TRUMP 2024

2,813,122 Views | 25650 Replies | Last: 30 min ago by hokiewolf
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump cannot allow a dishonest election....Juan O'Savin
https://rumble.com/v75jrhy-juan-o-savin-trump-can-not-allow-a-dishonest-election-jordan-clark-2-3-2026.html
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Cthepack said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

I'm interested to see where the wage growth is occurring, but I hope those numbers can hold.


And how after all the DOGE cuts we magically have higher federal employment than we've had in 60 years.

Feels like magic beans, as you like to say.

Help me out. This is what the post said:

"federal employment dropped to its lowest level since 1966". I read that as total employment for federal employees is the lowest since 1966, where are you seeing the opposite?


Ha! Yeah, I misread it. I thought it was claiming highest employment.

Although having lowest total employment since 1966 likely begets even more questions.

Where are all these jobs? Where's the growth coming from?

This will get hashed out in the next 6-12 as these reports get revised.


It's like you almost want the worst to be true?


What I want is for Trump to feel the economic and political and electoral and judicial pressure to end his illegal, economically indefensible, and colossally stupid tariffs, which would help both the broader economy and my bank statement.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Cthepack said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

I'm interested to see where the wage growth is occurring, but I hope those numbers can hold.


And how after all the DOGE cuts we magically have higher federal employment than we've had in 60 years.

Feels like magic beans, as you like to say.

Help me out. This is what the post said:

"federal employment dropped to its lowest level since 1966". I read that as total employment for federal employees is the lowest since 1966, where are you seeing the opposite?


Ha! Yeah, I misread it. I thought it was claiming highest employment.

Although having lowest total employment since 1966 likely begets even more questions.

Where are all these jobs? Where's the growth coming from?

This will get hashed out in the next 6-12 as these reports get revised.


It's like you almost want the worst to be true?


What I want is for Trump to feel the economic and political and electoral and judicial pressure to end his illegal, economically indefensible, and colossally stupid tariffs, which would help both the broader economy and my bank statement.


Economy is doing great. "Economically indefensible" is just stupid and further emphasizes your mental illness.

Seek help.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://insidepacksports.com/s/17965/game-photos-nc-state-vs-north-carolina/2

Just following up on that "hair color" discussion from the same exact timeframe that it first came up here...
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Read it and weep......think about it. Your World views have been nothing but a fabrication.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:




Capture the leaders so they can stand trial and bomb the rest into dust. Make it a job no one wantsโ€ฆat least until a democrat President gets into the WH.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL on the last few words
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I highly doubt that Mexico has surrendered their sovereignty. Were never actually checks what he posts
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When will reality set in for some of you? Burying your head in the sand does work, but does it help these children? Does it promote a civilized society?

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

When will reality set in for some of you? Burying your head in the sand does work, but does it help these children? Does it promote a civilized society?



Every time Were posts a tweet in another language it occurs to me that he's probably just a buggy Russian chat bot.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder why Democrats want to keep all of these criminal illegal aliens in the United States....

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, darn, I must post in English around here, LOL.

If you insist............
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOLOLOL... you know exactly why.

Same reason they allowed them into our country to begin with. Manufacturing future votes in exchange for ongoing entitlements. Dems love them some free ****, that the rest of us end up paying for.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really easy to manage expectations and set precedents with consistent enforcement of the law. Nipping all the BS asylum cases in the bud is an excellent start. Too bad Dems need all of those votes and encourage illegal immigration.

TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Really easy to manage expectations and set precedents with consistent enforcement of the law. Nipping all the BS asylum cases in the bud is an excellent start. Too bad Dems need all of those votes and encourage illegal immigration.



Should have never been here to begin with.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Really easy to manage expectations and set precedents with consistent enforcement of the law. Nipping all the BS asylum cases in the bud is an excellent start. Too bad Dems need all of those votes and encourage illegal immigration.




Good
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep.

Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOLOLOL

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Yep.




The old school democrats are aging out and they are being replaced with radicals brainwashed from an early age.

These radicals are hatful and violent.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

LOLOLOL




Doesn't take much to please the betas. Pitiful.

Totally not mentally ill.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

packgrad said:

Yep.




The old school democrats are aging out and they are being replaced with radicals brainwashed from an early age.

These radicals are hatful and violent.

Moreso than the millions of righty radicals that gobble up Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens' hateful loonery, or nah?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

LOLOLOL




Doesn't take much to please the betas. Pitiful.

Totally not mentally ill.

JFC are you this humorless at home too, or just on these boards?

It was well-played and it's OK to laugh at Trump's demented drivel occasionally. Nobody's going to take your cult ID card away.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

LOLOLOL




Doesn't take much to please the betas. Pitiful.

Totally not mentally ill.

JFC are you this humorless at home too, or just on these boards?

It was well-played and it's OK to laugh at Trump's demented drivel occasionally. Nobody's going to take your cult ID card away.


Sure thing, Civ. It wasn't even funny. The spelling was also some gay **** you would do. I get why you think it's funny though. Mental illness and all.

Love how you beta quars try to say conservatives are a cult though. Hilarious watching the cult try to flip the script so pathetically.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

packgrad said:

Yep.




The old school democrats are aging out and they are being replaced with radicals brainwashed from an early age.

These radicals are hatful and violent.

Moreso than the millions of righty radicals that gobble up Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens' hateful loonery, or nah?


Bubububut Candace?

I've told you for quite a while America is sick of your kind. Truth hurts.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

The betas can't handle all of this winning.

betas love the free market, which MAGA folks used to like. But their new mistress is government command and control economy, you know, the same dumb **** progressives love.

That comment is coming from an uninformed position.

MAGA folks love free trade!! I know I do. That said, name one country that has or had free trade with the US.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

The betas can't handle all of this winning.

betas love the free market, which MAGA folks used to like. But their new mistress is government command and control economy, you know, the same dumb **** progressives love.

That comment is coming from an uninformed position.

MAGA folks love free trade!! I know I do. That said, name one country that has or had free trade with the US.

He can't. He refused to answer the same question I posed to him a few months back, he deflected.

Since you're pals with him, he could do better with an attempt.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

The betas can't handle all of this winning.

betas love the free market, which MAGA folks used to like. But their new mistress is government command and control economy, you know, the same dumb **** progressives love.

That comment is coming from an uninformed position.

MAGA folks love free trade!! I know I do. That said, name one country that has or had free trade with the US.

He can't. He refused to answer the same question I posed to him a few months back, he deflected.

Since you're pals with him, he could do better with an attempt.

We will seeโ€ฆ
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

The betas can't handle all of this winning.

betas love the free market, which MAGA folks used to like. But their new mistress is government command and control economy, you know, the same dumb **** progressives love.

That comment is coming from an uninformed position.

MAGA folks love free trade!! I know I do. That said, name one country that has or had free trade with the US.
a lot of countries had free trade agreements. Now we don't.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was that a dodge, Cary? LOL

Here's a pic on the left with Obama and a small Asian girl. I've shared pics of Obama with this little girl before here and one was with George Clooney in the boat with the two.

Clooney and Obama deserve one of those Roman executions we watched on Sat/Sun morning television years ago..

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the world wide webs:

The following agreements were negotiated and took effect (or were renegotiated) within the last ~25 years:
1. AustraliaUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2005)
2. BahrainUnited States FTA signed 2005 (effective 2006)
3. Dominican RepublicCentral AmericaU.S. FTA (CAFTA-DR) signed 2004 (effective 2006) with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic
4. ChileUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
5. ColombiaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2012)
6. JordanUnited States FTA signed 2000 (effective December 2001) (on the edge of the 25-year window but typically counted here)
7. MoroccoUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2009)
8. OmanUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2006)
9. PanamaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2007 (effective 2012)
10. PeruUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2009)
11. SingaporeUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
12. United StatesKorea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) signed 2007 (effective 2012)
13. United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) renegotiated and signed 2018 (effective 2020), replacing NAFTA (originally 1994)

So ~13 FTAs have been put into force by the United States over the past 25 years. These cover trade liberalization with about 20 partner countries in total.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
First Page Refresh
Page 733 of 733
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.