TRUMP 2024

3,834,794 Views | 30879 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by SmaptyWolf
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

"probably"... "likely"...

Just another "Get Trump" story that is created to only fit one side of a narrative.

And I'm sure that there are other "experts" out there that would quickly tell you that the coating was in fact vandalized.

I continue to contend that this stuff isn't rocket science - no where close to it in fact. Jobs like this are getting done somewhere every single day in this country... but somehow, someway this is the only single job that got botched? Give me an f'n break.

Where's the story about all the rest of these jobs that have been botched? If there were a bunch of them out there, I'm sure someone would have posted it here already. But somehow we are supposed to believe that this project got awarded to some "fly by night" company that had no idea whatsoever about what they were doing?

Do you know how laughable that sounds?

Tell me this hokie. How many times have you physically visited this jobsite so far as this situation has been unfolding? How was your personal, physical inspection of the surface prep work? What did you see that concerned you while you were on the site watching the application process? What are you seeing there each day as these damaged areas are being removed? I'm sure that you've stuck your fingers right into the proverbial nail holes - not just once, but day after day after day. Right?

Yeah. That's what I thought.



LOLOL

Experts like who, Sidney Powell? Rudy Giuliani? The Pillow Guy? LOLOL

Go find us these actual experts. Hell, start with one. Find us one expert that thinks they have evidence the coating was vandalized by lefty loons.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#SunTzu, appear weak when you are strong.....it invites overextension by the enemy. Its draws the enemy into the light and more vulnerable and easier to kill. You guys are so gullible.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.

It'll come as a shock to no one that the documents Trump released to support his speech last night mostly don't remotely say what he said, or contradict it, including docs written by his own appointees.

It's comical that you absolutely didn't trust the FBI, CIA, etc until this year. What changed? Aside from Trump gutting them and replacing career professionals with toadies. For some reason, though, he trashed the FBI task force on foreign influence and the DNI's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and didn't replace them. I wonder why?

And last week he got rid of the bipartisan commission that helps states secure their elections. Strange behavior for a guy so concerned about election security, don't you think?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.

It'll come as a shock to no one that the documents Trump released to support his speech last night mostly don't remotely say what he said, or contradict it, including docs written by his own appointees.

It's comical that you absolutely didn't trust the FBI, CIA, etc until this year. What changed? Aside from Trump gutting them and replacing career professionals with toadies. For some reason, though, he trashed the FBI task force on foreign influence and the DNI's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and didn't replace them. I wonder why?

And last week he got rid of the bipartisan commission that helps states secure their elections. Strange behavior for a guy so concerned about election security, don't you think?


Again, repot the news and let people make up their own mind.

The rest is your opinion and not fact but you tell it so well.

Democrats seem really upset by this speech that none of them watched.
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.



Again, repot the news and let people make up their own mind.

The rest is your opinion and not fact but you tell it so well.

Democrats seem really upset by this speech that none of them watched.

That is because the MSM is telling them lies again and what to think and they keep falling for it. I hope ABC, CBS, and NBC etc lose their broadcast licenses for not carrying the speech of President Trump. It can happen.

John Solomon was on with Glenn Beck a little while ago and it's really a good listen. He is in the know and there is more coming and he believes that people will be charged and perp walked...including journalists who took money from China to write bad stories about Trump. A journalist's job is to report the news, not change it towards their opinion and say Orange Man Bad.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.

It'll come as a shock to no one that the documents Trump released to support his speech last night mostly don't remotely say what he said, or contradict it, including docs written by his own appointees.

It's comical that you absolutely didn't trust the FBI, CIA, etc until this year. What changed? Aside from Trump gutting them and replacing career professionals with toadies. For some reason, though, he trashed the FBI task force on foreign influence and the DNI's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and didn't replace them. I wonder why?

And last week he got rid of the bipartisan commission that helps states secure their elections. Strange behavior for a guy so concerned about election security, don't you think?


Again, repot the news and let people make up their own mind.

The rest is your opinion and not fact but you tell it so well.

Democrats seem really upset by this speech that none of them watched.

I watched it, did you?

Hey, maybe you can help me understand why China let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election. I'm sure you've thought about it deeply. Any idea?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.


What happened to it, is that we've got a president that firehoses the country with conspiracies and blatant lies every time he opens his mouth.

We've never seen anything close to this before. We've never had a president that flouted normative, lawful presidential behavior and honest leadership so consistently and proudly.

Our system simply isn't set up to handle it.

So, cry me a river that media outlets are trying to deal with it as best they can. 1A gives them the latitude to cover or not cover things as they see fit. This isn't different in approach than Fox cutting away early from other presidential speaking engagements when he quickly begins spiraling the toilet bowl with his nonsensical drivel.

If you think the media has an obligation to cover the president spouting conspiracies and lies, more than you think the president has an obligation to NOT spout those conspiracies and lies, you'd be missing the whole plot.

TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

There's 300 yards of vandalism according to Trump. Show me a picture of 1 yard that's been released and I'll believe your theory. 1/4 mile of possibilities and I'm asking for 3 feet

After you show me all the pictures that you took that back up all the "definitive" statements that you've made about this over the last month.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

"probably"... "likely"...

Just another "Get Trump" story that is created to only fit one side of a narrative.

And I'm sure that there are other "experts" out there that would quickly tell you that the coating was in fact vandalized.

I continue to contend that this stuff isn't rocket science - no where close to it in fact. Jobs like this are getting done somewhere every single day in this country... but somehow, someway this is the only single job that got botched? Give me an f'n break.

Where's the story about all the rest of these jobs that have been botched? If there were a bunch of them out there, I'm sure someone would have posted it here already. But somehow we are supposed to believe that this project got awarded to some "fly by night" company that had no idea whatsoever about what they were doing?

Do you know how laughable that sounds?

Tell me this hokie. How many times have you physically visited this jobsite so far as this situation has been unfolding? How was your personal, physical inspection of the surface prep work? What did you see that concerned you while you were on the site watching the application process? What are you seeing there each day as these damaged areas are being removed? I'm sure that you've stuck your fingers right into the proverbial nail holes - not just once, but day after day after day. Right?

Yeah. That's what I thought.



LOLOL

Experts like who, Sidney Powell? Rudy Giuliani? The Pillow Guy? LOLOL

Go find us these actual experts. Hell, start with one. Find us one expert that thinks they have evidence the coating was vandalized by lefty loons.

Man, I don't even pay any attention to anything you post here anymore... experts shouldn't have to say "probably" and "likely".
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.

That's all that he's capable of anymore...
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

hokiewolf said:

There's 300 yards of vandalism according to Trump. Show me a picture of 1 yard that's been released and I'll believe your theory. 1/4 mile of possibilities and I'm asking for 3 feet

After you show me all the pictures that you took that back up all the "definitive" statements that you've made about this over the last month.
the manufacturer and the installer have both stated that there were failures in the coating that were not expected and needed to be repaired. Damn man, just take the L.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember a time when Hillary Clinton was mocked (and rightly so) for stating there was a vast right wing conspiracy. Funny how the tables have turned.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Not that Russia's involvement was in question ever since Mueller, the Congressional bipartisan commission, and the multiple prison sentences for Russian operatives and those in Trump's orbit that tried to cover it up, but hilarious self-own by Trump here.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ABC, NBC, CNN do not air Trump's election-security speech live on primary channels

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-networks-face-dilemma-over-whether-air-trumps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/
- - -

Suppressing speech and information are what the Nazi's and fascist would do all while calling other people Nazi's and fascist.

It's fascinating that you think stations have a legal or ethical obligation to platform the debunked conspiracy theories and outright lies pouring from the president's mouth on a minute by minute basis, to the very clear detriment of his constituents and our country. (They don't)

But for some reason you don't think the president himself has an obligation for some semblance of ethical, honest leadership. (He does)

Stations have a first amendment right to choose what to cover, and choosing not to cover a cascade of grievances and lies seems rational.

The insecure, infantile president still propagating debunked conspiracies to the world because he's a child, certainly does not.


What happened to reporting the news and letting people make up their own minds? The President backed up with the CIA, DHS, FBI, DNI are ALL lying?

I remember when democrats were telling everyone, ironically enough with the help of the media, Russia interfered in the 2016 election but now….NOW everything is a conspiracy theory? What changed?

The rest of your post is full blown TDS. Try to control yourself.


What happened to it, is that we've got a president that firehoses the country with conspiracies and blatant lies every time he opens his mouth.

We've never seen anything close to this before. We've never had a president that flouted normative, lawful presidential behavior and honest leadership so consistently and proudly.

Our system simply isn't set up to handle it.

So, cry me a river that media outlets are trying to deal with it as best they can. 1A gives them the latitude to cover or not cover things as they see fit. This isn't different in approach than Fox cutting away early from other presidential speaking engagements when he quickly begins spiraling the toilet bowl with his nonsensical drivel.

If you think the media has an obligation to cover the president spouting conspiracies and lies, more than you think the president has an obligation to NOT spout those conspiracies and lies, you'd be missing the whole plot.




LOL-what? Man, I don't know if you're going to make it 2 more years?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2024 Election, too.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL, just spout it out. #Popcorn :-)
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We've frantically worked to develop new supply chains in anticipation of the eventual 'reveal'. Election hacking is an Act of War. We were vulnerable with the supply chain deficiencies created by the globalists.

#Sieve, you are correct...........this is going to become very serious over the next several months.

Additionally, Primaries for 2026 have already been stolen on both sides of the aisle. Many of the current candidates are fraudulently on the November ballot as a result of both D & R primaries. We have it all, by the way!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?

Too big to rig.......and there had been enough protective measures put in place. As I've said many times here, we have - in US military custody - more than 100 Venezuelans and their families. Parked overseas from 2021ish to Jan 2025 and then brought into the US after Trump's election. Families were brought 1st and then actual techs/engineers followed. I don't know the # but a good # of the technicians and engineers that had come forward were actually assassinated before we could gain protective custody.

You think Biden controlled anything substantive from 2021-2025? Stay tuned.........find out for yourself at your own pace. The truth will continue to be slowly fed to the masses.........release a bit to secure you getting over your skis.............then release some more......and you get out over your skis......slowly some of the most brainwashed will wake up. From what I see from you 3 bliind mice last night and today, I don't have much hope for ya.





Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow!.......220 million that's damn near every legal American in this country including our youth.

By the way, an opportunity for me to educate further:

- the Smartmatic and Dominion systems are some sort of an advanced form of two CIA softwares, Hammer & Scorecard, that had been previously used by the CIA to steal elections overseas in the favor of the United States Deep State/Global Cabal shadow govt. Look up Dennis Montgomery associated with Hammer and Scorecard. In Nov/Dec 2020, I listened to a podcast with Mary Fanning and Lt Gen Thomas McInerny where this topic was discussed. The theft of 2016 was underway and, in the works, when the US Military somehow prevented this digital theft. McInerney carefully crafted utterance says so........it was carefully nebulous you might say.

I won't waste my time going into the US Special Forces vs. CIA/Gina Haspell gunbattle in Germany in Nov 2020. Guess who won?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.

There was massive theft, however, the real #'s were much greater than the results. The US Military monitored the entire thing, they have it all. #SpaceForce
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?

Too big to rig.......and there had been enough protective measures put in place. ...

You think Biden controlled anything substantive from 2021-2025? ..

Lol, what in the **** are you talking about? So 2020 wasn't too big to rig? And the "protective measures put in place" exsted when apparently Biden didn't control anything substantive, but they don't exist now?

Are you even trying to make sense?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And apparently the entirety of the truth is not going to be revealed..........or at least for a while. This burn bag story is cover for other means, ie US Military.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.

Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote versus Kamala's 48.3%. I get it that Trump Devotion Syndrome demands that you think that's a landslide, but it's not.

So why did China let him eek out a victory this time and not in 2020? They could have easily flipped all the swing states the other direction.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?

Too big to rig.......and there had been enough protective measures put in place. ...

You think Biden controlled anything substantive from 2021-2025? ..

Lol, what in the **** are you talking about? So 2020 wasn't too big to rig? And the "protective measures put in place" exsted when apparently Biden didn't control anything substantive, but they don't exist now?

Are you even trying to make sense?

You were allowed to win......"IT HAD TO BE THIS WAY". It's called waking up the #sheeple. #devolution, my friend.
1. You had to experience 4 years of Biden
2. Too many brainwashed people in 2020 so the normies had to be woken up to 4 yrs of Biden, thus 2024.
3. #Sieve has seen me post the #'s we needed to reach in order to avoid Civil War. The #'s to avoid a civil war are 80% want Biden out..........and the other 20% want Biden to stay in. .............it is not 80% pro-Trump that was needed ...........it was 80% get Biden the hell out of there that was needed. We have it on the anti- Biden.

You've experienced a #STING operation, you just didn't know it. You will know at some point.

The MSM is a powerful weapon! They will soon be taken down.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?

Too big to rig.......and there had been enough protective measures put in place. ...

You think Biden controlled anything substantive from 2021-2025? ..

Lol, what in the **** are you talking about? So 2020 wasn't too big to rig? And the "protective measures put in place" exsted when apparently Biden didn't control anything substantive, but they don't exist now?

Are you even trying to make sense?

You were allowed to win......"IT HAD TO BE THIS WAY". It's called waking up the #sheeple. #devolution, my friend.
1. You had to experience 4 years of Biden
2. Too many brainwashed people in 2020 so the normies had to be woken up to 4 yrs of Biden, thus 2024.
3. #Sieve has seen me post the #'s we needed to reach in order to avoid Civil War. The #'s to avoid a civil war are 80% want Biden out..........and the other 20% want Biden to stay in. .............it is not 80% pro-Trump that was needed ...........it was 80% get Biden the hell out of there that was needed. We have it on the anti- Biden.

You've experienced a #STING operation, you just didn't know it. You will know at some point.

The MSM is a powerful weapon! They will soon be taken down.

Wait, so Trump (Q?) wanted China to hack the election in 2020 to "let Biden win" in order to avoid a civil war, so he "allowed it"? But then he bawled about it being hacked every day since, despite his civil war concerns? But letting Biden win allowed Trump to overwhelm China's hacking skills in 2024 with a massive 1% landslide (that the MSM won't tell you was actually 80/20), but now he's worried he won't have another landslide despite his MASSIVE popularity that the MSM won't tell you about?

Now I'm even more confused. Are you sure you're not just completely insane?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.

Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote versus Kamala's 48.3%. I get it that Trump Devotion Syndrome demands that you think that's a landslide, but it's not.

So why did China let him eke out a victory this time and not in 2020? They could have easily flipped all the swing states the other direction.


That gets you every time. All 7 swing states is a landslide in its self. I don't know, why don't you ask China?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.

Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote versus Kamala's 48.3%. I get it that Trump Devotion Syndrome demands that you think that's a landslide, but it's not.

So why did China let him eke out a victory this time and not in 2020? They could have easily flipped all the swing states the other direction.


That gets you every time. All 7 swing states is a landslide in its self. I don't know, why don't you ask China?

I don't need to ask China. Because you'd have to be a moron to believe any of the nonsensical vomit that Trump spewed on America last night. Lol, even Fox & Friends pretended like the speech didn't happen.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Werewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

It's not the speech that you should pay attention to, it's what it tees up next. Not sure what that is yet, feels like this was a SAVE Act speech.

I'll be very pleasantly surprised if that's all it was.

You guys are being toyed with........it's a Military Intelligence operation and it has been for 10 years. What are you going to say with those 100+ technicians and engineers from Venezuela step on the stand and talk about the Dominion and Smartmatics mechanisms for changing votes? When they tell us how they've changed the outcomes of elections in 71 other countries, in addition to the United States? I can tell you 3 of the 71 off the cuff, and they are Brazil, South Korea and South Africa.

Like I've said, I step to the plate and call the shot!

What will your retort be then?

I've got my #Popcorn, this will be fun! #EnjoyDaShow

Since Gulf's brain couldn't process the question maybe you can help me out. Why did China (and Venezuela?) let Trump win in 2024, when Biden controlled everything and it would have been much easier to hack the election?


The landslide victory was too big? If the media would report the news we could make up our own minds.

Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote versus Kamala's 48.3%. I get it that Trump Devotion Syndrome demands that you think that's a landslide, but it's not.

So why did China let him eke out a victory this time and not in 2020? They could have easily flipped all the swing states the other direction.


That gets you every time. All 7 swing states is a landslide in its self. I don't know, why don't you ask China?

I don't need to ask China. Because you'd have to be a moron to believe any of the nonsensical vomit that Trump spewed on America last night. Lol, even Fox & Friends pretended like the speech didn't happen.


Sure. Why are democrats so upset? You seem to watch a lot of Fox News?
First Page Last Page
Page 873 of 883
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.