TRUMP 2024

2,018,216 Views | 17791 Replies | Last: 51 min ago by Werewolf
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course


Biden should have gotten rid of that person doing the statistics.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal




Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packofwolves said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course


Biden should have gotten rid of that person doing the statistics.


lol
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packofwolves said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course


Biden should have gotten rid of that person doing the statistics.

I just hope we can wrap up this Ignorant A**hole Revolution soon before you guys do any more long-term damage that you clearly don't understand.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

packofwolves said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course


Biden should have gotten rid of that person doing the statistics.

I just hope we can wrap up this Ignorant A**hole Revolution soon before you guys do any more long-term damage that you clearly don't understand.


Only a short 170 weeks, 00 days, 7 hours and 2 minutes for you to go. Enjoy! I know I will…
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What was the page #, #Sieve? Was it 498?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fiat ponzi times ahead
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.

In summary:
  • You made a stupid comment making it absolutely clear you had no idea that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union
  • You then said "nuh uh, I totally knew that!"
  • Then you seemed to think that a "rhetorical question" somehow means I back pedaled, and even spent the time to add a pic!
  • Then you retreated to one of your usual moronic one liners
With each step you managed to get even stupider, and then declared victory. Soooo, yeah...

…about par for the course
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.

In summary:
  • You made a stupid comment making it absolutely clear you had no idea that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union
  • You then said "nuh uh, I totally knew that!"
  • Then you seemed to think that a "rhetorical question" somehow means I back pedaled, and even spent the time to add a pic!
  • Then you retreated to one of your usual moronic one liners
With each step you managed to get even stupider, and then declared victory. Soooo, yeah...

…about par for the course


Give Gulf a break, the guy he's anointed as savior is wrapped up in a pedophilia scandal; would rather fire statisticians than reckon with reality a la the bad jobs report and economic damage his colossally dumb self-inflicted wounds are causing; and who even tells caddies to drop golf balls out of their pant legs so he can putt for eagle for the "championship."

Long story short, bad couple of weeks for Gulf, Dear Leader, and for the US.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolutely hilarious that Trump's golf WINNING triggers civ too. Bad year for the radlibs. 3 more bad ones ahead...

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.

In summary:
  • You made a stupid comment making it absolutely clear you had no idea that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union
  • You then said "nuh uh, I totally knew that!"
  • Then you seemed to think that a "rhetorical question" somehow means I back pedaled, and even spent the time to add a pic!
  • Then you retreated to one of your usual moronic one liners
With each step you managed to get even stupider, and then declared victory. Soooo, yeah...

…about par for the course


Hahaha in summary you posted a ghey man who thinks he can breast feed and who knows who with a Ukrainian flag but telling jokes from their sworn enemy. All that makes about as much sense as you do. And after all that you STILL TDS.

…about par for the course
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.

In summary:
  • You made a stupid comment making it absolutely clear you had no idea that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union
  • You then said "nuh uh, I totally knew that!"
  • Then you seemed to think that a "rhetorical question" somehow means I back pedaled, and even spent the time to add a pic!
  • Then you retreated to one of your usual moronic one liners
With each step you managed to get even stupider, and then declared victory. Soooo, yeah...

…about par for the course


Give Gulf a break, the guy he's anointed as savior is wrapped up in a pedophilia scandal; would rather fire statisticians than reckon with reality a la the bad jobs report and economic damage his colossally dumb self-inflicted wounds are causing; and who even tells caddies to drop golf balls out of their pant legs so he can putt for eagle for the "championship."

Long story short, bad couple of weeks for Gulf, Dear Leader, and for the US.



Your President Trump is "wrapped up" in your CNN manufactured scandal. Another day another outrage from you.

Have you been living under a rock during the Biden administration…talk about economy? Geez.

Something-something Trump, golf, no one cares but feel free to outrage over it. I bet a coke and candy bar your President Trump would beat you in golf?

If it's bad for the U.S. it's good for the democrats. Right? You should be happy and stop with the outrage?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:




A loon on a message board, a ghey man and who knows who with an Ukraine flag but telling Russian jokes.

…about par for the course

He was telling a Soviet joke. You do know that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, right?

...about par for the course.


Sure do and thank you kindly. That's why I don't want the U.S. to be there. They can figure it out.

Why are you and a ghey man liking post from the dude?

That was a rhetorical question. You obviously had no clue.


Nice back pedal






Lol, uh huh.

I know Trump taught you that tripling down on the stupid is how you win every argument, but unless you have Trump's demonic powers all it does is make you look even stupider.


Something-something Trump. Game. Set. Match.

In summary:
  • You made a stupid comment making it absolutely clear you had no idea that Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union
  • You then said "nuh uh, I totally knew that!"
  • Then you seemed to think that a "rhetorical question" somehow means I back pedaled, and even spent the time to add a pic!
  • Then you retreated to one of your usual moronic one liners
With each step you managed to get even stupider, and then declared victory. Soooo, yeah...

…about par for the course


Give Gulf a break, the guy he's anointed as savior is wrapped up in a pedophilia scandal; would rather fire statisticians than reckon with reality a la the bad jobs report and economic damage his colossally dumb self-inflicted wounds are causing; and who even tells caddies to drop golf balls out of their pant legs so he can putt for eagle for the "championship."

Long story short, bad couple of weeks for Gulf, Dear Leader, and for the US.





#Sieve is #SunTzu bait!
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot of truth packed into a few sentences.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First hand accounts that Clapper is one of the most vile evil people walking the face of the earth and dating back to the Iraq War.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, it's an action packed thriller where the good guys win for me.; it's a nightmare horror flick for you and your ilk, however. But a good show is better with popcorn ;-)
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The #Sheeple here will madly debate the perils of tariffs, taxes and GDP yet blindly look past the a system not included in economic models. The greatest scam on America continues along with its sister creation, the IRS.

Wonder how this stupidity continues? Soros, Rothschilds, Rockerfellers and the globalist cabal that's fleeced this country for more than 100 years can't tell you why.

southernpackalistic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Redding/s/ZzzeXalfej

Y'all need to listen up.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?


What are you calling the "lack of solid numbers" Cary?

Are you saying that because the numbers require adjustment, sometimes signficantly so, as more data gets collected, that's a flaw in the methodology that will be corrected by replacing the BLS chief and cutting the budget to the agency like the Trump administration has proposed?
Wolfblood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe it would be a better idea to just wait for the official numbers instead of putting out projections and guess work. That would solve all the hand wringing and the release of unreliable information.

I haven't posted as much since Snappy outed me as a Russian agent because I hate the media and the leaders of the UK, Germany and France so I thought I would weigh in on some recent events.

First, the war in Iran has been brutal. Kudos to everyone who correctly predicted this foreign policy disaster. Although, I guess I shouldn't completely rule out the war beginning soon because Iran will have the Fordow facility cleaned up and back operating in two more weeks so the US might have to drop twelve 30,000 lb bunker busting bombs on the Fordow facility every two months for the foreseeable future since they're barely a deterrence. That could lead to war eventually.

Sydney Sweeney. God bless her and God bless America. That ad brought me back to the 80's and the 90's. Maybe American Eagle will lead a resurgence in corporate America and leave the ridiculous woke bs in the dust. We might even get supermodels back instead of the 200 lb body positivity crap we have today.

Men fleeing the Democrat Party. I see where the libs here say it's not happening, but your party spending 20 million on the "Speaking with American Men" study or SAM for short says otherwise. Good luck with that.

Some good news for our liberal friends. The walls are finally closing in on Trump. The Epstein files will get him when released. I would like to thank the Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, the CIA and the FBI for respecting political norms and by being respectful of the victims by holding that Trump incriminating pedophile information from the public when they could have used it to take down Trump anytime over the last ten years. Statesmen all of them.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfblood said:

Maybe it would be a better idea to just wait for the official numbers instead of putting out projections and guess work. That would solve all the hand wringing and the release of unreliable information.

I haven't posted as much since Snappy outed me as a Russian agent because I hate the media and the leaders of the UK, Germany and France so I thought I would weigh in on some recent events.

First, the war in Iran has been brutal. Kudos to everyone who correctly predicted this foreign policy disaster. Although, I guess I shouldn't completely rule out the war beginning soon because Iran will have the Fordow facility cleaned up and back operating in two more weeks so the US might have to drop twelve 30,000 lb bunker busting bombs on the Fordow facility every two months for the foreseeable future since they're barely a deterrence. That could lead to war eventually.

Sydney Sweeney. God bless her and God bless America. That ad brought me back to the 80's and the 90's. Maybe American Eagle will lead a resurgence in corporate America and leave the ridiculous woke bs in the dust. We might even get supermodels back instead of the 200 lb body positivity crap we have today.

Men fleeing the Democrat Party. I see where the libs here say it's not happening, but your party spending 20 million on the "Speaking with American Men" study or SAM for short says otherwise. Good luck with that.

Some good news for our liberal friends. The walls are finally closing in on Trump. The Epstein files will get him when released. I would like to thank the Clinton campaign, the Obama administration, the CIA and the FBI for respecting political norms and by being respectful of the victims by holding that Trump incriminating pedophile information from the public when they could have used it to take down Trump anytime over the last ten years. Statesmen all of them.

Pure Gold!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Well said, Mike!
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?


What are you calling the "lack of solid numbers" Cary?

Are you saying that because the numbers require adjustment, sometimes signficantly so, as more data gets collected, that's a flaw in the methodology that will be corrected by replacing the BLS chief and cutting the budget to the agency like the Trump administration has proposed?

Yes! Fix the problem. If one continues to do the same thing, over and over, it's time to try someone else…. How long is your grace period?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:



Well said, Mike!

If Ford is manufacturing and distributing 100% internally, how are tariffs being assessed? Aren't tariffs applied to products coming through a port? I clicked on the link and Bitter Mike seems to be skimpy on the details.
CALS grad
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Civilized said:



Well said, Mike!

If Ford is manufacturing and distributing 100% internally, how are tariffs being assessed? Aren't tariffs applied to products coming through a port? I clicked on the link and Bitter Mike seems to be skimpy on the details.


Because the upstream supply chain is obviously not 100% domestic.

Quote:

This rise in anticipated tariff costs stems from Ford's imports of vehicle parts, steel, and aluminum, along with levies on Mexico and Canada remaining higher for longer than expected. Ford's tariff bill from Q2 eliminated its net profit, resulting in the company's first quarterly loss since 2023.


Yahoo: Ford Revises Tariff Hit Again - And it's not Pretty

And Ford uses more American parts and labor than any other American auto manufacturer (Tesla uses a higher proportion of American parts and labor, but on much lower domestic production volume). The losses will be even worse for GM and Chrysler.

Maybe Ford should fire their accounting staff that did the initial projection and subsequent adjustment, and plug in someone to just tell them what they want to hear. That will fix things.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:



Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!
First Page
Page 508 of 509
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.