Coronavirus

2,685,369 Views | 20323 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by Werewolf
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldsouljer • 2:52p, 1/31/22
Oldsouljer said:
packgrad said:


Meanwhile our government pushes on sending masks and tests to everyone.
That's because BoJo, while dictatorially inclined, is sane and realizes what's coming down the pike, politically speaking. No such sanity this side of the pond, and that goes double for Canada.
If you have largely rigged/fraudulent elections (as we now do in the United States), then the tyrants don't worry...as they can't be voted out of power -- as is the case in virtually every communist nation. Biden could have 25% approval, and they may still just rig the 2024 election as they did the 2020 presidential election to have him "win".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
statefan91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Daviewolf83 • 3:05p, 1/31/22
Daviewolf83 said:
statefan91 said:
Didn't UK lock down much more aggressively than the US?
They required masking on public transportation and indoors. They did not limit large group events. They did encourage people to work from home if it was possible, but did not force them to do so. They did require school kids to mask briefly, but this requirement has been lifted and they do not mask kids in school. In speaking with a co-worker recently that lives in southwest England, he said restrictions had been minimal. They relied on the vaccinations and boosters to get them through the Omicron wave.

Currently, the US has more restrictions, particularly on kids, than the UK.
Are you talking about the most recent Omicron wave or in total? The UK had very strict lockdowns and did limit large group events at different times throughout the pandemic:

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/charts/uk-government-coronavirus-lockdowns



I guess it's not really possible to do apples to apples since UK took national approaches whereas for the most part the States have been left to be...States with their response. I guess I'm just not sure why the poster was holding up the UK as a paragon of the right approach if they (the poster) are also against many of the COVID restrictions that have been implemented throughout the pandemic.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Daviewolf83
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to statefan91 • 3:07p, 1/31/22
Staff
statefan91 said:
Daviewolf83 said:
statefan91 said:
Didn't UK lock down much more aggressively than the US?
They required masking on public transportation and indoors. They did not limit large group events. They did encourage people to work from home if it was possible, but did not force them to do so. They did require school kids to mask briefly, but this requirement has been lifted and they do not mask kids in school. In speaking with a co-worker recently that lives in southwest England, he said restrictions had been minimal. They relied on the vaccinations and boosters to get them through the Omicron wave.

Currently, the US has more restrictions, particularly on kids, than the UK.
Are you talking about the most recent Omicron wave or in total? The UK had very strict lockdowns and did limit large group events at different times throughout the pandemic:

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/charts/uk-government-coronavirus-lockdowns



I guess it's not really possible to do apples to apples since UK took national approaches whereas for the most part the States have been left to be...States with their response. I guess I'm just not sure why the poster was holding up the UK as a paragon of the right approach if they (the poster) are also against many of the COVID restrictions that have been implemented throughout the pandemic.
I am talking about Omicron, since their new polices are in regards to the current Omicron restrictions.
Reply Quote Next Staff
Wayland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Daviewolf83 • 3:14p, 1/31/22
Daviewolf83 said:
statefan91 said:
Then wouldn't it seem that the Democrats would be quickly moving to an endemic approach because COVID fatigue has been present for a while and now that Omicron is going down it's really going to ramp up? I know everyone on here says it's all about control and that's what the Democrats want, but it seems like continuing the fallacy of being able to control COVID will just ruin them at the ballot box.
Some Democrats are starting to shift their views, but are getting tremendous pushback from the zero-Covid and long-Covid zealots. The new favorite term for them is to label anyone who wants to relax restrictions as a Eugenicist.

They can read the polls and they know they are in trouble. This is why you see some shifting, but not as much as you would expect. The teacher's unions are not ready to relax restrictions, primarily due to the fact that they lose leverage and they carry a lot of weight with the politicians. Until the CDC shifts their stance on what makes up "community spread", a definition that is quite arbitrary and not based on data, I do not expect to see big changes in current policies. School children will continue to be masked and fully vaccinated and boosted college students will be required to mask (even healthy athletes).
Moving quickly would also show how wrong they were and how many of their failed policies were held onto for purely political reasons.

They are basically screwed either way.

By holding on to current mandates like masking children for no good reason and keep the support of the covidZERO zealots and COVID prevention political cultists that populate their bubbles. That way they keep getting that reinforcing feedback.

End all mandates and restrictions now (as should have been a LOOOOOONG time ago), they are going to make the zealots unhappy. The Democrats at the top exist in a feedback loop.... The broad dissatisfaction outside the blue elites as been evident for a while and tried to have high level conversations with my flag waving 'blue' friends since the summer of 2020 that I thought the short term politicizing of COVID for the short term gains was going to do massive damage in the long run for their party... but I was mostly laughed off.

Now even some of them are 'done', but are still very loyal party types. It has been interesting to watch them try and bridge the normalcy divide with those die-hards and seeing them get eaten alive by the zealots.

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Daviewolf83
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wayland • 3:35p, 1/31/22
Staff
Wayland said:
Daviewolf83 said:
statefan91 said:
Then wouldn't it seem that the Democrats would be quickly moving to an endemic approach because COVID fatigue has been present for a while and now that Omicron is going down it's really going to ramp up? I know everyone on here says it's all about control and that's what the Democrats want, but it seems like continuing the fallacy of being able to control COVID will just ruin them at the ballot box.
Some Democrats are starting to shift their views, but are getting tremendous pushback from the zero-Covid and long-Covid zealots. The new favorite term for them is to label anyone who wants to relax restrictions as a Eugenicist.

They can read the polls and they know they are in trouble. This is why you see some shifting, but not as much as you would expect. The teacher's unions are not ready to relax restrictions, primarily due to the fact that they lose leverage and they carry a lot of weight with the politicians. Until the CDC shifts their stance on what makes up "community spread", a definition that is quite arbitrary and not based on data, I do not expect to see big changes in current policies. School children will continue to be masked and fully vaccinated and boosted college students will be required to mask (even healthy athletes).
Moving quickly would also show how wrong they were and how many of their failed policies were held onto for purely political reasons.

They are basically screwed either way.

By holding on to current mandates like masking children for no good reason and keep the support of the covidZERO zealots and COVID prevention political cultists that populate their bubbles. That way they keep getting that reinforcing feedback.

End all mandates and restrictions now (as should have been a LOOOOOONG time ago), they are going to make the zealots unhappy. The Democrats at the top exist in a feedback loop.... The broad dissatisfaction outside the blue elites as been evident for a while and tried to have high level conversations with my flag waving 'blue' friends since the summer of 2020 that I thought the short term politicizing of COVID for the short term gains was going to do massive damage in the long run for their party... but I was mostly laughed off.

Now even some of them are 'done', but are still very loyal party types. It has been interesting to watch them try and bridge the normalcy divide with those die-hards and seeing them get eaten alive by the zealots.

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Unfortunately, they will hold onto the masking of children and university students lever for the next surge, since they will NEVER admit they were not effective. In fact, many still fail to recognize a thing called seasonality and continue to state that the only reason why cases are falling now is due to the strict policies they enacted. To borrow from computer programming terminology, they have created an "infinite Do loop." Without admitting mistakes were made and policies did not work, the loop has no termination. The only termination for them is at the ballot box.
Reply Quote Next Staff
Daviewolf83
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:57p, 1/31/22
Staff
As many of you long-timers to this thread know, I put forth the idea of SARS-CoV-2 possibly originating from a lab over a year ago. Many months ago, I posted a some very detailed information that showed how a lab could have manipulated a Coronavirus to make it more infectious to humans and the FACT SARS-CoV-2 possesses this possible manipulation (known as a furin clevage). Later, I posted links to a study (I have read the entire proposal in it entirety), proposed by several of the scientists involved in my earlier information. In this study, the proposed studies on coronaviruses and the steps that could be taken to make the virus more infectious to humans.

Through the early days of the virus, several scientists proposed lab leak as a possibility for the origin and they were met with attacks from other scientists and they were censured by publications and social media. In fact, when I proposed the theory on this thread, several people took issue with me and said it was not possible. Well, it appears there was a concerted effort on the part of Dr. Fauci and others to squash the theory and to cover-up the origin. Why? Well, maybe it is due to the fact that they were involved with the earlier suggested research and even though the original proposal was not funded by DARPA, they research did continue as proposed.

As many of you know, I have stated that in a perfect world I would be president of the US and if I was, my first act would be to fire Dr. Anthony Fauci. I would not fire him just for his incompetent leadership during this pandemic, but I would fire him for being involved in a cover-up and lying to Congress.

The link below provides more information on the cover-up and his involvement. Why he is still employed by the US government is a mystery to me, but he is someone I do not trust. By the way, the author of the story below is a former NY Times science reporter. He is the reporter that broke the story last year (the one I referred to above) about a possible lab origin for SARS-CoV-2 that brought the idea back to the mainstream media. Until his article, discussions of lab origin were censured, but since his article, you have seen more an more interest in the mainstream.

A Covid Origin Conspiracy?
Reply Quote Next Staff
1 edit
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wayland • 4:00p, 1/31/22
Wayland said:

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Hardcore supporters are going to vote D no matter what happens. They aren't going to get pissed about Dems' handling of mandates and vote for Trump in 24.

Electoral challenges come from the center. Independents and moderates swing elections, not hard-core partisans.

That's where the pressure to off-ramp is coming from, and it's what Dems will respond to.

Trump relatively recently starting to pump up vaccinations and boosters a little is the flip side of the same coin. People that booed him at his rallies for saying it aren't who he has to worry about. They'll vote for him anyway. Winning back the suburban swing vote is his path to office again.
Reply Quote
2
Everpack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:33p, 1/31/22
Y'all seen the pictures floating around of Magic with the California politicians at the Rams-Niners game last night? Those peoples hypocrisy literally knows no bounds.

Reply Quote
2
Wayland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Everpack • 4:37p, 1/31/22
Everpack said:
Y'all seen the pictures floating around of Magic with the California politicians at the Rams-Niners game last night? Those peoples hypocrisy literally knows no bounds.

Hypocrites going to hypocrite.

https://danaloesch.substack.com/p/gavin-newsom-was-caught-maskless

Link to a blog with him lying about having the mask in his left hand (with a video of him going in for a hug with no mask in hand) and a pic of him sitting with his mask off at another point in the game.

Again, he shouldn't have to wear a mask... but take the ****ing masks off the kids you *******.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
Ripper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 5:04p, 1/31/22
Civilized said:
Wayland said:

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Hardcore supporters are going to vote D no matter what happens. They aren't going to get pissed about Dems' handling of mandates and vote for Trump in 24.

Electoral challenges come from the center. Independents and moderates swing elections, not hard-core partisans.

That's where the pressure to off-ramp is coming from, and it's what Dems will respond to.

Trump relatively recently starting to pump up vaccinations and boosters a little is the flip side of the same coin. People that booed him at his rallies for saying it aren't who he has to worry about. They'll vote for him anyway. Winning back the suburban swing vote is his path to office again.
While not huge numbers, a decent subset of D voters did vote for Glenn Youngkin in Virginia a few months ago. The reasons were mostly related to the state and localities messing up the schools (Covid, gender, race hustling theories, devaluation of advanced learning due to strange equity policies, and inappropriate sexual material available for young students). I know multiple D's who voted for Youngkin. It was not an insignificant amount as the election returns showed. The other issue, outside of schools, was Covid mandates in general.

Can't speak to National elections, but the trend is there. D's with families will potentially be voting R in the next few elections.
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ripper • 6:08p, 1/31/22
Ripper said:
Civilized said:
Wayland said:

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Hardcore supporters are going to vote D no matter what happens. They aren't going to get pissed about Dems' handling of mandates and vote for Trump in 24.

Electoral challenges come from the center. Independents and moderates swing elections, not hard-core partisans.

That's where the pressure to off-ramp is coming from, and it's what Dems will respond to.

Trump relatively recently starting to pump up vaccinations and boosters a little is the flip side of the same coin. People that booed him at his rallies for saying it aren't who he has to worry about. They'll vote for him anyway. Winning back the suburban swing vote is his path to office again.
While not huge numbers, a decent subset of D voters did vote for Glenn Youngkin in Virginia a few months ago. The reasons were mostly related to the state and localities messing up the schools (Covid, gender, race hustling theories, devaluation of advanced learning due to strange equity policies, and inappropriate sexual material available for young students). I know multiple D's who voted for Youngkin. It was not an insignificant amount as the election returns showed. The other issue, outside of schools, was Covid mandates in general.

Can't speak to National elections, but the trend is there. D's with families will potentially be voting R in the next few elections.

For sure. Youngkin's candidacy was compelling to many moderate Dems that were tired of mandates, kids masking at school, etc.

Those Dems wouldn't profile as the "hardcore supporters" Wayland was referring to though.
Reply Quote
1
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:27p, 1/31/22
Glad we have the "masks are all upside", "the AAP and FDA are apolitical", "there's a higher risk of myocarditis for young males from covid than there is from vaccine", "social media should censor those who put out misinformation" guy here to tell us who "hardcore supporters" are.
Reply Quote
5
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wayland • 6:40p, 1/31/22
Wayland said:
Everpack said:
Y'all seen the pictures floating around of Magic with the California politicians at the Rams-Niners game last night? Those peoples hypocrisy literally knows no bounds.

Hypocrites going to hypocrite.

https://danaloesch.substack.com/p/gavin-newsom-was-caught-maskless

Link to a blog with him lying about having the mask in his left hand (with a video of him going in for a hug with no mask in hand) and a pic of him sitting with his mask off at another point in the game.

Again, he shouldn't have to wear a mask... but take the ****ing masks off the kids you *******.


I saw a tweet recently where they said the optics at the Super Bowl in a couple weeks will be phenomenal… with the packed mostly maskless crowd in the stadium while they still have a mask mandate for children indoors and outside.

How anyone could continue to vote for a Democrat is beyond me.
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:55p, 1/31/22
https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-252-making-history/

Couple of dozen world renowned medical experts and 17,000+ medical doctors...crush the narrative of big pharma and corporate media......academic fraud......Nuremberg ........3 hours plus.. Truth for you amd your family's health ...and Liberty. Comparison of Nazi Germany made by concentration camp Survivors.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:00p, 1/31/22
I don't watch any communist Lamestream media. Are they covering this historic trucker protest against the vaxx mandates in Canada?

In other news out of Canada...as here in the United States, they are also making sure that doctors do not speak out against the Branch Covidian Establishment narrative by threatening to take away the licenses of doctors that "spread misinformation":




See how they could say that "99% of doctors" believe that "masks work" or "the vaxx is safe and effective"?? Because only a few will be brave enough to tell the truth and speak out against the Establishment's fraudulent agenda and risk the consequences. Similar to the claim that "97% of scientists believe in global warming". Because those who dare to speak out against it will likely be railroaded out of their job (at the Marxist-run university, etc), or see their grant money dry up, or otherwise be black-balled in their career.

Also heard that Spotify is caving to the pressure by the Establishment to censor Joe Rogan, and is going to issue a "warning" for any content that "spreads covid misinformation".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
4 edits
bgr3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 8:48a, 2/1/22
packgrad said:
Wayland said:
Everpack said:
Y'all seen the pictures floating around of Magic with the California politicians at the Rams-Niners game last night? Those peoples hypocrisy literally knows no bounds.

Hypocrites going to hypocrite.

https://danaloesch.substack.com/p/gavin-newsom-was-caught-maskless

Link to a blog with him lying about having the mask in his left hand (with a video of him going in for a hug with no mask in hand) and a pic of him sitting with his mask off at another point in the game.

Again, he shouldn't have to wear a mask... but take the ****ing masks off the kids you *******.


I saw a tweet recently where they said the optics at the Super Bowl in a couple weeks will be phenomenal… with the packed mostly maskless crowd in the stadium while they still have a mask mandate for children indoors and outside.

How anyone could continue to vote for a Democrat is beyond me.
It's not hypocracy, it's hierarchy. And it is intentional.
Reply Quote
4
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:03a, 2/1/22
The fact that the faux "elite" don't wear masks, while mandating everyone else wear masks ought to be enough to convince any rational person that "covid" is not near as dangerous as the Establishment is making it out to be, and all of these mandates and lockdowns and other draconian measures are a fraud (in order to advance a tyrannical agenda). Just that one fact alone.

If covid was really this super duper dangerous disease, then don't you think the communist NWO globalist puppet politicians would know? Wouldn't they be freaking out and wearing 5 masks at one time, and have taken 10 vaccines by now? If covid was the "uber threat" they make it out to be, the elite would be walking around wearing the latest and greatest mask technology - N95 masks or better. But no, they don't do that, and they don't even follow their own mandates to wear a useless cloth face diaper. Because they know it's a fraud and con job.

And don't be so sure that these high-level politicians and elites have actually taken the same vaxx that is for the masses. Highly doubt it. They get a harmless saline injection, or haven't taken any injection whatsoever.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
1
5 edits
Ripper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 9:38a, 2/1/22
Civilized said:
Ripper said:
Civilized said:
Wayland said:

So by ending the mandates quickly, they would be turning off the only hardcore supporters they have left. And that is really hard to do. Especially when you have to admit what you did was largely ineffective.

And I mean, let's be honest... for the most part what is being held on to is the useless masking of children... and that is (as previously mentioned) just the teacher union grip on the party. Nothing to do with public health.

Hardcore supporters are going to vote D no matter what happens. They aren't going to get pissed about Dems' handling of mandates and vote for Trump in 24.

Electoral challenges come from the center. Independents and moderates swing elections, not hard-core partisans.

That's where the pressure to off-ramp is coming from, and it's what Dems will respond to.

Trump relatively recently starting to pump up vaccinations and boosters a little is the flip side of the same coin. People that booed him at his rallies for saying it aren't who he has to worry about. They'll vote for him anyway. Winning back the suburban swing vote is his path to office again.
While not huge numbers, a decent subset of D voters did vote for Glenn Youngkin in Virginia a few months ago. The reasons were mostly related to the state and localities messing up the schools (Covid, gender, race hustling theories, devaluation of advanced learning due to strange equity policies, and inappropriate sexual material available for young students). I know multiple D's who voted for Youngkin. It was not an insignificant amount as the election returns showed. The other issue, outside of schools, was Covid mandates in general.

Can't speak to National elections, but the trend is there. D's with families will potentially be voting R in the next few elections.

For sure. Youngkin's candidacy was compelling to many moderate Dems that were tired of mandates, kids masking at school, etc.

Those Dems wouldn't profile as the "hardcore supporters" Wayland was referring to though.
LOL, you decree they are moderates. You have know idea. Just spouting. I have hard core D neighbors here in Arlington that are po'ed at the school situation, that voted for Youngkin. Asra Nomani and all of Thomas Jefferson High parents are dyed in the wool lefties. They (and many other Fairfax County parents) voted for Youngkin. Schools and Covid mandates are not like tax policy, where the squishy middle fluctuates back and forth on an issue. A lot of hard core D's are angry that their kids are being harmed. You literally have no idea what you are talking about.
Reply Quote
4
statefan91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ripper • 9:54a, 2/1/22
It sounds like you both have anecdotes from personal experience...not sure you can really say they don't know what they're talking about in that case?
Reply Quote
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:59a, 2/1/22
I've also thumbs-downed Trump for joining the anti-crypto crowd. I'd like to know why an otherwise freedom-supporting President takes that position.
Reply Quote
2
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ripper • 11:05a, 2/1/22
What is odd about that is that Dems were once much more attuned to bread and butter issues than Republicans. But since they've drifted from blue collar labor to the Ivory Tower crowd, they've become a lot more out of touch with the working class and with Main Street concerns.
Reply Quote
3
Ripper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to statefan91 • 11:13a, 2/1/22
statefan91 said:
It sounds like you both have anecdotes from personal experience...not sure you can really say they don't know what they're talking about in that case?
My anecdotes lead me to look at the exit polls and the shifts in voting patterns. My anecdotes and actual data tell me a subset of hard core lefties who are married with school age kids, actually did vote for Youngkin. I live here in NOVA. I follow it. I can say with confidence, your guy has no idea what he is talking about.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
statefan91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:36a, 2/1/22
All good - you opened your comments with personal anecdotes about your neighbors. Good that you're using exit data, just commenting that your post didn't really offer anything substantive regarding the data you are now mentioning.
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ripper • 11:54a, 2/1/22
Ripper said:
statefan91 said:
It sounds like you both have anecdotes from personal experience...not sure you can really say they don't know what they're talking about in that case?
My anecdotes lead me to look at the exit polls and the shifts in voting patterns. My anecdotes and actual data tell me a subset of hard core lefties who are married with school age kids, actually did vote for Youngkin. I live here in NOVA. I follow it. I can say with confidence, your guy has no idea what he is talking about.

How are you defining "hard-core lefties?"
Reply Quote
1
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldsouljer • 11:58a, 2/1/22
Oldsouljer said:
I've also thumbs-downed Trump for joining the anti-crypto crowd. I'd like to know why an otherwise freedom-supporting President takes that position.
Because he hasn't figured out a way to profit from it.
Reply Quote
6
bgr3
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:36p, 2/1/22
hokiewolf said:
Oldsouljer said:
I've also thumbs-downed Trump for joining the anti-crypto crowd. I'd like to know why an otherwise freedom-supporting President takes that position.
Because he hasn't figured out a way to profit from it.
It's also that he's a real estate investor, real estate investors love cheap money because they tend to use a lot of leverage. Fixed interest rate debt is great to have in a highly inflationary environment because you borrow more valuable dollars and pay them back with cheaper dollars.

Idk if that has anything to do with his policy position or if its just that he has more neocon-ish national security types advising him now.
Reply Quote
1
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:37p, 2/1/22
The communist Lamestream media talking heads disgustingly cheerlead this....



When did vaccines flip from being something that protected those who took them, to now being needed to "protect others"?? I thought vaccines were supposed to make those who took the injection immune to the disease. But now the vaxxtard lemmings admit that the vaccine they took doesn't protect them, and are under the delusion that they need other people to take the injection in order to "protect themselves".

So you want to force everyone to take a "vaccine" that doesn't work to protect you who've taken it, and doesn't protect anyone from anything? Absolute insanity.

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
Wayland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:36p, 2/1/22


As someone who has listened to the vast majority of the ACIP and VRBPAC committee meetings.

It is frightening to see how they went from spirited debate when the vaccines were first recommended for over 65 to hysterical rubber stamping for the pediatric vaccination programs.

And now the FDA is ready to go ahead with the under 5s when the initial trials showed they weren't effective in the hopes that the 3rd dose MAY be effective down the line.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:37p, 2/1/22
^ GP, its hard for those who've fallen for the hoax and taken the jab to accept the reality they now face. I think they understand but wouldn't agree in a thousand years on this or similar platform. Let's hope this info helps them not take another as we're truly all in this together. I have a # of family members and even high school classmates unwilling to come to terms with this in an open discussion.

A trucker convoy - similar to the one in Canada - in the US is apparently in the works, a dose of reality to some will be empty grocery store shelves compounded as a result. At some point - in unison - we all say "no more masks" and "no more vaccines". But as censorship of the truth continues to be tightened will we be so far down the censorship rabbit hole that its too late.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1
Wayland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:29p, 2/1/22
It is Feb 2022.

Tonight WCPSS is voting to move from recommending masks for 2-5 to requiring it.

Just who do you think is 2-5 in the WCPSS.

These are special needs/early intervention/developmentally delayed children.

If they vote yes, this is the WCPSS saying AT THIS POINT... it is a good idea to require masks on these children.

Like what the actual **** is wrong with these people? Sitting around at dinner on Sunday going:

"You know, Omicron is on its way out. Let's round up all our special needs toddlers and force mask them!!"
"Great idea, Karen. These children certainly don't have enough challenges in their lives. Let's really stick it to them"
"Right O!! By the way, where do you want to go out for drinks tonight?!"
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
Ripper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 5:40p, 2/1/22
Civilized said:
Ripper said:
statefan91 said:
It sounds like you both have anecdotes from personal experience...not sure you can really say they don't know what they're talking about in that case?
My anecdotes lead me to look at the exit polls and the shifts in voting patterns. My anecdotes and actual data tell me a subset of hard core lefties who are married with school age kids, actually did vote for Youngkin. I live here in NOVA. I follow it. I can say with confidence, your guy has no idea what he is talking about.

How are you defining "hard-core lefties?"

Dyed in the wool Democrats. Never voted for a Republican before Youngkin.

They simply don't want their kids ruined.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:06p, 2/1/22
Or democrats like the ones in the FDA and AAP. Party over science.


Reply Quote
3
Wayland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 7:07p, 2/1/22
packgrad said:
Or democrats like the ones in the FDA and AAP. Party over science.


Reply Quote
3
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:47p, 2/1/22
So...do you guys think that the lockdowns have helped and actually saved lives?

Shocker...they did not. They provided ZERO benefit, according to a study by Johns Hopkins University.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jan/31/lockdowns-had-little-or-no-impact-covid-19-deaths-/

Quote:
Lockdowns had little or no impact on COVID-19 deaths, new study shows

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Monday, January 31, 2022

Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University.

The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by about 0.2%, said the broad review of multiple scientific studies.

"We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality," the researchers wrote.


Masks, lockdowns....nothing. Absolutely NOTHING. No benefit at all.

But let's just keep doing it. Let's just keep destroying our freedoms and turn the world into one gigantic police state, or prison. Because manlet King Fauci and the CDC witch says so, and somehow they became the de facto dictators of the country. Because Klaus Schwab and George Soros and Lord Rothschild and all the other hunchback inbred globalist NWO Satanist elites at the World Economic Forum and the United Nations and the other Ivory Towers of power are hell bent on their "Great Reset" and "Build Back Better" worldwide full communist takeover by the year 2030.

Because the people in power and the people on TV say it's the thing to do. And they say that anyone who disagrees with them is a "crazy nutball conspiracy theorist white supremacist spreading misinformation".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
1
7 edits
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:02p, 2/1/22
Canada's PM Castro who is enforcing mandates. Ever heard of this guy?

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
4
First Page Last Page
Page 450 of 581 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.