White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt just dropped a political earthquake:
“Nearly ten years later, thanks to the declassification of documents by the Director of National Intelligence, the truth has finally come to light—vindicating… pic.twitter.com/7KsFpSY2oX
December, 2016. During the hour long press conference that Obama used to get the Russia hoax rolling, he said that he hopes Trump is concerned about foreign interference in future elections.
I can't think of 2 normal Republicans so not sure that's a real winning argument
Rubio and Vance. Give me two normal Democrats that actually have a chance of winning the nomination.
Normal? LOLOLOL
Hilarious that anyone who voted for or still supports this clown show of an administration wants to talk about "normal."
Are they going to start totally unnecessary wars? Are they going to impose illegal and economically harmful tariffs? Are they going to fellate Putin and then turn around and threaten to invade or go to war with our NATO allies? Are they going to bang porn stars and pay them off? Are they going to run the government like a kleptocracy and treat the office like it's their and their family's own personal piggy bank? Are they going to rape or sexually assault women? Are they going to insult, browbeat, and demean the Supreme Court, the press, and anyone else that disagrees with them? Are they going to lie like they breathe on a daily basis about all things big and small?
Because none of that is normal, and all of this is what we have now, and you seem to be totally fine with all that.
Newsom. AOC. Ossoff. Bashear. Shapiro. Pritzker. All these Democrats are normal by those standards, even though their levels of progressivism vary. You just don't like their politics.
Pritzker is my favorite, although it's unlikely he's gonna be the guy. We need a lot more humanist leaders like him who are fiscally pragmatic.
We've got an administration that has disrespected and flouted and defiled norms and laws for years, and you want to talk about other politicians being not-normal because of their laugh, or their stance on obscure culture war issues like trans stuff, or because they want to pay for more health care or child care or care about climate change.
It's a total joke of a double standard, and you know it.
I eagerly await your "Whoa, TDS bro!" response because no one on the right can respond constructively to any of this. The only response is to act like it's weird to object to it.
Newsom…with what he's done to California, no thanks. Far left AOC…lol. Ossoff and Bashear, are you even serious? Your party hates Israel but you think they vote for Shapiro? Billionaire Pritzker going to rail against billionaires and an economy for everyone? That would be height of hypocrisy.
We still have two more years. Just think how far left the democrats will be then.
The Republican Party has doused itself in gasoline and lit itself on fire by tethering its sinking ship to MAGA and a disaster of a president and human being.
And you're talking about the Democratic Party's shoes being untied.
LMAO at you criticizing an actually successful businessman that also looks out for people when you eagerly plugged in a bankrupted, fraudulent clown that's turned himself into a billionaire on a crypto scam that profits mightily for him while losing money for everyone else, and openly cares only about enriching himself and his family.
As usual you're all too eager to oversimplify a complicated issue in Israel. The left doesn't "hate Israel." If that was true where are all the Jewish democrats switching parties? You can clearly make the case that Bibi sucks and is leading Trump around by the nose; that the Palestinian people deserve more support; and that we need to take a pragmatic stance on not trusting Bibi with a blank check. Balancing the ability of Israel to defend itself in a region that wants to extinguish it, with the humanitarian need for that war to end, and the plight of the Palestinians (NOT Hamas) is obviously too complex for the current Administration, so they should probably let the adults take a hack at it.
Call me crazy, but maybe you should worry a little about Trump and this Republican Congress' actual failures, and Republicans getting destroyed in November because of it, instead of worrying about problems that may arise in the unlikely event far-left Dem candidates get elected to a boatload of seats around the country.
Bill Maher calls out Democrat Party
- - -
Bill Maher. Van Jones. James Carville are all telling you the same thing I'm telling you but all you can do is "something Trump".
Another thing, I don't think the midterms are going to be as bad for republicans as you are hoping, wishing and praying for. Feel free to disagree.
More boogeymen.
Carville and Jones and Maher are rightfully just saying that infighting on the left is going to hurt the party if they don't get their **** together and selectively ignore the far-left wing on issues like trans activism and Gaza.
But establishment Dems would be stupid not to pay attention to why DSA candidates are resonating, especially in high-cost-of-living locations, and regarding the issues that impact most Americans.
Which of these do you think are going to end America, if implemented reasonably:
Swinging balance of political and economic power back to working class and away from massive corporations Quality public housing Affordable health care Cutting military spending Being less interventionist abroad Campaign finance reform
Discussing police reform, de-escalation training, reduction or elimination of cash bail, etc. is fine, but no one is getting elected to a major public office talking about abolishing the police or the Senate.
If the more moderate Dems are smart, they'll see and understand why DSA candidates are resonating, and double down on addressing these issues in their own campaigns without the scary "socialist" label, while openly rejecting the craziest ideas of the far left.
Spoken like a true DSA person...
LOL
Good luck in the midterms and in 28 railing against the working class, affordability, and health care.
Civ, the Communist Part started their platform a long time ago. In fact, if you read their platform from the early 60's, you will see they have accomplished a lot. They didn't have to win elections; rather, they had to influence the societal norms.
I agree that society has gobbled up the narrative that started 60+ years ago. Including yourself, you have bought into those Communist plans. Please feel free to look up their platform. You will see how much you've bought into the plan.
I'll give them their credit, they have succeeded in changing the minds of so many.
LOLOL
What narrative?
Trump ran on affordability and then illegally tariff'ed the world and drove up inflation and made everything more expensive for Americans (in addition to pissing the entire world off, with no identifiable endgame or benefit).
He said he was going to replace Obamacare with something better and/or cheaper. How's that going?
Even if he didn't run on cutting military spending, he ran on getting us out and keeping us out of foreign wars, and then promptly threatened to invade our allies in Greenland and militarily struck Venezuela and started a war with Iran with no discernible endgame and is threatening action in Cuba. Aside from the sheer stupidity of this, you think these wars and operations are cheap?
Our infrastructure quality is lower than most of the rest of the developed world. Our health care and child care are vastly more expensive.
Which of these issues are communist, again?
Pubs are going to get destroyed even worse in November (if that's even possible, which I'm doubting at this point) if they double down on Trump's "affordability is a made-up word" trope, and are now hammering "affordability is communist."
Y'all are trying to set some sort of record for tone-deafness and electoral unpopularity at this point. That's the only answer that makes sense.
The only answer that makes sense to me is that they're YOLO'ing like they're confident Trump will find a way to rig the election... or they just have no intention of accepting the results.
NOW elections can be rigged?
If it's possible I'm sure the biggest crook in American history will find a way.
Is it possible to rig an election, yes or no?
Rig it by having millions of ineligible voters vote? No.
Rig it by having the federal government usurp the power to administer elections? We've never confronted that before so we don't know.
New Jersey accidentally registered 6,600 noncitizens to vote years ago, governor says
"Last week I learned that a serious software error in New Jersey's Motor Vehicle System led to the registration of roughly 6,600 people who indicated that they were not U.S. citizens - - -
NJ busted trying to pull a fast one. Is it out of the realm of possibility this could be happening in other states?
Wow! 6,600 voters. Scary.
It wasn't a "fast one." It was a software glitch. Nothing nefarious is even being suggested here.
Why would New Jersey need to rig an election? For who, Democrats? Democrats win by massive margins there. Harris had the worst showing by a Democrat there in decades and still won by a quarter-million votes That would be like North Dakota rigging elections for Republicans; it makes zero sense. If anyone is trying to rig an election, wouldn't it be the underdog party, in a state where they need the help and also actually have a chance of winning?
And how are they getting the massive, organized fraud past all the Republicans on their bipartisan election commission?
There are always abnormalities in elections. Always have been. Always will be. The scale is what matters, and they're never, ever close to being the scale necessary to tip elections.
Here's the context that y'all never try to find:
6,600 registered erroneously in NJ. Fewer than 400 of those people actually voted.
Do you know how many voters are registered in New Jersey? Nearly 6.7MM. 4.3MM of those voted in the last election.
Do the math. That's .009%. Nine one-thousandths of one percent of the votes cast in that state.
Harris won New Jersey by 250,000 votes and you're talking about 400 votes, and you don't even know who they voted for.
So yeah, that math doesn't math and it never does, but it doesn't stop y'all from gulping down Trump's firehose of election fraud lies.
Just to emphasize this statement from the article:
"The governor's statement said that the state's "preliminary analysis" found that less than 400 people who were erroneously registered to vote had voted in elections and were not tied to just one party; they were registered as Democrats, Republicans, or unaffiliated voters."
The election fraud fantasy began when Trump concocted a preemptive excuse for if he lost 2016. It's never been factually supported by any evidence, just the insecure ramblings of a sore loser, but it's done tremendous damage to Americans' trust in elections.
🚨Alert: American B-1 Nuclear Bombers are Now Heading for Iran for the First time since the 40-day war to destroy Iranian underground Missiles bases!! pic.twitter.com/hkUi3KtNOW
— US Homeland Security News (@defense_civil25) July 21, 2026
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Awakened Outlaw asks the question: "why was the President of the United States [Biden] working on behalf of China and against the interests of the American people on multiple fronts?"
I can't think of 2 normal Republicans so not sure that's a real winning argument
Rubio and Vance. Give me two normal Democrats that actually have a chance of winning the nomination.
Normal? LOLOLOL
Hilarious that anyone who voted for or still supports this clown show of an administration wants to talk about "normal."
Are they going to start totally unnecessary wars? Are they going to impose illegal and economically harmful tariffs? Are they going to fellate Putin and then turn around and threaten to invade or go to war with our NATO allies? Are they going to bang porn stars and pay them off? Are they going to run the government like a kleptocracy and treat the office like it's their and their family's own personal piggy bank? Are they going to rape or sexually assault women? Are they going to insult, browbeat, and demean the Supreme Court, the press, and anyone else that disagrees with them? Are they going to lie like they breathe on a daily basis about all things big and small?
Because none of that is normal, and all of this is what we have now, and you seem to be totally fine with all that.
Newsom. AOC. Ossoff. Bashear. Shapiro. Pritzker. All these Democrats are normal by those standards, even though their levels of progressivism vary. You just don't like their politics.
Pritzker is my favorite, although it's unlikely he's gonna be the guy. We need a lot more humanist leaders like him who are fiscally pragmatic.
We've got an administration that has disrespected and flouted and defiled norms and laws for years, and you want to talk about other politicians being not-normal because of their laugh, or their stance on obscure culture war issues like trans stuff, or because they want to pay for more health care or child care or care about climate change.
It's a total joke of a double standard, and you know it.
I eagerly await your "Whoa, TDS bro!" response because no one on the right can respond constructively to any of this. The only response is to act like it's weird to object to it.
Newsom…with what he's done to California, no thanks. Far left AOC…lol. Ossoff and Bashear, are you even serious? Your party hates Israel but you think they vote for Shapiro? Billionaire Pritzker going to rail against billionaires and an economy for everyone? That would be height of hypocrisy.
We still have two more years. Just think how far left the democrats will be then.
The Republican Party has doused itself in gasoline and lit itself on fire by tethering its sinking ship to MAGA and a disaster of a president and human being.
And you're talking about the Democratic Party's shoes being untied.
LMAO at you criticizing an actually successful businessman that also looks out for people when you eagerly plugged in a bankrupted, fraudulent clown that's turned himself into a billionaire on a crypto scam that profits mightily for him while losing money for everyone else, and openly cares only about enriching himself and his family.
As usual you're all too eager to oversimplify a complicated issue in Israel. The left doesn't "hate Israel." If that was true where are all the Jewish democrats switching parties? You can clearly make the case that Bibi sucks and is leading Trump around by the nose; that the Palestinian people deserve more support; and that we need to take a pragmatic stance on not trusting Bibi with a blank check. Balancing the ability of Israel to defend itself in a region that wants to extinguish it, with the humanitarian need for that war to end, and the plight of the Palestinians (NOT Hamas) is obviously too complex for the current Administration, so they should probably let the adults take a hack at it.
Call me crazy, but maybe you should worry a little about Trump and this Republican Congress' actual failures, and Republicans getting destroyed in November because of it, instead of worrying about problems that may arise in the unlikely event far-left Dem candidates get elected to a boatload of seats around the country.
Bill Maher calls out Democrat Party
- - -
Bill Maher. Van Jones. James Carville are all telling you the same thing I'm telling you but all you can do is "something Trump".
Another thing, I don't think the midterms are going to be as bad for republicans as you are hoping, wishing and praying for. Feel free to disagree.
More boogeymen.
Carville and Jones and Maher are rightfully just saying that infighting on the left is going to hurt the party if they don't get their **** together and selectively ignore the far-left wing on issues like trans activism and Gaza.
But establishment Dems would be stupid not to pay attention to why DSA candidates are resonating, especially in high-cost-of-living locations, and regarding the issues that impact most Americans.
Which of these do you think are going to end America, if implemented reasonably:
Swinging balance of political and economic power back to working class and away from massive corporations Quality public housing Affordable health care Cutting military spending Being less interventionist abroad Campaign finance reform
Discussing police reform, de-escalation training, reduction or elimination of cash bail, etc. is fine, but no one is getting elected to a major public office talking about abolishing the police or the Senate.
If the more moderate Dems are smart, they'll see and understand why DSA candidates are resonating, and double down on addressing these issues in their own campaigns without the scary "socialist" label, while openly rejecting the craziest ideas of the far left.
Spoken like a true DSA person...
LOL
Good luck in the midterms and in 28 railing against the working class, affordability, and health care.
Civ, the Communist Part started their platform a long time ago. In fact, if you read their platform from the early 60's, you will see they have accomplished a lot. They didn't have to win elections; rather, they had to influence the societal norms.
I agree that society has gobbled up the narrative that started 60+ years ago. Including yourself, you have bought into those Communist plans. Please feel free to look up their platform. You will see how much you've bought into the plan.
I'll give them their credit, they have succeeded in changing the minds of so many.
LOLOL
What narrative?
Trump ran on affordability and then illegally tariff'ed the world and drove up inflation and made everything more expensive for Americans (in addition to pissing the entire world off, with no identifiable endgame or benefit).
He said he was going to replace Obamacare with something better and/or cheaper. How's that going?
Even if he didn't run on cutting military spending, he ran on getting us out and keeping us out of foreign wars, and then promptly threatened to invade our allies in Greenland and militarily struck Venezuela and started a war with Iran with no discernible endgame and is threatening action in Cuba. Aside from the sheer stupidity of this, you think these wars and operations are cheap?
Our infrastructure quality is lower than most of the rest of the developed world. Our health care and child care are vastly more expensive.
Which of these issues are communist, again?
Pubs are going to get destroyed even worse in November (if that's even possible, which I'm doubting at this point) if they double down on Trump's "affordability is a made-up word" trope, and are now hammering "affordability is communist."
Y'all are trying to set some sort of record for tone-deafness and electoral unpopularity at this point. That's the only answer that makes sense.
The only answer that makes sense to me is that they're YOLO'ing like they're confident Trump will find a way to rig the election... or they just have no intention of accepting the results.
NOW elections can be rigged?
If it's possible I'm sure the biggest crook in American history will find a way.
Is it possible to rig an election, yes or no?
Rig it by having millions of ineligible voters vote? No.
Rig it by having the federal government usurp the power to administer elections? We've never confronted that before so we don't know.
New Jersey accidentally registered 6,600 noncitizens to vote years ago, governor says
"Last week I learned that a serious software error in New Jersey's Motor Vehicle System led to the registration of roughly 6,600 people who indicated that they were not U.S. citizens - - -
NJ busted trying to pull a fast one. Is it out of the realm of possibility this could be happening in other states?
Wow! 6,600 voters. Scary.
It wasn't a "fast one." It was a software glitch. Nothing nefarious is even being suggested here.
Why would New Jersey need to rig an election? For who, Democrats? Democrats win by massive margins there. Harris had the worst showing by a Democrat there in decades and still won by a quarter-million votes That would be like North Dakota rigging elections for Republicans; it makes zero sense. If anyone is trying to rig an election, wouldn't it be the underdog party, in a state where they need the help and also actually have a chance of winning?
And how are they getting the massive, organized fraud past all the Republicans on their bipartisan election commission?
There are always abnormalities in elections. Always have been. Always will be. The scale is what matters, and they're never, ever close to being the scale necessary to tip elections.
Here's the context that y'all never try to find:
6,600 registered erroneously in NJ. Fewer than 400 of those people actually voted.
Do you know how many voters are registered in New Jersey? Nearly 6.7MM. 4.3MM of those voted in the last election.
Do the math. That's .009%. Nine one-thousandths of one percent of the votes cast in that state.
Harris won New Jersey by 250,000 votes and you're talking about 400 votes, and you don't even know who they voted for.
So yeah, that math doesn't math and it never does, but it doesn't stop y'all from gulping down Trump's firehose of election fraud lies.
Just to emphasize this statement from the article:
"The governor's statement said that the state's "preliminary analysis" found that less than 400 people who were erroneously registered to vote had voted in elections and were not tied to just one party; they were registered as Democrats, Republicans, or unaffiliated voters."
The election fraud fantasy began when Trump concocted a preemptive excuse for if he lost 2016. It's never been factually supported by any evidence, just the insecure ramblings of a sore loser, but it's done tremendous damage to Americans' trust in elections.
For nothing.
We are absolutely in the dumbest timeline.
Oh it's blatantly obvious but you just have to go on a scavenger hunt and search through my posts from years ago
