SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Given that any charges against him have the appearance of bad faith political prosecutions, yes, any gag order should be reviewed by the Supremes due to the vital importance of not establishing a precedent against future candidates for President.

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Riiiiight...

History will look kindly on the ex-president that committed corporate tax fraud, defrauded lenders, carelessly stored/discussed and then ignored requests to return classified documents, and tried to overturn a free and fair American election that he lost, who also happened to have been accused of sex assault by nearly 30 women, but not those that called him to task after.

Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds when you say it out loud?

You make it seem like the man may get thrown in prison without due process for eating a ham sandwich. Multiple grand juries found that there was probable cause to bring nearly 100 felony charges against him.

If the current president's primary rival doesn't want to risk getting imprisoned he shouldn't do the **** that gets him accused, indicted, and tried.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Given that any charges against him have the appearance of bad faith political prosecutions, yes, any gag order should be reviewed by the Supremes due to the vital importance of not establishing a precedent against future candidates for President.

---

What was Trump doing at Mar-a-lago using highly sensitive nuclear secrets as drink coasters? And then actively trying to obstruct giving them back. Have you guys ever bothered to try to explain that? In the conservative post-law-and-order world I guess that's not insanely illegal now?

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Given that any charges against him have the appearance of bad faith political prosecutions, yes, any gag order should be reviewed by the Supremes due to the vital importance of not establishing a precedent against future candidates for President.

---

What was Trump doing at Mar-a-lago using highly sensitive nuclear secrets as drink coasters? And then actively trying to obstruct giving them back. Have you guys ever bothered to try to explain that? In the conservative post-law-and-order world I guess that's not insanely illegal now?

---

You should bother to explain whether you're just making up stuff on your own, or simply appropriating the partisan fantasies of others without due attribution, also known as plagiarism.

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

DrummerboyWolf said:

---

The judge in the DC Documents case has put a limited gag order on Trump. I know he is really worried about it and it might keep him from saying something for a few minutes. Election interference anybody? A foreign born Judge is trying to silence a "former" President of the United States. Anything to shred the Constitution.

I think he will violate the order and tell them to come arrest him. Not so sure how the Secret Service is ever going to let that happen. Should be great theater.

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-dc-judge-issues-gag-order-against-trump-in-j6-case?utm_campaign=64483

---

The order only restricts Trump's ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

This is SOP for a criminal trial.

I can't imagine a compelling argument against such a restriction but you're welcome to try (as I'm sure Trump will, claiming First Amendment violations and general victimhood the whole while.).

---

SOP, but all liberal outlets run articles about the gag order as if its unique to Trump.

I can't imagine a compelling argument for all of these outlets to run articles about a process that is "SOP".... but we know... TRUMP!!!!... got to feed the sheep.

---

Really? You can't imagine a compelling argument for the newsworthiness of our ex- and maybe future president being a combative defendant facing 91 felony charges in four separate criminal cases?

If that's not newsworthy, then nothing is.

Trump is not a victim of anything other than his own undemocratic and likely illegal behavior.

---

I mean, you said its SOP and then said its newsworthy. Which is it? Hell, even the liberal NYT called the order "complex" considering the former president's position.

So, I guess the facts of the matter are that it is not SOP. It is newsworthy. Trump is appealing it as is his right, and there are plenty of compelling arguments for him to do so if you are not deranged. This judge is not presiding over 91 felony charges and 4 separate cases so this little TDS addition to the post is irrelevant.

Lets just say we wont take you at your word for "likely illegal behavior". We've heard all of your false cries the last few years as it pertains to Trump and Republicans/Republican nominees.... Russia!!!, Rape!!!!, They deserve to die if they don't get vaccinated!!!. Science!!!

---

Preventing a defendant from threatening witnesses is SOP. An ex-"President" who openly threatens witnesses like some sort of deranged thug, to the point that a gag order is finally required after 75 warnings, is definitely newsworthy.

---

Exactly. This isn't hard.

SOP procedure to ensure that the process of justice is carried out without attempts to intimidate witnesses, court officials, or investigators.

Unheard of and completely newsworthy for an ex-President to be charged with 91 felonies, much less be charged with them and then try to intimidate witnesses, court officials, and investigators carrying out his prosecution.

The gag order is quite narrow which sounds like it optimizes the chances of it surviving appeal. Trump can still talk **** about Biden, the Justice Department, or even discuss how he thinks he's being unfairly prosecuted.

What he can't do is directly criticize specific investigators or members of the court or use language that could promote violence towards actors investigating and prosecuting him.

---

Yeah. It's unheard of because never before has a party tried to make the country a banana republic. Trying to imprison the president's primary rival. This isn't hard to see what's happening. Congrats on supporting it, comrade.

What an embarrassment the Democratic Party has become. They are everything they claimed Trump and the right would become. What a disaster of leadership.

But they have their loyal foot soldiers supporting them. History will look unkindly on you all.

---

Riiiiight...

History will look kindly on the ex-president that committed corporate tax fraud, defrauded lenders, carelessly stored/discussed and then ignored requests to return classified documents, and tried to overturn a free and fair American election that he lost, who also happened to have been accused of sex assault by nearly 30 women, but not those that called him to task after.

Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds when you say it out loud?

You make it seem like the man may get thrown in prison without due process for eating a ham sandwich. Multiple grand juries found that there was probable cause to bring nearly 100 felony charges against him.

If the current president's primary rival doesn't want to risk getting imprisoned he shouldn't do the **** that gets him accused, indicted, and tried.

---

You will also be remembered for your role in minimizing sexual assault and rape claims. Congratulations. You celebrate the claims of sexual assault. You don't even care if they're true. Just like the horrible women that line up to claim rape on damn near every prominent Republican nominee for something these days. Just horrible people.

Multiple grand juries I'm sure filled with people like you that don't care about due process. You celebrate accusations and put them on the board as if they're trophies. Prosecutors that are trying him for political reasons only in democrats areas only. Nothing about what is happening is being done on the up and up.

But you don't care. Just like your bull**** with RUSSIA!!!! The truth is irrelevant. You spouted your same nonsense about "facts" and were wrong then too. Same way you're wrong about transgender people and how many genders there are. Do you realize how stupid any of that has sounded?? You're a brainwashed minion cheerleading a banana republic because TRUMP!!!!

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Yeah, I'm not going to believe that Trump is a serial sexual predator just because he acts like the ass he is sometimes.

Do I like Trump? No. Do I think he has disqualified himself to be President of the United States, as has Joe Biden? Yes. Do I think some of this prosecution is political? Yes I do. Do I think Trump brought most of this on himself? Yes. Do I feel bad for Trump? No, he's made a career in using the Judicial System to his advantage. At some point the law of averages was going to catch up to him.

---

packgrad said:

---

So
Much
TDS

Congrats on taking all of the value out of someone claiming rape or sexual assault. It's sad democrat women and male cheerleaders have weaponized a horrible thing for political purposes.

Good for you going all in on it and being firm in your position that actual rape and sexual assault is irrelevant. You'd rather just be able to call someone a rapist or sexual assaulter because a democrat woman made a claim for political purposes.

Let's be real about your thoughts here. You supported the retched woman that called Kavanaugh a rapist. You don't care about how many women call someone a rapist, as you mentioned in your TDS post above, or the veracity of the claim. You just care about the label and how you can politicize it.

Just a garbage move.

But you do you, pretindependent.

---

packgrad said:

---

So
Much
TDS

Congrats on taking all of the value out of someone claiming rape or sexual assault. It's sad democrat women and male cheerleaders have weaponized a horrible thing for political purposes.

Good for you going all in on it and being firm in your position that actual rape and sexual assault is irrelevant. You'd rather just be able to call someone a rapist or sexual assaulter because a democrat woman made a claim for political purposes.

Let's be real about your thoughts here. You supported the retched woman that called Kavanaugh a rapist. You don't care about how many women call someone a rapist, as you mentioned in your TDS post above, or the veracity of the claim. You just care about the label and how you can politicize it.

Just a garbage move.

But you do you, pretindependent.

Edit to add… I also lol at the undercover recording Libby boys use to claim that he is a rapist/sexual assaulter. You snowflakes would have me and my friends arrested if you heard our commentary. I literally lol when you use that as one of your reasons.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

So
Much
TDS

Congrats on taking all of the value out of someone claiming rape or sexual assault. It's sad democrat women and male cheerleaders have weaponized a horrible thing for political purposes.

Good for you going all in on it and being firm in your position that actual rape and sexual assault is irrelevant. You'd rather just be able to call someone a rapist or sexual assaulter because a democrat woman made a claim for political purposes.

Let's be real about your thoughts here. You supported the retched woman that called Kavanaugh a rapist. You don't care about how many women call someone a rapist, as you mentioned in your TDS post above, or the veracity of the claim. You just care about the label and how you can politicize it.

Just a garbage move.

But you do you, pretindependent.

---

You're the exact gaslighting psycho that pretty much caused the whole "Me Too" thing in the first place.

That woman was WAY more credible than Kavanaugh, but Supreme Court picks trump all else, so Republicans buried it and pushed him through anyway. Pretty depraved, but you stopped caring about that stuff long ago.

---

packgrad said:

---

So
Much
TDS

Congrats on taking all of the value out of someone claiming rape or sexual assault. It's sad democrat women and male cheerleaders have weaponized a horrible thing for political purposes.

Good for you going all in on it and being firm in your position that actual rape and sexual assault is irrelevant. You'd rather just be able to call someone a rapist or sexual assaulter because a democrat woman made a claim for political purposes.

Let's be real about your thoughts here. You supported the retched woman that called Kavanaugh a rapist. You don't care about how many women call someone a rapist, as you mentioned in your TDS post above, or the veracity of the claim. You just care about the label and how you can politicize it.

Just a garbage move.

But you do you, pretindependent.

Edit to add… I also lol at the undercover recording Libby boys use to claim that he is a rapist/sexual assaulter. You snowflakes would have me and my friends arrested if you heard our commentary. I literally lol when you use that as one of your reasons.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

There was less than zero proof that Kavanaugh did anything to that woman. It was a political stunt of the highest order, along with the rest of that nomination hearing. Same with Jackson's hearing too. I'm tired of these gotcha nomination hearings. Just ask questions on judicial practice and vote

---

packgrad said:

---

Oh, and to be clear. I have no doubt there are 25 democrat gold digging *****s willing to claim they were raped for the team. I also have no doubt you would support their claims regardless of veracity.

Whatever it takes!!!!

Edit ti add… I just read an AP article about the evidence presented at the trial. Lol. This is what civ supports. No police report. No diary entries. She had a couple friends come in and testify that she told them sometime soon after. Prosecution also played the secret audio and had 2 other women who claim trump assaulted them. That is what they used to agree to the civil victory. There is literally zero evidence physical or written that she was raped or assaulted. Just a few women that say she was, unfounded accusations from other accusers and a secret audio recording that had nothing to do with the case.

Yeah, civ. You're a cheerleader celebrating this mess.

I hope it comes back tenfold on the left when the right gets back in control.

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Oh, and to be clear. I have no doubt there are 25 democrat gold digging *****s willing to claim they were raped for the team. I also have no doubt you would support their claims regardless of veracity.

Whatever it takes!!!!

Edit ti add… I just read an AP article about the evidence presented at the trial. Lol. This is what civ supports. No police report. No diary entries. She had a couple friends come in and testify that she told them sometime soon after. Prosecution also played the secret audio and had 2 other women who claim trump assaulted them. That is what they used to agree to the civil victory. There is literally zero evidence physical or written that she was raped or assaulted. Just a few women that say she was, unfounded accusations from other accusers and a secret audio recording that had nothing to do with the case.

Yeah, civ. You're a cheerleader celebrating this mess.

I hope it comes back tenfold on the left when the right gets back in control.

---

Trump sues everyone. Why has he not sued any of these 25+ women for libel or slander I wonder?

I think you'll be disappointed to find that the opportunities for "it to come back tenfold" are pretty limited since most people on the right or left don't engage in undemocratic or abusive or illegal behavior at nearly the same clip as your hero. It's pretty hard to just fabricate charges that a prosecutor can use to summon a grand jury and charge a defendant with crimes when there's no actual evidence of crimes.

Good luck trying though!

P.S. how's the Biden investigation going? Are we about ready to charge Joe and other members of the crime family with extortion-related malfeasance?

The irony of course is that if evidence of crimes emerges and prosecutors convince grand juries to indict Biden due to prevailing evidence you damn sure won't see me on here whining about political motivations. I'll trust the justice system to sort it and if he's found guilty, too bad for him. He shouldn't have ****ed around and found out.

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Oh, and to be clear. I have no doubt there are 25 democrat gold digging *****s willing to claim they were raped for the team. I also have no doubt you would support their claims regardless of veracity.

Whatever it takes!!!!

Edit ti add… I just read an AP article about the evidence presented at the trial. Lol. This is what civ supports. No police report. No diary entries. She had a couple friends come in and testify that she told them sometime soon after. Prosecution also played the secret audio and had 2 other women who claim trump assaulted them. That is what they used to agree to the civil victory. There is literally zero evidence physical or written that she was raped or assaulted. Just a few women that say she was, unfounded accusations from other accusers and a secret audio recording that had nothing to do with the case.

Yeah, civ. You're a cheerleader celebrating this mess.

I hope it comes back tenfold on the left when the right gets back in control.

---

Trump sues everyone. Why has he not sued any of these 25+ women for libel or slander I wonder?

I think you'll be disappointed to find that the opportunities for "it to come back tenfold" are pretty limited since most people on the right or left don't engage in undemocratic or abusive or illegal behavior at nearly the same clip as your hero. It's pretty hard to just fabricate charges that a prosecutor can use to summon a grand jury and charge a defendant with crimes when there's no actual evidence of crimes.

Good luck trying though!

P.S. how's the Biden investigation going? Are we about ready to charge Joe and other members of the crime family with extortion-related malfeasance?

The irony of course is that if evidence of crimes emerges and prosecutors convince grand juries to indict Biden due to prevailing evidence you damn sure won't see me on here whining about political motivations. I'll trust the justice system to sort it and if he's found guilty, too bad for him. He shouldn't have ****ed around and found out.

---

Trump doesn't sue everyone. Another lie. So much TDS. Impossible for you to speak on Trump without hyperbole or spouting unfounded accusations as fact.

Why do you cheerlead rape charges, civ? The one that just won literally had no evidence to support her. No physical evidence from the day. No police report. No diary notes (I know notes are really important to you as it pertains to Kavanaugh). Just some friends that weren't there that she supposedly told sometime after. Why would they lie? Some additional women she doesn't know and never talked to but also claiming to be assaulted by Trump? Why would they lie? (But hey maybe they can get this one to testify in their civil trials! I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine.) And finally an audio of 2 guys talking ***** I can imagine how much you would cheerlead this result based on this evidence if it was a black man (not Republican of course). Hilarious how you pretend to believe in the letter of the law and a fair justice system then cheerlead results like this. Hey, but it's a civil result. You don't have to prove ***** You just have to have some civ's on the jury if you want a civil result against Trump. TDS trumps all.

It's easy to say you will support charges against your hero, Biden,
when you know they won't bring charges against him. You brush aside the "big guy" comments. You brush away the lies Biden said about knowing about his son's dealings. You brush away the lies Biden said about being involved in any phone calls. You brush aside the IRS suppressing information. You brush aside the cia suppressing information. You brush aside the fbi suppressing information. Congrats on being the fake guy pretending you're willing to accept the justice departments decision, when it is clear they were, are, and likely will continue to be suppressing information on Biden.

Baaaa

---

Werewolf said:

---

The four years of the Trump presidency, no wars. They now come after Trump but the American citizen is next. They need an excuse.......like the turmoil that all these illegals can bring......and possibly like an electrical power grid failiure ........and possibly like a food shortage........or a fuel shortage. Just create a crisis and be prepared to provde the solution........the MO.

---

Quote:

---

Trump also pardoned Alex van der Zwaan, 36, the Dutch son-in-law of Russian billionaire German Khan. Van der Zwaan was sentenced to 30 days in prison and fined $20,000 for lying to U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigators about contacts with an official in Trump's 2016 campaign.

---

Civilized said:

---

I see Trump's ex-attorney Sid Powell pleaded guilty this morning to election tampering in GA.

Undoubtedly part of her guilty plea was an agreement to turn state's evidence and testify against all her loser pals that also tried to interfere in the GA election.

Will be curious to see how this development in the criminal trial comes to bear on the massive civil suits she's facing for her unhinged and defamatory claims that Dominion and Smartmatic rigged the election.

Crazy she is all but assured of financial ruin, and for what? What did she stand to gain that was worth the exceedingly high risk of personal financial devastation by propagating absolutely loony conspiracy theories?

---