TheStorm said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Marco said:

---

While all yall Trumpeters r worried bout Ole Joe do the Conman Donald a favor and go find him them 11,780 votes he was looking for in Georgia,which was 1 more than what he had!!Indictment cuming!!Focus on that!!

---

Honest question, did you complete middle school?

---

I don't even think that dude is a real person to be honest... I think it's a burner account for someone else and the Elite+ was thrown in as an extra measure to make the guy appear more "real".

Might even be a staff member here

---

That's what I think is possible too. But be careful Storm, you're going to be called a conspiracy theorist :-)

Werewolf said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Marco said:

---

While all yall Trumpeters r worried bout Ole Joe do the Conman Donald a favor and go find him them 11,780 votes he was looking for in Georgia,which was 1 more than what he had!!Indictment cuming!!Focus on that!!

---

Honest question, did you complete middle school?

---

I don't even think that dude is a real person to be honest... I think it's a burner account for someone else and the Elite+ was thrown in as an extra measure to make the guy appear more "real".

Might even be a staff member here

---

That's what I think is possible too. But be careful Storm, you're going to be called a conspiracy theorist :-)

---

Gotta keep the loonies clicking on the site to generate revenue!! Just like on the BY.... you have the clown 302Sullivan that starts at 7 am sharp and rolls all day/night until about 11 pm or so. Pretty sure that is a "company account" that is used by several of the clowns that took that site over.

If not that is one sad individual.

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

If brains were gasoline he wouldn't have enough to power a piss ant's moped halfway around a BB.

From what I've seen, you OWN him

Wait…

Hey @Antoni, what are you cooking tonight? pic.twitter.com/otSh31u5E3

— Dr. Jill Biden (@DrBiden) September 2, 2020

Werewolf said:

---

From what I've seen, you OWN him

---

He is just another typical lefty blowhard.... If he can't resort to calling something racist he has no argument.

He did a "hit and run" just like he did with the gun control/mass shooting thread.

When he was shown statistics, especially the ones he didn't like, he disappeared. Very telling of the type of character he possesses.

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

caryking said:

---

Wait…

Hey @Antoni, what are you cooking tonight? pic.twitter.com/otSh31u5E3

— Dr. Jill Biden (@DrBiden) September 2, 2020

---

Do you think Joe is going to use the rebate to replace his gas range for an electric?

By the way. Gas ranges are a far more economical choice for lower income families. I guess the poor don't matter.

So let me get this straight

Joe Biden bragged about getting a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was investigating Hunter’s financial ties to Burisma

Then Biden stole classified docs from the White House while he was VP that pertained to…

Ukraine?

This is Obstruction of Justice

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 10, 2023

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

That would require him to think for himself. Hasn't he proven he isn't capable of that enough times? Stop asking him to do stuff he's not able to do!!! LMAO....

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

---

Biden had "No" right, under any law, to move these documents! They were classified! The President has so much more power to do what he wants! That makes this the big difference. In fact that's what makes the Trump document issue, ridiculous!

https://gettr.com/post/p24opl4a5b4

https://gettr.com/post/p24oqzbbcb5

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

---

Biden had "No" right, under any law, to move these documents! They were classified! The President has so much more power to do what he wants! That makes this the big difference. In fact that's what makes the Trump document issue, ridiculous!

---

I agree that the classified documents should not have been in the Biden offices. I don't think anyone - including Biden - has disputed that. As we discussed at length in the Mar-a-Lago thread, the question of whether Trump could have declassified any documents (although there remains no evidence that he actually did so) does not change either (a) that he was not authorized to retain those documents outside the custody of the Archives without their permission and did not return the documents when requested, or (b) that liability under any of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant does not require classification of any documents or information.

There remains no evidence that anyone, including Biden or the Archives, was aware of the documents before they were discovered in November or that these documents were subject of a request from the Archives before they were discovered and returned. It is Trump's conduct after the Archives began requesting the return of specific documents, after a subpoena was issued, and after his lawyer swore a statement that all documents were returned after a diligent search that makes his case more egregious.

(Edited to add the word "not," which is important.)

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

---

Biden had "No" right, under any law, to move these documents! They were classified! The President has so much more power to do what he wants! That makes this the big difference. In fact that's what makes the Trump document issue, ridiculous!

---

I agree that the classified documents should not have been in the Biden offices. I don't think anyone - including Biden - has disputed that. As we discussed at length in the Mar-a-Lago thread, the question of whether Trump could have declassified any documents (although there remains no evidence that he actually did so) does not change either (a) that he was not authorized to retain those documents outside the custody of the Archives without their permission and did not return the documents when requested, or (b) that liability under any of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant does not require classification of any documents or information.

There remains no evidence that anyone, including Biden or the Archives, was aware of the documents before they were discovered in November or that these documents were subject of a request from the Archives before they were discovered and returned. It is Trump's conduct after the Archives began requesting the return of specific documents, after a subpoena was issued, and after his lawyer swore a statement that all documents were returned after a diligent search that makes his case more egregious.

(Edited to add the word "not," which is important.)

---

Manny, I think we are at an impasse, right?

I believe Trump can wave a magic wand over a room and de-classify documents. I'm not saying that it would be prudent; rather, he can. The VP does "NOT" have that latitude! Hopefully, we agree on that!

So, no need for this to be debated any longer as we don't see eye to eye. Isn't it amazing how the law can be so non-binding... On to another debate...

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

---

Biden had "No" right, under any law, to move these documents! They were classified! The President has so much more power to do what he wants! That makes this the big difference. In fact that's what makes the Trump document issue, ridiculous!

---

I agree that the classified documents should not have been in the Biden offices. I don't think anyone - including Biden - has disputed that. As we discussed at length in the Mar-a-Lago thread, the question of whether Trump could have declassified any documents (although there remains no evidence that he actually did so) does not change either (a) that he was not authorized to retain those documents outside the custody of the Archives without their permission and did not return the documents when requested, or (b) that liability under any of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant does not require classification of any documents or information.

There remains no evidence that anyone, including Biden or the Archives, was aware of the documents before they were discovered in November or that these documents were subject of a request from the Archives before they were discovered and returned. It is Trump's conduct after the Archives began requesting the return of specific documents, after a subpoena was issued, and after his lawyer swore a statement that all documents were returned after a diligent search that makes his case more egregious.

(Edited to add the word "not," which is important.)

---

Manny, I think we are at an impasse, right?

I believe Trump can wave a magic wand over a room and de-classify documents. I'm not saying that it would be prudent; rather, he can. The VP does "NOT" have that latitude! Hopefully, we agree on that!

So, no need for this to be debated any longer as we don't see eye to eye. Isn't it amazing how the law can be so non-binding... On to another debate...

---

I agree that the president's theoretical power to declassify documents at will stems from his role as Commander in Chief, which the VP dies not enjoy. However, whether did or didn't does not affect his potential culpability under any of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant. I looked at those statutes again yesterday and IMHO, under the facts that are known as of now, none of them would appear to apply to the Biden documents. A main reason for that is that they variously require a request for the return oft documents that was not complied with or conduct that was "willful" or "with the intent to." That's a high bar, but Trump's conduct after the Archives began requesting the documents and after the subpoena could arguably qualify.

I appreciate your willingness to have a reasonable discussion.

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

There are plenty of facts about the Biden docs. You just need to get off MSNBC as they are a shill…

---

OK, so which facts have I supposedly been unabble to refute?

---

Manny, just go look at other media…. You will find things, like, the documents were moved twice, by who? They moved from the (hell, I don't even know from where) to the first building that was this thinktank into the current building, on Constitution Ave.

---

I'm happy to stipulate:

• The documents include US intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics including Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom dated between 2013 and 2016
• The Biden offices (and, hence, these documents) were moved some number of times after 2016

Not sure how either of those facts either (a) make much difference in comparing the Biden and Trump circumstances or (b) add up to "obstruction of justice." I ealier listed a number of differences between the Biden and Trump circumstances. I don't see how either of these facts affect any of those diferences. If you see otherwise, please elaborate.

---

Biden had "No" right, under any law, to move these documents! They were classified! The President has so much more power to do what he wants! That makes this the big difference. In fact that's what makes the Trump document issue, ridiculous!

---

I agree that the classified documents should not have been in the Biden offices. I don't think anyone - including Biden - has disputed that. As we discussed at length in the Mar-a-Lago thread, the question of whether Trump could have declassified any documents (although there remains no evidence that he actually did so) does not change either (a) that he was not authorized to retain those documents outside the custody of the Archives without their permission and did not return the documents when requested, or (b) that liability under any of the statutes listed in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant does not require classification of any documents or information.

There remains no evidence that anyone, including Biden or the Archives, was aware of the documents before they were discovered in November or that these documents were subject of a request from the Archives before they were discovered and returned. It is Trump's conduct after the Archives began requesting the return of specific documents, after a subpoena was issued, and after his lawyer swore a statement that all documents were returned after a diligent search that makes his case more egregious.

(Edited to add the word "not," which is important.)

---

Manny, I think we are at an impasse, right?

I believe Trump can wave a magic wand over a room and de-classify documents. I'm not saying that it would be prudent; rather, he can. The VP does "NOT" have that latitude! Hopefully, we agree on that!

So, no need for this to be debated any longer as we don't see eye to eye. Isn't it amazing how the law can be so non-binding... On to another debate...

---

Even if you take the President's potential power to declassify to the maximum logical extreme and say he can literally wave his magic wand and declassify information (and it's legally quite dubious, at best, this is true) he has a responsibility to notify other stakeholders and invested parties of his decision so that they can act accordingly, which he very clearly did not do.

But like Manny said, the case against him isn't predicated upon whether the docs were classed or declassed. It's regarding his and his team's conduct after the Archives requested docs and subpoena issued that makes him and his team potentially culpable. No such corollary for the Biden team exists.

Werewolf said:

---

JOY BEHAR: "We all know that Trump is a liar and a thief...We don’t think Biden is a liar and a thief, so we give him the benefit of the doubt." pic.twitter.com/EO4loaWaaI

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) January 10, 2023

---

We all know Joy is an old fat, man hater who's mad at the world for the way her miserable life turned out.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

For me, Trump had the authority to have the documents. Biden (VP) did not.

With that said. Biden is now President and the buck stops with him.

---

Even if you start with the idea that Trump was authorized to have them and Biden was not, that is less relevant if you look at the statutes, especially 18 U.S.C. 793 section (d):

Quote:

---

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, ... willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it

---

Even if Trump starts from a position of lawfully being in possesion, once he "willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand" he is potentially in viloation of the law. As I mentioned earlier, the other statutes require willful conduct that would be hard to establish with respect to the Biden documents, and isn't supported by facts we have at present.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

For me, Trump had the authority to have the documents. Biden (VP) did not.

With that said. Biden is now President and the buck stops with him.

---

Even if you start with the idea that Trump was authorized to have them and Biden was not, that is less relevant if you look at the statutes, especially 18 U.S.C. 793 section (d):

Quote:

---

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, ... willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it

---

Even if Trump starts from a position of lawfully being in possesion, once he "willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand" he is potentially in viloation of the law. As I mentioned earlier, the other statutes require willful conduct that would be hard to establish with respect to the Biden documents, and isn't supported by facts we have at present.

---

Biden had his 4 years longer than Trump... chew on that and explain it away for us why don't you?

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Back on topic... Notice every damn thing I said about Comrade Manny is true. He got his lefty ass handed to him yesterday, was proven to be nothing more than a pinko mouthpiece for the MSM and his BS was exposed.

He couldn't refute the facts. He couldn't claim racism on any level. So what does he do? Run and hide until he finds his next talking point....

---

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere. Which facts relating to the Biden documents and/or the Trump documents was I supposedly unable to refute? There aren't a lot of facts out there for the Biden docs and the facts about the Trump docs are well established.

---

For me, Trump had the authority to have the documents. Biden (VP) did not.

With that said. Biden is now President and the buck stops with him.

---

Even if you start with the idea that Trump was authorized to have them and Biden was not, that is less relevant if you look at the statutes, especially 18 U.S.C. 793 section (d):

Quote:

---

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, ... willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it

---

Even if Trump starts from a position of lawfully being in possesion, once he "willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand" he is potentially in viloation of the law. As I mentioned earlier, the other statutes require willful conduct that would be hard to establish with respect to the Biden documents, and isn't supported by facts we have at present.

---

Biden had his 4 years longer than Trump... chew on that and explain it away for us why don't you?

---

Um, things were stuffed in a box and put in an office closet and nobody looked at it for four years. I don't find that far fetched. I have boxes in my attic that have been moved to three different house over 16 years without anyone going through them. My office has boxes of client documents that nobody has opened in way more than four years. (As far as I know, none of them contain classified documents.). Again, there is no evidence that anyone - Biden, the Archives, or anyone else - knew the doscuments were missing or in those boxes until they were discovered in November and returned to the Archives.