The Biden Administration..V3

1,094,582 Views | 10961 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Werewolf
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 12:57p, 4/25/23
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.


Only way they can roll. Biden is incapable of debating at this point. He can't even read a teleprompter without screwing it up. Also incapable of holding an actual press conference and if he does, it will have to be scripted.

Biden for another 4 years is scary and he will not be able to complete another term. And the Dems kept Harris on the ticket! If she performed in the public sector as she has done as VP, she would have been fired long ago. His opponents need serious funding and need to start hammering both of them with ads. Hold back no punches.

Reply Quote
6
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 1:02p, 4/25/23
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
1
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 1:09p, 4/25/23
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Big Bad Wolf. OG...2002

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply Quote
3
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 1:30p, 4/25/23
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Show me in the constitution where party run primaries are located.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 2:01p, 4/25/23
jkpackfan said:
packofwolves said:
Biden isn't going to stop the insanity. Did Manchin see this coming with his inexcusable vote.

"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2022 that an Obama-era rule limiting power plant emissions under the Clean Air Act was unconstitutional, since Congress never granted the EPA the explicit power to issue such regulations. But the Inflation Reduction Act passed two months after that ruling allows the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-preparing-major-crackdown-power-plants-fuel-nations-grid
Manchin knew damn well what was in that bill, it's time for WV to send him packing.
His constituents - along with essentially all the others - aren't paying attention and certainly don't make an effort to search out the truth. We still feed at the Legacy Media spoon fed controlled narrative that certainly never touches on the real truth. How many here know what Trump action expires on May 11 and the massive wave of illegal aliens that will be massing on our southern border? Do we even concern ourselves with it if we do?
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PackFansXL • 2:05p, 4/25/23
PackFansXL said:
You have to accept their emphasis on equity versus equality. They are pushing for identical results for skin color, effort rewards, education,, etc. They are essentially playing wack-a-mole on anyone who succeeds and starts to stand out while giving dollars and opportunity to those who don't want to work. Drive everything to the mean.
Working toward a slave class. It will start out as a govt welfare class..........then slavery.
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 2:13p, 4/25/23
BBW12OG said:
jkpackfan said:
BBW12OG said:
jkpackfan said:
packofwolves said:
Biden isn't going to stop the insanity. Did Manchin see this coming with his inexcusable vote.

"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2022 that an Obama-era rule limiting power plant emissions under the Clean Air Act was unconstitutional, since Congress never granted the EPA the explicit power to issue such regulations. But the Inflation Reduction Act passed two months after that ruling allows the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-preparing-major-crackdown-power-plants-fuel-nations-grid
Manchin knew damn well what was in that bill, it's time for WV to send him packing.
He's up for re-election in 2024. Watch him suddenly "turn" on Sleepy Joe and become the anti-Biden until after the election.

Then he will fall in line like a good little mindless sheep.

His family didn't get jobs and money because of their overwhelming qualifications. Sleepy Joe and the rest of the MARXISTS made sure they bought and paid for his vote in full.

This country can't split up fast enough for me.

You idiots on the left that keep voting for the politicians that don't hurt your feelings and have people like that clown Marco in your folds are exactly what is keeping this country down.

Not to mention the only real things you actually run on are "-isms." You lose the black vote you have nothing. And the only reason you got that is for the most part you keep them poor, uneducated and dependent upon the government.

And you do that by calling every member of the GOP a racist at every turn.

Really standup people you lefties are.. be proud as you thump your chests talking about how you care about the "forgotten man."
Yep he's already started going after him saying he might support a repeal of that terrible piece of trash legislation which has zero chance of being repealed. I hope the folks of WV finally see him for what he is.
It can be repealed and will be if the GOP gets the WH, Senate and holds the House. The same way they pushed it through it can be erased.
Remember R's held both the Senate and House majorities the 1st two years of Trump. If you noticed, just a handful of RINOs parted ways and sided with the D's to flip an outcome. Their #'s are much larger but they don't have to show themselves unless needed. Its a "safe" RINO that justifies a reason to side with the Marxists. Its because they seek a CCP style Marxist system outcome
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 2:15p, 4/25/23
You're a Constitutionalist now? What a joke.
Reply Quote
1
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 3:04p, 4/25/23
hokiewolf said:
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Show me in the constitution where party run primaries are located.
Show me the rationale behind anyone here believing you give a damn about the Constitution. You won't even capitalize it.

Plus.. with your penchant for honesty the words you type ring hollow for most people on this site.
Big Bad Wolf. OG...2002

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply Quote
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 4:00p, 4/25/23
BBW12OG said:
jkpackfan said:
BBW12OG said:
jkpackfan said:
packofwolves said:
Biden isn't going to stop the insanity. Did Manchin see this coming with his inexcusable vote.

"The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2022 that an Obama-era rule limiting power plant emissions under the Clean Air Act was unconstitutional, since Congress never granted the EPA the explicit power to issue such regulations. But the Inflation Reduction Act passed two months after that ruling allows the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-admin-preparing-major-crackdown-power-plants-fuel-nations-grid
Manchin knew damn well what was in that bill, it's time for WV to send him packing.
He's up for re-election in 2024. Watch him suddenly "turn" on Sleepy Joe and become the anti-Biden until after the election.

Then he will fall in line like a good little mindless sheep.

His family didn't get jobs and money because of their overwhelming qualifications. Sleepy Joe and the rest of the MARXISTS made sure they bought and paid for his vote in full.

This country can't split up fast enough for me.

You idiots on the left that keep voting for the politicians that don't hurt your feelings and have people like that clown Marco in your folds are exactly what is keeping this country down.

Not to mention the only real things you actually run on are "-isms." You lose the black vote you have nothing. And the only reason you got that is for the most part you keep them poor, uneducated and dependent upon the government.

And you do that by calling every member of the GOP a racist at every turn.

Really standup people you lefties are.. be proud as you thump your chests talking about how you care about the "forgotten man."
Yep he's already started going after him saying he might support a repeal of that terrible piece of trash legislation which has zero chance of being repealed. I hope the folks of WV finally see him for what he is.
It can be repealed and will be if the GOP gets the WH, Senate and holds the House. The same way they pushed it through it can be erased.
Right was talking about prior to that.
Reply Quote
1
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 4:06p, 4/25/23
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
With all due respect this is insane. How do we get the best candidate(s) without a primary. Have each party nominate one guy even if no one likes him/her? I hope it never comes to that.
Reply Quote
2
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 4:11p, 4/25/23
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Show me in the constitution where party run primaries are located.
Show me the rationale behind anyone here believing you give a damn about the Constitution. You won't even capitalize it.

Plus.. with your penchant for honesty the words you type ring hollow for most people on this site.
Just didn't think you guys were to into progressive ideas like primaries. I fail to see how changing from closed partisan primaries to a nonpartisan blanket primary makes me a marxist. . It would reduce the ability for the AOCs and such, and the MTGs and such to have much sway within the House and Senate.

Heck, I'd love to go back to allowing state legislatures to pick senators while we're at it too.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
1 edit
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 8:45p, 4/25/23
hokiewolf said:
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Show me in the constitution where party run primaries are located.
While we are at it, let's do away with the electoral college….
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 8:53p, 4/25/23
hokiewolf said:
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
BBW12OG said:
hokiewolf said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.
Honestly, I think we should do away with party primaries. All they do is present the most extreme candidates.
Spoken like a true MARXIST.....

Your true colors never fail to come out do they comrade?

Single party rule would make you giggle and squirm wouldn't it?? All giddy when Tucker was fired.... you can't help yourself can you??
Show me in the constitution where party run primaries are located.
Show me the rationale behind anyone here believing you give a damn about the Constitution. You won't even capitalize it.

Plus.. with your penchant for honesty the words you type ring hollow for most people on this site.
Just didn't think you guys were to into progressive ideas like primaries. I fail to see how changing from closed partisan primaries to a nonpartisan blanket primary makes me a marxist. . It would reduce the ability for the AOCs and such, and the MTGs and such to have much sway within the House and Senate.

Heck, I'd love to go back to allowing state legislatures to pick senators while we're at it too.
This… I agree with!

BTW, a house representative only has one vote and only represent one district. If they have a bunch of sway, in the house, then they earned it. How do you think we have the country we have? People like, John Adams swayed others, in the Continental Congress, to sign onto the Declaration!

You may not like AOC; however, she, along with people like Pelosi, are good at what they do…
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:26p, 4/25/23
Probably Step #1 for many Americans.........


Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:11p, 4/25/23
ESG explained and how it will affect your life........goes along w a VAX Card and CBDC.


Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:13a, 4/26/23
This happened nearly a month ago.

Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:16a, 4/26/23
JUST IN - First Republic Bank share price plunges over 50% as it lost more than $100 billion in customer deposits.

https://www.disclose.tv/id/1650606818656133135/
Reply Quote
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:26a, 4/26/23
Will take over as President if Biden wins in 2024. Wake up Dems!

Reply Quote
2
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:33a, 4/26/23
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
Reply Quote
4
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packofwolves • 10:54a, 4/26/23
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
Because he didn't hurt their precious little "feewlings.."

The people that support him are people who would rather be told what to do rather than to do it on their own.

A bunch of beta cucks that are content with following whatever the MSM says is the thought for the day.

Look at this board.... imagine any of the MARXIST on here owning their own business, being responsible for the livelihoods of others and their families??? Hell, they can't do anything but yell "TRRRRUUUUMMMPPPPPPPP!!!!! 2.5 years after he has been out of office because that is what they have been conditioned to do.

They routinely bemoan how much of a "liar" President Trump was, how bad of a character he has but yet when you show them that their choice for POTUS is just as bad if not worse they stick their heads up the asses and pretend it isn't happening.

Here's more proof of how low Sleepy Joe will stoop to placate to his audiences....



And again... you see the lefties for who they are when they can support a man like this.

As far as the mortgage rate goes... even lefties are smart enough I would think to know that this is nothing but MARXISM 101... take from the people who have made a decent living and give to the lazy ass government funded leaches who could but choose to not because they know that good ol' Uncle Gubn'ment gonna hooks them up.

Got to placate to that base... keep em' poor, uneducated and dependent on the government... LBJ knew exactly what he was saying and the lefties play that game perfectly.
Big Bad Wolf. OG...2002

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply Quote
6
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packofwolves • 11:34a, 4/26/23
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
Packchem91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packofwolves • 12:15p, 4/26/23
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages


Well that sucks.
Reply Quote
2
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:43p, 4/26/23
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.


I don't understand how they have the authority to add a "tax" to someone's mortgage. They get away with that, imagine what else they can do. How about a tax on the wealthy who buy expensive e-vehicles to subsidize others who can't afford to buy them. I wouldn't put it past this administration to take this idea further.
Reply Quote
5
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:59p, 4/26/23
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Not seeing any reference to that anywhere... just the May 1 date.
Reply Quote
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TheStorm • 1:40p, 4/26/23
TheStorm said:
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Not seeing any reference to that anywhere... just the May 1 date.
If it is our bank didn't tell us about it. We closed on our new home on March 24th. NOTHING was told to my wife and I about it and we both have scores well over 700. And we got the best rate we could get considering the current state of the Sleepy Joe economy.

Pretty sure if the policy were in place already we would have been told about it or Navy Federal would have been required by law to let us know.

Me thinks that Pinocchio is just talking out of his ass....

Again... relying on him to provide truthful information is laughable at best.
Big Bad Wolf. OG...2002

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:50p, 4/26/23
2023 - the year of the whistleblower..........a little birdie tweets. This is the 2nd major one of many coming. The 1st being the IRS whistleblower #1.

Whistleblower: U.S. Govt. is 'Middleman' in Massive Migrant Child Trafficking Ring American Greatness (amgreatness.com)

Today or next Wednesday, a whistleblower is set to testify before Congress with bombshell claims that the federal government has essentially become a "middleman" in a child trafficking ring along the southern border, an operation that is allegedly worth billions.
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:39p, 4/26/23
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:06p, 4/26/23
The United Nations wants:

1. to normalize adult sex with Children (Pedophilia), its a human right.

2. to have total control of all countries in "Emergency Satiations" . Secretary General to be world dictator.

https://rumble.com/v2jv0l0-un-global-takeover-plan-wickedness-from-pit-of-hell-alex-newman.html

UN Global Takeover Plan Wickedness From Pit of Hell Alex Newman with USA Watchdog's Greg Hunter.
Reply Quote
ncsualum05
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 3:15p, 4/26/23
BBW12OG said:
TheStorm said:
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Not seeing any reference to that anywhere... just the May 1 date.
If it is our bank didn't tell us about it. We closed on our new home on March 24th. NOTHING was told to my wife and I about it and we both have scores well over 700. And we got the best rate we could get considering the current state of the Sleepy Joe economy.

Pretty sure if the policy were in place already we would have been told about it or Navy Federal would have been required by law to let us know.

Me thinks that Pinocchio is just talking out of his ass....

Again... relying on him to provide truthful information is laughable at best.
I have heard about this. This policy is absolute disgrace. How can he just throw this in all of a sudden? I guess we are running the country full dictator style now? I'm going to run up credit and stop paying it if that's the case b/c why should I get penalized for being in good shape when I can **** around and get a better deal.
Reply Quote
3
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 4:18p, 4/26/23
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.
Reply Quote
1 edit
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 4:31p, 4/26/23
Civilized said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.
I wasn't talking about Tulsi, that's old news. I was talking about dems having no primary debates.
Reply Quote
3
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 4:31p, 4/26/23
Civilized said:
jkpackfan said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Good use of RIGGED by Tulsi.

Dog-whistle for the election deniers on the right and inflammatory for the woke left.

Well-played, Tulsi. Well played.
So I guess you support not giving other candidates of your party a chance to debate, you guys are too much.

LOL. She had a chance to debate. She was an unelectable candidate with almost no mainstream support. Having another few minutes of microphone time doesn't change those fundamentals.

Gabbard was a needle-threading candidate. Her niche was "male Democrats that voted for Trump in 2016." She had no support amongst women, very little amongst mainstream Dems, and none amongst the progressives or far-left. She also had very little Republican support. That is so narrow a base as to be a complete non-factor in a national election.

It's not in either party's best interests to take an egalitarian approach and give bad candidates in a big field the same attention as your electorally viable candidates.

And Gabbard is embarrassing herself with these RIGGED claims, it's un-serious political theater. At least in Trump's case he was a legit, viable candidate that took the L and started making up fraud claims because he couldn't handle being a loser. At least he had a legit shot to win. In Gabbard's case she didn't even sniff being a top-five candidate much less a candidate with a reasonable chance to win. Her being a bad candidate lost her the nomination, not get nominally less attention from her party.

She needs to start worrying more about why she performed so poorly as a candidate and stop blaming the RIGGED system.
The system is rigged, ask Bernie.
Reply Quote
2
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TheStorm • 4:33p, 4/26/23
TheStorm said:
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Not seeing any reference to that anywhere... just the May 1 date.


Another reference to May 1:

https://nypost.com/2023/04/24/bidens-mortgage-equity-will-screw-up-the-homebuying-market/

" That surtax could amount to $60 or more per month equivalent to more than $20,000 over a 30-year mortgage"

20K is a lot of money! Biden continues to screw up this country.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ncsualum05 • 4:46p, 4/26/23
ncsualum05 said:
BBW12OG said:
TheStorm said:
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
Did not realize Biden's mortgage penalty for those with good credit goes into effect on May 1st. How can anyone support this administration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-gop-slams-perverse-biden-rule-forcing-people-with-good-credit-to-subsidize-high-risk-mortgages
The new rule has actually been applied to mortgages for about a month or so now.
Not seeing any reference to that anywhere... just the May 1 date.
If it is our bank didn't tell us about it. We closed on our new home on March 24th. NOTHING was told to my wife and I about it and we both have scores well over 700. And we got the best rate we could get considering the current state of the Sleepy Joe economy.

Pretty sure if the policy were in place already we would have been told about it or Navy Federal would have been required by law to let us know.

Me thinks that Pinocchio is just talking out of his ass....

Again... relying on him to provide truthful information is laughable at best.
I have heard about this. This policy is absolute disgrace. How can he just throw this in all of a sudden? I guess we are running the country full dictator style now? I'm going to run up credit and stop paying it if that's the case b/c why should I get penalized for being in good shape when I can **** around and get a better deal.
As long as you are not a "white" that will work just fine... Just saying....

But.. if you are a white, my advice would be to identify as one of the 162 genders other than male of female. Maybe wear a puppy mask, adult diaper, bondage attire and make-up.

Hell, they may even give you a free house if you can check enough diversity boxes with this nut job crew running the show.

Funny how Civ and the rest of the clown crew ignores the hell out of this isn't it?
Big Bad Wolf. OG...2002

"The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply Quote
5
First Page Last Page
Page 138 of 314 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.