ncsupack1 said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

Who has said that people who dislike Trump won't vote for him? I think that is the case with many voters.

---

The name calling or questioning one's patriotism for simply asking questions are common place here.

---

packofwolves said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

Who has said that people who dislike Trump won't vote for him? I think that is the case with many voters.

---

The name calling or questioning one's patriotism for simply asking questions are common place here.

---

That's not from disliking Trump. That's from having no issue with constitutional rights being violated, which conservatives generally feel strongly about.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

^This. Been called a liberal/ Biden supporter quite a few times due to my disdain for Trump.

---

It happens.

---

ncsupack1, one can certainly dislike Trump. I even understand why some people dislike the guy. That said, this is so much bigger than Trump. This is about our Republic!

I'm not an absolutist on Trump policies, at all. That said, I like how tenacious he is. Dems are very tenacious; while, we sit around and try to be meek and mild and watch the country go to shambles.

I'm an unabashed supporter of Trump, even with all his warts.

---

And that is fine. I'm more so talking about the trashing of people who simply ask questions.

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

^This. Been called a liberal/ Biden supporter quite a few times due to my disdain for Trump.

---

It happens.

---

ncsupack1, one can certainly dislike Trump. I even understand why some people dislike the guy. That said, this is so much bigger than Trump. This is about our Republic!

I'm not an absolutist on Trump policies, at all. That said, I like how tenacious he is. Dems are very tenacious; while, we sit around and try to be meek and mild and watch the country go to shambles.

I'm an unabashed supporter of Trump, even with all his warts.

---

And that is fine. I'm more so talking about the trashing of people who simply ask questions.

---

You shouldn't take some of this stuff so seriously... and I don't mean that in any kind of negative manner whatsoever.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

^This. Been called a liberal/ Biden supporter quite a few times due to my disdain for Trump.

---

It happens.

---

ncsupack1, one can certainly dislike Trump. I even understand why some people dislike the guy. That said, this is so much bigger than Trump. This is about our Republic!

I'm not an absolutist on Trump policies, at all. That said, I like how tenacious he is. Dems are very tenacious; while, we sit around and try to be meek and mild and watch the country go to shambles.

I'm an unabashed supporter of Trump, even with all his warts.

---

And that is fine. I'm more so talking about the trashing of people who simply ask questions.

---

You shouldn't take some of this stuff so seriously... and I don't mean that in any kind of negative manner whatsoever.

---

That goes for a lot of people here.

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

^This. Been called a liberal/ Biden supporter quite a few times due to my disdain for Trump.

---

It happens.

---

ncsupack1, one can certainly dislike Trump. I even understand why some people dislike the guy. That said, this is so much bigger than Trump. This is about our Republic!

I'm not an absolutist on Trump policies, at all. That said, I like how tenacious he is. Dems are very tenacious; while, we sit around and try to be meek and mild and watch the country go to shambles.

I'm an unabashed supporter of Trump, even with all his warts.

---

And that is fine. I'm more so talking about the trashing of people who simply ask questions.

---

You shouldn't take some of this stuff so seriously... and I don't mean that in any kind of negative manner whatsoever.

---

That goes for a lot of people here.

---

Some is worth responding to. Some is not. I try to let most of it just roll off my back, when I can do so.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I've said it before and I'll say it again…. As bad as I see the Dems, the Pubs are worse. Dems play to win, Pubs are WEAK!!

---

"THE DEMS" didn't make the decision to have a habitual criminal and disgusting human being lead their party. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on multiple opportunities to distance themselves from him. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on impeachment, citing that the judicial process should deal with Trump, rather than themselves (and then cry "political witch-hunt" when he was indicted on his multiple crimes).

Start taking some responsibility for your party's own decisions.

I get that it's too late now for anyone to admit this to themselves or their constituents, so the only option is to claim that everyone's out to get Trump.

It is indeed a sad time for America, but not for any of the reasons that you guys think.

---

The issue that I have with this whole situation, the gates are now open for anyone to be gone after. This isn't going to just stop with Trump. When it happens again we can thank the Democrats for it. I hope you will be either okay with it or stay on the sidelines. This whole thing was bad.

---

Is Joe Biden going to be impeached soon?

If not, why not? Because Republicans think he committed impeachable acts and are just looking the other way? Or because the couldn't find enough evidence?

You can try to chase charges all you want. You still have to find actual evidence sufficient to convince a grand jury to indict. And if you do find that evidence, the person needs to be charged whether they're Joe Schmo or a past President.

Which is America more harmed by?

a.) Setting a precedent that a sitting American president can commit multiple unrelated felonies, including those crimes committed in conjunction with trying to overturn an election that he lost, without fear of legal consequences or...

b.) Setting a precedent that politicians who have committed indictable offenses may well be pursued legally for those potential crimes, even in the presence of some political motivation to do so?

Y'all are nuts for thinking that Presidents should for some reason be above the law.

Y'all are also obsessed with the idea that Trump shouldn't be charged, because he was a past President, while failing to recognize that position is every bit as political as the position that he should be pursued for charges. At the end of the day, the politics wash. It has to be evidence-driven.

So good luck with your witch hunt. Go find the evidence. And when you do, charge Biden or Hunter or whomever.

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I've said it before and I'll say it again…. As bad as I see the Dems, the Pubs are worse. Dems play to win, Pubs are WEAK!!

---

"THE DEMS" didn't make the decision to have a habitual criminal and disgusting human being lead their party. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on multiple opportunities to distance themselves from him. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on impeachment, citing that the judicial process should deal with Trump, rather than themselves (and then cry "political witch-hunt" when he was indicted on his multiple crimes).

Start taking some responsibility for your party's own decisions.

I get that it's too late now for anyone to admit this to themselves or their constituents, so the only option is to claim that everyone's out to get Trump.

It is indeed a sad time for America, but not for any of the reasons that you guys think.

---

The issue that I have with this whole situation, the gates are now open for anyone to be gone after. This isn't going to just stop with Trump. When it happens again we can thank the Democrats for it. I hope you will be either okay with it or stay on the sidelines. This whole thing was bad.

---

Is Joe Biden going to be impeached soon?

If not, why not? Because Republicans think he committed impeachable acts and are just looking the other way? Or because the couldn't find enough evidence?

You can try to chase charges all you want. You still have to find actual evidence sufficient to convince a grand jury to indict. And if you do find that evidence, the person needs to be charged whether they're Joe Schmo or a past President.

Which is America more harmed by?

a.) Setting a precedent that a sitting American president can commit multiple unrelated felonies, including those crimes committed in conjunction with trying to overturn an election that he lost, without fear of legal consequences or...

b.) Setting a precedent that politicians who have committed indictable offenses may well be pursued legally for those potential crimes, even in the presence of some political motivation to do so?

Y'all are nuts for thinking that Presidents should for some reason be above the law.

Y'all are also obsessed with the idea that Trump shouldn't be charged, because he was a past President, while failing to recognize that position is every bit as political as the position that he should be pursued for charges. At the end of the day, the politics wash. It has to be evidence-driven.

So good luck with your witch hunt. Go find the evidence. And when you do, charge Biden or Hunter or whomever.

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I've said it before and I'll say it again…. As bad as I see the Dems, the Pubs are worse. Dems play to win, Pubs are WEAK!!

---

"THE DEMS" didn't make the decision to have a habitual criminal and disgusting human being lead their party. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on multiple opportunities to distance themselves from him. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on impeachment, citing that the judicial process should deal with Trump, rather than themselves (and then cry "political witch-hunt" when he was indicted on his multiple crimes).

Start taking some responsibility for your party's own decisions.

I get that it's too late now for anyone to admit this to themselves or their constituents, so the only option is to claim that everyone's out to get Trump.

It is indeed a sad time for America, but not for any of the reasons that you guys think.

---

The issue that I have with this whole situation, the gates are now open for anyone to be gone after. This isn't going to just stop with Trump. When it happens again we can thank the Democrats for it. I hope you will be either okay with it or stay on the sidelines. This whole thing was bad.

---

Is Joe Biden going to be impeached soon?

If not, why not? Because Republicans think he committed impeachable acts and are just looking the other way? Or because the couldn't find enough evidence?

You can try to chase charges all you want. You still have to find actual evidence sufficient to convince a grand jury to indict. And if you do find that evidence, the person needs to be charged whether they're Joe Schmo or a past President.

Which is America more harmed by?

a.) Setting a precedent that a sitting American president can commit multiple unrelated felonies, including those crimes committed in conjunction with trying to overturn an election that he lost, without fear of legal consequences or...

b.) Setting a precedent that politicians who have committed indictable offenses may well be pursued legally for those potential crimes, even in the presence of some political motivation to do so?

Y'all are nuts for thinking that Presidents should for some reason be above the law.

Y'all are also obsessed with the idea that Trump shouldn't be charged, because he was a past President, while failing to recognize that position is every bit as political as the position that he should be pursued for charges. At the end of the day, the politics wash. It has to be evidence-driven.

So good luck with your witch hunt. Go find the evidence. And when you do, charge Biden or Hunter or whomever.

---

Should we go after Bill Clinton for paying Paula Jones $800,000 to keep quiet before he ran for President?

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I've said it before and I'll say it again…. As bad as I see the Dems, the Pubs are worse. Dems play to win, Pubs are WEAK!!

---

"THE DEMS" didn't make the decision to have a habitual criminal and disgusting human being lead their party. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on multiple opportunities to distance themselves from him. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on impeachment, citing that the judicial process should deal with Trump, rather than themselves (and then cry "political witch-hunt" when he was indicted on his multiple crimes).

Start taking some responsibility for your party's own decisions.

I get that it's too late now for anyone to admit this to themselves or their constituents, so the only option is to claim that everyone's out to get Trump.

It is indeed a sad time for America, but not for any of the reasons that you guys think.

---

The issue that I have with this whole situation, the gates are now open for anyone to be gone after. This isn't going to just stop with Trump. When it happens again we can thank the Democrats for it. I hope you will be either okay with it or stay on the sidelines. This whole thing was bad.

---

Is Joe Biden going to be impeached soon?

If not, why not? Because Republicans think he committed impeachable acts and are just looking the other way? Or because the couldn't find enough evidence?

You can try to chase charges all you want. You still have to find actual evidence sufficient to convince a grand jury to indict. And if you do find that evidence, the person needs to be charged whether they're Joe Schmo or a past President.

Which is America more harmed by?

a.) Setting a precedent that a sitting American president can commit multiple unrelated felonies, including those crimes committed in conjunction with trying to overturn an election that he lost, without fear of legal consequences or...

b.) Setting a precedent that politicians who have committed indictable offenses may well be pursued legally for those potential crimes, even in the presence of some political motivation to do so?

Y'all are nuts for thinking that Presidents should for some reason be above the law.

Y'all are also obsessed with the idea that Trump shouldn't be charged, because he was a past President, while failing to recognize that position is every bit as political as the position that he should be pursued for charges. At the end of the day, the politics wash. It has to be evidence-driven.

So good luck with your witch hunt. Go find the evidence. And when you do, charge Biden or Hunter or whomever.

---

Should we go after Bill Clinton for paying Paula Jones $800,000 to keep quiet before he ran for President?

---

You are going to get a " that was different " or no response.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I've said it before and I'll say it again…. As bad as I see the Dems, the Pubs are worse. Dems play to win, Pubs are WEAK!!

---

"THE DEMS" didn't make the decision to have a habitual criminal and disgusting human being lead their party. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on multiple opportunities to distance themselves from him. "THE DEMS" didn't pass on impeachment, citing that the judicial process should deal with Trump, rather than themselves (and then cry "political witch-hunt" when he was indicted on his multiple crimes).

Start taking some responsibility for your party's own decisions.

I get that it's too late now for anyone to admit this to themselves or their constituents, so the only option is to claim that everyone's out to get Trump.

It is indeed a sad time for America, but not for any of the reasons that you guys think.

---

The issue that I have with this whole situation, the gates are now open for anyone to be gone after. This isn't going to just stop with Trump. When it happens again we can thank the Democrats for it. I hope you will be either okay with it or stay on the sidelines. This whole thing was bad.

---

Is Joe Biden going to be impeached soon?

If not, why not? Because Republicans think he committed impeachable acts and are just looking the other way? Or because the couldn't find enough evidence?

You can try to chase charges all you want. You still have to find actual evidence sufficient to convince a grand jury to indict. And if you do find that evidence, the person needs to be charged whether they're Joe Schmo or a past President.

Which is America more harmed by?

a.) Setting a precedent that a sitting American president can commit multiple unrelated felonies, including those crimes committed in conjunction with trying to overturn an election that he lost, without fear of legal consequences or...

b.) Setting a precedent that politicians who have committed indictable offenses may well be pursued legally for those potential crimes, even in the presence of some political motivation to do so?

Y'all are nuts for thinking that Presidents should for some reason be above the law.

Y'all are also obsessed with the idea that Trump shouldn't be charged, because he was a past President, while failing to recognize that position is every bit as political as the position that he should be pursued for charges. At the end of the day, the politics wash. It has to be evidence-driven.

So good luck with your witch hunt. Go find the evidence. And when you do, charge Biden or Hunter or whomever.

---

I never said Biden, I'm talking about future presidents. If given enough power and a favorable DA, Republicans will try to get what they see has their pound of flesh. You say y'all, find a post that I posted that Trump shouldn't be charged.

---

His point is that this supposed "slippery slope" isn't really that slippery at all. Maybe Trump is just a crook, and when Mitch McConnell said he wouldn't support impeachment because he believed the Justice Department would handle it after he left office, this is in fact what he wanted to happen.

If Dems have such an amazing Justice Department conspiracy going that they can corrupt entire grand juries and courtroom juries to do their bidding, why haven't they gone after a bunch of other Republican politicians? Seems like a wasted opportunity to lock up Congress for Dems, don't you think?

---

Democrats solved Trump’s biggest political problems.

They proved the legal system can completely control him. No dictator risk.

They proved there is no secret MAGA army waiting to be activated. (You would have heard from them by now.)

And best of all, they generated massive…

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) May 31, 2024

Wolfpack8602 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack8602 said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

Some of you do realize that one can dislike Trump and still vote for him right? Just because someone may not like the man doesn't make them lib, and people wonder why the other side calls it cult like.

---

^This. Been called a liberal/ Biden supporter quite a few times due to my disdain for Trump.

---

It happens.

---

ncsupack1, one can certainly dislike Trump. I even understand why some people dislike the guy. That said, this is so much bigger than Trump. This is about our Republic!

I'm not an absolutist on Trump policies, at all. That said, I like how tenacious he is. Dems are very tenacious; while, we sit around and try to be meek and mild and watch the country go to shambles.

I'm an unabashed supporter of Trump, even with all his warts.

---

And that is fine. I'm more so talking about the trashing of people who simply ask questions.

---

It's because you're challenging them to think for themselves and they can't handle that. They are spoon fed information and just repeat it. When you question it they can't back it up so they attack you to quiet you down.

---

You support Putin like tactics. Congratulations on "thinking for yourself".

---

Putin like tactics? Like a DA running a campaign based solely on investigating a political opponent? *********you lack any self awareness

---

packgrad said:

---

This will be great for the Republican Party. Democrats have exposed themselves for how corrupt they are, and their ignorant minions defending this judgement, will further galvanize those against them.

Only those that wanted to round up the unvaccinated, those that believe in dozens of genders, those that think it's ok for mentally ill men to be in women's locker rooms support this decision. It's very telling.

---

"Donald Trump refers to himself as a political prisoner and blames you directly. What's your response to that, sir?"

BIDEN (CONFUSED):

*stops*

*smirks*

*shuffles away* pic.twitter.com/0GKm327Qy1

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 31, 2024

WolfpackUSC said:

---

I never supported rounding up the unvaccinated. I had to get the shot to keep serving in the military at the time. I believe in 2 genders and I don't think men should be in women's locker rooms, but I do support the jury's decision.

See, it's not all black and white.

---