The Biden Administration

125,949 Views | 2959 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by caryking
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hell yes. Finally...No way in hell did all of those "after midnight" votes go 89% to Sleepy Joe. Don't forget the Ice Cream Queen said..."Joe Biden WILL be President in November."

The fix was in. Now the SOCIALISTS are screaming because they won but they didn't win NC and a few others they thought they had in the bag in the Senate.

Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
Your not going to discuss the made up russian collusion anymore?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
"The Big Lie" was propaganda by National Socialist in the day. Civ, are you finally admitting to being one?

Isn't it funny how an admitted (presumed) Socialist, like Civ, is wanting to tell me how to use my energy? That is very telling of an elitist!! Yessa Master, I'll listen better to you...

BTW, Civ, you love to work in the mundane; however, you never deal with questions asked to you. See above...
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Cthepack said:

Civilized said:

If that's true then he's also making all Pub candidates, including Trump's competitors, look better.

Pubs can keep America First and do better than Trump. All of us would benefit from that evolution.

Also, there's a real likelihood Biden doesn't run again in 2024. Even if Trump decides to run and wins the nomination, it's likely not going to be Trump v Biden.


Do not disagree that a Biden v Trump is unlikely but I still stand by Biden is making Trump look good. More so Trump than just republicans.

Also I get you hate Trump but you cannot discount that he got the second most popular vote ever. By a lot.

And you cannot discount that Trump galvanized his opposition and propelled an average, really old Dem to get the first-most popular vote ever, 7 million more than Trump.

Trump inspires historically unique love and hate, there is no remaining doubt about that. Unfortunately for him and his electoral chances more people hate him than love him.
Nope. That never happened and you know it. Trump cleaned your clocks (and then you had to enact Plan D after hours in Democratic run states in major cities only (Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta)... after having kicked out the observers).

Deny it all you want... but you know damn good and well that's what happened... you are just glad that your side triumphed (regardless of how)!

HR-1 would solidify voter fraud forever... and we all know damn good and well that you are 100% for it's passage.

Please deny it here if I am incorrect. "Not a democrat"
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Four cities that acted in bad faith with SOCIALIST mayors and election boards railroaded the election.

The "big lie"....wow....again...lefties can't help but to step on their own dicks at every turn. History books are your friends. Why don't you check out the origination of that term. And no, I'm not doing it for you comrade.

The reason we have none of the lefties here debating the issues is there's nothing to debate. We have brought facts and I even provided sources.

I was called out by glass twice. Provided him with the answers he asked me to. He disappeared faster than a doughnut at fat camp. Gone.

I guess I broke the glass ceiling when I started providing facts backed up with sources instead of 5th grade rebuttals like the lefties give.

Oh... and don't forget when they are backed into the corner they call you "stupid", a very vulgar insult, a homophobic slur and ignorant racists... and do it on a personal level directed at certain individual posters. Which I think is supposed to get you banned? But, you know..."good for me but not for thee..."

I'll take my character over bowing to the lefties any day of the week. How many of them can say the same?
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden has no problem burning through American taxpayers cash, $60 million a week just to house migrant minors.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-government-spending-60-million-week-care-unaccompanied-minors
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packofwolves said:

Biden has no problem burning through American taxpayers cash, $60 million a week just to house migrant minors.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-government-spending-60-million-week-care-unaccompanied-minors
How much do we spend on homeless Veterans that need mental health that the lefties keep screaming about?

Oh...never mind... they don't see them as being able to bring in "chain migration" and become eligible SOCIALIST PARTY voters...

Got to keep the people beholden to Dear Leader and the lefties. No way in hell we take care of our own if they don't owe us something right lefties?

The party on the left should be ashamed. As should anyone that is supporting this **** show of an administration.

You took the NBA to hell. You took the NFL to hell. You took MLB to hell. You glamorized kneeling for our Country, the Soldiers, the Veterans, the Fallen Heroes.... Keep swinging left.......

You won't have much farther to fall until you hit bottom. You are damn near there.

Stay "woke."
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"No amendment to the Constitution is absolute" - Joe Biden on 4/8/2021

Lets hope no one crosses a DA enough for him to just ignore the 8th amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

Maybe we the democrats will decide to get Obama on the ballot again in 2024 and just ignore the 22nd amendment, which bars a president from running for a 3rd term

I am waiting for democrats to start to push the 15th amendment and tell all of the white people that they aren't allowed to vote anymore....after all..prohibiting the denial of the right to vote based on race isn't an absolute thing anymore.


Maybe this is a good thing though. I certainly believe that the 14th amendment needs to have a few changes. I also think that we need to change the 26th amendment to not allow people to vote until they turn 25. I'm ok with changing the 24th amendment as well to where if you don't own land you don't get to vote. We should get rid of the 16th amendment completely. Congress shouldn't be levying an income tax at all quite frankly. The 10th amendment should be stamped on every politicians forehead ...because they obviously have no idea what it means, same with the 11th amendment. I definitely thing that the 17th amendment should be adjusted and we should go back to state legislatures picking the senators instead of the popular vote

Before anyone makes a comment about how that may or may not of been Biden's intent....don't forget that words matter.....
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I won't call out certain posters by name because, well, you know I'm not a lefty and the rules actually apply to me. But.... for those that have said that "Trump's words mattered..." please explain this.

And you all know who you are. Deal with it.

"No amendment to the Constitution is absolute" - Joe Biden on 4/8/2021
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

I won't call out certain posters by name because, well, you know I'm not a lefty and the rules actually apply to me. But.... for those that have said that "Trump's words mattered..." please explain this.

And you all know who you are. Deal with it.

"No amendment to the Constitution is absolute" - Joe Biden on 4/8/2021
Insurrection indeed...
gtman49
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One hell of a slap fight.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Civilized said:

Cthepack said:

Civilized said:

If that's true then he's also making all Pub candidates, including Trump's competitors, look better.

Pubs can keep America First and do better than Trump. All of us would benefit from that evolution.

Also, there's a real likelihood Biden doesn't run again in 2024. Even if Trump decides to run and wins the nomination, it's likely not going to be Trump v Biden.


Do not disagree that a Biden v Trump is unlikely but I still stand by Biden is making Trump look good. More so Trump than just republicans.

Also I get you hate Trump but you cannot discount that he got the second most popular vote ever. By a lot.

And you cannot discount that Trump galvanized his opposition and propelled an average, really old Dem to get the first-most popular vote ever, 7 million more than Trump.

Trump inspires historically unique love and hate, there is no remaining doubt about that. Unfortunately for him and his electoral chances more people hate him than love him.
Nope. That never happened and you know it. Trump cleaned your clocks (and then you had to enact Plan D after hours in Democratic run states in major cities only (Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta)... after having kicked out the observers).

Deny it all you want... but you know damn good and well that's what happened... you are just glad that your side triumphed (regardless of how)!

HR-1 would solidify voter fraud forever... and we all know damn good and well that you are 100% for it's passage.

Please deny it here if I am incorrect. "Not a democrat"



Please deny what exactly? I told you I'm not wasting my time on the electoral fraud fairy tale that Trump concocted and promoted for months so he didn't have to acknowledge being a loser, and a loser to a really old, very average candidate at that.

It was ridiculous and undemocratic then and looks even moreso now in hindsight. That farce will take up a disproportionate proportion of Trump's legacy, unfortunately for him.

Fortunately though the nation has moved past the Big Lie. The demonstrated lack of electoral fraud is akin to settled science. People that still promote it sound like flat-earthers.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboypack02 said:

Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
Your not going to discuss the made up russian collusion anymore?

I'm pleased to acknowledge there was no proof of collusion if you'll acknowledge that there was incontrovertible proof of Russian meddling that Trump's team actively encouraged and used to his electoral benefit and that Trump for some reason was never man enough to acknowledge.

In his defense he was too insecure and too busy fellating his autocrat muse Putin to acknowledge that he needed Russian meddling to beat the most unlikeable Democrat candidate ever.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
"The Big Lie" was propaganda by National Socialist in the day. Civ, are you finally admitting to being one?

Isn't it funny how an admitted (presumed) Socialist, like Civ, is wanting to tell me how to use my energy? That is very telling of an elitist!! Yessa Master, I'll listen better to you...

BTW, Civ, you love to work in the mundane; however, you never deal with questions asked to you. See above...

What question are you talking about? Citizens United?

I'm no legal scholar obviously but the whole topic is fraught. On one hand I don't know that the limitation of corporation's ability to communicate political messages is constitutional; on the other hand I don't think the public benefits from unlimited corporate election spending and Super PACs.

I definitely don't have a canned response to the case. Seems like every "solution" just creates other problems of equal or greater magnitude.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
"The Big Lie" was propaganda by National Socialist in the day. Civ, are you finally admitting to being one?

Isn't it funny how an admitted (presumed) Socialist, like Civ, is wanting to tell me how to use my energy? That is very telling of an elitist!! Yessa Master, I'll listen better to you...

BTW, Civ, you love to work in the mundane; however, you never deal with questions asked to you. See above...

What question are you talking about? Citizens United?

I'm no legal scholar obviously but the whole topic is fraught. On one hand I don't know that the limitation of corporation's ability to communicate political messages is constitutional; on the other hand I don't think the public benefits from unlimited corporate election spending and Super PACs.

I definitely don't have a canned response to the case. Seems like every "solution" just creates other problems of equal or greater magnitude.
I guess I'll try...

The constitution does not speak to campaign donations; therefore, it's not in the Federal Legislative jurisdiction. See cowboys post above on the 10th amendment.

Now, here is how I solve the issue on corporate donations:

  • repeal the 16th amendment of the constitution
  • Repealing will stop the taxing of corporations
  • Pass a law prohibiting corporate campaign contributions - this might get challenged at the Supreme Court and is in direct conflict to my point above regarding the 10th amendment
  • Supreme should rule according to the core tenet of: No Taxation without Representation. So, no taxation, no contribution

My belief is that a corporation in an entity. A corporation cannot place a vote; therefore, they should not be giving contributions. If we are not taxing a corporation, then, they should be ok or; rather, I will be ok with it...
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

cowboypack02 said:

Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
Your not going to discuss the made up russian collusion anymore?

I'm pleased to acknowledge there was no proof of collusion if you'll acknowledge that there was incontrovertible proof of Russian meddling that Trump's team actively encouraged and used to his electoral benefit and that Trump for some reason was never man enough to acknowledge.

In his defense he was too insecure and too busy fellating his autocrat muse Putin to acknowledge that he needed Russian meddling to beat the most unlikeable Democrat candidate ever.
No way!!! The only Big Lie was done by the left and the media.

BTW, Civ, who meddled in the 2020 election, on behalf of Trump? Somebody had to as he received ~ 7M more votes than 2016. Being that the Russians meddled in 2016 for Trump and got him ~ 64M votes; something, had to happen in 2020...

Who are those dastardly people?
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

Civilized said:

cowboypack02 said:

Civilized said:

pineknollshoresking said:

ok, here goes...

If you think Biden got 80M legal votes, then, I have 50 miles of ocean front property on the NC coast to sell you. You know I'm right about this; however, you just can't let yourself stoop to a level beneath you (assuming you are an elitist).

Civ, you can call Trump all the names you want; however, I'm confident of one thing. YOU have never worked for or around Trump; therefore, you are speaking ignorantly (lacking knowledge) on the subject. BTW, neither do I...

I have listened extensively, to people, that actually have worked for and/or around Trump and they speak highly of the man. So, you can take your opinions from the likes of Joe Scarborough and his petulant wife, if you'd like. Personally, I choose to listen to people more closely to the man...

Election law changes in Georgia and the other States forthcoming lets me know Trump has a chance in 2024....

I'm not going to re-litigate the Big Lie.

Biden didn't get millions of illegal votes.

But if you want to continue championing Trump, I'm obviously not going to stop you.

I just think it's a waste of time and energy that you could be spending championing a new candidate on the right that has a better chance of winning the nomination and the presidency than an incumbent president that got beat soundly in 2020.
Your not going to discuss the made up russian collusion anymore?

I'm pleased to acknowledge there was no proof of collusion if you'll acknowledge that there was incontrovertible proof of Russian meddling that Trump's team actively encouraged and used to his electoral benefit and that Trump for some reason was never man enough to acknowledge.

In his defense he was too insecure and too busy fellating his autocrat muse Putin to acknowledge that he needed Russian meddling to beat the most unlikeable Democrat candidate ever.
No way!!! The only Big Lie was done by the left and the media.

BTW, Civ, who meddled in the 2020 election, on behalf of Trump? Somebody had to as he received ~ 7M more votes than 2016. Being that the Russians meddled in 2016 for Trump and got him ~ 64M votes; something, had to happen in 2020...

Who are those dastardly people?
it tickles me that everyone always refers to Trump when they talk about foreign interference in an election....but the Clinton campaign and democrats actually funded a foreign entity to dig up information on someone that was running for the same office from a different political party and then funneled it to the FBI, where it was used to investigate and smear the opposition candidate. This was all testified to under oath during congressional hearings.....
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's different.

Just like here and everywhere else. The lefties play by their own rules and require everyone else to play be the "real" set of rules.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So here's what Sleepy Joe and his merry band of SOCIALISTS have proposed this week to try and turn this country into a single party run SOCIALIST state.



  • infringing on 2nd Amendment rights with restrictions and appointing far left anti-gun leader of the ATF
  • telling the American people that "no Amendment is absolute..." that in itself should make the lefties take their heads out of the rear ends but it won't.
  • refused to acknowledge any issue at the border allowing for basically "open borders."
  • appointing an extremist to head the committee on expanding the SCOTUS because it's not "balanced." translation "we want power"
  • constantly lying about his "infrastructure" plan including all sorts of leftist wish list items like healthcare, abolishing right to work states, home care for the elderly, more bailout money for blue states, amnesty for ILLEGAL immigrants just to highlight a few
  • his latest is auditing of America's wealthy. in other words REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden-more-tax-audits-of-rich-americans-171252158.html

Again I'll challenge those of you on the left that can't seem to find a keyboard when the facts are presented to you to tell me how wrong I was/am on how your **** show of a party are not SOCIALISTS.

Only one party is attempting to turn this country into an Autocracy and damn sure isn't the GOP.

I know none of you will respond because you can't dispute the facts, you can't prove me wrong and you know I will call you out when you try to lie and BS your way through a rebuttal.

Have a great weekend comrades.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember some poster who posted in one word answers most of the time who pretended he cared about those south of the border attempting to illegally cross. I put him on ignore because his posts were all the equivalent of "nuh uh, you are". Not the least bit surprised he's on a milk carton now.

BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's all about power with the lefties.... they staged photo ops during the Trump Presidency at the border and now they won't even visit and the problem is 1,000 times or more worse.

That tells you all you need to know about the character of the SOCIALIST party and their followers.

"To seem rather than to be...."
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ask all the liberals (or so-called elitist) defend this mess, at the border. Actually, I know you can't defend it; so, just chime in and tell us it's a mess.

I think the actual recognition, by you all, will just tell the rest of us you are rational...
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Worth a read for all the insurrectionist around here...

https://www.revolver.news/2021/04/bellingcat-insurrection-documentary-trump-capitol-riots-january-6/

TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

I remember some poster who posted in one word answers most of the time who pretended he cared about those south of the border attempting to illegally cross. I put him on ignore because his posts were all the equivalent of "nuh uh, you are". Not the least bit surprised he's on a milk carton now.


Please respect the people.

Please respect the people.

Please respect the people.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This in a nutshell tells you all you need to know about the SOCIALIST PARTY, their condescension, smugness and overall "we are better than you personas."

How damn pathetic is this? Imagine her placating to the African American Communities, Latino Communities or Asian Communities. What would the outrage have been if Trump's Press Secretary said.." we are running adds on BET, Oprah Network...etc..." or "we are running ads on Telemundo."

Everyone knows he'd be labelled a racists. But, again, with the lefties, the only ones that can be an ( -ist ) of any sort is a Conservative. What a damn joke!

So much to unravel with this **** show of an administration. I hope you lefties are enjoying burying your heads in the sand. You damn sure should. I'd be ashamed if I voted for and still supported this **** show.

PackBacker07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No administration in history would ever try and play up to stereotypes in a public sphere.

I once blocked Muggsy Bogues' shot at the Siskey YMCA.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What stereotype is being placated to? President Trump signed the Prison Reform Bill that Dear Leader never signed.

He was able to get dozens of non-violent offenders released. Laughable that you would choose to use that picture since that was one of his early opponents in 2020. Try and keep up.

Not to mention he asked the African American voters this question.."(sic)......what the hell do you have to lose? what has the democrat party done for you in over 80 year?....."

Damn good question. I'll help you with the answer in the cities that they have run.

  • kept them poor
  • kept them uneducated
  • made sure crime stayed high
  • kept them dependent on the government
  • helped keep the view of the nuclear family negative

I could go on but I think you get the point. If you want statistics you can go to statista.com

Type in whatever statistics you would like to see and they should have them. I'm not doing homework for the lefties anymore.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

What stereotype is being placated to? President Trump signed the Prison Reform Bill that Dear Leader never signed.

He was able to get dozens of non-violent offenders released. Laughable that you would choose to use that picture since that was one of his early opponents in 2020. Try and keep up.

Not to mention he asked the African American voters this question.."(sic)......what the hell do you have to lose? what has the democrat party done for you in over 80 year?....."

Damn good question. I'll help you with the answer in the cities that they have run.

  • kept them poor
  • kept them uneducated
  • made sure crime stayed high
  • kept them dependent on the government
  • helped keep the view of the nuclear family negative

I could go on but I think you get the point. If you want statistics you can go to statista.com

Type in whatever statistics you would like to see and they should have them. I'm not doing homework for the lefties anymore.
And the worse... gathered them up and placed them in section 8 housing...
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gotta keep those guaranteed House of Representative seats. The lefties invented gerrymandering and have made it their mission in politics to masterfully dissect every district in America to have at least 2 -3 per state that they never have to spend money in, campaign Nationally for and most of all, have to worry about convincing the voters who to vote for.

You see exactly how they do it. It's sad. As sad as the lefties on here trying to defend it.

Oh...but I call the lefty politicians names so therefore I'm a meanie.

Go pound sand.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This one needs to be posted everywhere...

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/bwahaha-okeefe-tracks-down-cnn-stooge-at-restaurant-pulls-up-a-set/
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here you go...Let's just put it out here so it is easier for the lefties to watch.

BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welcome to Joe Biden's first 100 days in the America that the SOCIALIST PARTY has been dreaming of.....

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That might have been the worst representation of the United States i've ever seen, and that's saying something.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.