TRUMP 2024

2,387,544 Views | 21600 Replies | Last: 5 min ago by Werewolf
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Werewolf said:

...........and #Sieve would vote for this #witch over and over again



Not only democrat speaker of the House but also the worlds greatest stock trader of all time….can you believe that?!?!

Wow, $133 million since 1987!!! Lol, I guess they really don't want you to look at how much the Trump family has raked in since taking office 10 months ago. (hint: billions).

By the way, anyone on Wall St who doesn't regularly outperform the Dow doesn't get to work on Wall St for very long. Also, if you'd taken all that money you spent on Bud Light over the years and invested it in Nvidia 10 years ago, you'd have gotten a 31,000% return!

In summary... you are such easy marks. Hyperventilating on command, all day every day. Werewolf is making you dumber.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:




Liberal white women on their way to vote for it all


Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But one should ask themselves, why doctor words......if you're just an unbiased reporter?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civ was duped. Poor fella. Baaa

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, u paying attention?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who can a US Marshal arrest? Anybody including FBI, CIA, SES, Us Congress, judges, SCOTUS justices....anybody, #Sieve.


usms-policy-directive-arrests.pdf (1.17 MB)
United States Marshals and their deputies may make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Things are going well! Prices are down! We are winning!
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Things are going well! Prices are down! We are winning!



Here you go snowflake. But I do get that you are major butthurt and trying to change the subject because of looking like a fool, yet again, about Jan 6. Sheep.

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poor civ is devastated by a competent, cogent commander in chief. That fool voted for a guy that couldn't even speak with a teleprompter. And then he tried to blame it on a stutter.

"LOLOLOL". What a minion.

Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Things are going well! Prices are down! We are winning!


Wow, Trump got booed in DC. Whoda thunk it?
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMAO
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently #Sieve is allied with some like-minded Democrats.....

Latin Kings Leadership Authorizes "Shoot on Sight" Order Toward Border Patrol Agents Involved in Chicago's "Operation Midway Blitz
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/latin-kings-leadership-authorizes-shoot-sight-order-toward/
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What until the three morons wake up and read about their lefty losers folding and opening the government that they kept closed until after the elections.

They gave the same morals and character as nepo baby. None.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

Who said anything about a mandate? That would be ridiculous.

But acting like major shifts left in elections around the country, including deeply red parts of Georgia and Mississippi, mean nothing is equally ridiculous.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

Who said anything about a mandate? That would be ridiculous.

But acting like major shifts left in elections around the country, including deeply red parts of Georgia and Mississippi, mean nothing then that's equally ridiculous.

It means who was more motivated to vote. It doesn't mean much more than that, in an off-year, off-year election. Think about that. Now, if next year has a similar outcome, then… yes, we can have a discussion. Otherwise, you're just trying to make a point about nothing.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

Who said anything about a mandate? That would be ridiculous.

But acting like major shifts left in elections around the country, including deeply red parts of Georgia and Mississippi, mean nothing then that's equally ridiculous.

It means who was more motivated to vote. It doesn't mean much more than that, in an off-year, off-year election. Think about that. Now, if next year has a similar outcome, then… yes, we can have a discussion. Otherwise, you're just trying to make a point about nothing.


Obviously. But that's not some second-rate indicator. Turnout decides elections.

It's clear voters are unusually unhappy and motivated or else you wouldn't have seen deeply red districts shift so far left.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?


You're focused on winning or losing when the real analysis is how much districts shift right or left.

It's meaningful data when a party wins state elections that they haven't won in 20 years or more, or when districts that were Trump +25 shift left by 20 points, even they remain red, especially when that's part of a broad and consistent trend.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?


You're focused on winning or losing when the real analysis is how much districts shift right or left.

It's meaningful data when a party wins state elections that they haven't won in 20 years or more, or when districts that were Trump +25 shift left by 20 points, even they remain red, especially when that's part of a broad and consistent trend.

Civ, again, what you are doing is overanalyzing an off, off-year election. Next year is the key!

Now, since you are analyzing these results, why would Pubs not be so excited to come out to vote? What resource did the Pubs use to get people out to vote? What didn't they use?

Now, for my consistency, that so many liberals aren't willing to do... Trump should "NOT" be applauding the Stock Market. Generally speaking, his base doesn't recognize the correlation between it and their kitchen table reality.

Furthermore, I think I read where AI stocks had a P/E ratio in the range of 41. A correction will happen in that sector. Now, how much of that sector drives the major indices... well, I don't know. I don't follow it closely.

Everything is pointing to a correction soon...

Getting back to the topic, at hand... Why didn't people get out to vote? Why weren't they motivated? Please provide the data supporting your opinion, or just say its your opinion, without data...
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:



Lol, nothing... except for:
  • Galvanizing a demoralized Dem base
  • Forcing Trump and Republicans to go the mat to prevent people from getting health care (and food, etc)
  • Making sure that everyone now knows who's 100% responsible for the upcoming health care misery about to sweep through red states
Keep spinning. Trump got his ass handed to him.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?


You're focused on winning or losing when the real analysis is how much districts shift right or left.

It's meaningful data when a party wins state elections that they haven't won in 20 years or more, or when districts that were Trump +25 shift left by 20 points, even they remain red, especially when that's part of a broad and consistent trend.

Civ, again, what you are doing is overanalyzing an off, off-year election. Next year is the key!

Now, since you are analyzing these results, why would Pubs not be so excited to come out to vote? What resource did the Pubs use to get people out to vote? What didn't they use?

Now, for my consistency, that so many liberals aren't willing to do... Trump should "NOT" be applauding the Stock Market. Generally speaking, his base doesn't recognize the correlation between it and their kitchen table reality.

Furthermore, I think I read where AI stocks had a P/E ratio in the range of 41. A correction will happen in that sector. Now, how much of that sector drives the major indices... well, I don't know. I don't follow it closely.

Everything is pointing to a correction soon...

Getting back to the topic, at hand... Why didn't people get out to vote? Why weren't they motivated? Please provide the data supporting your opinion, or just say its your opinion, without data...

I remember when he warned us what was happening when that fake poll out of Iowa was released a few weeks before the election... had to stop paying attention a long time ago unfortunately.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

packgrad said:



Lol, nothing... except for:
  • Galvanizing a demoralized Dem base
  • Forcing Trump and Republicans to go the mat to prevent people from getting health care (and food, etc)
  • Making sure that everyone now knows who's 100% responsible for the upcoming health care misery about to sweep through red states
Keep spinning. Trump got his ass handed to him.


I'm not sure how much more you could emphasize what a nut job you are. Trump got his ass handed to him? Lol seek help wacko. America still hates you woke ******s.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?


You're focused on winning or losing when the real analysis is how much districts shift right or left.

It's meaningful data when a party wins state elections that they haven't won in 20 years or more, or when districts that were Trump +25 shift left by 20 points, even they remain red, especially when that's part of a broad and consistent trend.

Civ, again, what you are doing is overanalyzing an off, off-year election. Next year is the key!

Now, since you are analyzing these results, why would Pubs not be so excited to come out to vote? What resource did the Pubs use to get people out to vote? What didn't they use?

Now, for my consistency, that so many liberals aren't willing to do... Trump should "NOT" be applauding the Stock Market. Generally speaking, his base doesn't recognize the correlation between it and their kitchen table reality.

Furthermore, I think I read where AI stocks had a P/E ratio in the range of 41. A correction will happen in that sector. Now, how much of that sector drives the major indices... well, I don't know. I don't follow it closely.

Everything is pointing to a correction soon...

Getting back to the topic, at hand... Why didn't people get out to vote? Why weren't they motivated? Please provide the data supporting your opinion, or just say its your opinion, without data...

I remember when he warned us what was happening when that fake poll out of Iowa was released a few weeks before the election... had to stop paying attention a long time ago unfortunately.

Lmao I had totally forgotten about that.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

TheStorm said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Good to see the democratic Senators finally realizing how stupid this shutdown they created was.

Some of the more practical ones, most are still vehemently opposed to giving in. They seem to think blue state electoral victories equals a mandate or something.

What did I say last week?

My apologies, I must have missed it.

Oh, nothing like that. I basically said the same thing that you just did... which one of those elections were the Republicans ever favored to win?


You're focused on winning or losing when the real analysis is how much districts shift right or left.

It's meaningful data when a party wins state elections that they haven't won in 20 years or more, or when districts that were Trump +25 shift left by 20 points, even they remain red, especially when that's part of a broad and consistent trend.

Civ, again, what you are doing is overanalyzing an off, off-year election. Next year is the key!

Now, since you are analyzing these results, why would Pubs not be so excited to come out to vote? What resource did the Pubs use to get people out to vote? What didn't they use?

Now, for my consistency, that so many liberals aren't willing to do... Trump should "NOT" be applauding the Stock Market. Generally speaking, his base doesn't recognize the correlation between it and their kitchen table reality.

Furthermore, I think I read where AI stocks had a P/E ratio in the range of 41. A correction will happen in that sector. Now, how much of that sector drives the major indices... well, I don't know. I don't follow it closely.

Everything is pointing to a correction soon...

Getting back to the topic, at hand... Why didn't people get out to vote? Why weren't they motivated? Please provide the data supporting your opinion, or just say its your opinion, without data...

I remember when he warned us what was happening when that fake poll out of Iowa was released a few weeks before the election... had to stop paying attention a long time ago unfortunately.


I remember when you warned us what was happening was the 2020 election was stolen based on late-night Spectrum News ticker changes...had to stop paying attention a long time ago unfortunately.

Serious question...do you really think the Administration is ignoring the election results?

If they were ignoring the results, why did Trump immediately start tweeting out stupid tweets about the affordability of Walmart Thanksgiving dinners five seconds after Mamdani won a race that he made almost totally about affordability?

These elections aren't an indicator of what will happen in 26 and 28 because so much can change between now and then, but they are an indicator of what's currently resonating with voters, and both parties will (or should) take note and adapt accordingly.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
First Page
Page 617 of 618
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.