Bring back Stuckey's!

(I used to hate stopping there, but I definitely remember them being one of my dad's normal stops while sitting in that damn back seat on family road trips)

Oldsouljer said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I never gave a **** about the logo but I love how the arbiters of truth have gone from "they just used the original logo" to "they're just using a logo similar to the one they had before". Lol! The only similarities between the two are they both have words on them. My word, you mother****ers can never admit when you're wrong. lol


The best thing about the "controversy" is the backpedaling of the liberals. And that you're still mad that CB customers did not like the change. Hilarious.

---

Exactly.

MAGA is mad the old country fella isn't on the logo anymore because that's woke, somehow.

That's the whole point.

Except...the old country fella wasn't on the original logo either.

---

Your people have set quite the precedent with the Redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, etc. so I completely understand people with a vested interest not liking the new logo. I get the incessant willful ignorance by the Dems to not understand the Cracker Barrel patrons opinions as the goal is always to own the right, but most importantly to own MAGA!!!!!

But MAGA won again. Good guys FTW.

---

What does an old dude on a logo have to do with MAGA?

---

Exactly. Why did you have to bring MAGA into it?

Why was it important to the white woman CEO to remove the old white man from the logo is the better question.

---

Because I have eyes and ears and MAGA is obviously who's mad.

The CEO wanted to rebrand to modernize. Companies have to try to stay relevant and many refresh their branding as a component of that. Evidently some people (MAGA) care for some reason (that no one can coherently articulate) that an old dude got deleted from a logo.

Can you explain why deleting the old dude was woke?

---

Just the standard whitewashing from Dems. Cracker Barrel patrons didn't support it. I think we've all seen how you all have done this in the past with, again, the redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, and tried with Bud Light. I enjoy the faux ignorance about it. Accentuates how programmed you are imo.

But the way it has made you and your 2 buddies so mad makes me think the lefties are far more triggered than MAGA about all of this. You're so concerned about Cracker Barrel's ability to modernize and refresh their branding!!! Lolololol. Such incredible bull***** Godalmighty.

---

I don't give two ****s about what private companies do with their branding. It's a closed loop. They live and die by their marketing/branding decisions and other business practices. They can do whatever they think is best. And consumers can respond accordingly.

I do think it's hilarious that the MAGA anti-woke radar is so miscalibrated that it fires off when an old man gets deleted from a logo though. Evidently old men are victims now too.

---

The logo appears to be the final straw for some. Personally, I think you are misreading this whole thing. BTW, as a person that doesn't give two ****s about a private companies doings, you sure give this subject a ton of attention.

You obviously give two ****s about something…. What is it?

---

People treasure the timeless and take psychological refuge with things that don't change in a constantly changing world….I'm sure that upset people on some emotional level.

---

Probably so…

I haven't been to a Cracker Barrel in years. Not because I stand against them; rather, it's not a place that meets my needs, generally speaking. That said, I don't have anything's against the company, until recently, when I've read more about the way the company has, and/or, is being run.

I will think twice, if I'm asked to go there, until, I've read where they are changing some of their operating policies, or, more importantly, their leadership. In summary, this is why I try to stay away from stories like this. I'm sure more companies that I patronize with have similar leaders and implement similar policies.

soon enough, I would run out of places to do business…

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Good for them, not every company is going to be able to do that though.

I'm not eating a 5% increase in door security devices and fire alarm devices, I'm just increasing my estimate.

---

Hokie, that's the company the employs me! BTW, yes, every company can do that. We had a will, then we made a way.

where do you guys fit?

---

No, every company very clearly cannot do that.

The companies that can and will are fortunate and are operating on higher margins than agriculture, basic manufacturing, commoditized retail, and many other lower-margin industries. Luxury goods, specialized tech, others have more cushion.

My electrician that runs two three man crews in a competitive labor landscape isn't eating copper price increases. He's just not. He can't. He doesn't have the size or the margin. There are thousands of other companies like him that can't or won't.

This argument about "good companies will eat costs and bad companies won't" is untethered from economic and practical realities.

---

Once we get massive tariffs on copper imports, you all will have to source domestically. Exactly what would've been happening if both Political parties didn't buy (well accept bribes) into the whole globalization boondoggle.

now, you are subjected to the whims of a Politician, as opposed to owning your business direction…

---

lol domestic copper. Let me just go build a smelting plant.

---

Just did a google search and this came up in their AI response…

Copper mining in the US is concentrated in the western states, particularly Arizona, which produces roughly 70% of the nation's copper. While the US has significant copper reserves and domestic production, it imports about half of its refined copper, mainly from the Americas. Key players in US copper production include Freeport-McMoRan, Rio Tinto, and the Morenci and Kennecott mines.

---

we have plenty of mines, we have no smelters to take the or and turn it into usable copper. That is all in Canada and other countries. Same with Aluminum.

There is almost zero domestic production and there never will be. And I'm looking out for Johnny paycheck because I prefer my workers not to expose themselves to arsenic poisoning.

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Good for them, not every company is going to be able to do that though.

I'm not eating a 5% increase in door security devices and fire alarm devices, I'm just increasing my estimate.

---

Hokie, that's the company the employs me! BTW, yes, every company can do that. We had a will, then we made a way.

where do you guys fit?

---

No, every company very clearly cannot do that.

The companies that can and will are fortunate and are operating on higher margins than agriculture, basic manufacturing, commoditized retail, and many other lower-margin industries. Luxury goods, specialized tech, others have more cushion.

My electrician that runs two three man crews in a competitive labor landscape isn't eating copper price increases. He's just not. He can't. He doesn't have the size or the margin. There are thousands of other companies like him that can't or won't.

This argument about "good companies will eat costs and bad companies won't" is untethered from economic and practical realities.

---

Once we get massive tariffs on copper imports, you all will have to source domestically. Exactly what would've been happening if both Political parties didn't buy (well accept bribes) into the whole globalization boondoggle.

now, you are subjected to the whims of a Politician, as opposed to owning your business direction…

---

lol domestic copper. Let me just go build a smelting plant.

---

Just did a google search and this came up in their AI response…

Copper mining in the US is concentrated in the western states, particularly Arizona, which produces roughly 70% of the nation's copper. While the US has significant copper reserves and domestic production, it imports about half of its refined copper, mainly from the Americas. Key players in US copper production include Freeport-McMoRan, Rio Tinto, and the Morenci and Kennecott mines.

---

Nothing to do with politics or the subject at hand, but please dont rely on AI for actual answers. The Google search AI in particular isnt great at giving real, actual answers

Oldsouljer said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I never gave a **** about the logo but I love how the arbiters of truth have gone from "they just used the original logo" to "they're just using a logo similar to the one they had before". Lol! The only similarities between the two are they both have words on them. My word, you mother****ers can never admit when you're wrong. lol


The best thing about the "controversy" is the backpedaling of the liberals. And that you're still mad that CB customers did not like the change. Hilarious.

---

Exactly.

MAGA is mad the old country fella isn't on the logo anymore because that's woke, somehow.

That's the whole point.

Except...the old country fella wasn't on the original logo either.

---

Your people have set quite the precedent with the Redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, etc. so I completely understand people with a vested interest not liking the new logo. I get the incessant willful ignorance by the Dems to not understand the Cracker Barrel patrons opinions as the goal is always to own the right, but most importantly to own MAGA!!!!!

But MAGA won again. Good guys FTW.

---

What does an old dude on a logo have to do with MAGA?

---

Exactly. Why did you have to bring MAGA into it?

Why was it important to the white woman CEO to remove the old white man from the logo is the better question.

---

Because I have eyes and ears and MAGA is obviously who's mad.

The CEO wanted to rebrand to modernize. Companies have to try to stay relevant and many refresh their branding as a component of that. Evidently some people (MAGA) care for some reason (that no one can coherently articulate) that an old dude got deleted from a logo.

Can you explain why deleting the old dude was woke?

---

Just the standard whitewashing from Dems. Cracker Barrel patrons didn't support it. I think we've all seen how you all have done this in the past with, again, the redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, and tried with Bud Light. I enjoy the faux ignorance about it. Accentuates how programmed you are imo.

But the way it has made you and your 2 buddies so mad makes me think the lefties are far more triggered than MAGA about all of this. You're so concerned about Cracker Barrel's ability to modernize and refresh their branding!!! Lolololol. Such incredible bull***** Godalmighty.

---

I don't give two ****s about what private companies do with their branding. It's a closed loop. They live and die by their marketing/branding decisions and other business practices. They can do whatever they think is best. And consumers can respond accordingly.

I do think it's hilarious that the MAGA anti-woke radar is so miscalibrated that it fires off when an old man gets deleted from a logo though. Evidently old men are victims now too.

---

The logo appears to be the final straw for some. Personally, I think you are misreading this whole thing. BTW, as a person that doesn't give two ****s about a private companies doings, you sure give this subject a ton of attention.

You obviously give two ****s about something…. What is it?

---

People treasure the timeless and take psychological refuge with things that don't change in a constantly changing world….I'm sure that upset people on some emotional level.

---

Completely agree that this played a part.

But to the extent the stock drops and the right is firing off about it for days on every social and mainstream media outlet?

Were we all doing this when Sears Roebuck went out of business? When the iconic Ford Mustang muscle car got turned into an electric crossover SUV?

This particular issue has become a lightning rod not out of some generic sense of impermanence of Americana (or impermanence of anything for that matter), but because the logo specifically featured an old white man, and the vocal right is fully on board with making older white men out to be the true victims of the left.

Which is a completely wild take that's totally and completely out of touch with the reality of outcomes in this country.

Civilized said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I never gave a **** about the logo but I love how the arbiters of truth have gone from "they just used the original logo" to "they're just using a logo similar to the one they had before". Lol! The only similarities between the two are they both have words on them. My word, you mother****ers can never admit when you're wrong. lol


The best thing about the "controversy" is the backpedaling of the liberals. And that you're still mad that CB customers did not like the change. Hilarious.

---

Exactly.

MAGA is mad the old country fella isn't on the logo anymore because that's woke, somehow.

That's the whole point.

Except...the old country fella wasn't on the original logo either.

---

Your people have set quite the precedent with the Redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, etc. so I completely understand people with a vested interest not liking the new logo. I get the incessant willful ignorance by the Dems to not understand the Cracker Barrel patrons opinions as the goal is always to own the right, but most importantly to own MAGA!!!!!

But MAGA won again. Good guys FTW.

---

What does an old dude on a logo have to do with MAGA?

---

Exactly. Why did you have to bring MAGA into it?

Why was it important to the white woman CEO to remove the old white man from the logo is the better question.

---

Because I have eyes and ears and MAGA is obviously who's mad.

The CEO wanted to rebrand to modernize. Companies have to try to stay relevant and many refresh their branding as a component of that. Evidently some people (MAGA) care for some reason (that no one can coherently articulate) that an old dude got deleted from a logo.

Can you explain why deleting the old dude was woke?

---

Just the standard whitewashing from Dems. Cracker Barrel patrons didn't support it. I think we've all seen how you all have done this in the past with, again, the redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, and tried with Bud Light. I enjoy the faux ignorance about it. Accentuates how programmed you are imo.

But the way it has made you and your 2 buddies so mad makes me think the lefties are far more triggered than MAGA about all of this. You're so concerned about Cracker Barrel's ability to modernize and refresh their branding!!! Lolololol. Such incredible bull***** Godalmighty.

---

I don't give two ****s about what private companies do with their branding. It's a closed loop. They live and die by their marketing/branding decisions and other business practices. They can do whatever they think is best. And consumers can respond accordingly.

I do think it's hilarious that the MAGA anti-woke radar is so miscalibrated that it fires off when an old man gets deleted from a logo though. Evidently old men are victims now too.

---

The logo appears to be the final straw for some. Personally, I think you are misreading this whole thing. BTW, as a person that doesn't give two ****s about a private companies doings, you sure give this subject a ton of attention.

You obviously give two ****s about something…. What is it?

---

People treasure the timeless and take psychological refuge with things that don't change in a constantly changing world….I'm sure that upset people on some emotional level.

---

Completely agree that this played a part.

But to the extent the stock drops and the right is firing off about it for days on every social and mainstream media outlet?

Were we all doing this when Sears Roebuck went out of business? When the iconic Ford Mustang muscle car got turned into an electric crossover SUV?

This particular issue has become a lightning rod not out of some generic sense of impermanence of Americana (or impermanence of anything for that matter), but because the logo specifically featured an old white man, and the vocal right is fully on board with making older white men out to be the true victims of the left.

Which is a completely wild take that's totally and completely out of touch with the reality of outcomes in this country.

---

You seem to care a lot about this story that you said you don't really care about?

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

You mean a Christian who had been a member of that Trans group their whole life, who went nuts and wrote a Manifesto that was published online that didn't even mention trans people, and actually prayed for the soon to be victims of their craziness?

Yeah, still no and no.

packgrad said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I never gave a **** about the logo but I love how the arbiters of truth have gone from "they just used the original logo" to "they're just using a logo similar to the one they had before". Lol! The only similarities between the two are they both have words on them. My word, you mother****ers can never admit when you're wrong. lol


The best thing about the "controversy" is the backpedaling of the liberals. And that you're still mad that CB customers did not like the change. Hilarious.

---

Exactly.

MAGA is mad the old country fella isn't on the logo anymore because that's woke, somehow.

That's the whole point.

Except...the old country fella wasn't on the original logo either.

---

Your people have set quite the precedent with the Redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, etc. so I completely understand people with a vested interest not liking the new logo. I get the incessant willful ignorance by the Dems to not understand the Cracker Barrel patrons opinions as the goal is always to own the right, but most importantly to own MAGA!!!!!

But MAGA won again. Good guys FTW.

---

What does an old dude on a logo have to do with MAGA?

---

Exactly. Why did you have to bring MAGA into it?

Why was it important to the white woman CEO to remove the old white man from the logo is the better question.

---

Because I have eyes and ears and MAGA is obviously who's mad.

The CEO wanted to rebrand to modernize. Companies have to try to stay relevant and many refresh their branding as a component of that. Evidently some people (MAGA) care for some reason (that no one can coherently articulate) that an old dude got deleted from a logo.

Can you explain why deleting the old dude was woke?

---

Just the standard whitewashing from Dems. Cracker Barrel patrons didn't support it. I think we've all seen how you all have done this in the past with, again, the redskins, Indians, uncle Ben's, Aunt Jemima, and tried with Bud Light. I enjoy the faux ignorance about it. Accentuates how programmed you are imo.

But the way it has made you and your 2 buddies so mad makes me think the lefties are far more triggered than MAGA about all of this. You're so concerned about Cracker Barrel's ability to modernize and refresh their branding!!! Lolololol. Such incredible bull***** Godalmighty.

---

I don't give two ****s about what private companies do with their branding. It's a closed loop. They live and die by their marketing/branding decisions and other business practices. They can do whatever they think is best. And consumers can respond accordingly.

I do think it's hilarious that the MAGA anti-woke radar is so miscalibrated that it fires off when an old man gets deleted from a logo though. Evidently old men are victims now too.

---

The logo appears to be the final straw for some. Personally, I think you are misreading this whole thing. BTW, as a person that doesn't give two ****s about a private companies doings, you sure give this subject a ton of attention.

You obviously give two ****s about something…. What is it?

---

He gives two ****s about trying to own the right/MAGA. He thought this was going to be his winning ticket and like Lucy with Charlie Brown, the ball got pulled away at the last second yet again.

---

lol

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Good for them, not every company is going to be able to do that though.

I'm not eating a 5% increase in door security devices and fire alarm devices, I'm just increasing my estimate.

---

Hokie, that's the company the employs me! BTW, yes, every company can do that. We had a will, then we made a way.

where do you guys fit?

---

No, every company very clearly cannot do that.

The companies that can and will are fortunate and are operating on higher margins than agriculture, basic manufacturing, commoditized retail, and many other lower-margin industries. Luxury goods, specialized tech, others have more cushion.

My electrician that runs two three man crews in a competitive labor landscape isn't eating copper price increases. He's just not. He can't. He doesn't have the size or the margin. There are thousands of other companies like him that can't or won't.

This argument about "good companies will eat costs and bad companies won't" is untethered from economic and practical realities.

---

Once we get massive tariffs on copper imports, you all will have to source domestically. Exactly what would've been happening if both Political parties didn't buy (well accept bribes) into the whole globalization boondoggle.

now, you are subjected to the whims of a Politician, as opposed to owning your business direction…

---

lol domestic copper. Let me just go build a smelting plant.

---

Just did a google search and this came up in their AI response…

Copper mining in the US is concentrated in the western states, particularly Arizona, which produces roughly 70% of the nation's copper. While the US has significant copper reserves and domestic production, it imports about half of its refined copper, mainly from the Americas. Key players in US copper production include Freeport-McMoRan, Rio Tinto, and the Morenci and Kennecott mines.

---

we have plenty of mines, we have no smelters to take the or and turn it into usable copper. That is all in Canada and other countries. Same with Aluminum.

There is almost zero domestic production and there never will be. And I'm looking out for Johnny paycheck because I prefer my workers not to expose themselves to arsenic poisoning.

---

Do your parents know that you are posting on this site all freaking day and not pretending to work???

It's ok…. It's no secret in your area that you are nothing but a spoiled know it all who has done NOTHING but reap the rewards of being born into a successful family.

Being an absolute arrogant ass suits you well.

And by the way…. YOU aren't looking out for anyone!!! ****ing clown…

Why are we trying to make sense out of the things that a crazy person did before going out and murdering children? This is the same premise I take BTW when other shootings have happened in schools.

This person doesn't have a political side, because there is no political party that advocates for the murder of children (excluding abortion discussion because I know one of you *******s will respond with that).

Tragedies are tragedies, they are not and should not be part of the body politic.

BBW12OG said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Good for them, not every company is going to be able to do that though.

I'm not eating a 5% increase in door security devices and fire alarm devices, I'm just increasing my estimate.

---

Hokie, that's the company the employs me! BTW, yes, every company can do that. We had a will, then we made a way.

where do you guys fit?

---

No, every company very clearly cannot do that.

The companies that can and will are fortunate and are operating on higher margins than agriculture, basic manufacturing, commoditized retail, and many other lower-margin industries. Luxury goods, specialized tech, others have more cushion.

My electrician that runs two three man crews in a competitive labor landscape isn't eating copper price increases. He's just not. He can't. He doesn't have the size or the margin. There are thousands of other companies like him that can't or won't.

This argument about "good companies will eat costs and bad companies won't" is untethered from economic and practical realities.

---

Once we get massive tariffs on copper imports, you all will have to source domestically. Exactly what would've been happening if both Political parties didn't buy (well accept bribes) into the whole globalization boondoggle.

now, you are subjected to the whims of a Politician, as opposed to owning your business direction…

---

lol domestic copper. Let me just go build a smelting plant.

---

Just did a google search and this came up in their AI response…

Copper mining in the US is concentrated in the western states, particularly Arizona, which produces roughly 70% of the nation's copper. While the US has significant copper reserves and domestic production, it imports about half of its refined copper, mainly from the Americas. Key players in US copper production include Freeport-McMoRan, Rio Tinto, and the Morenci and Kennecott mines.

---

we have plenty of mines, we have no smelters to take the or and turn it into usable copper. That is all in Canada and other countries. Same with Aluminum.

There is almost zero domestic production and there never will be. And I'm looking out for Johnny paycheck because I prefer my workers not to expose themselves to arsenic poisoning.

---

Do your parents know that you are posting on this site all freaking day and not pretending to work???

It's ok…. It's no secret in your area that you are nothing but a spoiled know it all who has done NOTHING but reap the rewards of being born into a successful family.

Being an absolute arrogant ass suits you well.

And by the way…. YOU aren't looking out for anyone!!! ****ing clown…

---

I took an extended weekend for the football game. I'm cooking a pig! All by myself! I even bought it with my own money cutting grass!

In my area. LOL, are there signs posted? Did you create a Facebook group? Can I get an invite?

Also, appreciate you staying on topic!

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

You mean a Christian who had been a member of that Trans group their whole life, who went nuts and wrote a Manifesto that was published online that didn't even mention trans people, and actually prayed for the soon to be victims of their craziness?

Yeah, still no and no.

---

How the "kill Donald Trump" written on one of his magazines? How about the anti religious writings? How about the Trans people must be protected (flag included) in his journal?

Any of that matter to you?

---

Here's their manifesto/suicide note, which you'd assume is what the crazy person wanted you to know about their motivations. How about unplug from the hyper partisan demonic bullsh** you normally gobble up and just read it.

https://imgur.com/a/j53OQvY

Hint: Not much there except crazy.

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

I don't think we should have any name calling, but you guys set the discourse here, so when you stop, I'm sure others will stop too.

---

Yes, we are all aware you want to hold others to standards that you yourself don't meet.

---

Yes, please, go quote all the times hokie has called people mentally ill sheep, or worse.

Show us all those times he failed to live up to the same standard he holds others to.

---

Lol. No.


That said, I think we could just use your posting history and assume that what you're saying is not true.

---

Lol, No is right.

You won't quote him doing it, because you can't quote him doing it.

---

Well, well, well..... yet another swing and a miss...


"Why are we trying to make sense out of the things that a crazy person did before going out and murdering children? This is the same premise I take BTW when other shootings have happened in schools.

This person doesn't have a political side, because there is no political party that advocates for the murder of children (excluding abortion discussion because I know one of you *******s will respond with that).

Tragedies are tragedies, they are not and should not be part of the body politic."

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

You mean a Christian who had been a member of that Trans group their whole life, who went nuts and wrote a Manifesto that was published online that didn't even mention trans people, and actually prayed for the soon to be victims of their craziness?

Yeah, still no and no.

---

How the "kill Donald Trump" written on one of his magazines? How about the anti religious writings? How about the Trans people must be protected (flag included) in his journal?

Any of that matter to you?

---

Here's their manifesto/suicide note, which you'd assume is what the crazy person wanted you to know about their motivations. How about unplug from the hyper partisan demonic bullsh** you normally gobble up and just read it.

https://imgur.com/a/j53OQvY

Hint: Not much there except crazy.

---

The shooter who opened fire on Wednesday on school children attending a church service in the US city of Minneapolis, killing two students, had "kill Donald Trump" and "nuke India" written on his guns, a video on his now-deleted YouTube channel showed.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/minneapolis-shooter-wrote-kill-donald-trump-israel-must-fall-on-gun-showed-weapons-in-youtube-videos-9171748/amp/1

- - - -

My prediction is you will avoid the quote and attack the source.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

You mean a Christian who had been a member of that Trans group their whole life, who went nuts and wrote a Manifesto that was published online that didn't even mention trans people, and actually prayed for the soon to be victims of their craziness?

Yeah, still no and no.

---

How the "kill Donald Trump" written on one of his magazines? How about the anti religious writings? How about the Trans people must be protected (flag included) in his journal?

Any of that matter to you?

---

Here's their manifesto/suicide note, which you'd assume is what the crazy person wanted you to know about their motivations. How about unplug from the hyper partisan demonic bullsh** you normally gobble up and just read it.

https://imgur.com/a/j53OQvY

Hint: Not much there except crazy.

---

The shooter who opened fire on Wednesday on school children attending a church service in the US city of Minneapolis, killing two students, had "kill Donald Trump" and "nuke India" written on his guns, a video on his now-deleted YouTube channel showed.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/minneapolis-shooter-wrote-kill-donald-trump-israel-must-fall-on-gun-showed-weapons-in-youtube-videos-9171748/amp/1

- - - -

My prediction is you will avoid the quote and attack the source.

---

Of course your sources are always "truthgobblers.ru" or whatever, so that goes without saying. Did they mention all of the other crap written on the magazines? Or that most of it was written in Russian? Or that the shooter had a video supporting some gun nut for president?

Keep "researching" patriot, the truth is out there!!!

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

I don't think we should have any name calling, but you guys set the discourse here, so when you stop, I'm sure others will stop too.

---

Yes, we are all aware you want to hold others to standards that you yourself don't meet.

---

Yes, please, go quote all the times hokie has called people mentally ill sheep, or worse.

Show us all those times he failed to live up to the same standard he holds others to.

---

Lol. No.


That said, I think we could just use your posting history and assume that what you're saying is not true.

---

Lol, No is right.

You won't quote him doing it, because you can't quote him doing it.

---

Well, well, well..... yet another swing and a miss...


"Why are we trying to make sense out of the things that a crazy person did before going out and murdering children? This is the same premise I take BTW when other shootings have happened in schools.

This person doesn't have a political side, because there is no political party that advocates for the murder of children (excluding abortion discussion because I know one of you *******s will respond with that).

Tragedies are tragedies, they are not and should not be part of the body politic."

---

lol, I didn't attack anyone personally. Comparing me saying something clearly sarcastic and comparing it to BBW just straight up coming here to snipe at me personally like he know who I am. I'm the snowflake? Child please.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

That would be like Christmas/New Years/4th of July all rolled into one for the left. They would have a field day with 24hrs around the clock coverage of the outrage.

---

Why do you act like this is some hypothetical?

You don't have to squint. 2/3 of ideological shootings over the last couple of decades have been perpetrated by far-right extremists.

And yet, you don't see me running over here when one happens asking you to defend it.

Why do you feel the need to do it?

There's no defense for mentally ill shooters shooting up a school or church or synagogue or whatever.

Gun control would help but we're not getting that so we better pour resources into more robust mental health care in this country. Like, yesterday.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Why are we trying to make sense out of the things that a crazy person did before going out and murdering children? This is the same premise I take BTW when other shootings have happened in schools.

This person doesn't have a political side, because there is no political party that advocates for the murder of children (excluding abortion discussion because I know one of you *******s will respond with that).

Tragedies are tragedies, they are not and should not be part of the body politic.

---

He had "kill Donald Trump" written on one of his magazines…..so I'm going out on a limb and say he didn't vote republican. Call me crazy….

…what say you?

---

I try not to rationalize the thought of obviously mentally unwell folks. Same goes for the guy who attacked Pelosi's husband, crazy person.

I don't see a correlation between becoming a lunatic who shoots kids in schools vs voting record. I do see a big correlation with mental instability though.

Should have that smelter up and running in about 20 - 25 years if I can get through the environmental permitting!

Thanks to tariffs (esp re: Canada), US aluminium prices are now roughly 50% higher than in Europe & Japan, thus putting US manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage.

Heckuva industrial strategy. pic.twitter.com/MBKejS1Oel

— Scott Lincicome (@scottlincicome) August 28, 2025

Civilized said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

That would be like Christmas/New Years/4th of July all rolled into one for the left. They would have a field day with 24hrs around the clock coverage of the outrage.

---

Why do you act like this is some hypothetical?

You don't have to squint. 2/3 of ideological shootings over the last couple of decades have been perpetrated by far-right extremists.

And yet, you don't see me running over here when one happens asking you to defend it.

Why do you feel the need to do it?

There's no defense for mentally ill shooters shooting up a school or church or synagogue or whatever.

Gun control would help but we're not getting that so we better pour resources into more robust mental health care in this country. Like, yesterday.

---

The need to what? Call a spade a spade? The left is increasingly violent and easy for anyone with two eyes to see it.

You simply don't want anyone to talk about it.

Plus, I enjoy trolling you. I bet you have aged in dog years since November.

Smartest man in the room. That Lutnick, true conservative just like Barack.

🚨 BREAKING: Howard Lutnick reveals he will now seek to have the United States federal government OWN a portion of the patents currently owned by universities as a result of new inventions.

"If we give them the money, don't you think it's fair the USA and taxpayers who funded it… pic.twitter.com/uFKGdj5rV1

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 26, 2025

Here is a link to a video by Jeffrey Mead. I believe he used to play football at Oklahoma and he shows how the Main Stream Media will try to manipulate people with their stories. This is from yesterday's shooting at the Catholic School and he just buries the ABC reporter.

https://www.instagram.com/the_jefferymead/reel/DN4MDF-jGZP/

Hey, you out here yet? I'm getting ready to go by and see Mormad in like 2 minutes…

I recall posting on the VIRUS thread 4 years ago that there would be Nuremberg 2.0 trials in the future. I continue to stand by this prediction.

Those scoffing at such an idea was da one n only #Gobbler and his fellow minion, #daSieve. I'm never bashful about running up the score, fellas.

"At least three other senior leaders resigned, according to notes they sent to staff:

Daniel Jernigan, director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases;
Chief Medical Officer Deb Houry;
Demetre Daskalakis, director of the National Center for…

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) August 27, 2025

Quite the oversight, AG Session!

Sessions has a reputation of being very detailed -- dotting every i & crossing every t.

Yet, with that reputation... he did not date his resignation letter -- an official, historical gov document... and he didn't date it. Pretty huge "miss" for such a known-detailed person! pic.twitter.com/nstSHqLfh3

— Kat.Mo1992! (@KatToTheMo) August 28, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Who wants to take a stab at answering this? Today, once again, we have a horrible shooting. I have two questions that I'd like to see people's opinion on…

• Was today's shooting and killing Domestic Terrorism?
• Was today's shooting and killing a Hate Crime?

---

Democrats are keeping a low profile as this is one of their creations

---

And not a one will touch my questions…. They are nothing but grievance idiots…

---

Lol, oh we're the grievance idiots. Riiiiiiiiiight.

The shooter was a member of the church, and an obvious lunatic, so the answers to your questions are pretty clearly no and no. But of course MAGA never lets a good tragedy go to waste.

---

Now, switch this around and answer the same question. A Christian going into a building full of Trans having some type of meeting, and mow them down…

---

You mean a Christian who had been a member of that Trans group their whole life, who went nuts and wrote a Manifesto that was published online that didn't even mention trans people, and actually prayed for the soon to be victims of their craziness?

Yeah, still no and no.

---

Soul = lost

hokiewolf said:

---

🚨 BREAKING: Howard Lutnick reveals he will now seek to have the United States federal government OWN a portion of the patents currently owned by universities as a result of new inventions.

"If we give them the money, don't you think it's fair the USA and taxpayers who funded it… pic.twitter.com/uFKGdj5rV1

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 26, 2025

---

Should the Federal Government fund the research and get nothing from it? First, I would stop all research funding at Universities. Now, I know I wouldn't get alignment on that; therefore, I want an equity stake in the investment.