BBW12OG said:

---

ncsualum05 said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Me thinks that Pinocchio is just talking out of his ass....

---

---

Funny how Civ and the rest of the clown crew ignores the hell out of this isn't it?

---

Not really…. People will be people!!

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

If this is true then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

The system is rigged, ask Bernie.

---

I bet you do want Bernie as the left candidate. He's unelectable too.

The DNC and RNC are not the federal government. Fairness is not paramount. Their best interests are served by bringing the most electable candidate to the general election.

If you want to change that, do away with primaries that are run by the parties.

Could care less what your idiot party does but not giving more electable candidates a shot is ridiculous and no I'm not talking about Kennedy or Tulsi.

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

The system is rigged, ask Bernie.

---

I bet you do want Bernie as the left candidate. He's unelectable too.

The DNC and RNC are not the federal government. Fairness is not paramount. Their best interests are served by bringing the most electable candidate to the general election.

If you want to change that, do away with primaries that are run by the parties.

---

Who would run it, then?

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

If this is true then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

---

The extent of evil and corruption will be shown to be beyond the pale. Wait until we learn the details of the child trafficking there and all that goes with it.

---

RT is Russian Television. This is propaganda

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

If this is true then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

---

The extent of evil and corruption will be shown to be beyond the pale. Wait until we learn the details of the child trafficking there and all that goes with it.

---

RT is Russian Television. This is propaganda

---

I wasn't aware as I'd never heard of it.

I left out money laundering…..many many American politicians and their families …LLCs

Haha, you're suggesting that Hunter, Soros and Co aren't involved in any illegalities. I'd put more true in the damn Russians than any legacy western media or any connected to Biden and Soros.

There are numerous reports of biolabs in Ukraine and these reports have bee released over several months now.

jkpackfan said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

If this is true then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

---

The extent of evil and corruption will be shown to be beyond the pale. Wait until we learn the details of the child trafficking there and all that goes with it.

---

RT is Russian Television. This is propaganda

---

I wasn't aware as I'd never heard of it.

---

After months of denial, U.S. admits to running Ukraine biolabs People's World (peoplesworld.org)

US undersecretary of state acknowledges there are biological warfare labs in Ukraine - World Socialist Web Site (wsws.org)

Here's the underlying problem with all news. Our media is heavily controlled and run by western intelligence agencies. We can fact check all day long and see this narrative protected. The same people control all those sites too........Snopes, Reuters, etc. Systematically the few MSM figures reporting the truth........are removed and making it harder for us to have an honest discussion or debate.

As yourself, is your life as an American improving? Has any media figure asked our federal govt a legit tough question? Why has there not been a tough question of the Biden regime.......ie Something simple like Hunter's laptop. Do you trust our media?

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

If this is true then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

---

The extent of evil and corruption will be shown to be beyond the pale. Wait until we learn the details of the child trafficking there and all that goes with it.

---

RT is Russian Television. This is propaganda

---

I wasn't aware as I'd never heard of it.

---

After months of denial, U.S. admits to running Ukraine biolabs People's World (peoplesworld.org)

US undersecretary of state acknowledges there are biological warfare labs in Ukraine - World Socialist Web Site (wsws.org)

Here's the underlying problem with all news. Our media is heavily controlled and run by western intelligence agencies. We can fact check all day long and see this narrative protected. The same people control all those sites too........Snopes, Reuters, etc. Systematically the few MSM figures reporting the truth........are removed and making it harder for us to have an honest discussion or debate.

As yourself, is your life as an American improving? Has any media figure asked our federal govt a legit tough question? Why has there not been a tough question of the Biden regime.......ie Something simple like Hunter's laptop. Do you trust our media?

---

As much as I believe the Hunter laptop story is important, because of the potential influence peddling; right now, it's so secondary to the economic issues going on…

Central Banks around the world buying gold, like never before
BRICS countries in talks of trading on something, other than the dollar
Debt limit - my opinion, no more increase and have the treasury and OMB prioritize expenditures
Spending, Spending, Spending

So, yes, conversation about Hunter stuff, Biden's floundering mind, are important; however, the immediate issues, above, are far more important!!

You are 100% correct. It was merely a way of communicating the extensive level of misinformation and censorship, etc. The expression "mockingbird media", "operation mockingbird" have been posted here off and on for the last couple of years. Its real and omnipresent.

Werewolf said:

---

I left out money laundering…..many many American politicians and their families …LLCs

Haha, you're suggesting that Hunter, Soros and Co aren't involved in any illegalities. I'd put more true in the damn Russians than any legacy western media or any connected to Biden and Soros.

There are numerous reports of biolabs in Ukraine and these reports have bee released over several months now.

---

That is my biggest problem with you and some others here, you believe Russia actually tells the truth because you don't like legacy media in the US and that's just wrong.

Like I've said before, let's see who's closer to the truth in the end. MAGA will prevail.

You'll find that you're part of that 45-yr old and younger professional class that's been indoctrinated in our university system and continued in the corporate world. I posted a short video about it yesterday.

jkpackfan said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Hunter Biden, George Soros, and CDC are Linked to Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine that are Controlled by the Pentagon.

These #Biolabs are Linked to Los Alamos Research Lab That Developed Nuclear Weapons. #ProjectManhattan pic.twitter.com/B7sNpOlYuB

— NoWorldSystem (@lowfreqfilms) March 25, 2022

---

IF THIS IS TRUE then no wonder Russia invaded Ukraine and no I'm not saying it's ok but we have no business meddling in the affairs of other countries. I would've thought we all learned from Bush and Iraq but now the same ones that crucified Bush and called him a warmonger (which he was) have now become the warmongers.

---

Ahhhh... the $1,000,000.00 question...

"were" posted it, so those chances could be all over the board.

LIke science, getting to the truth is a lot of trial, error and near successes. I share a lot of stuff here and I do NOT feel obligated to verify it with a half dozen other sources. What other source do you think appropriate?

Fact check with Snopes? Fact check with Reuters? Fact check with CNN? Fact check with USA Today? Factd check with Washington Post? Fact check with our FBI? One of two of three truthful MSM news sources and easily the major one just got removed. Blackrock purchases substantial stock over the course of the last 3 months and an icon is removed. He'll report election fraud honestly........we're at the 2024 mark now.

Guys like you don't matter with alternatives and truth........you don't believe your eyes and you don't believe your ears......just turn back on the hose of Brett Baier

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...


Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Uh-oh, another loon who thinks Biden is dead and being played by an impersonator.
The idiocy of werewolf is rubbing off

I showed you sheep the pics....but, but ......it cannot be.
I showed you sheep th pics and words of Obama/Michael.........it cannot be.

You're brainwashed and in a matrix you're unable to get out of. Just like the virus and the jab.......it took you how long?.
\
Now, where we heading?

Packchem91 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...


Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Uh-oh, another loon who thinks Biden is dead and being played by an impersonator.
The idiocy of werewolf is rubbing off

---

Now that's really a low blow, Chem... but nicely done nonetheless.

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...


Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Uh-oh, another loon who thinks Biden is dead and being played by an impersonator.
The idiocy of werewolf is rubbing off

---

Now that's really a low blow, Chem... but nicely done nonetheless.

---

You guys at it again?

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...

Big Joe was getting his f'n ass kicked by multiple "unelectable" (as you call them later on in this same thread) democrats before the national party had to literally and figuratively step in and remove everybody from the equation but Joe...

Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Who was "removed" that was remotely more electable than Biden?

Civilized said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...

Big Joe was getting his f'n ass kicked by multiple "unelectable" (as you call them later on in this same thread) democrats before the national party had to literally and figuratively step in and remove everybody from the equation but Joe...

Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Who was "removed" that was remotely more electable than Biden?

---

Even u Sieve ,,,, you would have beaten Trump in 2016

Look for media to begin to coalesce around centrist ideas..........its about to be election season. Its about drawing the sheep back in to a comfy safe place. That's a primary reason for the Tucker release and also the reason for the zealot Don Lemon being let go. Let's get normie, safe and comfy, Sheeple.

packofwolves said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...


Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Uh-oh, another loon who thinks Biden is dead and being played by an impersonator.
The idiocy of werewolf is rubbing off

---

Or, perhaps referring to whoever is actually running the presidency for a very much alive, but incompetent, Joe Biden.

---

Yes, I know what he meant. I was poking fun (allowed on the site still??) at stormy. while we may disagree on some things, we are joined together in mocking were, who has a number of low iq beliefs he posts here.

I won't hack your discussion other than to say - for an I told ya so - to those here with the stormie eyes and stormie ears. So here are my "I told ya so"'s on the fake Biden:

33% ........Option A: Q/Trump and the Q is global, Trump is America First -- a fake Biden, wake up the public and identify the outlier criminals involved in the human trafficking and corruption.....term is devolution.

33% .......Option B: World Economic Forum/NWO/UN is global, Senior Executive Service/CIA/Obama w/ Globalist agenda --- a fake Biden, allow massive influx of foreigners, dependent upon govt and vote that way too, create havoc with Antifa and BLM, possible 2nd very real and dangerous plandemic, and nuclear confrontation over Ukraine and to destroy evidence. Bring in Global Govt possibly with deadly 2nd plandemic. Demoralization/Humiliation of American population consistent with 13 min explanation below. Wish to create CCP style system globally. What's next is the CRISIS phase (what's it gonna be?)

33% .......Option C: Chinese Communist Party; Not sure if there was a splintering with Xi with attempted suppressed coup-d'etat in September. You may have seen the #2 guy marched out of huge meeting about a month later. Demoralization/Humiliation of American population consistent with 13 min explanation below.....it's our current situation. What's next is the CRISIS phase (what's it gonna be?)

Humiliation of American population consistent with 13 min explanation in this link. Marxist methods.


The question is are Options B and C working together. I think 10 years ago, yes. Since then I think a splintering of the two groups has occurred over who would be the top dog.

I stand behind these thoughts and I am putting it on record (like the jabs)........Fake Biden is part of one of the three and as vanilla as I can put it. Our country is on the edge of the cliff.

Packchem91 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Civilized said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

When I ran for Pres in 2020 the debates were rigged but in a subtle way. Preferred candidates were given more time and fed softball questions. This time Democrats are taking no chances so there will be no primary debates. This is another example of their disdain/disrespect for… pic.twitter.com/CUSlt52BLq

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) April 25, 2023

---

Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.

---

So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

---

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.

---

LOL. Right back at you...


Do you ever wonder who your real president is? Joe hasn't made one single decision since he took office...

---

Uh-oh, another loon who thinks Biden is dead and being played by an impersonator.
The idiocy of werewolf is rubbing off

---

Another idiotic interpretation of what someone said...

My hunch says Storm is talking about the person(s) that are really calling the shots.