The Biden Administration..V3

589,879 Views | 8759 Replies | Last: 27 min ago by ncsupack1
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

BBW12OG said:

Here is what the left has.....




This guy is out of his freaking mind.
/

Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorta like you posting Tucker Carlson's constant lies, like there were no guns at the Capitol on Jan 6. Or lying about the number of people still held in jail. And how they landed in jail. They weren't grandmas posing for selfies like you suggested.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wufskins said:

Sorta like you posting Tucker Carlson's constant lies, like there were no guns at the Capitol on Jan 6. Or lying about the number of people still held in jail. And how they landed in jail. They weren't grandmas posing for selfies like you suggested.
I'll give it to you pedoskins..... you can deflect better than a Star Wars Destroyer.....

As far as your character goes..... you have none.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Oldsouljer said:

The man's got a problem if 42% of Democrats really do support mass deportations of illegal aliens.

https://t.co/fXPKxpGlQj


Perfect time for the GOP to make massive gains, but they will more than likely throw away a golden opportunity. Fortunately for some, the old talking points can be reused.


Sadly, I think you are correct.


Sad is the word. I mean it's right there for the taking.
If, and only if, leadership (and the cronies) listen to the people. Unfortunately, they continue with war bills, and allowing spending promoted by Schumer and Biden.


You forgot about expanding the base and taking votes from Democrats. The hard line right, isn't the majority at the moment. The continued in fighting within the party isn't helping with the average voter.


I would say the hard right is the majority of the Party, just not majority of the country. Just like the hard left is the majority of Dems, just not the majorly of the country.

The point is: the majority of the party should get a say, for the party (either). It becomes how you bring the balance of your party in…

If that were true, then Bernie Sanders (the closest thing America has to a "hard left" politician, still a moderate by global lefty standards) wouldn't have gotten trounced in the last Dem primary.

The vast majority of Dems (including pretty much all black people) are actually pretty centrist. You guys have created a "hard left OMG MARXIST" boogeyman in order to balance out and justify your leap off of a right wing "burn it all down" cliff.


He didn't
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Oldsouljer said:

The man's got a problem if 42% of Democrats really do support mass deportations of illegal aliens.

https://t.co/fXPKxpGlQj


Perfect time for the GOP to make massive gains, but they will more than likely throw away a golden opportunity. Fortunately for some, the old talking points can be reused.


Sadly, I think you are correct.


Sad is the word. I mean it's right there for the taking.
If, and only if, leadership (and the cronies) listen to the people. Unfortunately, they continue with war bills, and allowing spending promoted by Schumer and Biden.


You forgot about expanding the base and taking votes from Democrats. The hard line right, isn't the majority at the moment. The continued in fighting within the party isn't helping with the average voter.


In each party, the more right or left makes up the majority. Republicans can't win without the right flank of the party. So, we have to pick our poison. I'm choosing the right flank…
I've been arguing for awhile now that no reform from within of the NCGOP will be allowed and that real conservatives should decamp, take over the NC Constitution Party and negotiate with the corporate GOP for conservative objectives in return for electoral support.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.
You want to compare your record vs. his on honesty?

We can start from there.

You are about as much a Republican as Liz Cheney.....

Again.... I stand by every damn comment I have ever made about you. Mostly because you never cease to disappoint......

Keep delivering.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.
You want to compare your record vs. his on honesty?

We can start from there.

You are about as much a Republican as Liz Cheney.....

Again.... I stand by every damn comment I have ever made about you. Mostly because you never cease to disappoint......

Keep delivering.

Let me check... hmmmmmmmmmmmmm... yep! Nobody cares.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.
You want to compare your record vs. his on honesty?

We can start from there.

You are about as much a Republican as Liz Cheney.....

Again.... I stand by every damn comment I have ever made about you. Mostly because you never cease to disappoint......

Keep delivering.

Let me check... hmmmmmmmmmmmmm... yep! Nobody cares.
You cared enough to comment on a post that had nothing to do with you......

See the irony?

Again....... room temperature IQ....... keep proving it.
Bockwinkle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
That an opinion. What issue do you want to discuss that Gaetz holds?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.


He told you all of this?
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.


He told you all of this?
He will tell you he did......

Someone that lies the way hokie does you need to take what he says with a half grain of salt.

I'm sure he is donating more money to Pocahontas' campaign, faking receipts and doubling down on lying about it.

He's been known to do that.

Imagine being a person of that character and trying to convince everyone you are a good person. He's not.
barelypure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Wufskins said:

"I'll give you the truth why I'm not speaker," McCarthy said during a Tuesday interview at Georgetown University. "It's because one person, a member of Congress, wanted me to stop an ethics complaint because he slept with a 17 year old."

https://www.axios.com/2024/04/10/mccarthy-gaetz-johnson-house-speaker-removal





McCarthy is a charlatan!!
True. On the BY before McCarthy was chosen as Speaker I posited that it should be anyone but him. Sure he can raise money like no one's business but he's not a conservative. Also, he has suspect friends, like Frank Luntz, his room mate when he was Speaker. Luntz may have at 1 time been a decent fellow working with Newt but some of the circles he moves in are a little questionable.

Oh, and you can thank him for the migration of the term global warming to climate change so it would get greater acceptance. That's the kind of work he does.
barelypure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well someone on the Biden team wet their finger and stuck it in the air to see which way the wind was blowing. They read the tea leaves and saw that their hold on the black voting was waning and had to be addressed. In a masterful stroke they have delayed the ban on menthol cigarettes. 81% of black voters and 51% of Hispanic voters smoke menthols. I just hope those 2 groups notice the word delayed and not killed. Once they elect Biden you can bet the menthol ban will be back on the table. Mark my words.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have never understood the whole menthol thing.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
That an opinion. What issue do you want to discuss that Gaetz holds?
Gaetz's positions are the flavor of the hour. If the populists wanted to double middle class taxes he'd be on TV telling us he's for it. He has no principled positions to debate.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.


He told you all of this?
see response to Cary above ^
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
barelypure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Finally people are starting to realize we're being lied to by this Administration. I'm surprised it took this long.



Critics of Biden's numbers find the fact that jobless filings have not fluctuated even a little seems to be a bit on the statistically impossible side. "How is this statistically possible? Five of the last six weeks, the exact same number," Bianco Research analyst Jim Bianco asked Thursday on social media platform X.

"Initial claims for unemployment insurance are state programs, with 50 state rules, hundreds of offices, and 50 websites to file. Weather, seasonality, holidays, and economic vibrations drive the number of people filing claims from week to week," Bianco continued. "Yet this measure is so stable that it does not vary by even 1,000 applications a week."

Then of course there's the jobs report I mentioned some time back but here's a refresher for those who may have missed it



It's the economy stupid, well unless they can convince the stupid not to believe their own eyes and common sense and still vote for this charlatan. At least when Trump was President you can bet any and all discrepancies were shouted from the mountain tops but now the MSM is content to remain silent and hide the numbers from all of us.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the truth!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barelypure said:

Finally people are starting to realize we're being lied to by this Administration. I'm surprised it took this long.



Critics of Biden's numbers find the fact that jobless filings have not fluctuated even a little seems to be a bit on the statistically impossible side. "How is this statistically possible? Five of the last six weeks, the exact same number," Bianco Research analyst Jim Bianco asked Thursday on social media platform X.

"Initial claims for unemployment insurance are state programs, with 50 state rules, hundreds of offices, and 50 websites to file. Weather, seasonality, holidays, and economic vibrations drive the number of people filing claims from week to week," Bianco continued. "Yet this measure is so stable that it does not vary by even 1,000 applications a week."

...

Yes, you've blown the conspiracy wide open. Except this moron is looking as seasonally adjusted numbers. The raw numbers are in fact not identical.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sieve & Nappy's guy has got this!

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a real-life poll........not the bulls$it being sold on the mockingbird media.

Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
What the Administrative doesn't fudge, the Federal Reserve will. Those inflation figures are totally divorced from Main Street reality.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

ncsupack1 said:

Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
What the Administrative doesn't fudge, the Federal Reserve will. Those inflation figures are totally divorced from Main Street reality.


Folks have called the administration out.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Oldsouljer said:

ncsupack1 said:

Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
What the Administrative doesn't fudge, the Federal Reserve will. Those inflation figures are totally divorced from Main Street reality.


Folks have called the administration out.

So which non-right leaning site are you referring to that accused them of cooking the books? Only links I've seen are from Twitter disinformation trolls.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

Oldsouljer said:

ncsupack1 said:

Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
What the Administrative doesn't fudge, the Federal Reserve will. Those inflation figures are totally divorced from Main Street reality.


Folks have called the administration out.

So which non-right leaning site are you referring to that accused them of cooking the books? Only links I've seen are from Twitter disinformation trolls.


MSNBC business I believe…or CNN …go look it up…Drudge had the link..
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

Oldsouljer said:

ncsupack1 said:

Glad to see folks calling out the Administration. I've read other articles that are basically accusing the administration of cooking the books. And some of those weren't right leaning sites.
What the Administrative doesn't fudge, the Federal Reserve will. Those inflation figures are totally divorced from Main Street reality.


Folks have called the administration out.

So which non-right leaning site are you referring to that accused them of cooking the books? Only links I've seen are from Twitter disinformation trolls.


MSNBC business I believe…or CNN …go look it up…Drudge had the link..

Lol, uh huh.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
That an opinion. What issue do you want to discuss that Gaetz holds?
Gaetz's positions are the flavor of the hour. If the populists wanted to double middle class taxes he'd be on TV telling us he's for it. He has no principled positions to debate.


Again, that's your opinion. What specific policy of his would you like to discuss?
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
That an opinion. What issue do you want to discuss that Gaetz holds?
Gaetz's positions are the flavor of the hour. If the populists wanted to double middle class taxes he'd be on TV telling us he's for it. He has no principled positions to debate.


Again, that's your opinion. What specific policy of his would you like to discuss?
Cary, he doesn't have any policies he believes in. There is nothing to debate with Gaetz. He's only in it for himself.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Imagine defending Matt freaking Gaetz.


I will! What issue do you want to discuss?
hes smart, he knows what he's doing which is to destroy the Republican Party and to get on TV doing it. That's all he cares about.
That an opinion. What issue do you want to discuss that Gaetz holds?
Gaetz's positions are the flavor of the hour. If the populists wanted to double middle class taxes he'd be on TV telling us he's for it. He has no principled positions to debate.


Again, that's your opinion. What specific policy of his would you like to discuss?
Cary, he doesn't have any policies he believes in. There is nothing to debate with Gaetz. He's only in it for himself.
How can you quantify this statement?

Do tell us please... this is YOUR opinion. You know this if you have an IQ outside your mom's apron pocket.
First Page Last Page
Page 237 of 251
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.