The Biden Administration..V3

994,181 Views | 10757 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Werewolf
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

I've personally never have looked at the MSM the same ever since the Dan Rather report on GB.
GB?
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How about this little gem that will be getting a lot of airplay in the next 6 months.....

ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

I've personally never have looked at the MSM the same ever since the Dan Rather report on GB.
GB?


George Bush. The fake documents before the election.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

I've personally never have looked at the MSM the same ever since the Dan Rather report on GB.
GB?
https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/10/30/the-truth-about-dan-rathers-deceptive-reporting-on-george-w-bush/

It ran deeper than that.

When President Trump came onto the scene he exposed the MSM for what they are.

The Joseph Goebbels Arm of the MARXIST PARTY.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Werewolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

I've personally never have looked at the MSM the same ever since the Dan Rather report on GB.
GB?
https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/10/30/the-truth-about-dan-rathers-deceptive-reporting-on-george-w-bush/

It ran deeper than that.

When President Trump came onto the scene he exposed the MSM for what they are.

The Joseph Goebbels Arm of the MARXIST PARTY.
Should have been a major wake up call for anyone. Trump had been the darling of the media and hollywood for many years.......and when he announced the massive attacks came from everywhere. Relentless.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Werewolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

I've personally never have looked at the MSM the same ever since the Dan Rather report on GB.
GB?
https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/10/30/the-truth-about-dan-rathers-deceptive-reporting-on-george-w-bush/

It ran deeper than that.

When President Trump came onto the scene he exposed the MSM for what they are.

The Joseph Goebbels Arm of the MARXIST PARTY.


Completely. I was just saying that was the first at least that I can remember, where a " prominent " media figure got caught.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!
Sadly you have to discredit the source as opposed to the facts right?

Here's one for you to discredit.



How are you going to spin this?

It's "altered?"

It's "CGI/AI?"

You once again are a typical lefty. When you can't dispute the facts you attack the source.

If those articles had been from CNN or MSDNC you wouldn't have questioned them. Guess what? You can't dispute the facts only the source they came from.

That's the lowest form of a debate rebuttal there is. It also shows you aren't smart enough to figure out how ignorant that makes you look when you post a reply in that form.

Good. Keep it coming. It's always fun to send you and your foreskin buddy back to the corner to regroup.
Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's gonna cost Joe the Iraqi vote!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.

What you're mad at Dan Rather for is literally the business model of the "news" sources you guys nod along to now.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.

What you're mad at Dan Rather for is literally the business model of the "news" sources you guys nod along to now.


Not mad at all. Cost Dan his job though.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.

What you're mad at Dan Rather for is literally the business model of the "news" sources you guys nod along to now.


Not mad at all. Cost Dan his job though.

So CBS fired the guy for either inadvertently or on purpose showing bias, and that makes you mad at CBS?

I guess you'd prefer non-mainstream media where worrying about bias isn't actually a thing? The guys that only get paid by the click so have an incentive to generate constant clickbait outrage are certainly more trustworthy I imagine.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.

What you're mad at Dan Rather for is literally the business model of the "news" sources you guys nod along to now.


Not mad at all. Cost Dan his job though.

So CBS fired the guy for either inadvertently or on purpose showing bias, and that makes you mad at CBS?

I guess you'd prefer non-mainstream media where worrying about bias isn't actually a thing? The guys that only get paid by the click so have an incentive to generate constant clickbait outrage are certainly more trustworthy I imagine.


Once again I'm not mad. Rather was caught and fired. Sorry you want to defend the fraud.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

ncsupack1 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

When you can't trust the corporate shills of the MSM where do you go?

The hard hitting economic reporters at "End Wokeness" of course! Definitely unbiased news you can trust!


Dan Rather was exposed. But I'm sure though that you didn't mind.

What you're mad at Dan Rather for is literally the business model of the "news" sources you guys nod along to now.


Not mad at all. Cost Dan his job though.

So CBS fired the guy for either inadvertently or on purpose showing bias, and that makes you mad at CBS?

I guess you'd prefer non-mainstream media where worrying about bias isn't actually a thing? The guys that only get paid by the click so have an incentive to generate constant clickbait outrage are certainly more trustworthy I imagine.


Once again I'm not mad. Rather was caught and fired. Sorry you want to defend the fraud.
This coming from the same clown that questioned the source of the FACTS.... and NOT the FACTS themselves.

Imagine being that intellectually clueless.... I see why he and foreskins are so close.... Neither one will ever own up to the fact that they aren't able to refute the facts that I have posted for weeks now.

They jjust move on to their next little perceived "gotcha" moments....

Here is a little nugget of interest.... I'm sure the SCOTUS when this sham trial makes it there will love this...

Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe he shouldn't have done his criminal acts in Manhattan. Poor fella just can't catch a break.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wufskins said:

Maybe he shouldn't have done his criminal acts in Manhattan. Poor fella just can't catch a break.
Make sure when Sleepy Joe is in the courtroom after January of next year you have plenty of tissues.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wufskins said:

Maybe he shouldn't have done his criminal acts in Manhattan. Poor fella just can't catch a break.

Man, what has this country come to? It's getting so you can't even sleep with a porn star while your wife is home pregnant, and then pay the porn star off to keep quiet during an election.

I do bet Trump in retrospect regrets paying her off... turns out his evangelical base is really into that kinda thing.
Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Wufskins said:

Maybe he shouldn't have done his criminal acts in Manhattan. Poor fella just can't catch a break.

Man, what has this country come to? It's getting so you can't even sleep with a porn star while your wife is home pregnant, and then pay the porn star off to keep quiet during an election.

I do bet Trump in retrospect regrets paying her off... turns out his evangelical base is really into that kinda thing.

Can't even grab em by the P or else you have to pay. Maybe he can buy another beauty pageant so he can stare at teenagers getting undressed.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Wufskins said:

Maybe he shouldn't have done his criminal acts in Manhattan. Poor fella just can't catch a break.
Make sure when Sleepy Joe is in the courtroom after January of next year you have plenty of tissues.

In the courtroom for what?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill Mayer opines on abortion.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bill-maher-abortion-murder/2024/04/15/id/1161067/
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?
The better question is… which one isn't?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some of Smapty's friends on the ground?


Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters

I'm unclear what we're mad about.

Protesters that break the law can and should be arrested.

What do protesters protesting our Israel/Hamas response have to do with 9/11, or with Democrat elected officials?

Is it just me or does it seem like a big logical leap from interrupting traffic to committing jihad?
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters

I'm unclear what we're mad about.

Protesters that break the law can and should be arrested.

What do protesters protesting our Israel/Hamas response have to do with 9/11, or with Democrat elected officials?

Is it just me or does it seem like a big logical leap from interrupting traffic to committing jihad?
I'm not mad, just asking why are these protesters allowed keep pulling this and more times than not, they don't get arrested...lololol I'm asking you something different than Cary
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?
The better question is… which one isn't?

Which one isn't what, exactly, Cary?

Stop being vague.

What Democrat politicians support "Death to America" and "Death to Israel"?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters

I'm unclear what we're mad about.

Protesters that break the law can and should be arrested.

What do protesters protesting our Israel/Hamas response have to do with 9/11, or with Democrat elected officials?

Is it just me or does it seem like a big logical leap from interrupting traffic to committing jihad?
I'm not mad, just asking why are these protesters allowed keep pulling this and more times than not, they don't get arrested...lololol I'm asking you something different than Cary

Yeah I was talking about Cary being mad, not you, haha.

I'm curious about what's being suggested?

Have the rates of protester arrests decreased over recent decades?

Are they lower under Republican presidents than Democratic presidents?

Are they lower in states with Republican governors?

Are they lower in cities with Republican mayors?

I'm skeptical that police on the ground in local protests are getting their marching orders from the federal government regarding who to arrest and who to leave alone. I'm also fairly skeptical they're getting them from the state government/governor's office either.

Seems more like a local precinct or city-level decision, not a state or certainly a federal gubmint decision. I'd think those police are getting their orders from their CO's or the police chief.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters

I'm unclear what we're mad about.

Protesters that break the law can and should be arrested.

What do protesters protesting our Israel/Hamas response have to do with 9/11, or with Democrat elected officials?

Is it just me or does it seem like a big logical leap from interrupting traffic to committing jihad?
I'm not mad, just asking why are these protesters allowed keep pulling this and more times than not, they don't get arrested...lololol I'm asking you something different than Cary

Yeah I was talking about Cary being mad, not you, haha.

I'm curious about what's being suggested?

Have the rates of protester arrests decreased over recent decades?

Are they lower under Republican presidents than Democratic presidents?

Are they lower in states with Republican governors?

Are they lower in cities with Republican mayors?

I'm skeptical that police on the ground in local protests are getting their marching orders from the federal government regarding who to arrest and who to leave alone. I'm also fairly skeptical they're getting them from the state government/governor's office either.

Seems more like a local precinct or city-level decision, not a state or certainly a federal gubmint decision. I'd think those police are getting their orders from their CO's or the police chief.

You are assuming a lot here. I just would like to know why the police aren't arresting these folks that are blocking traffic? Someone is telling the cops to stand to the side. Who is it? I find it wrong and I'll wait and see if the next time anyone on the right does this, how these cities handle it. That's all.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

WOW!!

The leftist are really make themselves known today. These are violent people shutting down bridges, airports, and roads. Biden wants to give work permits to these people. At some point, the Democrats need to disown these people or vote the people supporting this out!!

Death to America
Death to Israel

I hope our feckless government does something so we don't end up having another 9/11

What elected Dem officials are supporting "this"?



Should they be arrested? Protesters

I'm unclear what we're mad about.

Protesters that break the law can and should be arrested.

What do protesters protesting our Israel/Hamas response have to do with 9/11, or with Democrat elected officials?

Is it just me or does it seem like a big logical leap from interrupting traffic to committing jihad?
I'm not mad, just asking why are these protesters allowed keep pulling this and more times than not, they don't get arrested...lololol I'm asking you something different than Cary

Yeah I was talking about Cary being mad, not you, haha.

I'm curious about what's being suggested?

Have the rates of protester arrests decreased over recent decades?

Are they lower under Republican presidents than Democratic presidents?

Are they lower in states with Republican governors?

Are they lower in cities with Republican mayors?

I'm skeptical that police on the ground in local protests are getting their marching orders from the federal government regarding who to arrest and who to leave alone. I'm also fairly skeptical they're getting them from the state government/governor's office either.

Seems more like a local precinct or city-level decision, not a state or certainly a federal gubmint decision. I'd think those police are getting their orders from their CO's or the police chief.

You are assuming a lot here. I just would like to know why the police aren't arresting these folks that are blocking traffic? Someone is telling the cops to stand to the side. Who is it? I find it wrong and I'll wait and see if the next time anyone on the right does this, how these cities handle it. That's all.

Probably their police chief and the broader law enforcement community's adoption of best policing practices for protests.

I don't think this is a political issue, I think it's almost purely pragmatic.

The police community isn't exactly a bastion of liberal thought, I wouldn't think, and yet use of force, arrests, etc. are commonly avoided during protests when possible. Blocking traffic is annoying but police physicaly interjecting themselves into non-violent protests that could then turn confrontational and violent unnecessarily puts officers' lives at risk.

Still, you're already seeing reports of dozens of arrests in these cities where roads/bridges are being blocked.

Hard to both-sides this issue since dating back decades political protesters are overwhelmingly young and liberal.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not political? Got ya, like I said, I'll be watching if or when the shoe is on the other foot. That's all…I mean how many nights did cities burn not to long ago? Seemed like the cops were told to stand down then too. I know for a fact Raleigh did.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Not political? Got ya, like I said, I'll be watching if or when the shoe is on the other foot. That's all…I mean how many nights did cities burn not to long ago? Seemed like the cops were told to stand down then too. I know for a fact Raleigh did.

When "Cities burned" I'm assuming you mean during BLM protests?

There were thousands of arrests across the country during those protests so I think this image of police standing around doing nothing while cities burn is inaccurate. There were over 150 arrests in Raleigh alone.

There may not be as many arrests as you'd like but to act like cops were "standing down" and not enforcing laws at all is not what happened then, and is not happening today (I just saw on the news there were dozens of arrests in Chicago and New York, as an example).
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Some of Smapty's friends on the ground?




Yeah, I wish they'd taken notes from your friends on how a "peaceful protest" works.



I'm assuming you also think the Republicans need to disown those people or vote the people supporting that out?

Of course you do.
First Page Last Page
Page 227 of 308
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.