TRUMP 2024

1,077,767 Views | 12626 Replies | Last: 18 min ago by SmaptyWolf
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Enchanted Princess
Very nice…
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

Does this spell it out adequately for you, #Nappy?

Was just getting ready to post this. They are here illegally and are trouble. The Trump administration told the judge to pound sand and that is a good thing.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kari Lake downsizing the US Agency for Global Media and saving we the taxpayers money.

https://www.usagm.gov/2025/03/15/u-s-agency-for-global-media-complies-with-presidential-executive-order-to-reduce-the-federal-bureaucracy/
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Better than the beginning of the week. Good weather. Just hit the duty free port shop for wine, rum, and another bottle of Grants triple-distilled. It's not particularly well aged but for twelve freaking dollars, I couldn't resist
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
I wish I knew what laws are on the books that gives this judge the capacity for such a ruling. Perhaps, the laws are there and if so, the Pubs need to address them immediately.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just got back on the boat, heading to Tortola next. Was up at Brimstone Fortress in St. Kitts this morning…spectacular views at that altitude.

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Just got back on the boat, heading to Tortola next. Was up at Brimstone Fortress in St. Kitts this morning…spectacular views at that altitude.


Awesome picture…
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Or… a radical group of judges.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Or… a radical group of judges.

LOL

A radical group of Republican-appointed judges whose judgments get upheld by radical appellate judges and a radical mostly conservative Supreme Court.

At some point you're just out of bounds legally, and for most of Trump's shenanigans we're well past that point.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thought y'all would like my headgear.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Just got back on the boat, heading to Tortola next. Was up at Brimstone Fortress in St. Kitts this morning…spectacular views at that altitude.




Good pic, amigo.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't take any pics the other day on Sint Maarten but if I had, I would have taken a shot of Eric Clapton's house from a similar high elevation perch that I traveled across while I was there.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Or… a radical group of judges.

LOL

A radical group of Republican-appointed judges whose judgments get upheld by radical appellate judges and a radical mostly conservative Supreme Court.

At some point you're just out of bounds legally, and for most of Trump's shenanigans we're well past that point.
You obviously dont research too much…
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://instagr.am/p/DHR3q6juB7a
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

https://instagr.am/p/DHR3q6juB7a


GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't look like this Antif@g terrorist has a Communist Soros-funded district attorney to let him get away with his crimes:




GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:






YES, and the communist Democrats are the ones doing it.

You guys are the ones who want to transition America into a Soviet-esque communist totalitarian state - using Big Tech to silence conservatives, rig elections, and use the immense power of the government to persecute your political enemies (eg, throw Trump in prison on sham charges, throw J6ers in prison for 10-20 years for misdemeanor trespassing).
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So….once again they can't help themselves and have to use the communists' Saul Alinky "Rules For Radicals" tactic of accusing their opponents of what THEY (the communist Left) are doing.

You accuse the right-wing of "turning the USA into the USSR".

When the obvious truth is that it is actually the communist Democrat party that wants to turn America into a hardcore totalitarian Marxist State, that subjugates the people and violates their rights and institutes authoritarian rule with rigged elections.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

So….once again they can't help themselves and have to use the communists' Saul Alinky "Rules For Radicals" tactic of accusing their opponents of what THEY (the communist Left) are doing.

You accuse the right-wing of "turning the USA into the USSR".

When the obvious truth is that it is actually the communist Democrat party that wants to turn America into a hardcore totalitarian Marxist State, that subjugates the people and violates their rights and institutes authoritarian rule with rigged elections.
So in order to prevent all that you guys have no choice but to turn America into a hardcore totalitarian Marxist State, that subjugates the people and violates their rights and institutes authoritarian rule? I assume rigged elections are next.

Got it!
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Or… a radical group of judges.

What evidence is there for that?

The judiciary has largely behaved as anyone would expect so far. In that they are following the law. No one of any repute would say that this decision was anything but expected.

The Trump admin has been pushing every angle they can to expand Executive power whether legal or illegal.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drip, drip, drip........ LOL
Wolfblood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.
Oh, that's exactly why Trump did it. Find the most extreme scenario where he can break a law to deport scumbags, all so he can get you used to him ignoring judges.

Drip. Drip. Drip.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.
Civ, based on what I read, Trump is actually doing what you said. His attorneys provide legal opinions and he acts. Now, he knows the Dems will use law fare to obstruct any of his moves, which, they can. Trump has listened to the courts. Now, that doesn't mean he will not challenge the ruling…

This latest event was on the way, when the court made its ruling. It is what it is…. Now, go find an incident whereas Trump has disregarded a court ruling. Right now, I can't find one…
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

By issuing such not well grounded rulings, this judge is endangering the judicial branch by inviting increased contempt for it, and inadvertently adding to Trump's support. Very hazardous in the long run for the Republican and the rule of law
Whether or not the people being deported were scumbags, Trump is trying to use a law from the 1700s that applies to wartime. What's not "well-grounded" about the ruling?

Just because you guys want everyone rounded up without due process doesn't mean it's legal. Just like everything else Trump is doing at the moment to ignore the constitution and seize power for the executive branch. You just don't care, the ends justify the means.

It's not the judicial branch who is threatening the rule of law, it's you.

Hilarious and scary that there are so many people out there trying to assert the judges analyzing and in some cases checking Trump's ability to implement legally spurious orders are the ones threatening the rule of law.

ACTIVIST JUDGES = judges that check Trump's power, no matter their party; which President appointed them; their judicial chops; or the legal basis of their ruling. All that matters is that they're not letting Trump do something he wants to do.

This ruling is also temporary, meant to allow a few days to appropriately study the situation and its legal merits. And if the temp ruling is upheld, there are appellate courts and the Supreme Court as backstops if the administration feels like the ruling is illegal or unconstitutional.

Trump and many Pubs are drunk on executive power, and sobriety seems a long ways off.

ETA: This is what happens when you convince yourself for years that Trump's lack of legal success either as the complainant or the defendant was due to the legal system and political climate being tilted against him, rather than the merits of his cases being tilted against him.

It must be jarring to see it continuing to happen when Trump and his party have all the consequential power. The only rational determination that can be made at that point is that Trump's cases, lack legal merit, a conclusion that many still evidently refuse to acknowledge.
Or… a radical group of judges.

What evidence is there for that?

The judiciary has largely behaved as anyone would expect so far. In that they are following the law. No one of any repute would say that this decision was anything but expected.

The Trump admin has been pushing every angle they can to expand Executive power whether legal or illegal.
Which case are you talking about?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.


BS. These criminals are NOT American citizens. They do not have the rights you and I have.

I wish to God, one of these criminals would in some way touch your family or your friends. I bet you would change your TDS loving mind after that.

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.


This is a loser for democrats but they hate President Trump so much they can't see it. Heck, Trump could cure cancer and democrats would hate him for it.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.


BS. These criminals are NOT American citizens. They do not have the rights you and I have.

I wish to God, one of these criminals would in some way touch your family or your friends. I bet you would change your TDS loving mind after that.


There's no low that dems won't stoop to in order to "get Trump"
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.


This is a loser for democrats but they hate President Trump so much they can't see it. Heck, Trump could cure cancer and democrats would hate him for it.
I really hope they continue "fighting" for crap like this, that 29% approval rating will only get worse.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.
Civ, based on what I read, Trump is actually doing what you said. His attorneys provide legal opinions and he acts. Now, he knows the Dems will use law fare to obstruct any of his moves, which, they can. Trump has listened to the courts. Now, that doesn't mean he will not challenge the ruling…

This latest event was on the way, when the court made its ruling. It is what it is…. Now, go find an incident whereas Trump has disregarded a court ruling. Right now, I can't find one…
I think what Civ is saying is the attack on the institution of the Judiciary by normalizing calling these rulings as something done by an activist judge is the bigger issue. But, both the far right and far left do this, and it's a bad idea. It's one of the things far left progressives and populist MAGA has in common. And it needs to stop, period.
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Wolfblood said:

Please let the Democrats and the media make these poor illegal alien gang bangers not receiving due process and unlawfully being deported the biggest news story of the week.

I think the Democrats should send a Congressional Delegation to the prison in El Salvador and demand these young men be released and brought back home to America.

If you haven't seen the video released by the President of El Salvador of the Venezuela and
MS-13 gang members arriving at the prison check it out. It's a must watch.

To go from roaming the United States committing theft, rape and murder at will and with no consequences to being incarcerated in that particular prison is going to be quite the change.

Like I said, Democrats and media, please die on this hill.

Presidents following laws and the constitution and observing the power of the courts and checks and balances is more important for our country's long-term safety and security and stability than any edge case justification to ignore these things that you can possibly dream up.


BS. These criminals are NOT American citizens. They do not have the rights you and I have.

I wish to God, one of these criminals would in some way touch your family or your friends. I bet you would change your TDS loving mind after that.




The rule of law matters unless you want to live under a King. The courts are the protectors of individual freedom, not the executive.

What crimes did Dr. Rasha Alawieh violate to be sent home as a kidney transplant specialist employed by Brown on a valid, legal visa?
First Page
Page 360 of 361
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.