TRUMP 2024

1,248,449 Views | 15173 Replies | Last: 15 min ago by Werewolf
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

SmaptyWolf said:


LOL

more proof that the commie Left can't meme for chit
Was that a request? I've got plenty more!


Ohhhhhh so now commie libtards (who WORSHIP Satanic LGBTQ perversion, drag queen story time, and mass murdering unborn children) "care about Jesus"??!!

Lmfao

Keep your lame memes coming.

You guys on the Left are the biggest jokes of all time. Your side are literal anti-Christs, who hate God and hate Christians with religious fervor, and worship everything that is wicked and perverted in this world and make it part of the Demonic-Rat party platform.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Just face the fact that Commie libtards are TOTALLY DERANGED BATCHIT INSANE.

Here is some Libtard wildabeast making a massive scene in a restaurant and acting like an escaped mental asylum patient attacking an old man wearing a red MAGA hat.

https://instagr.am/p/DIl25G-OrDY


All you lunatics can do is parrot what your Commie overlords in the Marxist Lamestream media brainwash you to be outraged about.

Bring back our MS-13 "Maryland father" illegal alien!!!

Save the right to murder millions of unborn children!!!

Let the poor transgender men compete in girls sports and go into girls locker rooms, and cut little boys' p3nises off!!!

The Cheeto Orange Man is so bad for not catering to our insanity!!!!


Liberalism is a disease
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

SmaptyWolf said:


LOL

more proof that the commie Left can't meme for chit
Was that a request? I've got plenty more!




All three of those women are hotter than any woman you've been with…and you know it.
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.


Here's the precedent you prefer.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
So, the Biden administration can set the precedent that we can let in untold millions through a phone app without any sort of screening, but the Trump administration cant deport someone with a deportation order over bad paperwork?

Again, good luck selling that message. Let me know how that works out for the Democrats
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have a serious problem; it cannot be overstated.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Allow me to indulge you. ;-)
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (AP) Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele proposed carrying out a prisoner swap with Venezuela on Sunday, suggesting he would exchange Venezuelan deportees from the United States his government has kept imprisoned for what he called "political prisoners" in Venezuela.

In a post on the social media platform X, directed at President Nicols Maduro, Bukele listed off a number of family members of high-level opposition figures in Venezuela, journalists and activists detained during the South American government's electoral crackdown last year.

"The only reason they are imprisoned is for having opposed you and your electoral fraud," he wrote to Maduro. "However, I want to propose a humanitarian agreement that includes the repatriation of 100% of the 252 Venezuelans who were deported, in exchange for the release and surrender of an identical number (252) of the thousands of political prisoners you hold."

Among those he listed were the son-in-law of former Venezuelan presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzlez, a number of political leaders seeking asylum in the Argentine embassy in Venezuela, and what he said were 50 detained citizens from a number of different countries across the world. Bukele also listed the mother of opposition leader Mara Corina Machado, whose house the political leader has said was surrounded by Venezuelan police in January.

Bukele said he would ask El Salvador's foreign ministry to be in contact with the Maduro government, which did not immediately respond to the post.

The proposal comes as El Salvador has come under sharp international scrutiny for accepting Venezuelans and Salvadorans deported by the Trump administration, which accused them of being alleged gang members with little evidence. Deportees are locked up in a "mega-prison" know as the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT), built by the Bukele government during his crackdown on the country's gangs.

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.

Nice try.

If only you didn't also have conservative district judges and the Supreme Court disagreeing with you, you may have been able to sell that oceanfront property in Iowa.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
-#SunTzu #devoltion #boomerang ;-)
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
So, the Biden administration can set the precedent that we can let in untold millions through a phone app without any sort of screening, but the Trump administration cant deport someone with a deportation order over bad paperwork?

Again, good luck selling that message. Let me know how that works out for the Democrats

The courts are finding the current administration's missteps to be a lot more than "bad paperwork."

And anyway, horrid precedent of the President robbing people of due process and obviously violating the Constitution is far more important than immigration optics for Democrats.

Biden waited too long to act on immigration, but he eventually did after the limp dicks in Congress wouldn't, and Biden's eventual EO slashed border crossings.

The worst you can say about Biden is that he waited too long for Congress to act. There were no Constitutional issues at play with Biden's immigration action.

This continued whataboutism with Biden's slow action on immigration is not a serious criticism in light of the current administration's actual Constitutional malfeasance.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was there ever any doubt,....
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't see this one coming....quite interesting
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.

Nice try.

If only you didn't also have conservative district judges and the Supreme Court disagreeing with you, you may have been able to sell that oceanfront property in Iowa.
It's not a conservative/non-conservative thing. It's the judicial branch, albeit with exceptions, disgracing itself and failing the Constitution. Nor is it I who overruled Boasberg.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level
When the Supreme Court blocked these deportations the other night, part of the decision said:
Quote:

"The Government's argument, moreover, implies that it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U. S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene..."
Let that sink in for a sec. If you can't understand the bigger picture that makes this a HUGE issue for our country then maybe you should start questioning your own competence.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.

Nice try.

If only you didn't also have conservative district judges and the Supreme Court disagreeing with you, you may have been able to sell that oceanfront property in Iowa.
It's not a conservative/non-conservative thing. It's the judicial branch, albeit with exceptions, disgracing itself and failing the Constitution. Nor is it I who overruled Boasberg.
So the Supreme Court, who conservatives stacked with ideologues who JUST NUKED ROE VS WADE, now is "disgracing itself and failing the Constitution"? Amazing how you guys breathlessly say this stuff with a straight face. Also amazing that you've gone too far even for them.

Trump has been "disgracing himself and failing the Constitution" literally daily since he's been in office, pretending he has powers that he doesn't have. That's why you love him. I think what you meant to say is that "the judicial branch is disgracing itself and failing our coup". Not the same thing,
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.

Nice try.

If only you didn't also have conservative district judges and the Supreme Court disagreeing with you, you may have been able to sell that oceanfront property in Iowa.
It's not a conservative/non-conservative thing. It's the judicial branch, albeit with exceptions, disgracing itself and failing the Constitution. Nor is it I who overruled Boasberg.

The Supreme Court even being in this position is the consequence of the President's unconstitutional behavior. What role and responsibility does he and his Administration bear in the Supreme Court even getting pulled into this?

And how exactly is the judicial branch "disgracing itself and failing the Constitution," again? What specifically did Boasberg do that's such a disgrace?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The hypocrisy....but oh yeah, we're strict constitutionalists. My a$$.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the illegals who broke the law coming here now demand we follow the law before sending them home. And the American hating democrats agree with them coming and going.

Let that sink in…
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

So the illegals who broke the law coming here now demand we follow the law before sending them home. And the American hating democrats agree with them coming and going.

Let that sink in…
Haven't you heard, #Sieve, #Nappy, #22YrOld and #daGobbler are strictly constitutionalists supporting this. They might even suggest that they're constitutional scholars.


#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've posted here a dozen times; the CIA is the operational arm that reports to our CFR that answers to a global cabal. Dismiss it as you wish, but the truth is coming.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve writes so well I wonder if he could be a US DIstrict Judge.....of course, a Democrat one.

How bout it, #Sieve, you don't have any TDA's living with you at your home, do you?

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This one is a stunner. Time to clean house!
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSM Is not reporting this, it must not be true. Right?

Tariff War Drives China to the Brink, Yuan Devaluation Fails to Save the Economy
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level
First Cary, now you leaving. The WC is losing all of its few rational minds.
Hey, some good indicators. The Chinese know where this is going.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Ok, thought my last post would be my last input, but I cant resist. My question is...whats the win for the Democrats here? He gets a return flight? Cool, he stays here until his next court hearing when the Trump admin follows the policy. There is more than enough credible evidence to deport him all the way back to 2019.

All I want is competence. Neither party is interested. This is why neither of them get my vote at a Federal level


Dude, it's the precedent. The individual case here is small compared to the precedent it will set.

The Whitehouse lawyers are arguing that ICE can grab someone off the street and deport them to a foreign prison without a hearing, or any due process. A foreign prison where they absolve themselves of all custodial authority and can't bring someone back. This would allow the executive to effectively deport and exile anyone, regardless of immigration status.

These cases are also where the admin is making the most noises about impeaching judges and/or ignoring their rulings. People are obviously watching this very closely, as directly refusing to obey the courts brings on a constitutional crisis.
It's the district judges whom are fomenting constitutional crises. Boasberg in particular, went crazy with partisan hatred, making legally untenable demands of the administration, attempting to usurp Article II prerogatives, and attempting to exceed Article III powers by establishing a special prosecutor.

Nice try.

If only you didn't also have conservative district judges and the Supreme Court disagreeing with you, you may have been able to sell that oceanfront property in Iowa.
It's not a conservative/non-conservative thing. It's the judicial branch, albeit with exceptions, disgracing itself and failing the Constitution. Nor is it I who overruled Boasberg.

The Supreme Court even being in this position is the consequence of the President's unconstitutional behavior. What role and responsibility does he and his Administration bear in the Supreme Court even getting pulled into this?

And how exactly is the judicial branch "disgracing itself and failing the Constitution," again? What specifically did Boasberg do that's such a disgrace?
You'll have to tell us exactly what Trump did that so unconstitutional, because I don't see it.

As for Boasberg, I've already addressed that in a previous post.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

So the illegals who broke the law coming here now demand we follow the law before sending them home. And the American hating democrats agree with them coming and going.

Let that sink in…

It's not the illegals that you have to listen to.

It's the Supreme Court.
First Page Last Page
Page 413 of 434
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.