Wayland said:
Going back over the surge surveys. You can see that hospitalization jump in late May from mid 500s into the low 700s and you can see it is mostly isolated to 3 hospital groups (Duke, Meck region, and Triad).
DHHS should be providing this information daily. Was there any admit policy or is this just reflective of local outbreaks? Because the other hospital groups were stable while these three increased signifcantly. This aligns to the spike in non-critical cases that we see at the end of May in the surveillance report.
This is why I question motivations when this data is not made public. Why hide it? I mean it shows things roughly stable and looks like Meck is driving the increased hospitalizations (the same people that wanted to build a field hospital 6 weeks ago. So I am suspicious of them)
I'd take it a step further....not just include the data, but, I don't know...maybe try to explain / justify it?
I mean, if the spike is due to a meat processing plant, or outbreak at a LTC, or tied to some big event that took place in a community. Add an asterisk and footnote it to explain.
Seems that's the transparency we really need to (1) avoid fear mongering, and (2) either prevent policy from being incorrectly applied to those where its not needed, or justify why it is being implemented.
I mean, there are a bunch of smart people around....if they aren't currently on the staff presenting this data, go hire them and have them make better sense of the data, even if its bad. That's what we have to do in the business world.