caryking said:
Packchem91 said:
caryking said:
Packchem91 said:
caryking said:
Packchem91 said:
PackFansXL said:
Steve Videtich said:
Packchem91 said:
Steve Videtich said:
Packchem91 said:
Steve Videtich said:
Packchem91 said:
Steve Videtich said:
Packchem91 said:
Steve Videtich said:
So, the only question I have is who gets the right to determine what's true and what's false? Does being a "moderator" give one that ability? Steve and James have done an admirable job, in my opinion, of letting things be for the most part in the Water Cooler.
At times things have gotten personal, which they never should. But, I've seen errors in judgement and decorum carried out by "moderators" at times as well. So, who I ask again, who had the right to determine what's true?
Haaa....the reality we see every day is that what is true aligns very closely with what you believe, or want to believe. Major news organizations have turned into "team sites" just as if they were Panthers.com or GoPack.com, and feed off of the above (And make it worse)
Not true at all! Maybe for some, maybe for the hard headed, but I don't see it that way. I have a brain and common sense. Any news I watch (which is very little), and even talk that I listen to, I don't always agree with. I'm able to weed through the BS and make my own decision.
I don't 100% agree with people I tend to align with on this board. But, just because someone disagrees with information on here, doesn't mean it's wrong. Look at all the things that were censored in recent years as false information, but has now come a full 180.
The boy who cried wolf was even right one time, but it was too late when people should've listened.
Its very true that news services are doing this. It is also true that we see news thru a filtered lens. It is also true that some people can rise above this and consider multiple sources.
People who dislike all forms of immigration, see a CNN article about it, and flip out...so they go find a news source that shows a drunk Mexican immigrant who plowed into a teenager and say, "see, we shouldn't allow immigration".
And of course this goes both ways.....
It's also true that some people see someone post something against immigration and jump to conclusions that that person is xenophobic and racist. I think we all need to do a better job of expressing our opinions as well as understanding where we're coming from. Myself included!
Yes, and some people who posts those opinions about immigration ARE xenophobic and racist. I'm not speaking about anyone here...but come on, we know this is true, in general.
And yes, I know you disagree, but i believe this is the exact sentiment of the America First agenda that folks like Trump capitalize on...
Wow...here we are having a discussion about our message board, how we can get along better, and better understand each other. And you can't help yourself but make a political statement in the middle of it.
Oh please...you made a specific statement and I responded. If you want people to communicate well here, lead by example. Quit getting upset with posters who disagree with you and putting words in their mouth. Thats easy to control.
Where did I disagree with you? Didn't I respond to a statement you made regarding opinions of others regarding the topic of immigration? Where did I say that there aren't racist and xenophobic people?
So playing the victim all the time. I made no inferences about you. You made one about me assuming I don't think there are xenophobic and racists people. Don't put words in my mouth... sound familiar!?!
Thanks for making my point... chill dude!
With all due respect, I perceive some folks are more affected by hard left entertainment news than they realize. There seems to be a shift towards the biases of the left and an acceptance of interpretations of events as Media Progressives see things. For instance, this notion that the extreme Right where racist and xenophobic folks exist is a large percentage of the Right or has any political pull appears to be a fabrication of those on the extreme Right and all of the Left including the media. I believe the "mainstream" Right ignores those loons. This is not the case with the Progressives however. The Left have shifted significantly off their "mainstream" base and have allowed the extremists to have far too much power. Media seems to be dominated by Left extremism and the present leadership of the Democratic party has ceded too much control to the extreme left.
CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc. all PUSH an extreme Progressive narrative including intentionally misleading their viewers on actual events. FOX generally does the same PUSH to the right. This is the reason I quit watching any of the above during the 2nd term of Obama. I am much happier for doing so. I get my news from National Review as I am sure many have gathered. They are definitely not Trump fans but they write articles from the perspective of a Conservative. There are some written Progressive news sites out there that aren't blatantly pushing a narrative, but I don't know who they are. I just know the TV folks are lying most of the time and I don't see any point in watching.
I think the mainstream media in general, finds the worst example of the margins. Trump coverage from CNN/ABC, etc...find the unshaven mouth-breating, don't tread on me face tatted angry man to interview instead of the soccer mom or the successful small-business owner.
Biden coverage from Fox, find the image of him hanging out with AOC or some supporter who is wearing antifa uniform.
But....there is indeed so much more of that in the mainstream that leans left.
Funny… your example of supporters for both candidates could actually be either's supporter..
Of course. Its identity politics at is worst. The Dems were great at it ("rich" people are bad, unless they live in Hollywood or NYC)....then Trump excelled at it. And worse than either, the media uses it as a tool of division, every day. Every...single...day. With imagery. Which is lasting.
If Trump excelled at it, what is happening now?
Did you miss the part about Dems were great at it? I mean, I can edit it to say "were/are".
But politicians are biased....thats what they do. I don't have to like it....i think its dangerous, but its what they are.
Media doing it is so much worse.
I truly question your ability to put things together…
Yes, you said the Dems were great at it…. Then, you said Trump excelled at it…
My question is, if Trump excelled at it, then what is happening now?
Logical progression is Dems, Trump, and now…. Is it progressing in your eyes more than Trump?
Again, I assumed it was pretty simple, when I updated it for you to say the Dems were/
are, would imply that folks like Psaki (who speaks much more than Biden) and Biden and his other voice agents, still do this.
As for progressing....that is your word, I didn't intend it to represent some sort of progression, just that it was occurring. And that it is still bad today.
I think Trump was the first GOP candidate I recall who really did this as well as the Dems.
But what was that you just talked about not taking personal shots? Just smoke, I guess.