What % of the population in England is vaxxed? The ol Google says only 74.4% of the English population has submitted to the injections.Daviewolf83 said:You are correct and as I pointed out a few weeks ago, people saying the data out of England proves vaccines do not work and can cause VAIDS are ignorant of statistics and how to apply them to data. It is the perfect example of base-rate fallacy and it a common mistake for people who do not know how to apply statistics to data. It is just more of the same misinformation being posted on this thread.Civilized said:GuerrillaPack said:
New data out of the UK. In the month of March, 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England were in vaxxed people, and 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaxxed.
This supports the claims that the vaxx weakens your immune system, and may lead to what they are calling VAIDS ("vaccine induced AIDS").
No, it doesn't support that claim at all.
If 100% of people are vaxxed, 100% of the deaths will be vaxxed people.
That stat alone tells you nothing about vaccine efficacy.
If people are interested, the following report from the UK does a very good job of properly analyzing the data and clearly shows vaccines reduce deaths from Covid.
Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022
If people are interested in doing their own analysis, here is a link to the data used in the study above:
Deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022 edition of this dataset
Lastly, the following article does a good job of explaining base-rate fallacy and how you should properly analyze data to avoid it.
Base Rate Fallacy Explanation
It's not "100%" of the population.
Let's say, for sake of argument, that 85% of the English population over the age of 30 is vaxxed. If, hypothetically, the Rona Black Plague Cold infected (and caused death) in both the vaxxed and unvaxxed at the same rate, then you would have 85% of the deaths from the vaxxed, and 15% from unvaxxed. And if they are infected and die from the Wu Flu at the same rate, then that means of course that the vaxx provides no protection at all. But the data shows even worse than that. It shows that 92% of deaths are from those who are vaxxed. So that means that those who are vaxxed are suffering death at a HIGHER rate than the unvaxxed.
Using the same 85% vaxx rate for sake of argument, if the miracle covid vaxx was actually providing this "great protection" from the Black Death Rona, then you would expect that at least 50% of those dying were unvaxxed -- such as three to four times a rate of death as the percentage of unvaxxed in the population (ie, 15%). But no...the actual number is only 8% of deaths being the unvaxxed.
If this vaxx was the uber duber miracle cure your overlords tell you it is, then you would actually expect that ZERO people who are vaxxed up to the hilt with 3 or 4 shots should be dying. They should be bulletproof with those 3 shots of graphene oxide nano particles and mRNA spike protein factories. If that was the case and this vaxx was the miracle they say it is, then it should be close to 0% of those dying as vaxxed. Like maybe 5%. But NO...it's 92%.
Based on the data, in order for the miracle vaxx to actually be providing any meaningful protection, then well over 92% of the English population would need to be vaxxed...like, say, 95%. No way it's that high.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
