Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

I'm calling BS here. The man was writing a book and I'm 100% certain the classified docs were there for reference for said book.

Just because your old and senile now doesn't make you old and senile then.

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Can't handle your side being exposed can you? You have deflected more than the shields in Star Wars on this topic.

Again, when you can't resort to calling something "racist" you have little to no original thoughts on a topic do you?

Typical lefty.... You keep slurping up the MSM talking points, regurgitating them and posting. Simple task for a simple mind.

---

packofwolves said:

---

Classified documents in 2 locations. One location funded by Chinese $s and the second being a locked garage with a car. A garage that is accessible to people in the house and anyone taking the car for a spin.

And Biden has "no regrets"!

https://news.yahoo.com/no-regrets-over-discovery-classified-122603552.html

---

Redwolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Classified documents in 2 locations. One location funded by Chinese $s and the second being a locked garage with a car. A garage that is accessible to people in the house and anyone taking the car for a spin.

And Biden has "no regrets"!

https://news.yahoo.com/no-regrets-over-discovery-classified-122603552.html

---

Did Hunters Chinese squeeze, the spy, have access… at this point, it's hard to believe she didn't.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

I'm calling BS here. The man was writing a book and I'm 100% certain the classified docs were there for reference for said book.

Just because you're old and senile now doesn't make you old and senile then.

---

I'm glad you're 100% certain. Is there any evidence that supports that, or just supposition?

---

yes, it's called "Promise me, Dad"! I think it free on Audible so I'll grab and and give it a listen.

Look, we're not in court here, I'm not trying a case, but I'm 100% in my opinion that Biden, based on his past pompous ass tendencies, no doubt knew about these documents and took them to write a pompous assery like book

To me, that is certainly much more plausible than "he didn't know". And it's certainly more plausible than some of the other wackadoodle theories.

---

packgrad said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

lol. "He didn't know." Good boy.

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

Redwolf said:

---

I think the problem for manny here is he's use to arguing with uninformed or poorly informed people.
The other problem is that no matter how hard we hit him with truth and facts …he will always tow the party line.

It's like trying to break someone from a cult…we need to be patient with him and continue to put out the information. You never know when someone will have their moment of clarity.

---

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

Lmao geez dude.

---

That's why I never understood Cary's insistence on continued debate with Civ. Waste of time.

---

Redwolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Quote:

---

Speaking of "awareness", I am glad you have stopped throwing your firm under the bus for equating the way they handle sensitive information to the way Biden handles classified information. Just a terrible look for the firm, and emphasizes the total lack of "awareness" you have when blindly defending the shield.

---

Nobody was "thrown under the bus." Merely an acknowledgement that any organization that operated with paper files, and has an obligation to retain client records, is going to have boxes of papers that nobody ever looks at. Often for years and years. The fact that there were boxes of what were believed to be mundane papers, and that were not examined for six years, is not at all surprising.

---

Papers that he wasn't permitted to have after he left office to begin with... you always somehow consistently manage to leave that out of your defense of him here...

---

But that assumes knowledge that the classified docs were in the boxes, and that that makes not looking at the boxes for a long time suspicious. At this point there is no evidence that the classified docs were put in those boxes purposefully or that anyone, including Biden, knew they were there. The evidence so far suggests that the boxes were understood to contain mundane papers, not classified docs.

---

Lmao geez dude.

---

That's why I never understood Cary's insistence on continued debate with Civ. Waste of time.

---

Yea, I wonder that myself…

---

Hang in there, Manny might not ever see the truth or worse he's all for the deconstruction of our constitution and country and in that case nothing we say can sway him. All we can hope for is every time we counter his attempt at misdirection with the real facts, that other people will see, read, process, and wake up to this systematic destruction of our country and our freedom.

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Redwolf said:

---

I think the problem for manny here is he's use to arguing with uninformed or poorly informed people.
The other problem is that no matter how hard we hit him with truth and facts …he will always tow the party line.

It's like trying to break someone from a cult…we need to be patient with him and continue to put out the information. You never know when someone will have their moment of clarity.

---

I'm sorry, what are the supposed "truth and facts" you have hit so hard with? Regarding the possession and movement of the Biden documents before they were found beginning in November, all I see here are beliefs and assumptions. If there is any actual evidence of who knew what and when prior to November, please share. Nobody has so far.

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Redwolf said:

---

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Redwolf said:

---

I think the problem for manny here is he's use to arguing with uninformed or poorly informed people.
The other problem is that no matter how hard we hit him with truth and facts …he will always tow the party line.

It's like trying to break someone from a cult…we need to be patient with him and continue to put out the information. You never know when someone will have their moment of clarity.

---

I'm sorry, what are the supposed "truth and facts" you have hit so hard with? Regarding the possession and movement of the Biden documents before they were found beginning in November, all I see here are beliefs and assumptions. If there is any actual evidence of who knew what and when prior to November, please share. Nobody has so far.

---

Thanks for proving my point. You're blind to everything. That's ok that's you. I am not posting to change your mind.
I hope the silent readers of this thread hear me/us, and see. Those are the ones for whom I fight..
You .. your just amusement at this juncture. I suggest turning off msnbc … or go work for them.

---

Blind to what? Nobody, including you, has posted any actual evidence of who knew what and when prior to November. Just beliefs and assumptions. If you think I have missed something along the way, just list it here. How hard can that be? I promise I'll acknowledge it.

---

The Department of Justice just announced they searched Joe Biden’s home on Friday and found SIX MORE classified documents. This comes after Biden said there were no more. It’s way past time for a full FBI raid of all Joe Biden’s properties. Our democracy won’t survive otherwise.

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) January 22, 2023

This says some of the docs are from his Senate service.

Serious Q: how on earth did he do that?

I’ve served in the Senate for 10 years. EVERY single classified doc I’ve read—100%—have been in a secure SCIF in the basement of the Capitol.

What the hell?? https://t.co/XXznYth2dA

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 22, 2023

packgrad said:

---

He didn't know he took documents when he was a senator too. HE DIDNT KNOW!!!

This says some of the docs are from his Senate service.

Serious Q: how on earth did he do that?

I’ve served in the Senate for 10 years. EVERY single classified doc I’ve read—100%—have been in a secure SCIF in the basement of the Capitol.

What the hell?? https://t.co/XXznYth2dA

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) January 22, 2023

---