all can't stand me saying both that Biden isn't fit and shouldn't be president (which I've said for years, there's nothing new about it) and that I'd vote for him again because there's no other acceptable choice, but in the same breath you turn around and say you'll vote for a dude that also can't talk worth a damn compared to 20 years ago; is a sex-assaulting felon; and literally tried to overturn an election, as if that dude is fit to be president.

News flash for you: We're both voting for unfit candidates. I'll take the old one whose staff respects democracy; has not been accused of sex crimes; has not been charged with obstructing the return of classified docs; and has not tried to overturn an election.






False. You are voting for an unfit candidate because you are mentally ill. Bident doesn't meet with his "democracy respecting" staff and they do not make decisions together, which you are fine with because, again, you are mentally ill. Ironic you bring up democracy respect though. Trump did not try to overturn an election. You continuously repeat that narrative because, again, you are mentally ill. Trump is charged with obstructing the return of classified documents. You are fine with Democrats weaponizing the government to go after their political rivals because, again, you are mentally ill.

Trump is fit to be president. You just have a mental illness so you say he isn't. Seek help. You are embarrassing yourself.

You are a threat to democracy voting for unelected bureaucrats to run the country.

TDS is real.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

packgrad said:

It's fascinating to watch Democrats threats to democracy.
Trying to over turn the "people's vote".

Is Biden unfit or not?

If he's unfit he needs to step down.

If he's fit to govern for the next four years, what have y'all been complaining about?

You can't have it both ways.


He's been unfit. This didn't happen overnight.

I've been saying for years on here that I don't think either of the candidates are fit and what our country needs. There are better options than two geriatrics that can't speak well, one of whom is a felon and sex assaulter that tried to overturn an election.

From the outside Biden' health seemed steady state for most of his term though. And with him having pieced together a great staff and an unusually successful term legislatively, his supporters were hopeful (naively) that a mid-late 80's Biden could continue working effectively until and through the end of the next prospective term.

What's different according to a ton of reports is that his acuity has seemingly taken a nosedive recently, to an extent that has shocked people that have spent time around him.


I'm not buying the nosedive. The only difference now, he isn't being protected and sheltered. The Dems want him out for whatever reason and they are throwing him under the bus. With the help of their friends in the media.


Agree. This is not a new and developing issue. Anyone paying attention for the last four or five years could see Biden's condition deteriorating.


Same with Trump, his seeming decline just isn't exacerbated by a speech impediment.

He speaks like an elementary schooler now. Go listen to him talk 20 or 30 years ago. It's shocking how bad he's gotten at forming cogent thoughts and talking.

Read this article, from 2017. It's gotten much worse since. Watch the embedded video from 1987. His talking straight up sucks now by comparison. He just distracts from it with his angry, pugilistic style.

Trump wasn't always so linguistically challenged. What could explain the change?

Quote:

In interviews Trump gave in the 1980s and 1990s (with Tom Brokaw, David Letterman, Oprah Winfrey, Charlie Rose, and others), he spoke articulately, used sophisticated vocabulary, inserted dependent clauses into his sentences without losing his train of thought, and strung together sentences into a polished paragraph, which and this is no mean feat would have scanned just fine in print. This was so even when reporters asked tough questions about, for instance, his divorce, his brush with bankruptcy, and why he doesn't build housing for working-class Americans.

Trump fluently peppered his answers with words and phrases such as "subsided," "inclination," "discredited," "sparring session," and "a certain innate intelligence." He tossed off well-turned sentences such as, "It could have been a contentious route," and, "These are the only casinos in the United States that are so rated." He even offered thoughtful, articulate aphorisms: "If you get into what's missing, you don't appreciate what you have," and, "Adversity is a very funny thing."

Now, Trump's vocabulary is simpler. He repeats himself over and over, and lurches from one subject to an unrelated one, as in this answer during an interview with the Associated Press last month:
"People want the border wall. My base definitely wants the border wall, my base really wants it you've been to many of the rallies. OK, the thing they want more than anything is the wall. My base, which is a big base; I think my base is 45 percent. You know, it's funny. The Democrats, they have a big advantage in the Electoral College. Big, big, big advantage. … The Electoral College is very difficult for a Republican to win, and I will tell you, the people want to see it. They want to see the wall."

For decades, studies have found that deterioration in the fluency, complexity, and vocabulary level of spontaneous speech can indicate slipping brain function due to normal aging or neurodegenerative disease. STAT and the experts therefore considered only unscripted utterances, not planned speeches and statements, since only the former tap the neural networks that offer a window into brain function.

That's not to even speak of his criminality and attempts to overthrow the election.

If you want to hold Biden accountable for his mental decline, hold Trump to the same standard.

At least with Biden, his team has four years of serious, competent governance and legislative successes. His campaign at least had that track record to point to in spite of him not being as fit as he was decades ago.

Trump's last term was characterized by the inability to get legislation passed, installing his family members as senior advisors, and leaving a historically high number of positions in his government unfilled.

What makes you think he'll govern differently the second time around?



Lol-respectfully, just stop.

Most of your post is CNN talking points and I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you.

Look, Trump is an abrasive NY yankee loud mouth, you ever met one that wasn't? But he's in much better shape to be President than Biden.

Sorry facts that penetrate your Trump bubble offend you.

According to y'all Biden is a vegetable so Trump could be "in better shape" than Biden and not be worth a damn.

Neither of these guys should be anywhere near the White House for the next four years.


Respectfully, you are not having a good day my friend.

According to who? A bunch of dudes lining up to vote for a sex-assaulting felon that talks like a second grader and tried to overturn an election?

LOLOL.


Trump can't be all bad, your boy picked him as VP.
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

packgrad said:

It's fascinating to watch Democrats threats to democracy.
Trying to over turn the "people's vote".

Is Biden unfit or not?

If he's unfit he needs to step down.

If he's fit to govern for the next four years, what have y'all been complaining about?

You can't have it both ways.


He's been unfit. This didn't happen overnight.

I've been saying for years on here that I don't think either of the candidates are fit and what our country needs. There are better options than two geriatrics that can't speak well, one of whom is a felon and sex assaulter that tried to overturn an election.

From the outside Biden' health seemed steady state for most of his term though. And with him having pieced together a great staff and an unusually successful term legislatively, his supporters were hopeful (naively) that a mid-late 80's Biden could continue working effectively until and through the end of the next prospective term.

What's different according to a ton of reports is that his acuity has seemingly taken a nosedive recently, to an extent that has shocked people that have spent time around him.


I'm not buying the nosedive. The only difference now, he isn't being protected and sheltered. The Dems want him out for whatever reason and they are throwing him under the bus. With the help of their friends in the media.


Agree. This is not a new and developing issue. Anyone paying attention for the last four or five years could see Biden's condition deteriorating.


Same with Trump, his seeming decline just isn't exacerbated by a speech impediment.

He speaks like an elementary schooler now. Go listen to him talk 20 or 30 years ago. It's shocking how bad he's gotten at forming cogent thoughts and talking.

Read this article, from 2017. It's gotten much worse since. Watch the embedded video from 1987. His talking straight up sucks now by comparison. He just distracts from it with his angry, pugilistic style.

Trump wasn't always so linguistically challenged. What could explain the change?

Quote:

In interviews Trump gave in the 1980s and 1990s (with Tom Brokaw, David Letterman, Oprah Winfrey, Charlie Rose, and others), he spoke articulately, used sophisticated vocabulary, inserted dependent clauses into his sentences without losing his train of thought, and strung together sentences into a polished paragraph, which and this is no mean feat would have scanned just fine in print. This was so even when reporters asked tough questions about, for instance, his divorce, his brush with bankruptcy, and why he doesn't build housing for working-class Americans.

Trump fluently peppered his answers with words and phrases such as "subsided," "inclination," "discredited," "sparring session," and "a certain innate intelligence." He tossed off well-turned sentences such as, "It could have been a contentious route," and, "These are the only casinos in the United States that are so rated." He even offered thoughtful, articulate aphorisms: "If you get into what's missing, you don't appreciate what you have," and, "Adversity is a very funny thing."

Now, Trump's vocabulary is simpler. He repeats himself over and over, and lurches from one subject to an unrelated one, as in this answer during an interview with the Associated Press last month:
"People want the border wall. My base definitely wants the border wall, my base really wants it you've been to many of the rallies. OK, the thing they want more than anything is the wall. My base, which is a big base; I think my base is 45 percent. You know, it's funny. The Democrats, they have a big advantage in the Electoral College. Big, big, big advantage. … The Electoral College is very difficult for a Republican to win, and I will tell you, the people want to see it. They want to see the wall."

For decades, studies have found that deterioration in the fluency, complexity, and vocabulary level of spontaneous speech can indicate slipping brain function due to normal aging or neurodegenerative disease. STAT and the experts therefore considered only unscripted utterances, not planned speeches and statements, since only the former tap the neural networks that offer a window into brain function.

That's not to even speak of his criminality and attempts to overthrow the election.

If you want to hold Biden accountable for his mental decline, hold Trump to the same standard.

At least with Biden, his team has four years of serious, competent governance and legislative successes. His campaign at least had that track record to point to in spite of him not being as fit as he was decades ago.

Trump's last term was characterized by the inability to get legislation passed, installing his family members as senior advisors, and leaving a historically high number of positions in his government unfilled.

What makes you think he'll govern differently the second time around?



Lol-respectfully, just stop.

Most of your post is CNN talking points and I'm not going down the rabbit hole with you.

Look, Trump is an abrasive NY yankee loud mouth, you ever met one that wasn't? But he's in much better shape to be President than Biden.

Sorry facts that penetrate your Trump bubble offend you.

According to y'all Biden is a vegetable so Trump could be "in better shape" than Biden and not be worth a damn.

Neither of these guys should be anywhere near the White House for the next four years.


Respectfully, you are not having a good day my friend.

According to who? A bunch of dudes lining up to vote for a sex-assaulting felon that talks like a second grader and tried to overturn an election?

LOLOL.


I suppose you don't believe Ashley's diary entry about Joe taking showers with her.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Can we have a discussion without but? Lol

Y'all don't want a discussion.

You want a Biden-bashing session.

Your prerogative, but that's not a "discussion" when the "discussion" to be had is which candidate is more palatable/less objectionable/less harmful to our country.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Can we have a discussion without but? Lol

Y'all don't want a discussion.

You want a Biden-bashing session.

Your prerogative, but that's not a "discussion" when the "discussion" to be had is which candidate is more palatable/less objectionable/less harmful to our country.


Yeah. Your guy almost has us in WW3 but you're too much of a deranged lunatic to have a discussion about what is actually harmful to the country and what is you just being a deranged snowflake.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Can we have a discussion without but? Lol

Y'all don't want a discussion.

You want a Biden-bashing session.

Your prerogative, but that's not a "discussion" when the "discussion" to be had is which candidate is more palatable/less objectionable/less harmful to our country.
No I don't. What I am laughing at, are the people who are acting like this is new with Biden, cause it isn't. Biden has had a bad few weeks, it's okay to discuss it and have a few laughs when just the other week the White House press called this very same thing deep fakes. They have covered for this man since day one. So no, I don't see the problem with posters making it a thing. The trying but Trump makes this all worse for those folks. Sometimes it's best walk away.
WolfpackUSC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm writing in Hunter Biden
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Qincoming
wolfbreath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Progressives enraged as Democrats reportedly privately admit Trump isn't an 'existential threat to democracy'

https://www.yahoo.com/news/progressives-enraged-democrats-reportedly-privately-110059957.html

Liberals on social media seethed in reaction to Democratic lawmakers reportedly admitting behind the scenes that former President Trump isn't a "threat to democracy" as their party loudly claims.

New York Times columnist Ezra Klein appeared on The Bulwark Podcast Tuesday and revealed what "top Democrats" have told him off the record as they panic over whether they should support or abandon President Biden on their ticket.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#REVOLUTION@withoutfiringashot #NOCIVILWAR #EXPECTFALSEFLAGS


packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfbreath said:

Progressives enraged as Democrats reportedly privately admit Trump isn't an 'existential threat to democracy'

https://www.yahoo.com/news/progressives-enraged-democrats-reportedly-privately-110059957.html

Liberals on social media seethed in reaction to Democratic lawmakers reportedly admitting behind the scenes that former President Trump isn't a "threat to democracy" as their party loudly claims.

New York Times columnist Ezra Klein appeared on The Bulwark Podcast Tuesday and revealed what "top Democrats" have told him off the record as they panic over whether they should support or abandon President Biden on their ticket.


That article is hilarious. What a tumultuous ride for the sheep.

In 2 weeks civ is going to be saying "I never said Trump was a threat to democracy."

Lol.
PackProwl63
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Trump is liar -felon -Hitler-trying to destroy the democracy! August there is a documentary coming proving Nixon was innocent and was set up by the Democrats and deep state and DOJ- humm sounds like what they did to Trump by using Obama's /Bidens DOJ and racist DA's etc ! Hitler he is not but the Democrat Party and Liberal Media is the modern day HITLER it just not a single person it's a Movement taking us from a Republic to a Democracy so the Elite can rule ! America enjoy your modern Democratic SLAVE party for all !!
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, #Nappy & #Gobbler, you'll love this! #BEAUTIFUL


Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, listen to the sound of the drip-drip-drip......... #boomerang
wolfbreath
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our country is being destroyed right before our eyes. This is the guy that will stop it! They are trying every way they can to take him out. #JFK
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
(Continuation)

Nothing is more undemocratic than every attempt they have made to keep President Trump out of office.

It's time we got back to the values that this country holds.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:


I keep forgetting that Lou once coached Pack football.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hollywood legend Tom Selleck has praised Donald J. Trump as President of the United States. In a meeting with Breitbart News, the legendary American actor stated: "I'm completely sure that he is the best so far.

I'm saying I like this guy." "He's an answer to our problems. We need to get behind him. The Republicans need to unite behind this man. We need somebody to go in and reconstruct us in a sort of way, get us back to where we were, who we need to be."

Then he continued with something truly remarkable:
"Donald is funny, playful, and colorful, but most of all, he is honest. When he decided to run for president, I know he did it with a true conviction to bring this country back to prosperity. He is the only one who can do it. No frills, no fuss, only candid truths."

"I am very disappointed at the talk show hosts, also spewing out lies and propaganda against Donald. Why, I wonder? The only thing I can think of is he represents a form of freedom none of them ever saw before, and they are bewildered about it, and frightened about it.

I would say "*****you" to all of them. To all that are criticizing him for no reason and want him to resign for no reason. Just go to hell all of you!"

"I pray all Americans who have seen and felt the meltdown of America with the Obama years, to please fight for Donald Trump. He will not let us down. I pray for all good people to see clearly what faces us now. The right vote will save our nation."

Selleck additionally noticed that Trump's capacity to keep up an inspirational demeanor despite the fact that "he has individuals assaulting him from each side" was likewise a solid contention.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Courtesy of Juan O'Savin ;-)

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:


We have a REPUBLIC to save.........getting down to the brass tacks of it all.

The 2nd Revolution in spite of the Deep State/Global Cabal efforts towards a civil war or a world war.

"Shuffle all the cards and then redeal while drawing from the bottom of the deck for their hand". Been their playbook.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump Classified documents case dismissed.

Liberals weep….
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Trump Classified documents case dismissed.

Liberals weep….
Was just getting ready to post this.

https://truthsocial.com/@gracechong/posts/112790862541326386
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slowly, but surely, all these cases are falling apart…. This stuff will not (my opinion) have a good smell, in the future. I also think, many other issues, will be enlightened the more we get away from them…. In other words… the smell test is starting to stink!
Bockwinkle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you can't kill em, join em?
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOJ shenanigans with Jack Smith appointee bites them in the azz.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-dismisses-trumps-florida-classified-documents-case
WolfpackUSC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thought his list was down to 4, but just saw this.

Rubio is who I like the most, but I think he picks Vance (don't tell Were, but Vance is a millennial, Stefanik too).

But we'll know the pick soon.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WolfpackUSC said:

Thought his list was down to 4, but just saw this.

Rubio is who I like the most, but I think he picks Vance (don't tell Were, but Vance is a millennial, Stefanik too).

But we'll know the pick soon.

Youngkin would put VA in play. It would make me a Trump voter.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

WolfpackUSC said:

Thought his list was down to 4, but just saw this.

Rubio is who I like the most, but I think he picks Vance (don't tell Were, but Vance is a millennial, Stefanik too).

But we'll know the pick soon.

Youngkin would put VA in play. It would make me a Trump voter.

As someone that's long railed against Trump trying to overturn the election, his VP pick moves the needle enough for you to look past his efforts to overturn?
Bockwinkle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

WolfpackUSC said:

Thought his list was down to 4, but just saw this.

Rubio is who I like the most, but I think he picks Vance (don't tell Were, but Vance is a millennial, Stefanik too).

But we'll know the pick soon.

Youngkin would put VA in play. It would make me a Trump voter.

As someone that's long railed against Trump trying to overturn the election, his VP pick moves the needle enough for you to look past his efforts to overturn?


Yeah, ***?
First Page Last Page
Page 141 of 201
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.