TRUMP 2024

2,171,674 Views | 19077 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Werewolf
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

hokiewolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

SmaptyWolf said:




I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.
That's a made-up word/category used to try to ban what is perfectly legitimate and protected free speech in order to shield a certain class of people from criticism.

The Left is now criticizing the state of Israel for their war in Palestine. And it is called by many "anti-Semitism" to criticize the the state of Israel.

So should people be banned from IPS for criticizing the state of Israel over Palestine? Or for pointing out the fact that jews control Hollywood? Completely absurd.

The Left also is constantly whining about "white supremacy" and accusing "white people of controlling Western institutions" and "committing discrimination", etc. This is the EXACT thing being done against white people, that you are whining about that jews are accused of.

Should there also be a term "anti-whitism" to ban people who criticize white people??
no, when you present centuries old antisemitic tropes that are proven wrong as fact, you are indeed an antisemite. If you want to disagree with the policy of the State of Israel or if you think Israel shouldn't exist at all, that's fine, but brining up these old conspiracy theories about Jews as the reason why you disagree with those things should be banned here.

"But I know Jews" isn't an excuse for this either.
"proven as wrong". No, those things were objectively TRUE. But you just don't want to accept those truths.

The Left are "anti-white". They are constantly attacking white people and talking about "white supremacy".

There is a double standard here.
Remember Glass was the guy, I think, that was removing your warnings about the VIRUS plandemic and maybe the jab too. How did that censorship work out for some here?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Gobbler wants to march twenty million illegal aliens in front of a judge and tie up our entire judicial system. Makes perfect sense. We'll need a judge and a public defender too. Wonder what that's going to cost the taxpayer?
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

jkpackfan said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Glasswolf said:

Werewolf said:

i am very much against censoring but threats of harm here shouldn't be allowed.

Insults ,on the other hand, are on the table. Yes, GP is attacked more than anyone here. It's tough wearing Christian on one's sleeve at times.
No they're not. It's considered attacking the poster. Every time someone tries to moderate this forum we get blamed for "infringing on someone's 1st Amendment rights. I'm a Democrat, my wife is, my father in law and mother in law is. My FIL is a retired Baptist Minister. I don't have to go around wearing my faith on the my sleeve. I do it by showing the same compassion to everyone that I think Jesus would. Ernie crossed the line like I've never before. I don't even care if he was drunk. The things he said were wrong. I was taught that a drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts.

If you feel like you are being attacked personally flag the post or message me or Wolfer79
Is this a recent change of heart among the staff? Because man, up until this incident pushed things over the top this place has been a cesspool of daily personal attacks. Don't get me wrong, if it is an effort to clean things up then better late than never.

I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.
Those daily personal attacks come from you as well. You have constantly called those you disagree with "idiots" and "morons". It all needs to stop.
Oh please. As literally the only consistent "openly Dem" poster on here from Day One I've been the target of endless juvenile insults. It's taken the patience of Job to limit my insults to the occasional "idiot".
Like I clearly said it all needs to stop but you can't whine about the personal attacks when you're also lobbing them.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
You Leftists attack white people all day long, complaining bout "white supremacy", "white privilege", blah blah blah

How many white people are NC State alumni and fans.

Are we going to censor and ban you whenever you regurgitate the various anti-white propaganda that the Democrats and Left produce?

I'm not proposing that ANYONE be censored.

But this is how you communist Leftists operate. Your main modus operandi is censorship of conservatives.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
You Leftists attack white people all day long, complaining bout "white supremacy", "white privilege", blah blah blah

How many white people are NC State alumni and fans.

Are we going to censor and ban you whenever you regurgitate the various anti-white propaganda that the Democrats and Left produce?

I'm not proposing that ANYONE be censored.

But this is how you communist Leftists operate. Your main modus operandi is censorship of conservatives.

And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.


GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
You are proposing the OPPOSITE of a free market. You are an opponent of freedom, and freedom of speech. You are cheerleading censorship.

You want a CONTROLLED market, where conservative speech is suppressed and censored..so that Leftists ideology can "win".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
You Leftists attack white people all day long, complaining bout "white supremacy", "white privilege", blah blah blah

How many white people are NC State alumni and fans.

Are we going to censor and ban you whenever you regurgitate the various anti-white propaganda that the Democrats and Left produce?

I'm not proposing that ANYONE be censored.

But this is how you communist Leftists operate. Your main modus operandi is censorship of conservatives.


And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.
As I understand, Steve and/or James put a stop to your draconian censorship several years ago in your "moderation" of the Water Cooler.

Are you seriously trying to enact ideological censorship now? Are you seriously saying that no criticism of the LGBTQ agenda, including men in women's sports, will be allowed??

Really???
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do our LEFTIST friends here, #Sieve #Nappy, #22 and #Gobbler believe that the nationwide attacks on Tesla dealerships and Tesla drivers are acts of TERRORISM?

What's the time behind bars for these acts? 20-yrs or so?

terrorism
[terrizm]

noun
[ol]
  • the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims:
    "the fight against terrorism" "international terrorism"
  • [/ol]
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Glasswolf said:




    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

    You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
    Butthurt snowflakes who can't handle freedom of speech and have to go to their safe space have cancelled here??

    lmfao

    Freedom of speech is paramount. Not the feelings of snowflakes.

    Is your position that ANYONE who is "offended" has the "right" to censor someone else?
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    GuerrillaPack said:

    Glasswolf said:

    GuerrillaPack said:

    SmaptyWolf said:

    GuerrillaPack said:

    If this place enacts viewpoint censorship as just proposed by Glasswolf, I will likely be cancelling my premium membership.
    How many trans or jewish pack fans do you imagine have read your uncensored crap on here and then said "ohh, I definitely want to join IPS!"? It's a big school, those people exist.

    Losing you would be a fair trade for a more welcoming sports community. The free market at work.
    You Leftists attack white people all day long, complaining bout "white supremacy", "white privilege", blah blah blah

    How many white people are NC State alumni and fans.

    Are we going to censor and ban you whenever you regurgitate the various anti-white propaganda that the Democrats and Left produce?

    I'm not proposing that ANYONE be censored.

    But this is how you communist Leftists operate. Your main modus operandi is censorship of conservatives.


    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.
    As I understand, Steve and/or James put a stop to your draconian censorship several years ago in your "moderation" of the Water Cooler.

    Are you seriously trying to enact ideological censorship now? Are you seriously saying that no criticism of the LGBTQ agenda, including men in women's sports, will be allowed??

    Really???

    Don't come to the Water Cooler political threads if you don't want some rough and tumble. It's easy.

    You might start a thread for debate. For instance, Cary could start one called "Debate with Cary, kind words and gentleness only". He could insist that shots be set shots only and that any above the rim play is not allowed. #Sieve would love to dribble between Cary's legs on a daily basis on the way to the rim. #Nappy would feel like he had a chance. #Gobbler would get his friendly protection. Yep, that's a gentle swipe. :-)
    SmaptyWolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    GuerrillaPack said:

    Glasswolf said:




    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

    You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
    Butthurt snowflakes who can't handle freedom of speech and have to go to their safe space have cancelled here??

    lmfao

    Freedom of speech is paramount. Not the feelings of snowflakes.

    Is your position that ANYONE who is "offended" has the "right" to censor someone else?
    You guys are perpetually confused about this. "Freedom of speech" means that the government can't come after you for having an opinion. That's it. There's no such thing as "Freedom from accountability for saying anything anywhere".

    IPS is a business. This is their house. If you spewing toxic sludge is bad for their business, you really think they don't have the right to show you the door?

    You should practice your "freedom of speech" at your job with all of your customers. Be sure to wail about being censored when the boss fires you in a day.
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    SmaptyWolf said:

    GuerrillaPack said:

    Glasswolf said:




    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

    You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
    Butthurt snowflakes who can't handle freedom of speech and have to go to their safe space have cancelled here??

    lmfao

    Freedom of speech is paramount. Not the feelings of snowflakes.

    Is your position that ANYONE who is "offended" has the "right" to censor someone else?
    You guys are perpetually confused about this. "Freedom of speech" means that the government can't come after you for having an opinion. That's it. There's no such thing as "Freedom from accountability for saying anything anywhere".

    IPS is a business. This is their house. If you spewing toxic sludge is bad for their business, you really think they don't have the right to show you the door?

    You should practice your "freedom of speech" at your job with all of your customers. Be sure to wail about being censored when the boss fires you in a day.
    #Nappy, I would say that you didn't benefit from Glass' censorship on the VIRUS and JAB but it wouldn't have mattered. You're loving that you can take another jab each month. Censorship works for you.
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Glasswolf said:




    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

    You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
    You just proposed censoring those who criticize the LGBTQ agenda. Now you are denying that this would be, in fact, censorship?

    I want to know if this is actually coming from Steve and/or James. I doubt it. I believe that they value a Water Cooler that allows freedom of speech and a vigorous debate on issues, and that is NOT heavily censored like so many other platforms on the internet (in order to advance a Leftist agenda).

    I firmly believe that IPS benefits from having a Water Cooler that is not censored, and that allows freedom of speech. There are probably dozens of users here primarily stay with the site and pay Premium or more, in large part due to appreciating the free speech of the Water Cooler as it has been for the last 7-8 years.

    I doubt that hardly anyone has ever cancelled their membership or quit the site because they disagree with some posts I've made here in the Water Cooler. And if such a person exists, they are pathetic Leftist snowflake who can't handle having someone in the world who disagrees with them being allowed to voice their opinion.
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    SmaptyWolf said:

    GuerrillaPack said:

    Glasswolf said:




    And there it is. Already with the censorship bull.

    You think there haven't been more than one that has canceled their premium subscriptions because of posters like you?
    Butthurt snowflakes who can't handle freedom of speech and have to go to their safe space have cancelled here??

    lmfao

    Freedom of speech is paramount. Not the feelings of snowflakes.

    Is your position that ANYONE who is "offended" has the "right" to censor someone else?
    You guys are perpetually confused about this. "Freedom of speech" means that the government can't come after you for having an opinion. That's it. There's no such thing as "Freedom from accountability for saying anything anywhere".

    IPS is a business. This is their house. If you spewing toxic sludge is bad for their business, you really think they don't have the right to show you the door?

    You should practice your "freedom of speech" at your job with all of your customers. Be sure to wail about being censored when the boss fires you in a day.
    No, we perfectly understand the distinction. IPS, hypothetically, could also decide to be a right-wing leaning site and censor and ban all Leftists like yourself.

    What you are proposing is that IPS enact a pro-Leftist censorship regime, as Glasswolf just proposed.

    What the conservative posters here appreciate over the years is that James and Steve have NOT censored the Water Cooler in order to promote any agenda, but have allowed freedom of speech. All we want is for that to continue.
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    Gulfstream4
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    SmaptyWolf said:

    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    i am very much against censoring but threats of harm here shouldn't be allowed.

    Insults ,on the other hand, are on the table. Yes, GP is attacked more than anyone here. It's tough wearing Christian on one's sleeve at times.
    No they're not. It's considered attacking the poster. Every time someone tries to moderate this forum we get blamed for "infringing on someone's 1st Amendment rights. I'm a Democrat, my wife is, my father in law and mother in law is. My FIL is a retired Baptist Minister. I don't have to go around wearing my faith on the my sleeve. I do it by showing the same compassion to everyone that I think Jesus would. Ernie crossed the line like I've never before. I don't even care if he was drunk. The things he said were wrong. I was taught that a drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts.

    If you feel like you are being attacked personally flag the post or message me or Wolfer79
    Is this a recent change of heart among the staff? Because man, up until this incident pushed things over the top this place has been a cesspool of daily personal attacks. Don't get me wrong, if it is an effort to clean things up then better late than never.

    I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.


    LOL-You can't make a single post without being condescending.
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Gulfstream4 said:

    SmaptyWolf said:

    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    i am very much against censoring but threats of harm here shouldn't be allowed.

    Insults ,on the other hand, are on the table. Yes, GP is attacked more than anyone here. It's tough wearing Christian on one's sleeve at times.
    No they're not. It's considered attacking the poster. Every time someone tries to moderate this forum we get blamed for "infringing on someone's 1st Amendment rights. I'm a Democrat, my wife is, my father in law and mother in law is. My FIL is a retired Baptist Minister. I don't have to go around wearing my faith on the my sleeve. I do it by showing the same compassion to everyone that I think Jesus would. Ernie crossed the line like I've never before. I don't even care if he was drunk. The things he said were wrong. I was taught that a drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts.

    If you feel like you are being attacked personally flag the post or message me or Wolfer79
    Is this a recent change of heart among the staff? Because man, up until this incident pushed things over the top this place has been a cesspool of daily personal attacks. Don't get me wrong, if it is an effort to clean things up then better late than never.

    I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.


    LOL-You can't make a single post without being condescending.
    He has been a leader in this category since the 1st day he showed up. He's easily the smartest person here on the Water Cooler, bar none.
    Gulfstream4
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    Gulfstream4 said:

    SmaptyWolf said:

    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    i am very much against censoring but threats of harm here shouldn't be allowed.

    Insults ,on the other hand, are on the table. Yes, GP is attacked more than anyone here. It's tough wearing Christian on one's sleeve at times.
    No they're not. It's considered attacking the poster. Every time someone tries to moderate this forum we get blamed for "infringing on someone's 1st Amendment rights. I'm a Democrat, my wife is, my father in law and mother in law is. My FIL is a retired Baptist Minister. I don't have to go around wearing my faith on the my sleeve. I do it by showing the same compassion to everyone that I think Jesus would. Ernie crossed the line like I've never before. I don't even care if he was drunk. The things he said were wrong. I was taught that a drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts.

    If you feel like you are being attacked personally flag the post or message me or Wolfer79
    Is this a recent change of heart among the staff? Because man, up until this incident pushed things over the top this place has been a cesspool of daily personal attacks. Don't get me wrong, if it is an effort to clean things up then better late than never.

    I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.


    LOL-You can't make a single post without being condescending.
    He has been a leader in this category since the 1st day he showed up. He's easily the smartest person here on the Water Cooler, bar none.


    A real rocket surgeon!
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Gulfstream4 said:

    Werewolf said:

    Gulfstream4 said:

    SmaptyWolf said:

    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    i am very much against censoring but threats of harm here shouldn't be allowed.

    Insults ,on the other hand, are on the table. Yes, GP is attacked more than anyone here. It's tough wearing Christian on one's sleeve at times.
    No they're not. It's considered attacking the poster. Every time someone tries to moderate this forum we get blamed for "infringing on someone's 1st Amendment rights. I'm a Democrat, my wife is, my father in law and mother in law is. My FIL is a retired Baptist Minister. I don't have to go around wearing my faith on the my sleeve. I do it by showing the same compassion to everyone that I think Jesus would. Ernie crossed the line like I've never before. I don't even care if he was drunk. The things he said were wrong. I was taught that a drunk mans words are a sober mans thoughts.

    If you feel like you are being attacked personally flag the post or message me or Wolfer79
    Is this a recent change of heart among the staff? Because man, up until this incident pushed things over the top this place has been a cesspool of daily personal attacks. Don't get me wrong, if it is an effort to clean things up then better late than never.

    I am curious... where does over-the-top antisemitism and that sort of disgusting crap fall on your scale of bannable offenses? Because that's also been traditionally ignored by the staff.


    LOL-You can't make a single post without being condescending.
    He has been a leader in this category since the 1st day he showed up. He's easily the smartest person here on the Water Cooler, bar none.


    A real rocket surgeon!
    Gotta be both, I'm sure he'll tell us so.

    Must be a cross between a rocket scientist and a world-renowned neurosurgeon.
    Glasswolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    If it was because of political differences no one would be posting because there wouldn't be a forum. But threatening a poster with physical violence and violence against the sitting POTUS crosses the line. And it will every time. We are just asking every single poster here to treat everyone else with respect. I respect every single one of you regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. I'd love to at some point meet everyone here. But I have gay and lesbian family members that grew up in Christian homes. Do I condemn them? No I show them the love Jesus would. We weren't put on this earth to judge anyone. hat will be his place when that day comes. I will play no part in that judgement.
    I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.


    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Do you need further reminders?

    Do you need more #receipts?

    Or will you slip further back into the MSM matrix of lies without them?

    Can you hold firm in what you have been shown?

    Believe your eyes, they're not lying to you.

    Okay, Cary, we're ready for your set shot. I'm giving up the ball, Cary it's all you!!! Cary, Cary, he's our man, no one can guard him, he's #daMan.

    #Sieve, you and #Nappy have to give Cary some room to get his shot off, no blocking shots.

    Glasswolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Back on topic. what ever that was. I will be back on the MBB nd FB forums. Y'all play nice please.
    I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.


    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    If it was because of political differences no one would be posting because there wouldn't be a forum. But threatening a poster with physical violence and violence against the sitting POTUS crosses the line. And it will every time. We are just asking every single poster here to treat everyone else with respect. I respect every single one of you regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. I'd love to at some point meet everyone here. But I have gay and lesbian family members that grew up in Christian homes. Do I condemn them? No I show them the love Jesus would. We weren't put on this earth to judge anyone. hat will be his place when that day comes. I will play no part in that judgement.
    We probably all have gay family members and friends nowadays. Gender identity issues too. Wonder where that came from?

    I agree with your post here generally. My very hot 3rd wife could tell us some stories about her pastor....LOL. And we shared another one together and I think he was banging a dozen women in our church......and thankfully not mine.

    Again, I'm not LEFT or RIGHT, I'm not a D and I am not an R. I'm a populist and I'm a nationalist; not a globalist. In the end, 400 of our 535 in Congress will be shown to be criminal or corrupt in the end, stay tuned.
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    If it was because of political differences no one would be posting because there wouldn't be a forum. But threatening a poster with physical violence and violence against the sitting POTUS crosses the line. And it will every time. We are just asking every single poster here to treat everyone else with respect. I respect every single one of you regardless of where you fall on the political spectrum. I'd love to at some point meet everyone here. But I have gay and lesbian family members that grew up in Christian homes. Do I condemn them? No I show them the love Jesus would. We weren't put on this earth to judge anyone. hat will be his place when that day comes. I will play no part in that judgement.
    Okay fine. I'm all for treating everyone with respect, and not having personal attacks. And I wouldn't "personally" attack any poster here who says they are a homosexual.

    However, we should still be able to criticize the LGBTQ agenda...the ideology, and discuss the pros and cons of various policy across the nation as it relates to "LGBTQ" issues, such as whether men should be allowed in women's sports.

    Maybe we are having a "miscommunication" here, and didn't understand exactly what you were saying about the rules here. It sounds like you are talking about clarification on the existing rule against "personal attacks", and are expanding on that to say to not PERSONALLY attack other posters on issues such as ethnicity or LGBTQ.

    What I'm saying that I staunchly oppose is the creation of any new rule where we couldn't even have a debate about LGBTQ issues, and post anything critical of the LGBTQ agenda. Or we couldn't ever post anything that could be construed to be critical of any "ethnicity" (in general).

    Is that basically what you were saying Glass? You were expounding upon the rule against "personal attacks", and not some new rule where we can't have debates on ideology that are critical of LGBTQ policy, etc?
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    hokiewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    calling for someone's child to be raped is a-ok though.
    Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    hokiewolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    calling for someone's child to be raped is a-ok though.
    I can't use the word "liar" here so I won't comment.

    I'm not sure who's a more disgusting human being, you or #Nappy. You're neck and neck.
    Glasswolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    I lean more middle. I know I'm a registered Democrat. I don't like the violence against Tesla. Just don't buy the day car. Simple. I thought Biden was to old. Same with Trump. I'm for term limits, but none of them are ever going to vote to cut their gravy train off. I'm for Voter ID. I guess the biggest issue is I'm not so much pro abortion as I am for a woman's right to choose. I don't want someone in Washington telling me what to do with my body. Hell I do steroids. They are illegal. I don't even like that. I sold all my guns because I don't need them. I'm fine with you having yours. Just stop the school killings all all the other killings. I don't believe any monuments should have been ever taken down. It has always been Ft. Bragg as the same as it will always be the Gulf of Mexico lol. I believe Pot for any purpose should be legal. I'm all over the place.
    I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.


    Werewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Yes you are. But that's what we believe in and what we fight for. HE$$ I voted for Obama in 2008.
    hokiewolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    hokiewolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    I think the ban on the guy making the threats of violence to a poster is where the line should have been drawn and Glass made the correct call.

    What's a personal attack? Mocking someone's political viewpoint? I hope not.
    calling for someone's child to be raped is a-ok though.
    I can't use the word "liar" here so I won't comment.

    I'm not sure who's a more disgusting human being, you or #Nappy. You're neck and neck.
    you did it a you know it, you can't will it out of existence like Trump does.
    Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    Yes you are. But that's what we believe in and what we fight for. HE$$ I voted for Obama in 2008.
    whaaaat????
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    OK, I'll "confess"...but many already know this about me....

    I believe 9/11 was a "false flag" carried out by criminal elements within the U.S. Govt (with help of Mossad, CIA).

    It used to be that Leftists-Democrats were the ones primarily talking about "9/11 being an inside job", talking about how Bush and Cheney were complicit. Now it seems it's flipped, and it's mostly those on the right who believe and talk about this.
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    Glasswolf
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Werewolf said:

    Yes you are. But that's what we believe in and what we fight for. HE$$ I voted for Obama in 2008.
    I voted for Reagan, Bush 1 and 2. Martin and McCory for Gov. Still believe Donnie Harrison should be Wake Cty Sheriff. Biggest regret is ever voting for Thom Tillis. I may have even voted for Jesse Helms lol
    I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.


    GuerrillaPack
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Glasswolf said:

    Werewolf said:

    Yes you are. But that's what we believe in and what we fight for. HE$$ I voted for Obama in 2008.
    I voted for Reagan, Bush 1 and 2. Martin and McCory for Gov. Still believe Donnie Harrison should be Wake Cty Sheriff. Biggest regret is ever voting for Thom Tillis. I may have even voted for Jesse Helms lol
    Jesse Helms over Thom Tillis all day long.

    Can't stand Tillis
    "Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
    First Page Last Page
    Page 385 of 546
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.