statefan91 said:

---

Cases under 100k for the first time since early December, hopefully will continue a nice downward trend.

---

I expect there to be a spring plateau, if not a slight bump up in the next 2-4 weeks. Followed by the wringing of hands and "I told ya so"s by the mask wielding Covidians who still can't grasp the concept of seasonality.

Everpack said:

---

statefan91 said:

---

Cases under 100k for the first time since early December, hopefully will continue a nice downward trend.

---

I expect there to be a spring plateau, if not a slight bump up in the next 2-4 weeks. Followed by the wringing of hands and "I told ya so"s by the mask wielding Covidians who still can't grasp the concept of seasonality.

---

On the edge of my seat waiting for the same.

Masjid Nawaz interview on Rogan is very interesting.
Talks about a lot of what we've spoken about on here in regards to with and from. Speaks about deaths from covid in uk. Talks about a lot of things. Very interesting conversation.

He also spoke about the groups that try to cancel others. Great story. He was listed on 2 opposing hate groups at the same time. Islamic terrorist. And anti Islam. Lol. He sued both publications/groups. Can't remember who it was and how to term their organization.

"Maajid Nawaz is a former Islamist turned counter-extremism activist, author of multiple books, and public speaker."

https://open.spotify.com/episode/1ugbn7cuab3mNgKbo81ajM?si=-d0aSeB3RteE3NJ3Ts_BJw

More doctoring of the data...this time attempting to cover up the dramatic increase in myocarditis, hospital visits, and other harmful side effects due to the vaxx within the military. Watch the short video:

THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE EVIDENCE AND ARE IN A PANIC.
US Department of defence altering their data to hide jab injuries. pic.twitter.com/B7XJ0mh6Oh

— TJ (@TJ0059) February 23, 2022

Google now no longer requiring an injection of the mystery juice as a condition of employment:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/23/googles-relaxes-mandates-opens-amenities-for-return-to-office.html

Quote:

---

Google relaxes mandates, opens amenities as it prepares for workers to return

PUBLISHED WED, FEB 23 2022

[...]

Google Real Estate and Workplace Services VP David Radcliffe wrote an email to San Francisco Bay Area employees this week explaining that the company is relaxing some rules around vaccines, testing, social distancing and masks. Separately, a Google spokesperson told CNBC that the company has reversed course and will not require vaccinations as a condition of employment for U.S. workers, but declined to offer further details.

---

Russia is attacking Ukraine and this is what Branch Covidians are concerned about.

It is a ****ing cult.

Lot of people in Ukraine crowding together inside.

Only 35% of Ukrainians have been vaccinated. Less than 2% have been boosted.

— Dana Houle (@DanaHoule) February 24, 2022

Don't know if this has already been posted or not, but this is one of the first articles I've seen from the Lamestream/Establishment media that is now openly harshly criticizing Fauci, the CDC, the FDA and Establishment, and saying that "the science" is being manipulated to push a political agenda:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/how-eisenhower-predicted-fauci-opinion/ar-AATJhbG

Quote:

---

How Eisenhower Predicted Fauci

Opinion by Rafi Eis - Feb 11

If it wasn't obvious before, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that science has become thoroughly politicized. Though normally focused on observable and verifiable causes and effects in the natural world, many scientists, especially government employed ones, have taken on a political role and have shaped scientific findings in the service of those political ends. The truth eventually came out, but at a massive cost to people's mental health, finances and trust. President Dwight Eisenhower foresaw this abuse by government scientists, and he shows us the way out.

Public health officials initially insisted on the wet-market origin story for the novel coronavirus, but the lab-leak theory has become just as plausible. Cloth masks once deemed essential are now labeled "facial decorations." Schools have opened without becoming super spreaders. A John Hopkins University study recently concluded that lockdowns had a minuscule impact on virus morbidity.

With all of these issues, some of the federal government's top scientists made a concerted effort to stifle debate. Dr. Francis Collins, the former head of the National Institutes of Health, requested a "devastating takedown" of those who disagreed with his insistence on lockdowns, referring to dissenting scholars from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford as "fringe." He and other public health officials selectively ignored real data. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and chief medical adviser to the president, declared that "attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science."

Collins' approach and Fauci's sentiment are exactly what President Eisenhower warned the American public about in his Farewell Address. He advised vigilance against the "danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." These "task forces of scientists," Eisenhower cautioned, would lead to the "domination of the nation's scholars."

One reason that so few infectious disease scientists disagreed with Fauci is quite simple: the power of money. America offers around $5 billion per year to support infectious disease research, and almost all of it runs through the agency led by Collins and Fauci. Any infectious disease researcher would therefore be disinclined to run afoul of Dr. Fauci, as future grant funding or professional advancement may depend on the director's approval. Grants like those from NIAID give the project a stamp of legitimacy and open the door to other supporters. This system offers Fauci monopoly-like power over infectious disease research.

Research scientists then toe the line, or at least remain silent. This creates the appearance of unanimous agreement as, in Eisenhower's words, "a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity."

It is hard to prove intentional silence. But there are signs. When mask mandates were first introduced, for example, numerous virologists should have pointed to published RCT studies that cast doubt on masks' effectiveness in preventing transmission of airborne viruses. One May 2020 CDC paper "did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility."

Likewise, the World Health Organization's 2019 program for an influenza pandemic does not recommend facemask use for the non-symptomatic or uninfected, and only recommends business and school closures in the most severe circumstances, even while acknowledging that these measures lack good evidence of effectiveness. This too was missing from COVID policy discussions.

[...]

---

^^
Do you think the Poles are more concerned about Covid, or the Rus?

If you remember, they have experience in this matter.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10542765/Romanias-famous-football-team-Steaua-Bucharest-announce-ban-VACCINATED-players.html

Study Confirms AT LEAST 400K People Have Died From The COVID "Vaccine" In The US (shtfplan.com)

What did Moderna know and when did they know it? pic.twitter.com/V0imMkknmr

— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com (@JordanSchachtel) February 25, 2022

Wayland said:

---

What did Moderna know and when did they know it? pic.twitter.com/V0imMkknmr

— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com (@JordanSchachtel) February 25, 2022

---

Dumb question, but is there a correlation between Moderna's stock abbreviation and the mRNA delivery system in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines - or is that just a total coincidence?

I'm guessing the latter, but figured someone here could answer definitively. Thanks.

https://naturallyhealthynews.info/johns-hopkins-university-confirms-you-can-be-vaccinated-with-a-pcr-test-even-without-knowing/

John Hopkins study - PCR test may have also been a COVID vaccination.

Wayland said:

---

What did Moderna know and when did they know it? pic.twitter.com/V0imMkknmr

— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com (@JordanSchachtel) February 25, 2022

---

What is the implication here? People think that Moderna created the virus, and then weren't prepared with a vaccine (even sandbagging a little bit to not make it look suspicious), and then let Pfizer/BioNtech get the first approval for EUA, first approval for teens, first approval for kids, and first fully approved vaccine?

Not sure what the video clip is implying.

statefan91 said:

---

Wayland said:

---

What did Moderna know and when did they know it? pic.twitter.com/V0imMkknmr

— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com (@JordanSchachtel) February 25, 2022

---

What is the implication here? People think that Moderna created the virus, and then weren't prepared with a vaccine (even sandbagging a little bit to not make it look suspicious), and then let Pfizer/BioNtech get the first approval for EUA, first approval for teens, first approval for kids, and first fully approved vaccine?

Not sure what the video clip is implying.

---

At a minimum, I would think, it came from a lab.

Don't you think they would have had a little bit of a headstart on a vaccine then?

Wayland said:

---

statefan91 said:

---

Don't you think they would have had a little bit of a headstart on a vaccine then?

---

Didn't we just have like the fastest approval of a vaccine in history?

The mass vaccine trial started in July 2020 .. about 4 months after **** hit the fan in the West.

I am finding articles that the first first shot actually went into arms in March. That is really fast.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-clinical-trial-investigational-vaccine-covid-19-begins

March 16, 2020 shots were going in arms.

On March 13, 2020, I was having a pleasant dinner out and the world was normal.

---

Yeah....Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab and other parasite "elites" were "predicting" for several years that this worldwide pandemic was coming. Gates and his cronies with the World Economic Forum and other international organizations then ran a "trial run" called "Event 201" in October of 2019, war-gaming and practicing the exact draconian measures that would be taken by governments and organizations if a worldwide pandemic occurred.

Then when this pLandemic just "coincidentally" happens just a few months later, Big Pharma already has all the patents (for mRNA gene therapy "vaccines", etc) ready to go and they produce the fastest vaccines in world history.

Almost like they planned this all out and knew it was coming.

But, yeah...nothing to see here. That's just "crazy conspiracy theorist" talk.

According to new data out of John’s Hopkins University, daily COVID-19 cases have DROPPED 90% in the US since mid-January. Over a six-week period, new daily cases have DROPPED from more than 802,000 to FEWER than 80,000.

— Chise 🧬🧫🦠💉 (@sailorrooscout) February 25, 2022

Wayland said:

---

Didn't we just have like the fastest approval of a vaccine in history?

The mass vaccine trial started in July 2020 .. about 4 months after **** hit the fan in the West.

I am finding articles that the first first shot actually went into arms in March. That is really fast.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-clinical-trial-investigational-vaccine-covid-19-begins

March 16, 2020 shots were going in arms.

On March 13, 2020, I was having a pleasant dinner out and the world was 'mostly' normal.

---

Yeah I get that, I'm just saying that if Moderna was responsible for developing it in a lab multiple years before it spread, why / how did Pfizer beat them to the vaccine?

This article from 3/7/2020 was already returning interim results for Pfizer / BioNtech's vaccine: https://www.labiotech.eu/trends-news/pfizer-biontech-covid-19/

Whoops, sorry, thought I was in the thread where we post stuff about COVID

statefan91 said:

---

Whoops, sorry, thought I was in the thread where we post stuff about COVID

---

Apology accepted.

statefan91 said:

---

Wayland said:

---

Didn't we just have like the fastest approval of a vaccine in history?

The mass vaccine trial started in July 2020 .. about 4 months after **** hit the fan in the West.

I am finding articles that the first first shot actually went into arms in March. That is really fast.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-clinical-trial-investigational-vaccine-covid-19-begins

March 16, 2020 shots were going in arms.

On March 13, 2020, I was having a pleasant dinner out and the world was 'mostly' normal.

---

Yeah I get that, I'm just saying that if Moderna was responsible for developing it in a lab multiple years before it spread, why / how did Pfizer beat them to the vaccine?

This article from 3/7/2020 was already returning interim results for Pfizer / BioNtech's vaccine: https://www.labiotech.eu/trends-news/pfizer-biontech-covid-19/

---

I don't know. Resources?

I don't know when they first realized that they had patented sequence in the virus.

I am not claiming intentional malfeasance for Moderna for the release of the virus, just potentially that somewhere in the chain of custody some part of it passed through their hands.

Here is a data related palate cleanser.