Civilized said:

---

NT Times: Chief Justice Roberts Issues Rare Rebuke of Trump and Musk's Calls for Judge Impeachments


Glad to see Chief Justice Roberts standing up for institutions and sanity.

---

Impeach Roberts too. Guy is a fake conservative, RINO appointed. I'm sure there is "dirt" there for a valid impeachment. Roberts is probably blackmailed...maybe on an Epstein type list.

The process for impeachment of judges is authorized in the U.S. Constitution.

But Roberts doesn't follow the Constitution...in many cases. So makes sense that he would oppose the Constitution again, and oppose being able to hold judges accountable.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

NT Times: Chief Justice Roberts Issues Rare Rebuke of Trump and Musk's Calls for Judge Impeachments


Glad to see Chief Justice Roberts standing up for institutions and sanity.

---

Impeach Roberts too. Guy is a fake conservative, RINO appointed.

The impeachment of judges is sanctioned in the U.S. Constitution.

But Roberts doesn't follow the Constitution...in many cases. So makes sense that he would oppose being able to hold judges accountable.

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

NT Times: Chief Justice Roberts Issues Rare Rebuke of Trump and Musk's Calls for Judge Impeachments


Glad to see Chief Justice Roberts standing up for institutions and sanity.

---

Impeach Roberts too. Guy is a fake conservative, RINO appointed. I'm sure there is "dirt" there for a valid impeachment. Roberts is probably blackmailed...maybe on an Epstein type list.

The process for impeachment of judges is authorized in the U.S. Constitution.

But Roberts doesn't follow the Constitution...in many cases. So makes sense that he would oppose the Constitution again, and oppose being able to hold judges accountable.

---

There are pics of a middle aged man that appears to be John Roberts standing in water at a beach on Epstein Island with Bill Clinton and other middle aged men.

Will the Supreme Court be taking up any of these preposterous lower court rulings by commie activist judges trying to usurp the President's clear constitutional powers any time soon?

Quote:

---

The Supreme Court explicitly ruled in the 1948 Ludecke v. Watkins case that Alien Enemy Act removals by the president are non-justiciable.

Here are some key excerpts from the ruling, lest anyone think the SCOTUS opinion was in any way unclear: "The Alien Enemy Act precludes judicial review of the removal order."

That line is literally the first sentence of the SCOTUS holding.

"The very nature of the President's power to order the removal of all enemy aliens rejects the notion that courts may pass judgment upon the exercise of his discretion."

"[E]very judge before whom the question has since come has held that the statute barred judicial review."

"A war power of the President not subject to judicial review is not transmuted into a judicially reviewable action because the President chooses to have that power exercised within narrower limits than Congress authorized."

"These are matters of political judgment for which judges have neither technical competence nor official responsibility."

"The Act is almost as old as the Constitution, and it would savor of doctrinaire audacity now to find the statute offensive to some emanation of the Bill of Rights."

"Accordingly, we hold that full responsibility for the just exercise of this great power may validly be left where the Congress has constitutionally placed it -- on the President of the United States. The Founders, in their wisdom, made him not only the Commander in Chief, but also the guiding organ in the conduct of our foreign affairs."

There is no gray area or uncertainty here.

As the Supreme Court has made abundantly and explicitly clear, removals under the Alien Removal Act are non-justiciable. Because of this, it is the inferior and unelected district judge who is violating the law and the Constitution today by purporting to have the authority to review what the Supreme Courthis superiorhas prohibited him from reviewing.

The proper form for this case to take, based on the Constitution, federal statutes, and 250 years of case law in this country, is for the judge to dismiss the plaintiffs' case for lack of jurisdiction and standing. Plaintiffs can of course appeal that dismissal, at which point the appellate court would be required to reject the appeal. And if plaintiffs wished to do so at that point, they could apply for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, which would then decide whether it wished to overturn its own precedents. Only the Supreme Court has the authority to undertake such an action. And even if that were to happen, the president still retains inherent Article II authority, independent of federal statute, to remove foreign enemies from the United States.

That is how the legal system in this country actually works. It does not in any way empower an inferior trial court judge to unilaterally overturn controlling federal law or Supreme Court precedents.

---

The Supreme Court explicitly ruled in the 1948 Ludecke v. Watkins case that Alien Enemy Act removals by the president are non-justiciable.

Here are some key excerpts from the ruling, lest anyone think the SCOTUS opinion was in any way unclear: “The Alien Enemy Act precludes… https://t.co/TBRzgmUrOx

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) March 18, 2025

https://www.newsweek.com/gas-prices-plummeting-under-donald-trump-fourth-week-aaa-gasbuddy-2046238

Quote:

---

Gas Prices Are Plummeting Under Donald Trump

Published Mar 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM EDT

Gas prices fell for the fourth straight week on Monday and are likely to continue sliding below $3 per gallon, according to experts.

The average price of a gallon of regular gas is currently $3.078 across the U.S. as of March 18, according to AAA data. This is down from $3.081 a week earlier; $3.161 last month; and $4.367 last year.

The average price for a gallon of gas is also currently below $3 in 34 states, according to GasBuddy.com, which monitors gas prices across the U.S..

---

https://instagr.am/p/DHWpEMxzGSs

Civilized said:

---

NT Times: Chief Justice Roberts Issues Rare Rebuke of Trump and Musk's Calls for Judge Impeachments


Glad to see Chief Justice Roberts standing up for institutions and sanity.

---

coax em all in.

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

Man, this is the whiniest coup ever. "Hey, we're the only ones that are allowed to ignore the rule of law! It's not FAAAAAAIR!!!"

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

Man, this is the whiniest coup ever. "Hey, we're the only ones that are allowed to ignore the rule of law! It's not FAAAAAAIR!!!"

---

How is deporting illegal aliens "ignoring the rule of law"?

The communist Left are the ones who blatantly ignore and violate the law. Your side are for TOTAL lawlessness on this issue, aiding and abetting tens of millions of illegal aliens to invade our nation, and then prevent them from being lawfully deported.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

---

Clips of a handful of people pushing against cops is NOT proof that J6ers were violent. 99.999% were completely peaceful. Only an EXTREMELY SMALL percentage of them committed any sort of "violence", and of those who did you are talking about pushing against a cop. Wow, the horror.

Your clip shows people going past a barricade. That is not violence. Trespassing inside the capitol is not violence.

Even though libtards clutch their pearls in fake outrage at video like this, your supposedly "mostly peaceful" Antif@g and BLM rioters did things 1,000 times more violent than anything J6ers did.

Commie Leftists stage "sit ins" in state capitols all the time, trespassing inside capitols, trying to intimidate legislators.. But the Marxist Lamestream media never calls those "insurrections".

We have PROOF of Fed provocateurs and informants in the J6 crowd - including Ray Epps and the at least 26/27 others that got exposed/admitted. It's not just "right wing conspiracy theorists" making stuff up. There is all the evidence proving it to be true.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

---

Clips of a handful of people pushing against cops is NOT proof that J6ers were violent. 99.999% were completely peaceful. Only an EXTREMELY SMALL percentage of them committed any sort of "violence", and of those who did you are talking about pushing against a cop. Wow, the horror.

Your clip shows people going past a barricade. That is not violence. Trespassing inside the capitol is not violence.

Even though libtards clutch their pearls in fake outrage at video like this, your supposedly "mostly peaceful" Antif@g and BLM rioters did things 1,000 times more violent than anything J6ers did.

Commie Leftists stage "sit ins" in state capitols all the time, trespassing inside capitols, trying to intimidate legislators.. But the Marxist Lamestream media never calls those "insurrections".

We have PROOF of Fed provocateurs and informants in the J6 crowd - including Ray Epps and the at least 26/27 others that got exposed/admitted. It's not just "right wing conspiracy theorists" making stuff up. There is all the evidence proving it to be true.

---

You clearly didn't watch the video. There are hours of video of huge mobs literally dragging cops out of the building and beating them with American flag poles, crushing them, bear spraying them in the face, Mike Pence and every other congressmen running for their lives, mobs trying to break down inner barricades (resulting in one of them getting shot), etc, etc, etc.

Lol, so completely bizarre how you're incapable of accepting reality.

And no, you don't have PROOF. You have the same old steaming pile of bullsh** propaganda that keeps you safely lodged in your fantasy world.

---

I'll admit, I haven't seen the bolded videos. Please link those when you can…

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

---

Clips of a handful of people pushing against cops is NOT proof that J6ers were violent. 99.999% were completely peaceful. Only an EXTREMELY SMALL percentage of them committed any sort of "violence", and of those who did you are talking about pushing against a cop. Wow, the horror.

Your clip shows people going past a barricade. That is not violence. Trespassing inside the capitol is not violence.

Even though libtards clutch their pearls in fake outrage at video like this, your supposedly "mostly peaceful" Antif@g and BLM rioters did things 1,000 times more violent than anything J6ers did.

Commie Leftists stage "sit ins" in state capitols all the time, trespassing inside capitols, trying to intimidate legislators.. But the Marxist Lamestream media never calls those "insurrections".

We have PROOF of Fed provocateurs and informants in the J6 crowd - including Ray Epps and the at least 26/27 others that got exposed/admitted. It's not just "right wing conspiracy theorists" making stuff up. There is all the evidence proving it to be true.

---

You clearly didn't watch the video. There are hours of video of huge mobs literally dragging cops out of the building and beating them with American flag poles, crushing them, bear spraying them in the face, Mike Pence and every other congressmen running for their lives, mobs trying to break down inner barricades (resulting in one of them getting shot), etc, etc, etc.

Lol, so completely bizarre how you're incapable of accepting reality.

And no, you don't have PROOF. You have the same old steaming pile of bullsh** propaganda that keeps you safely lodged in your fantasy world.

---

So two or three two guys (that could be Feds for all we know) assaulted a cop….among a crowd of around ONE MILLION people there protesting? Like I have said over and over, 99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. THAT is the REALITY.

How many of the ~1,500 J6ers that Trump pardoned were convicted of assaulting police? Probably only a small handful. The vast majority of those cases I saw were guys whose only "crime" was trespassing inside the building, and were convicted on trespassing and other non-violent sham charges.

You can deny that Ray Epps and other Fed informants and provocateurs were there all you want. You are the ones denying reality…

https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents/

Quote:

---

FBI had 26 informants at Jan. 6 Capitol riots and most were involved, bombshell DOJ report confirms

---

Fantasies?? Everything you Commie libtards believe is a complete fantasy and the height of absurdity - 70 genders, men competing in women's sports and sharing locker rooms with girls, unborn children "are not human" and "only a clump of cells", mandatory drag queen story time, the "global warming" hoax, muh Russian collusion delusion hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop was created by Russia, etc etc etc.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

---

Clips of a handful of people pushing against cops is NOT proof that J6ers were violent. 99.999% were completely peaceful. Only an EXTREMELY SMALL percentage of them committed any sort of "violence", and of those who did you are talking about pushing against a cop. Wow, the horror.

Your clip shows people going past a barricade. That is not violence. Trespassing inside the capitol is not violence.

Even though libtards clutch their pearls in fake outrage at video like this, your supposedly "mostly peaceful" Antif@g and BLM rioters did things 1,000 times more violent than anything J6ers did.

Commie Leftists stage "sit ins" in state capitols all the time, trespassing inside capitols, trying to intimidate legislators.. But the Marxist Lamestream media never calls those "insurrections".

We have PROOF of Fed provocateurs and informants in the J6 crowd - including Ray Epps and the at least 26/27 others that got exposed/admitted. It's not just "right wing conspiracy theorists" making stuff up. There is all the evidence proving it to be true.

---

You clearly didn't watch the video. There are hours of video of huge mobs literally dragging cops out of the building and beating them with American flag poles, crushing them, bear spraying them in the face, Mike Pence and every other congressmen running for their lives, mobs trying to break down inner barricades (resulting in one of them getting shot), etc, etc, etc.

Lol, so completely bizarre how you're incapable of accepting reality.

And no, you don't have PROOF. You have the same old steaming pile of bullsh** propaganda that keeps you safely lodged in your fantasy world.

---

So two or three two guys (that could be Feds for all we know) assaulted a cop….among a crowd of around ONE MILLION people there protesting? Like I have said over and over, 99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. THAT is the REALITY.

How many of the ~1,500 J6ers that Trump pardoned were convicted of assaulting police? Probably only a small handful. The vast majority of those cases I saw were guys whose only "crime" was trespassing inside the building, and were convicted on trespassing and other non-violent sham charges.

You can deny that Ray Epps and other Fed informants and provocateurs were there all you want. You are the ones denying reality…

https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents/

Quote:

---

FBI had 26 informants at Jan. 6 Capitol riots and most were involved, bombshell DOJ report confirms

---

Fantasies?? Everything you Commie libtards believe is a complete fantasy and the height of absurdity - 70 genders, men competing in women's sports and sharing locker rooms with girls, unborn children "are not human" and "only a clump of cells", mandatory drag queen story time, the "global warming" hoax, muh Russian collusion delusion hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop was created by Russia, etc etc etc.

---

Just so we're clear, Trump pardoned 169 protestors convicted with VIDEO EVIDENCE in court of assaulting police officers. You're saying Trump pardoned 169 Fed provocateurs? That's a strange thing to do, don't you think?

If 99.999% of your protesters are peaceful, guess what? You have a riot. THAT is the REALITY.

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Which SC Justices aren't OMG RINOs or commie leftist libtards then?

Just so we can know who the real ones are.

---

Will you condemn the terrorism against Tesla dealerships?

---

I think you misspelled "vandalism." I don't think anyone is running scared from crunchy libtard soy boy vandals.

But yeah it's criminal. You won't ever hear me rah-rah criminality.

Arrest and charge the vandals.

---

This is clearly more than vandalism. It is textbook definition terrorism…the use of violence to attempt to achieve a political or ideological goal. Same as with the Antifa and BLM violence/terrorism. They are trying to intimidate people into kowtowing to the Leftist agenda.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/terrorism

terrorism

noun

"the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives."

---

Wait, are you saying January 6th was terrorism? Trump pardoned terrorists?!

---

Peacefully trespassing is not using violence.

---

Do your eyes just turn off the second this video starts playing? Or do we have a different understanding of "bear spraying cops in the face"?

---

Those are Fed provocateurs for all I know. Your boy Ray Epps the Fed informant encouraged people to go inside the capitol and got off without jail time.

And as has been discussed and proven at length, the capitol police initiated and provoked conflict by shooting tear gas into the crowd for no legitimate reason. The crowd was completely peaceful prior to that. As displayed by Ray Epps, the PLAN by the Feds was to provoke "violence". It was all a pre-planned set up by the Feds to stage a fake "insurrection".

99.999% of J6 protesters were completely peaceful and committed no violence whatsoever. Of the ones who were violent, I bet most of those were Fed provocateurs in the crowd with MAGA hats on pretending to be Trump supporters.

The only substantial violence committed that day was by capitol police murdering a J6 protester, Ashli Babbitt.

---

In your case I'm sure it's because you're seriously mentally ill, but it really is a marvel how thoroughly captured the MAGA movement is by total propaganda. Pretty wild. You can't even believe your lying eyes now.

Anyway, why wouldn't you assume that Fed provocateurs are lighting the Teslas on fire, too?

---

Clips of a handful of people pushing against cops is NOT proof that J6ers were violent. 99.999% were completely peaceful. Only an EXTREMELY SMALL percentage of them committed any sort of "violence", and of those who did you are talking about pushing against a cop. Wow, the horror.

Your clip shows people going past a barricade. That is not violence. Trespassing inside the capitol is not violence.

Even though libtards clutch their pearls in fake outrage at video like this, your supposedly "mostly peaceful" Antif@g and BLM rioters did things 1,000 times more violent than anything J6ers did.

Commie Leftists stage "sit ins" in state capitols all the time, trespassing inside capitols, trying to intimidate legislators.. But the Marxist Lamestream media never calls those "insurrections".

We have PROOF of Fed provocateurs and informants in the J6 crowd - including Ray Epps and the at least 26/27 others that got exposed/admitted. It's not just "right wing conspiracy theorists" making stuff up. There is all the evidence proving it to be true.

---

You clearly didn't watch the video. There are hours of video of huge mobs literally dragging cops out of the building and beating them with American flag poles, crushing them, bear spraying them in the face, Mike Pence and every other congressmen running for their lives, mobs trying to break down inner barricades (resulting in one of them getting shot), etc, etc, etc.

Lol, so completely bizarre how you're incapable of accepting reality.

And no, you don't have PROOF. You have the same old steaming pile of bullsh** propaganda that keeps you safely lodged in your fantasy world.

---

I'll admit, I haven't seen the bolded videos. Please link those when you can…

---

Ummm... ok.

For all of these you'll need to click through to YouTube... they're restricted for some reason.

In this one the peaceful protestors used the "drag the cops out to be beaten by the crowd" approach:



Here's a body cam view:



In other tunnels they went with the "heave ho crush the life out of them" approach.



Like I said, there are literally hours of violent video to choose from. We clearly live in two different universes.

Farmers, we love you. Remember we, it's all about fiscal responsibility folks!

The Agriculture Department will start distributing $10 billion in economic loss recovery payments to farmers who spent more on producing a commodity than they expected to recoup during the 2024 crop year, officials announced Tuesday. https://t.co/Nv5POlj52t

— Bloomberg Government (@BGOV) March 18, 2025

Looks like they're not going to be best buds anymore

Surprise: The Russians, who started this awful war and have committed heinous war crimes throughout it, are playing cynical games. It looks like they’re trying to embarrass Trump. https://t.co/k063EfNgdE

— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) March 19, 2025

Gut the oil/nat gas revenue for Russia and they might sing a different tune in six months. Provided Ukraine can hold out that long