Werewolf said:

---

CARTEL CRUSHER: Trump Vows to Deploy U.S. Special Forces to Inflict ‘Maximum Damage’ on Cartels https://t.co/TJt4RfHGqX

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) January 6, 2023

---

yeah, that's called a war. Thought all you America first folks didn't want the US to mess with other countries affairs.

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

CARTEL CRUSHER: Trump Vows to Deploy U.S. Special Forces to Inflict ‘Maximum Damage’ on Cartels https://t.co/TJt4RfHGqX

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) January 6, 2023

---

yeah, that's called a war. Thought all you America first folks didn't want the US to mess with other countries affairs.

---

Umm. What about all those poor people from those countries that should be able to live free without persecution and violence? Shouldn't they have the opportunity to live freely in the countries where they were born?

I have no feelings either way about Trump being the one talking about it, but I do think that it is something that should be done with the cooperation and assistance of those country's themselves.

It's a hell of a lot of a better idea than whatever that is that we are doing right now.

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

CARTEL CRUSHER: Trump Vows to Deploy U.S. Special Forces to Inflict ‘Maximum Damage’ on Cartels https://t.co/TJt4RfHGqX

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) January 6, 2023

---

yeah, that's called a war. Thought all you America first folks didn't want the US to mess with other countries affairs.

---

Hokie, there is a huge difference between a "vital National interest of the US" and not.

Ukraine - not
Southern border - vital

I'm confident you see that to be the case. Ukraine situation is horrible, just not in the vital national interest of the US. For the land mass around Ukraine, it is. They need to step up and help. Unfortunately, they aren't. Why?

From The Hill:

Gaetz, for his part, said he had switched from voting for other candidates to voting "present" because "I ran out of things to ask for."

Asked if he trusts McCarthy, Gaetz suggested he does not. "Fortunately, we have a rules agreement that isn't reliant on that," he said.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3803496-mccarthy-praises-trump-gaetz-for-helping-secure-speakership/

This is the person (Mike Rogers of Alabama) that threatened the 20 holdouts. Here, he is being restrained, when addressing Matt Gaetz.

https://t.co/vRNYO6YelX pic.twitter.com/w5DzxyyRr1

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 7, 2023

This guy is the epitome of a RINO Republican. I hope he is primaried in his next election. THUG!!

Werewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

All 20 do not trust him; all of em'.

---

Well, it looks like only 7 don't trust him now…

---

Interesting stuff. My belief is that this is calculated for more than just a show. Several of those voting for KM don't trust him either and would certainly prefer another. Jim Jordan is 100% freedom caucus and certainly he would prefer freedom caucus in leadership. Something is up..

---

Jordan wants that judiciary chairmanship bad….now we'll see what he does with it.

Oldsouljer said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

All 20 do not trust him; all of em'.

---

Well, it looks like only 7 don't trust him now…

---

Interesting stuff. My belief is that this is calculated for more than just a show. Several of those voting for KM don't trust him either and would certainly prefer another. Jim Jordan is 100% freedom caucus and certainly he would prefer freedom caucus in leadership. Something is up..

---

Jordan wants that judiciary chairmanship bad….now we'll see what he does with it.

---

Actually, it's what McCarty and the Rules Committee let him do with it…. Without the required changes, from the 20, his committee would have been no different than what we got, out of the Benghazi hearings. Nothing!

All that's left is to get these new rules passed by the house. I've already seen one (Gonzales of Texas) say he is a "No" vote. Let's see if McCarthy will whip the votes, for the rules changes. Do you trust him?

Oldsouljer said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

All 20 do not trust him; all of em'.

---

Well, it looks like only 7 don't trust him now…

---

Interesting stuff. My belief is that this is calculated for more than just a show. Several of those voting for KM don't trust him either and would certainly prefer another. Jim Jordan is 100% freedom caucus and certainly he would prefer freedom caucus in leadership. Something is up..

---

Jordan wants that judiciary chairmanship bad….now we'll see what he does with it.

---

I agree. Somewhat like Trey Gowdy, I question whether he'll follow through. Of course, we see who Gowdy is now.

caryking said:

---

This is the person (Mike Rogers of Alabama) that threatened the 20 holdouts. Here, he is being restrained, when addressing Matt Gaetz.

https://t.co/vRNYO6YelX pic.twitter.com/w5DzxyyRr1

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 7, 2023

This guy is the epitome of a RINO Republican. I hope he is primaried in his next election. THUG!!

---

The epitome of our so-called representative govt. They won't fight for the individual like that.

caryking said:

---

This is the person (Mike Rogers of Alabama) that threatened the 20 holdouts. Here, he is being restrained, when addressing Matt Gaetz.

https://t.co/vRNYO6YelX pic.twitter.com/w5DzxyyRr1

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) January 7, 2023

This guy is the epitome of a RINO Republican. I hope he is primaried in his next election. THUG!!

---

So is the guy "holding" him and the guy next to him. Both of them North Carolina born or raised and both of them are North Carolina worthless.

TheStorm said:

---

caryking said:

---

If this is true, then this is despicable…

This is El Paso before Biden's visit and after his announcement he was coming to El Paso. We needed him to see what his policies have done to our Border cities and South Texas is still waiting for his Border visit.

Photos: Fit Fam El Paso pic.twitter.com/kLbOpBleEh

— Mayra Flores (@MayraFlores2022) January 8, 2023

---

Of course it's true. That's exactly how the 'crats always roll...

---

Storm, unfortunately, Republicans do the same thing…. Nonetheless, it's despicable either way…

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/another-setback-for-the-democrats-stolen-election-conspiracy-theory/

Quote:

---

Today, however, the Post's own cybersecurity columnist Tim Starks offers a reality check:

Quote:

---

Russian influence operations on Twitter in the 2016 presidential election reached relatively few users, most of whom were highly partisan Republicans, and the Russian accounts had no measurable impact in changing minds or influencing voter behavior, according to a study out this morning. The study, which the New York University Center for Social Media and Politics helmed, explores the limits of what Russian disinformation and misinformation was able to achieve on one major social media platform in the 2016 elections. "My personal sense coming out of this is that this got way overhyped," Josh Tucker, one of the report's authors who is also the co-director of the New York University center, told me about the meaningfulness of the Russian tweets. "Now we're looking back at data and we can see how concentrated this was in one small portion of the population, and how the fact that people who were being exposed to these were really, really likely to vote for Trump," Tucker said. "And then we have this data to show we can't find any relationship between being exposed to these tweets and people's change in attitudes."

---

In fact, Tucker suggests that Democrats running with "Russians hacked the election" did more damage to our political system than the Russian efforts themselves:

Quote:

---

One of the potential impacts was indirect, Tucker said: It opened the door for people to doubt that President Biden defeated Trump in 2020. "That campaign may have been more successful for reasons that it didn't set out to be successful, but by getting caught and having all this discussion," he said.

---

---

https://instagr.am/p/CnNT20HJBp3

LOL, that's about right.

Your POTUS has spoken. Now fall in line.......immediately. Sieve, recommended for U50 so you'll have to wait.

🤡 pic.twitter.com/YFg8R9HN8c

— Clown World ™ 🤡 (@ClownWorld_) January 9, 2023

High Travoltage said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

caryking said:

---

Multiple CLASSIFIED documents from when Joe Biden was VP were found in his private office

The FBI should be raiding his house in 3…2…1…

It’s only fair right?

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 9, 2023

COMER tells @bresreports he will send a letter to the White House counsels office and national archives tomorrow on the classified documents found at University of Pennsylvania.

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) January 9, 2023

Goodness https://t.co/PpwlwkKkxZ

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 9, 2023

Biden on 60 Minutes in September reacting to classified documents being found at Mar-a-Lago:

"How does that happen? How could anyone be that irresponsible." https://t.co/ps6kLurHa3 pic.twitter.com/WiiYBGPOFM

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 9, 2023

[url=https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/1612593475790467072?s=61&t=D7YfR7E5xo1kcfbiyRX-bA][/url]

---

The rules don't apply to democrats.

---

Im sure we will see the folks from the trump documents thread with the same passion here...probably even some exclamation points for emphasis....

---

You would think so.

But, if history has proven anything on this board people such as Hokie, Civ, Plasma, Manny, Chem and the rest are of little moral character. And I sincerely mean that.

They parrot whatever the MSM tells them and follow blindly. Could care less about the facts just as long as their side wins.

Take for instance the lies that Hokie has spewed on here time and time again. But yet we are supposed to believe he is an "OK" guy. BS. When you lie constantly and then try to play it off when you are busted you are a caught liar and that is what you are. He epitomizes the "trophies for all" generation and has probably never been told no and has been propped up by his folks and never had to really work a day in his life....FACT.

Civ does nothing but drop in, twist information and run and hide. His first original thought or opinion will be his first.

Chem is just a full blown left wing nutjob who would slurp up anything the MARXIST PARTY serves. And ask for more.

Plasma... well... see above.

Manny is nothing but a race baiting lefty who sees racism in every situation. And wouldn't know how to intelligently have a conversation on gun violence if you gave him a month to prepare. He's proven that time and time again. If you take RAAAAYYYYYYCCCCIIIIIISSSSSMMMMMM out of his playbook he's as empty as a champagne bottle after the New Year rings in.

Now, Happy New Year to all....

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

---

I categorically deny making racist comments in the gun control thread(s) or any other. Maybe you have me confused with someone else, maybe you misconstrued something I said, or maybe you made it up in your imagination. I don't know. However, if you continue to make that accusation, you need to back it up. Point to such a post. Shouldn't be that hard. Not like I have thousands of posts. This is my 170th post. Glancing at my profile, it looks like I have less than 20 in the "Texas School Shooting" thread. Please point to the one in which you think I made racist comments.

Back it up or retract and apologize.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

---

I categorically deny making racist comments in the gun control thread(s) or any other. Maybe you have me confused with someone else, maybe you misconstrued something I said, or maybe you made it up in your imagination. I don't know. However, if you continue to make that accusation, you need to back it up. Point to such a post. Shouldn't be that hard. Not like I have thousands of posts. This is my 170th post. Glancing at my profile, it looks like I have less than 20 in the "Texas School Shooting" thread. Please point to the one in which you think I made racist comments.

Back it up or retract and apologize.

---

Deny all you want. Read the thread. You know damn well what you were implying when you made the comments.

I don't "need to back up" anything. Why did you abandon the thread when you were shown the facts that refuted your statements?

As far as you saying "Back it up or retract and apologize" you can go pound sand.

Flag the post, email the mods do whatever you feel like you need to do. Typical crying lefty when you are called out suits you to a "T."

caryking said:

---

Multiple CLASSIFIED documents from when Joe Biden was VP were found in his private office

The FBI should be raiding his house in 3…2…1…

It’s only fair right?

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 9, 2023

COMER tells @bresreports he will send a letter to the White House counsels office and national archives tomorrow on the classified documents found at University of Pennsylvania.

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) January 9, 2023

Goodness https://t.co/PpwlwkKkxZ

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) January 9, 2023

Biden on 60 Minutes in September reacting to classified documents being found at Mar-a-Lago:

"How does that happen? How could anyone be that irresponsible." https://t.co/ps6kLurHa3 pic.twitter.com/WiiYBGPOFM

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 9, 2023

[url=https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/1612593475790467072?s=61&t=D7YfR7E5xo1kcfbiyRX-bA][/url]

---

You can't make this stuff up.

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

---

I categorically deny making racist comments in the gun control thread(s) or any other. Maybe you have me confused with someone else, maybe you misconstrued something I said, or maybe you made it up in your imagination. I don't know. However, if you continue to make that accusation, you need to back it up. Point to such a post. Shouldn't be that hard. Not like I have thousands of posts. This is my 170th post. Glancing at my profile, it looks like I have less than 20 in the "Texas School Shooting" thread. Please point to the one in which you think I made racist comments.

Back it up or retract and apologize.

---

Deny all you want. Read the thread. You know damn well what you were implying when you made the comments.

I don't "need to back up" anything. Why did you abandon the thread when you were shown the facts that refuted your statements?

As far as you saying "Back it up or retract and apologize" you can go pound sand.

Flag the post, email the mods do whatever you feel like you need to do. Typical crying lefty when you are called out suits you to a "T."

---

Once again, you make an assertion of fact, are challenged to back up your assertions, and you cannot. It is, as you would say, "typical." Done responding to this.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

---

I categorically deny making racist comments in the gun control thread(s) or any other. Maybe you have me confused with someone else, maybe you misconstrued something I said, or maybe you made it up in your imagination. I don't know. However, if you continue to make that accusation, you need to back it up. Point to such a post. Shouldn't be that hard. Not like I have thousands of posts. This is my 170th post. Glancing at my profile, it looks like I have less than 20 in the "Texas School Shooting" thread. Please point to the one in which you think I made racist comments.

Back it up or retract and apologize.

---

Deny all you want. Read the thread. You know damn well what you were implying when you made the comments.

I don't "need to back up" anything. Why did you abandon the thread when you were shown the facts that refuted your statements?

As far as you saying "Back it up or retract and apologize" you can go pound sand.

Flag the post, email the mods do whatever you feel like you need to do. Typical crying lefty when you are called out suits you to a "T."

---

Once again, you make an assertion of fact, are challenged to back up your assertions, and you cannot. It is, as you would say, "typical." Done responding to this.

---

Anything on your guy and the finding of classified documents?

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Welcome back. Nice first post since your vacation.

I'm generally willing to roll along with your weak personal insults in lieu of actual arguments (yelling "MARXIST" and all that), but if you want to accuse me or anyone else of racism, you best be prepared to back it up. Otherwise, please retract and apologize. I don't take that lightly.

---

Thanks.... Arizona was lovely and so was my wedding.

If you are insinuating I was banned then you can GFY. I wasn't.

I'm not apologizing for anything I said. You are the one that absolutely brought race into the argument of gun control/mass shootings when I posted the facts from the FBI Crime Statistics website. And I don't have to "prove" anything. Anyone that read the threads and has a memory will know what you said and what your comments were.

When you were proven wrong you disappeared. Typical....

And I could care less what you take lightly or what you take heavily. You are who you are and you proved it last summer. I proved your racist comments wrong and you disappeared when you couldn't refute the facts.

Deal with it.

---

I categorically deny making racist comments in the gun control thread(s) or any other. Maybe you have me confused with someone else, maybe you misconstrued something I said, or maybe you made it up in your imagination. I don't know. However, if you continue to make that accusation, you need to back it up. Point to such a post. Shouldn't be that hard. Not like I have thousands of posts. This is my 170th post. Glancing at my profile, it looks like I have less than 20 in the "Texas School Shooting" thread. Please point to the one in which you think I made racist comments.

Back it up or retract and apologize.

---

Deny all you want. Read the thread. You know damn well what you were implying when you made the comments.

I don't "need to back up" anything. Why did you abandon the thread when you were shown the facts that refuted your statements?

As far as you saying "Back it up or retract and apologize" you can go pound sand.

Flag the post, email the mods do whatever you feel like you need to do. Typical crying lefty when you are called out suits you to a "T."

---

Once again, you make an assertion of fact, are challenged to back up your assertions, and you cannot. It is, as you would say, "typical." Done responding to this.

---

Of course you are. Thanks for proving my point.

Typical lefty... when faced with the facts that you don't like you run and hide.

Answer Gulf's question. Anything on topic for the Sleepy Joe administration?

You and your lefty brethren are a great example of the spineless identity politics of your party. I'm sure you'll find something racist in that statement with your posting history...

*Also you failed to acknowledge your insinuation of me being banned or on "vacation" as you put it. Just as you do with your veiled accusations of racism you circumvent accountability your obvious innuendo.

Like I said when this Trump documents thing started, I'll take a wait and see approach.