ClePack said:
cmball3 said:
He had so much elite talent at UNCW to help him overcome his lack of coaching acumen. Glad people say that it's easy to give examples yet can't give them.
Is watching this team not enough?
We have no offensive philosophy.
Our defense is atrocious. It's been bad every year under keatts. We "press" but it's awful and ends up leading to more open dunks than turnovers against good teams.
We never rebound. We miss FT's. We haven't fixed ANY of these issues in 5 years.
His scheme is pretty gimmicky imo and worked well at lower levels. It doesn't work in the ACC.
Do you guys have any examples to actually support your view of him being a good coach? Anything?
We have an offensive philosophy. It works a lot better with a facilitating point guard like Markell and I'm sure Keatts would like to get Hayes there.
The defense is built on the concept of 3 is better than 2 and trying to increase opportunity. Run teams off of the 3 point line and speed up the game with full court defense and deflections.
I do wish we were better at rebounding.
His scheme isn't gimmicky. A lot of teams play a pnr style. Need shooters and facilitators.
He's done a great job with player development (Hellems, Manny, Seabron, Daniels to name a few). His guys don't quit. He got that first team to the tourney, his second team should have and his third team was projected as a tourney team. People's thought are probably different if he had 3 ncaa tourneys in 4 seasons. Also, his offense looked pretty good when we had Markell facilitating to shooters and yurt as a pick and pop guy. He also outcoaches what many believe is the second best coach in the acc every year in Tony Bennett but that's just some extra credit. This year hasn't been great but they've been close in the games they've lost despite not having Bates, Gant or a healthy Morsell lately.