TRUMP 2024

3,186,298 Views | 28034 Replies | Last: 46 min ago by Gulfstream4
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:05p, 4/29/26
This Congressman is a sorry excuse for an American.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:08p, 4/29/26

But on the other hand, #MAGA.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 6:14p, 4/29/26
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.

Reply Quote
5 edits
eljefe444
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 6:28p, 4/29/26
Gulfstream4 said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?


Is your argument "it was wrong then (but you were okay with it) and it's wrong now"?


Why do you assume I was okay with it?
Reply Quote
1
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 6:45p, 4/29/26
FlossyDFlynt said:
Oldsouljer said:
hokiewolf said:
lol that's case is so weak against Comey it's a waste of taxpayer money.

Makes me wonder what the grand jury has seen that you and I have not.

Its a complete waste of time. For all of Comey's faults, I doubt he did anything stupid enough (like putting something in writing) that would lead to a conviction. Ill be surprised if it actually reaches a trial.

To be clear, I think Comey knew exactly what he was doing, but that doesnt mean his actions were criminal

Apparently, conveying a threat to the Prez is actionable under 18 U.S.C. 871.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 4/29/26


In just ONE state, 14,000 individuals receiving SNAP benefits were driving LUXURY VEHICLES!

3 Bentleys
3 Ferraris
11 Lamborghinis
59 Maseratis
141 Porsches
244 Alfa Romeos
306 Land Rovers
2,098 Teslas

And this is just in ONE STATE, a RED state.

Meanwhile, Blue States are SUING them to hide their SNAP data. It's gonna be a million times worse.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
2 edits
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:52p, 4/29/26
One might come to a conclusion that Democrats are actually Communists. ;-)
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 7:00p, 4/29/26
SmaptyWolf said:
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.

we can absolutely have a society now that doesn't have to make race an issue. The ones that can decide to make that change are also the ones profiting from keeping that happening.
Reply Quote
4
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 7:09p, 4/29/26
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.


we can absolutely have a society now that doesn't have to make race an issue. The ones that can decide to make that change are also the ones profiting from keeping that happening.

Yes, I think it was Sandra Day O'Connor who had some interesting views on this…principally that statutes enacted under the civil rights act were always intended to be temporary in nature. In fact, I think we're slightly behind the curve with respect to when she thought such measures should be repealed.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Reply Quote
4
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:15p, 4/29/26

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 7:16p, 4/29/26
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.


we can absolutely have a society now that doesn't have to make race an issue. The ones that can decide to make that change are also the ones profiting from keeping that happening.

I take it you missed the jackboot thugs rounding up brown people recently? Do you imagine Republicans would be trying to limit all immigration if our only immigrants were white? Please.

Do you imagine the a**holes like Gulf sporting their crusader wink wink white nationalist crap are just dying for a post-racial society? Give me a fu**ing break.

Lol, and you're the "reasonable" Republican in the Water Cooler, apparently completely oblivious to who took over his party.

Reply Quote
2
4 edits
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 7:18p, 4/29/26
hokiewolf said:
packofwolves said:
hokiewolf said:
Well for my time in college working in kitchens it never meant kill or assassinate. Maybe we were using it wrong


If you haven't heard the 86 phrase used in reference to killing someone, you have lived a sheltered life. I find it hard to believe you haven't. More likely you're just pushing an agenda that its all innocent.
I've never heard someone use 86 as a threat and I grew up in Durham. Now 187, yes if we're going by number threats.

If it's such a threat should that MAGA cat Jack Posobiec be prosecuted for posting 8646 on X?


Well it means the same thing regardless of whether it's said about a Democrat or Republican or anyone else. But as already stated, nothing will come of it with Comey because it is free speech. I think most, if not all, on this board are in agreement on this.

Now if some idiot comes out and says or posts they are planning to 8647 Trump or 8646 Biden, that's a different scenario.
Reply Quote
2
FlossyDFlynt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldsouljer • 7:40p, 4/29/26
Oldsouljer said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Oldsouljer said:
hokiewolf said:
lol that's case is so weak against Comey it's a waste of taxpayer money.

Makes me wonder what the grand jury has seen that you and I have not.

Its a complete waste of time. For all of Comey's faults, I doubt he did anything stupid enough (like putting something in writing) that would lead to a conviction. Ill be surprised if it actually reaches a trial.

To be clear, I think Comey knew exactly what he was doing, but that doesnt mean his actions were criminal

Apparently, conveying a threat to the Prez is actionable under 18 U.S.C. 871.

I get that, but good luck proving it based on sea shells.

Again, I think he knew exactly what he was doing. Proving it in court is an entirely different matter
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 8:54p, 4/29/26
FlossyDFlynt said:
Oldsouljer said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Oldsouljer said:
hokiewolf said:
lol that's case is so weak against Comey it's a waste of taxpayer money.

Makes me wonder what the grand jury has seen that you and I have not.

Its a complete waste of time. For all of Comey's faults, I doubt he did anything stupid enough (like putting something in writing) that would lead to a conviction. Ill be surprised if it actually reaches a trial.

To be clear, I think Comey knew exactly what he was doing, but that doesnt mean his actions were criminal

Apparently, conveying a threat to the Prez is actionable under 18 U.S.C. 871.

I get that, but good luck proving it based on sea shells.

Again, I think he knew exactly what he was doing. Proving it in court is an entirely different matter

Do you think Comey will be convicted of any charges, this or other?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:12p, 4/29/26
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:14p, 4/29/26
BAAL Is trending on X, imagine that ;-) #TheGreatAwakening
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:24p, 4/29/26
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 9:29p, 4/29/26
Werewolf said:
doing the right thing. Keep it closed until unconditional surrender
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 9:30p, 4/29/26
agreed
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 10:06p, 4/29/26
Werewolf said:

Riiiight, I'm sure that's exactly what's happening. Trump would never just make crap up every single day.
Reply Quote
2
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 10:09p, 4/29/26
It actually is economically for Iran. They're in the danger zone with high unemployment and high inflation.
Reply Quote
3
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 10:26p, 4/29/26
hokiewolf said:
It actually is economically for Iran. They're in the danger zone with high unemployment and high inflation.

They're a brutal autocracy. I suspect they'll be happy to endure stone age conditions long enough to trash our economy, too.

Trump of course has to pretend he's in control at all times, but Iran is refusing to open the strait, and there's not much we can do about it.

Enjoy gas prices going up another dollar next week.
Reply Quote
1
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:40p, 4/29/26
Juan O'Savin; plus hear a typical beautiful Juan O'Savin prayer to close.
https://rumble.com/v796nm6-juan-o-savin-the-fight-networks-and-a-god-moment-for-tina-ppn-4-28-2026.html
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:49p, 4/29/26
How much of the proceedings is represented here I cannot say, but most of the underlying facts are consistent with what I understand to be true. You may have witnessed a truly historical event yesterday and today.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:52p, 4/29/26
Our world is changing rapidly right before our eyes.....
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to eljefe444 • 2:27a, 4/30/26
eljefe444 said:
Gulfstream4 said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?


Is your argument "it was wrong then (but you were okay with it) and it's wrong now"?


Why do you assume I was okay with it?


I'm all ears….
Reply Quote
2
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 2:40a, 4/30/26
.
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 4:36a
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.

we can absolutely have a society now that doesn't have to make race an issue. The ones that can decide to make that change are also the ones profiting from keeping that happening.


You ever notice the real racist are the loudest of all and only call names and point fingers at others?

The leftist are obsessed with race.
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:32a
He's telling you a story,
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 6:04a
Werewolf said:
He's telling you a story,


Ohhh boy, if that's true our liberal friends are going to have a meltdown?
Reply Quote
Nairo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:57a
It's jaw dropping the mental health crisis among this mouthdribbling Qanon cabal. Please seek help.
Reply Quote
6
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:01a
Excellent post
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:10a
Sunburnt and blasted out in the RF bleachers, he hasn't a clue as to what's gone on in the game. He could at least put his shirt on and cover that big belly.

The drama is far from over and the real drama has yet to begin. But we are about to take their 'weapons'! Look for sabotage and false flags these next 9-10 months as the arrests get underway ....big arrests late in the year
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:18a
I thought this could be what's underway with his single weak charge.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 9:09a
Gulfstream4 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
hokiewolf said:
eljefe444 said:
hokiewolf said:
SmaptyWolf said:
Hey cool! Our definitely not corrupt Supreme Court just squeaked in a voting rights decision just in time for the midterms, paving the way for more southern states to redraw their maps with weeks to spare. The timing is uncanny!

Is Virginia discriminating against white males by making it harder to elect republicans?

"North Carolina's 12th District (1990s & 2010s): Widely considered the most notoriously gerrymandered district in American history. In the 1990s, it was a thin, snake-like line that followed Interstate 85, designed to connect black communities. In the 2010s, it was redesigned as a tight, urban "packing" district to concentrate Democratic voters."

Exactly how did this district elect a representative that knew the concerns of minority communities in both Greensboro and Charlotte? Are you implying because of race, their issues are the same and therefore needed to be connected, even though they are over an hour away from each other, have different economic drivers, and entirely different local governments?

So your argument is to gerrymander now because it was done in the early 90's? Why not end gerrymandering altogether?

my argument is that gerrymandering by race does more harm than good and disenfranchises minorities more because they have worse contact with their representatives who don't live where they live and therefore do not have their interests in mind.

Treating all black people the same in that grouping obviously different geographic locations with altogether different issues for the purpose of race parity in representation is actually more racist

Lol, yeah, ok. Hey, here's a fun fact! Did you know that NC elected their FIRST black member of congress in over 100 years in 1990? 19 f'ing 90. Hmmm, I wonder what happened in 1990? Ohhhh, maybe that district they were forced to create that you think black people are better off without?

Trust me man, I'd love to live in a society where we don't have to think about this crap anymore, but pretending like that's all ancient history is just being oblivious. It ain't. And pretending that trying to fix an obvious long-term problem with an imperfect solution is actually racist against white people is f'ing loony.

P.S. The point of my post was that this Supreme Court seems to have a knack for timing their decisions or lack of decisions in a way that suuuuuure looks like partisan bull**it.

we can absolutely have a society now that doesn't have to make race an issue. The ones that can decide to make that change are also the ones profiting from keeping that happening.


You ever notice the real racist are the loudest of all and only call names and point fingers at others?

The leftist are obsessed with race.

Says the guy with the crusader profile pic.
Reply Quote
3
First Page
Page 801 of 802 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.