That's "hate speech" per the communist democrats. Why do you think this is an insult? According to the DemonRat party that you support, it's a "wonderful blessed" thing to be an effeminate homosexual sissy boy. Are you disagreeing with the Demonicrats, and saying that homosexuality is something to be ashamed of?WolfpackUSC said:
My fault, a maxi pad.
GuerrillaPack said:But did you support a political party that effectively wanted to make it that so the unvaccinated were not able to have jobs and were ostracized from society? Rounding them up and putting them in camps was going too far, but banning them from being able to have jobs and forcing them to be quarantined inside their homes and not allowed to go anywhere in society was "not going too far"?WolfpackUSC said:
I never supported rounding up the unvaccinated. I had to get the shot to keep serving in the military at the time. I believe in 2 genders and I don't think men should be in women's locker rooms, but I do support the jury's decision.
See, it's not all black and white.
The communist Democrat are full steam ahead with this transgender agenda. Democrat politicians all over the country at every level of government are steamrolling ahead with this insanity - allowing trans men to compete against women in sports and share locker-rooms and bathrooms with young girls. So while you may not personally support it, the Democrat party that you continue to support will implement this agenda.
You might want to re-think supporting a political party that implements all these insane policies that you are actually opposed to.
GuerrillaPack said:That's "hate speech" per the communist democrats. Why do you think this is an insult? According to the DemonRat party that you support, it's a "wonderful blessed" thing to be an effeminate homosexual sissy boy. Are you disagreeing with the Demonicrats, and saying that homosexuality is something to be ashamed of?WolfpackUSC said:
My fault, a maxi pad.
The flat earth dude and the Sandy Hook is a hoax dude. Never sitting anything out.WolfpackUSC said:
Now this is ignorance. Assuming hatred from Trump means I'm a democrat. News flash I voted for Trump in 16 and 20, a registered Republican.
Aren't you the flat earth dude anyway? Maybe sit this one out.
GuerrillaPack said:The flat earth dude and the Sandy Hook is a hoax dude. Never sitting anything out.WolfpackUSC said:
Now this is ignorance. Assuming hatred from Trump means I'm a democrat. News flash I voted for Trump in 16 and 20, a registered Republican.
Aren't you the flat earth dude anyway? Maybe sit this one out.
I'm a strong defender of freedom of speech, especially hate speech.WolfpackUSC said:GuerrillaPack said:That's "hate speech" per the communist democrats. Why do you think this is an insult? According to the DemonRat party that you support, it's a "wonderful blessed" thing to be an effeminate homosexual sissy boy. Are you disagreeing with the Demonicrats, and saying that homosexuality is something to be ashamed of?WolfpackUSC said:
My fault, a maxi pad.
But it wasn't hate speech when the same gentlemen told me to wear my ***** hat yesterday?
If you can't take the heat, stay out the kitchen
Do you actually believe in hell? Hell is reserved for LIARS. Not for those who tell the truth, including about that psyop.WolfpackUSC said:GuerrillaPack said:WolfpackUSC said:
If you think Sandy Hook is a hoax, there's a special place in hell for you.
Don't forget the moon landing is a hoax dude and the Holocaust is a hoax dude. Never sell yourself short.GuerrillaPack said:The flat earth dude and the Sandy Hook is a hoax dude. Never sitting anything out.WolfpackUSC said:
Now this is ignorance. Assuming hatred from Trump means I'm a democrat. News flash I voted for Trump in 16 and 20, a registered Republican.
Aren't you the flat earth dude anyway? Maybe sit this one out.
GuerrillaPack said:
.
Oy vey. Not the fake "moon landings"!!grantwolf said:
Don't forget the moon landing is a hoax dude and the Holocaust is a hoax dude. Never sell yourself short.
Do you have time for the communist scum who support the mass murder of millions of unborn children??WolfpackUSC said:GuerrillaPack said:
.
I have no time for people who think the slaughter of little kids was a hoax. Good bye
So...the people that believe that we landed on the moon are communists?GuerrillaPack said:Oh boy. Not the fake "moon landings"!!grantwolf said:
Don't forget the moon landing is a hoax dude and the Holocaust is a hoax dude. Never sell yourself short.
Another sacred cow of the boot licking communists!!!
Of course more than just commie Leftists believe in the fake "moon landings"...unfortunately. But virtually all Leftists believe in it...like yourself, right? Leftists fall for all of the Establishment hoaxes and psyops, no matter how ridiculous they are -- eg, 70 genders transgender insanity, global warming aka climate change, etc.grantwolf said:So...the people that believe that we landed on the moon are communists?GuerrillaPack said:Oh boy. Not the fake "moon landings"!!grantwolf said:
Don't forget the moon landing is a hoax dude and the Holocaust is a hoax dude. Never sell yourself short.
Another sacred cow of the boot licking communists!!!
hokiewolf said:Lets get some things straight.SmaptyWolf said:Gulfstream4 said:
Should we go after Bill Clinton for paying Paula Jones $800,000 to keep quiet before he ran for President?
Did Clinton break any state laws when he paid her the $850,000 OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT after a 4 year very public court battle? The question sounds unbelievably stupid when you ask it out loud, but I get it, you guys are grasping for anything, so by all means go after him.
- The jury who found Trump guilty on all counts did it's job, and did it well. They did their civic duty and should not be harassed or blamed.
- This case was ill-conceived, unjustified mess that shouldn't have been brought forward in the first place
- The judge in this case did donate money - $35 to a pro Biden, anti-Trump operation that the judge earmarked the funds for "resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trumps radical right-wing legacy" Would you also had been fine with this judge staying on the case if he donated a couple bucks to "Re-elect Donald Trump MAGA forever!"? Absolutely not
- When has a District Attorney ever run for office with the specific political objective, who falsely claimed in his campaign that he had sued Trump over 100 times, and then brought forward a case that pushes the outer boundaries of the law and due process? Are you ok with that?
- The charges against Trump were obscure and unprecedented. No state, anywhere has ever used federal election laws as a direct state crime against anyone for anything. None. Ever. They are and should be misdemeanors under New York law. Which presents a couple of problems for the prosecution - 1. Nobody cares about misdemeanors, and 2. the statue of limitations was 2 years.
- Further, the argument that tied the committing a crime to cover up a crime that violated State election laws and elevated this to a Class E felony was allowed by the judge to only be revealed in closing arguments. So much for the obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of the trail.
- Finally, these charges appear to be crafted specifically and individually for the former president and nobody else. Is that justice? Is that what the judiciary is supposed to be used for?
"No man is above the law" only works if you don't distort the system to find something to trump up (pun intended) to charge a defendant. That's the type of stuff Putin says and has said, particularly when arresting, having a show trial (not claiming the outcome of Trumps trial was predetermined, the process was somewhat followed, but incredibly flawed), and convicting his political rivals to weaken them and most of the time eliminate them.
I urge you to look up Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and see that he was only arrested and charged after challenging the corrupt system in Russia and specifically Putin who was enriching himself over all else.
As someone who went to law school, did well enough, and teaches the subject at a state U from time to time: the "34 felony counts" line from the Trump case just is a complete joke.
— Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630) May 31, 2024
Essentially all of them spring from what would normally be charged as a single misdemeanor at a…
hokiewolf said:Lets get some things straight.SmaptyWolf said:Gulfstream4 said:
Should we go after Bill Clinton for paying Paula Jones $800,000 to keep quiet before he ran for President?
Did Clinton break any state laws when he paid her the $850,000 OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT after a 4 year very public court battle? The question sounds unbelievably stupid when you ask it out loud, but I get it, you guys are grasping for anything, so by all means go after him.
- The jury who found Trump guilty on all counts did it's job, and did it well. They did their civic duty and should not be harassed or blamed.
- This case was ill-conceived, unjustified mess that shouldn't have been brought forward in the first place
- The judge in this case did donate money - $35 to a pro Biden, anti-Trump operation that the judge earmarked the funds for "resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trumps radical right-wing legacy" Would you also had been fine with this judge staying on the case if he donated a couple bucks to "Re-elect Donald Trump MAGA forever!"? Absolutely not
- When has a District Attorney ever run for office with the specific political objective, who falsely claimed in his campaign that he had sued Trump over 100 times, and then brought forward a case that pushes the outer boundaries of the law and due process? Are you ok with that?
- The charges against Trump were obscure and unprecedented. No state, anywhere has ever used federal election laws as a direct state crime against anyone for anything. None. Ever. They are and should be misdemeanors under New York law. Which presents a couple of problems for the prosecution - 1. Nobody cares about misdemeanors, and 2. the statue of limitations was 2 years.
- Further, the argument that tied the committing a crime to cover up a crime that violated State election laws and elevated this to a Class E felony was allowed by the judge to only be revealed in closing arguments. So much for the obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of the trail.
- Finally, these charges appear to be crafted specifically and individually for the former president and nobody else. Is that justice? Is that what the judiciary is supposed to be used for?
"No man is above the law" only works if you don't distort the system to find something to trump up (pun intended) to charge a defendant. That's the type of stuff Putin says and has said, particularly when arresting, having a show trial (not claiming the outcome of Trumps trial was predetermined, the process was somewhat followed, but incredibly flawed), and convicting his political rivals to weaken them and most of the time eliminate them.
I urge you to look up Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and see that he was only arrested and charged after challenging the corrupt system in Russia and specifically Putin who was enriching himself over all else.
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?GuerrillaPack said:Do you have time for the communist scum who support the mass murder of millions of unborn children??WolfpackUSC said:GuerrillaPack said:
.
I have no time for people who think the slaughter of little kids was a hoax. Good bye
I'm giving you good news. No children died. It was a government psyop.
Commie libtards have never cared about the Constitution. They want to DESTROY the Constitution, and now openly admit that they hate the Constitution and want to destroy it. They attempt to justify that by referring to the Constitution as "an outdated document" that was "written by racist old white men" that "no longer applies to today's society".SmaptyWolf said:
So now suddenly you have a crook for a candidate who is finally getting raked over the coals and NOW you care about the Constitution and precedent and all that? Honestly guys, cry me a river.
FTFYGuerrillaPack said:
I bet that the vast majority of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are conservatives.
Support him. A real conservative, and not a pro-Establishment RINO cuck like Tillis or Burr. Love his courage to take bold stances against the Sodomite LGBTQ agenda and on other "verboten" issues that the RINOs won't touch.ncsupack1 said:
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?
""A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," - DJTGuerrillaPack said:Commie libtards have never cared about the Constitution. They want to DESTROY the Constitution, and now openly admit that they hate the Constitution and want to destroy it.SmaptyWolf said:
So now suddenly you have a crook for a candidate who is finally getting raked over the coals and NOW you care about the Constitution and precedent and all that? Honestly guys, cry me a river.
So him paying for a abortion is okay with you? BTW, he never to my knowledge mentioned it until he was asked.GuerrillaPack said:Support him. A real conservative, and not a pro-Establishment RINO cuck like Tillis or Burr. Love his courage to take bold stances against the Sodomite LGBTQ agenda and on other "verboten" issues that the RINOs won't touch.ncsupack1 said:
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?
Not theories. FACTUAL conspiracies.grantwolf said:FTFYGuerrillaPack said:
I bet that the vast majority of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are conservatives.
Of course I oppose abortion. Has Mark Robinson apologized for that? Doesn't he himself condemn what he did? If so, will you forgive him? He's not out here still supporting abortion. That's the communist Democrats. They are the ones foaming at the mouth to defend being able to murder millions of unborn children.ncsupack1 said:So him paying for the murder of a baby is okay with you? BTW, he never to my knowledge mentioned it until he was asked. FYI, I to plan on voting for him. So incoming name calling isn't needed here.GuerrillaPack said:Support him. A real conservative, and not a pro-Establishment RINO cuck like Tillis or Burr. Love his courage to take bold stances against the Sodomite LGBTQ agenda and on other "verboten" issues that the RINOs won't touch.ncsupack1 said:
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?
GuerrillaPack said:Not theories. FACTUAL conspiracies.grantwolf said:FTFYGuerrillaPack said:
I bet that the vast majority of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are conservatives.
I know this comes as a shocker...but the Marxist/communist Establishment actually is perpetrating all sorts of elaborate deceptions, frauds, scams, and crimes. Thousands of them...ongoing...on a daily basis.
Dictionary definition of "conspiracy" is "two or more people working together to perpetrate an immoral or illegal act". You know, like all these Leftists colluding to politically persecute Donald Trump and his supporters with lawfare and kangaroo courts.
Are the Marxists in the room with us right now?GuerrillaPack said:Not theories. FACTUAL conspiracies.grantwolf said:FTFYGuerrillaPack said:
I bet that the vast majority of CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are conservatives.
I know this comes as a shocker...but the Marxist/communist Establishment actually is perpetrating all sorts of elaborate deceptions, frauds, scams, and crimes. Thousands of them...ongoing...on a daily basis.
Dictionary definition of "conspiracy" is "two or more people working together to perpetrate an immoral or illegal act". You know, like all these Leftists colluding to politically persecute Donald Trump and his supporters with lawfare and kangaroo courts.
Why didn't he bring it up before he was called out? He sure has heck called out others for it. If he felt so bad, why didn't he share his shame with others who may have at times thought about getting one? Seems like that would be the right thing.GuerrillaPack said:Of course I oppose abortion. Has Mark Robinson apologized for that? Doesn't he himself condemn what he did? If so, will you forgive him? He's not out here still supporting abortion. That's the communist Democrats. They are the ones foaming at the mouth to defend being able to murder millions of unborn children.ncsupack1 said:So him paying for the murder of a baby is okay with you? BTW, he never to my knowledge mentioned it until he was asked. FYI, I to plan on voting for him. So incoming name calling isn't needed here.GuerrillaPack said:Support him. A real conservative, and not a pro-Establishment RINO cuck like Tillis or Burr. Love his courage to take bold stances against the Sodomite LGBTQ agenda and on other "verboten" issues that the RINOs won't touch.ncsupack1 said:
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?
Re-read that genius, and read it in context of DJT's larger comments. Isn't DJT alleging that it is the DEMOCRATS who are "allowing" the termination of all rules, including the Constitution?grantwolf said:
""A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," - DJT
What is your deal here man? You are voting for the man, but you want to argue with me all day about this? Don't you have anything better to do?ncsupack1 said:Why didn't he bring it up before he was called out? He sure has heck called out others for it. If he felt so bad, why didn't he share his shame with others who may have at times thought about getting one? Seems like that would be the right thing.GuerrillaPack said:Of course I oppose abortion. Has Mark Robinson apologized for that? Doesn't he himself condemn what he did? If so, will you forgive him? He's not out here still supporting abortion. That's the communist Democrats. They are the ones foaming at the mouth to defend being able to murder millions of unborn children.ncsupack1 said:So him paying for the murder of a baby is okay with you? BTW, he never to my knowledge mentioned it until he was asked. FYI, I to plan on voting for him. So incoming name calling isn't needed here.GuerrillaPack said:Support him. A real conservative, and not a pro-Establishment RINO cuck like Tillis or Burr. Love his courage to take bold stances against the Sodomite LGBTQ agenda and on other "verboten" issues that the RINOs won't touch.ncsupack1 said:
Question for you, if you live in NC what's your thoughts on Mark Robinson?
The Democrat party has been ideologically rooted in Marxism going back at least to the days of FDR. You know, with all those Big government openly socialist welfare state programs.grantwolf said:
Are the Marxists in the room with us right now?
Wow, and the communist Democrats never questioned election results or filed lawsuits to try to reverse election results.grantwolf said:
I love how Trump and his team filed 60 court cases to try to change the results of the presidential election, but it's the DEMONCRATS that are weaponizing the judicial system for their benefit. Trump is a criminal that's finally seeing repercussions for his actions. No more, no less.
Nope. That quote is not at all taken out of context. But lol at the attempt.GuerrillaPack said:Re-read that genius, and read it in context of DJT's larger comments. Isn't DJT alleging that it is the DEMOCRATS who are "allowing" the termination of all rules, including the Constitution?grantwolf said:
""A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," - DJT
