TRUMP 2024

4,311,840 Views | 33349 Replies | Last: 1 min ago by Werewolf
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

southernpackalistic said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

southernpackalistic said:

What an effin loony bin!

Do y'all keep talking about ridiculous BS to steer the conversation away from the 3.4% inflation and the 7.1% mortgage rates?


Now democrats care about inflation and mortgage rates! What changed?

LOLOL @ "Democrats"

Biden and Democrats got run out on a rail for two reasons - the border and the economy.

Trump took the economy he got handed and proceeded to punch himself in the dick for two years with his inept and economically illiterate bungling of tariffs and Iran.

Now it's Pubs who are going to get destroyed in November, and it ain't because "Democrats" are the only ones unhappy.

lol....."punch himself in the dick." Yep. Who the **** nominates a known monetary policy hawk to bring rates down. Or imposes tariffs to bring prices down. Or starts wars in the middle east to help the pain at the pump.

I used to consider myself a Pub, but I only see lip service being paid to the ideas of small government and fiscal conservatism. .




it's the lesser of two evils. 40T in debt wasn't done by one party alone….

yep. Most of it was done just by one president.

For once, just say the government is broken and don't try and pin it on any one person. You're such a disingenuous person.

when you legislate with the stroke of a pen, you own the results. That's not disingenuous it is what it is

Again… Dave, you know I appreciate you; however, your distaste for Trump is irrational. Yes, I agree with your sentiment, that said, you know as good as I do, this country isn't in the financial ruin all because of Trump.

The size and scope of the Federal Government started exploding in the early 1900's. No one since then, except maybe Coolidge, has had real restraint. By then, the country already had enough bad policy and constitutional amendments to throw us into chaos. And we saw it…. We still do.

didn't say it's all Trumps fault and everything you wrote I agree with. But to pretend that $20T in debt happened when the Rs controlled things and the administration doesn't have fault is absurd. Trump sets the agenda as President.

If we're going to fault Dave for yesterday, then the same premise with the debt rising astronomically while he is President is the same premise.

I'm not pretending anything. Regardless of the President, the congress is so out of control, within both parties, it's ridiculousness

Now, I do think your analogy regarding Saturday's debacle is not an accurate comparison at all. Our government is constructed with 3 equal branches. Our FB team has a 1 headed leader. So, yes, the President tries to set the agenda; however, he needs to have a congress that supports the agenda.



he 100% does. They all bend the knee.

You know that's called a sickness, right?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.

Negative.

He doesn't have to grant access to every outlet under the sun, but he also can't restrict access simply due to an outlet's viewpoint, and that's literally exactly what he said he was doing.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…


Their "reporting" is one sided garbage lapped up by the low information democrat voter.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.
im ok with private companies doing what's right for their shareholders, im not ok with the executive branch pick and choose who covers them because they want to control propaganda. That's some Soviet Union stuff.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

southernpackalistic said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

southernpackalistic said:

What an effin loony bin!

Do y'all keep talking about ridiculous BS to steer the conversation away from the 3.4% inflation and the 7.1% mortgage rates?


Now democrats care about inflation and mortgage rates! What changed?

LOLOL @ "Democrats"

Biden and Democrats got run out on a rail for two reasons - the border and the economy.

Trump took the economy he got handed and proceeded to punch himself in the dick for two years with his inept and economically illiterate bungling of tariffs and Iran.

Now it's Pubs who are going to get destroyed in November, and it ain't because "Democrats" are the only ones unhappy.

lol....."punch himself in the dick." Yep. Who the **** nominates a known monetary policy hawk to bring rates down. Or imposes tariffs to bring prices down. Or starts wars in the middle east to help the pain at the pump.

I used to consider myself a Pub, but I only see lip service being paid to the ideas of small government and fiscal conservatism. .




it's the lesser of two evils. 40T in debt wasn't done by one party alone….

yep. Most of it was done just by one president.

For once, just say the government is broken and don't try and pin it on any one person. You're such a disingenuous person.

when you legislate with the stroke of a pen, you own the results. That's not disingenuous it is what it is

Again… Dave, you know I appreciate you; however, your distaste for Trump is irrational. Yes, I agree with your sentiment, that said, you know as good as I do, this country isn't in the financial ruin all because of Trump.

The size and scope of the Federal Government started exploding in the early 1900's. No one since then, except maybe Coolidge, has had real restraint. By then, the country already had enough bad policy and constitutional amendments to throw us into chaos. And we saw it…. We still do.

didn't say it's all Trumps fault and everything you wrote I agree with. But to pretend that $20T in debt happened when the Rs controlled things and the administration doesn't have fault is absurd. Trump sets the agenda as President.

If we're going to fault Dave for yesterday, then the same premise with the debt rising astronomically while he is President is the same premise.

I'm not pretending anything. Regardless of the President, the congress is so out of control, within both parties, it's ridiculousness

Now, I do think your analogy regarding Saturday's debacle is not an accurate comparison at all. Our government is constructed with 3 equal branches. Our FB team has a 1 headed leader. So, yes, the President tries to set the agenda; however, he needs to have a congress that supports the agenda.



he 100% does. They all bend the knee.

You know that's called a sickness, right?
yes, it's called Populism
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…


Their "reporting" is one sided garbage lapped up by the low information democrat voter.
* Glass Breaks * BAUH GOD THATS OANs MUSIC!!
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lololol state run media. You guys worried about the DSA? Clean your own damn house.

Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see another #SunTzu moment coming on. ;-)

#dave and the rest of the #blindmice swinging wildly and flailing away, LOL.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24/7 truth. is that what's coming? ;-)
Will the #blindmice have any other options?

#dave's got a game of tiddlywinks to occupy himself so that he doesn't have to face the truthZ

#sieve's got a collector's checkers game he picked up at Cracker Barrel to keep occupied

#nappy can hang out with the Islamists taking over NYC.

$wetbehijdtheears can get back to suckling off his pacifier

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

24/7 truth. is that what's coming? ;-)
Will the #blindmice have any other options?

#dave's got a game of tiddlywinks to occupy himself so that he doesn't have to face the truthZ

#sieve's got a collector's checkers game he picked up at Cracker Barrel to keep occupied

#nappy can hang out with the Islamists taking over NYC.

$wetbehindtheears can get back to suckling off his pacifier


eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL, The White House, Trump, Dept of War, Homeland Security, Treasury Secretary, Dept of Energy, Musk all posting Q stuff.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, you'll be carrying a pocket full of these beauties before long. Aren't you excited!?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Blindmice, will you be excited for your children or grandchildren to have Trump accounts?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hegseth is a great patriot!
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A new Nick! #blindmice, is this fake news?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NC's new Governor in 2025, I missed. We'll see how this works out.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Populists?


Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…

What violation? They can (and do) continue to print whatever the hell they want.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…

What violation? They can (and do) continue to print whatever the hell they want.


Stay tuned…
https://apnews.com/article/trump-ban-ms-now-media-cnn-politico-72f9acf68244ca70e9078d9d3661c722
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shoukd be a fun week, #Sieve.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMAO
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Got ur popcorn ?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…

What violation? They can (and do) continue to print whatever the hell they want.

The violation where Trump removed their access because he's a big fat baby.

Him not liking their reporting is clearly arbitrary and won't stand up to even the slightest legal scrutiny.

It's an obvious violation of the First.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#dave, this might not be good for the #DeepState.....remember, what you insisted didn't exist.

#dave, what doesn't exist for you is #discernment, my friend....

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
epoch!
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

eljefe444 said:

caryking said:

eljefe444 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:



Good on Fox. Right call. Well done.

I hope CNN does the same the next time there is a D president that bars Fox from the press pool for reporting facts inconvenient to the President.

Just kidding, we know it would never come to that because a Democrat president would never do that.


The same networks that refused to cover the President's address to the nation are now upset they can not cover the President's addresses to the nation?


Trump ain't special in that regard.

Major networks have long opted to not cover presidential addresses they considered to be thinly veiled political rallies or just not particularly newsworthy. They did that exact same thing to Obama and Biden too.

We all know that it's unconstitutional as hell for him to ban specific outlets because of their viewpoint, whether you're keen to admit it or not.


How did you feel about your President Trump being banned from Twitter, facebook and other social media platforms? I guessing you were fine and dandy with it?

Are any of those spaces new gathering organizations? Who was the Twitter and Facebook pool reporter?


Well, one could argue yes as many news organizations and commentators, journalists…etc. use these sites and more to get their information out.

You seem okay with one certain person being silenced but not others? Interesting this is.


You realize those are private companies that choose to ban his account for violation of terms? It's ok though, he just stated his own state run media that is sure to be fair and balanced. Must've had it in the works knowing this would be a possibility:

I haven't followed this very closely; however, not every news agency has always had White House press credentials. Being that CNN is a big news outlet per se, that doesn't mean they should be included. Let's be honest, many more outlets (new media) have far larger audiences than CNN. It was only since this Trump admin has new media been given access into the White House press corps. As usual, this just appears to be a bunch of butt hurt leftists or faux outrage.


That's ironic because Trump is the one butt hurt about their reporting, which he explicitly used as his reasoning for violating their first amendment right to freedom of press. Selectively choosing which entities are barred…

What violation? They can (and do) continue to print whatever the hell they want.

The violation where Trump removed their access because he's a big fat baby.

Him not liking their reporting is clearly arbitrary and won't stand up to even the slightest legal scrutiny.

It's an obvious violation of the First.


It's awesome to see democrats now care about the 1st amendment after what we have seen the last decade with cancel culture.

First Page Last Page
Page 950 of 953
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.