TRUMP 2024

2,102,494 Views | 18660 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Civilized
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Lol


The Art of the Reality Show
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

You're right, my apologies. I'm just passionate about it.
Hokie, you and I agree on research to solve different epidemics, diseases, etc…. I think we just disagree on the funding source.

The fallacy of the "funding source" argument WRT federal government spending on things like NIH, USAID, IRS agents, etc. is these sorts of cuts literally solve nothing especially with looming tax cuts that will further cut revenue. They're all downside window dressing.

And if you say they're not, that these cuts in conjunction with tax cuts get us meaningfully closer to a balanced budget, then show us the math.
The fallacy of the tax cuts argument is: tax revenues never go down. They continue a natural trend upwards. So, as long as the natural upward happens, and we continue the 1.5 - 2.0 trillion in yearly deficits, something has to change.

You really can't tax enough, without destroying the economy, to make up for the deficit we have. So, as has been the case forever, this isn't a taxing issue; rather, it's a spending issue. It's time for the wrecking ball!!!



The fallacy is that you always focus on dollar amounts (instead of % of GDP) that never take into account things like inflation or our growing population and our growing GDP.

The only question is: do you really not understand this stuff, or are you in on the con?

For about 5 decades now is has been a deliberate strategy by conservatives to keep cutting taxes and adding it to the deficit. They even have a name for it. Ever wonder why Republicans always do that over and over? It's because THEY WANT A DEFICIT CRISES so that the "solution" will be to gut the entitlements that they're ideologically opposed to.

That's it! That's the crises, and we can fix it tomorrow. Just stop doing that!

Fun fact: We could raise taxes across the board like 3% and be completely sustainable with zero cuts. Crises averted.

Exactly. That's the math.

Or if you think we can cut taxes, and also continue not fully collecting taxes that aren't cut, show the math about how many IRS agents and USAID-like departments you have to cut to get the federal government where it needs to be.
Civ, that's just dumb..

LOLOL

Who needs math when we can just break **** and call it progress, amirite?!?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm about to board a cruise ship with a bunch of Canucks. Should be some fun conversations ahead.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

I'm about to board a cruise ship with a bunch of Canucks. Should be some fun conversations ahead.
Godspeed.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

I'm about to board a cruise ship with a bunch of Canucks. Should be some fun conversations ahead.

Hoping for tranquil seas, delicious food, and riveting conversations with your new friends and residents of our 51st state!
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the "tolerant" and "mostly peaceful" political cult of communist Democrats....

No, you Marxist libtards are most certainly NOT tolerant and peaceful. You are highly intolerant and you are violent -- as seen from the recent riots by your foot soldiers in Antifa and BLM.

https://instagr.am/p/DHBu1rDRsFm
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

I'm about to board a cruise ship with a bunch of Canucks. Should be some fun conversations ahead.


If they try to push that Canadian Bacon on you, start throwing people overboard. They deserve it.
wolf5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another win by Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/09/stock-market-news-today-live-updates.html

So much winning on Monday. Mission accomplished. Republicans hate this country. That's why they voted for this moron.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolf5 said:

Another win by Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/09/stock-market-news-today-live-updates.html

So much winning on Monday. Mission accomplished. Republicans hate this country. That's why they voted for this moron.


We don't hate this country, we just hate you.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolf5 said:

Another win by Trump.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/09/stock-market-news-today-live-updates.html

So much winning on Monday. Mission accomplished. Republicans hate this country. That's why they voted for this moron.
And it will go back up 1,000 points tomorrow. Or the next day. Or the next. Etc. Up and down yo-yo. That's how the "insiders" make money...by manipulating the market to go up and down (high volatility), and having inside knowledge to know when to buy and sell.

Besides, the stock market is not the "real" economy that impacts the average person. What is the unemployment rate? I think it's pretty low last I checked. And gas prices have actually been coming down. Etc
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

You're right, my apologies. I'm just passionate about it.
Hokie, you and I agree on research to solve different epidemics, diseases, etc…. I think we just disagree on the funding source.

The fallacy of the "funding source" argument WRT federal government spending on things like NIH, USAID, IRS agents, etc. is these sorts of cuts literally solve nothing especially with looming tax cuts that will further cut revenue. They're all downside window dressing.

And if you say they're not, that these cuts in conjunction with tax cuts get us meaningfully closer to a balanced budget, then show us the math.
The fallacy of the tax cuts argument is: tax revenues never go down. They continue a natural trend upwards. So, as long as the natural upward happens, and we continue the 1.5 - 2.0 trillion in yearly deficits, something has to change.

You really can't tax enough, without destroying the economy, to make up for the deficit we have. So, as has been the case forever, this isn't a taxing issue; rather, it's a spending issue. It's time for the wrecking ball!!!



The fallacy is that you always focus on dollar amounts (instead of % of GDP) that never take into account things like inflation or our growing population and our growing GDP.

The only question is: do you really not understand this stuff, or are you in on the con?

For about 5 decades now is has been a deliberate strategy by conservatives to keep cutting taxes and adding it to the deficit. They even have a name for it. Ever wonder why Republicans always do that over and over? It's because THEY WANT A DEFICIT CRISES so that the "solution" will be to gut the entitlements that they're ideologically opposed to.

That's it! That's the crises, and we can fix it tomorrow. Just stop doing that!

Fun fact: We could raise taxes across the board like 3% and be completely sustainable with zero cuts. Crises averted.

Exactly. That's the math.

Or if you think we can cut taxes, and also continue not fully collecting taxes that aren't cut, show the math about how many IRS agents and USAID-like departments you have to cut to get the federal government where it needs to be.
Civ, that's just dumb..

LOLOL

Who needs math when we can just break **** and call it progress, amirite?!?
Unless someone can show me where my math is off, then... go pound sand. As far as breaking ****; yes, we need a wrecking ball!!!
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

You're right, my apologies. I'm just passionate about it.
Hokie, you and I agree on research to solve different epidemics, diseases, etc…. I think we just disagree on the funding source.

The fallacy of the "funding source" argument WRT federal government spending on things like NIH, USAID, IRS agents, etc. is these sorts of cuts literally solve nothing especially with looming tax cuts that will further cut revenue. They're all downside window dressing.

And if you say they're not, that these cuts in conjunction with tax cuts get us meaningfully closer to a balanced budget, then show us the math.
The fallacy of the tax cuts argument is: tax revenues never go down. They continue a natural trend upwards. So, as long as the natural upward happens, and we continue the 1.5 - 2.0 trillion in yearly deficits, something has to change.

You really can't tax enough, without destroying the economy, to make up for the deficit we have. So, as has been the case forever, this isn't a taxing issue; rather, it's a spending issue. It's time for the wrecking ball!!!



The fallacy is that you always focus on dollar amounts (instead of % of GDP) that never take into account things like inflation or our growing population and our growing GDP.

The only question is: do you really not understand this stuff, or are you in on the con?

For about 5 decades now is has been a deliberate strategy by conservatives to keep cutting taxes and adding it to the deficit. They even have a name for it. Ever wonder why Republicans always do that over and over? It's because THEY WANT A DEFICIT CRISES so that the "solution" will be to gut the entitlements that they're ideologically opposed to.

That's it! That's the crises, and we can fix it tomorrow. Just stop doing that!

Fun fact: We could raise taxes across the board like 3% and be completely sustainable with zero cuts. Crises averted.

Exactly. That's the math.

Or if you think we can cut taxes, and also continue not fully collecting taxes that aren't cut, show the math about how many IRS agents and USAID-like departments you have to cut to get the federal government where it needs to be.
Civ, that's just dumb..

LOLOL

Who needs math when we can just break **** and call it progress, amirite?!?
Unless someone can show me where my math is off, then... go pound sand. As far as breaking ****; yes, we need a wrecking ball!!!

What math?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the current state of the Democrat party...about 27% of the electorate of far Left lunatics in a cult who are still wearing masks and with green or purple hair, who want men in girls locker rooms and playing in women's sports, and who are fanatically brainwashed into preserving their "right" to murder unborn children.

The other 73% of us are, well lets just say not under the Marxist Leftist brainwashing.

You guys on the far Left are the extreme minority. Not the rest of us.

https://instagr.am/p/DHB-VBXyWlK
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And the fact that Soros and other Leftist groups PAY people to go out on the streets and "protest" for Leftist causes creates the false impression that there are more far Left lunatics out there than there really are...

https://instagr.am/p/DHBikcnPUb8
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

From the "tolerant" and "mostly peaceful" political cult of communist Democrats....

No, you Marxist libtards are most certainly NOT tolerant and peaceful. You are highly intolerant and you are violent -- as seen from the recent riots by your foot soldiers in Antifa and BLM.

https://instagr.am/p/DHBu1rDRsFm


On MAGA's new January 6th Protest Scale this should rank as a "peaceful afternoon car shopping".
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Think about the absurdity of the lack of outrage or even concern voiced by #Nappy and #Gobbler. It's mind blowing that #Nappy justifies it and #Gobbler whines about several million that Duke apparently won't receive for research. I leave #Sieve out because he actually has voiced concern here.....albeit maybe calling it waste ......but not also describing it more broadly as fraud and abuse.



Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Demonic-Rats with transgender Satanist freaks mocking God at their little Commie political rallies and protests.

Please keep this up libtard Dems. This is totally "owning the Pubs" and "winning you supporters" LOL.

You people are VILE. You are just too brainwashed to see it.

https://instagr.am/p/DHB0clOJAjE
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

Think about the absurdity of the lack of outrage or even concern voiced by #Nappy and #Gobbler. It's mind blowing that #Nappy justifies it and #Gobbler whines about several million that Duke apparently won't receive for research. I leave #Sieve out because he actually has voiced concern here.....albeit maybe calling it waste ......but not also describing it more broadly as fraud and abuse.




Go look at the DOGE website. It tells a different story
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

SmaptyWolf said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

You're right, my apologies. I'm just passionate about it.
Hokie, you and I agree on research to solve different epidemics, diseases, etc…. I think we just disagree on the funding source.

The fallacy of the "funding source" argument WRT federal government spending on things like NIH, USAID, IRS agents, etc. is these sorts of cuts literally solve nothing especially with looming tax cuts that will further cut revenue. They're all downside window dressing.

And if you say they're not, that these cuts in conjunction with tax cuts get us meaningfully closer to a balanced budget, then show us the math.
The fallacy of the tax cuts argument is: tax revenues never go down. They continue a natural trend upwards. So, as long as the natural upward happens, and we continue the 1.5 - 2.0 trillion in yearly deficits, something has to change.

You really can't tax enough, without destroying the economy, to make up for the deficit we have. So, as has been the case forever, this isn't a taxing issue; rather, it's a spending issue. It's time for the wrecking ball!!!



The fallacy is that you always focus on dollar amounts (instead of % of GDP) that never take into account things like inflation or our growing population and our growing GDP.

The only question is: do you really not understand this stuff, or are you in on the con?

For about 5 decades now is has been a deliberate strategy by conservatives to keep cutting taxes and adding it to the deficit. They even have a name for it. Ever wonder why Republicans always do that over and over? It's because THEY WANT A DEFICIT CRISES so that the "solution" will be to gut the entitlements that they're ideologically opposed to.

That's it! That's the crises, and we can fix it tomorrow. Just stop doing that!

Fun fact: We could raise taxes across the board like 3% and be completely sustainable with zero cuts. Crises averted.

Exactly. That's the math.

Or if you think we can cut taxes, and also continue not fully collecting taxes that aren't cut, show the math about how many IRS agents and USAID-like departments you have to cut to get the federal government where it needs to be.
Civ, that's just dumb..

LOLOL

Who needs math when we can just break **** and call it progress, amirite?!?
Unless someone can show me where my math is off, then... go pound sand. As far as breaking ****; yes, we need a wrecking ball!!!

What math?
I don't know, you brought up math, so I commented on it…
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Posting this but I don't necessarily agree that a single full release will occur.

A View from the Couch: The Real Reason They Won't Release the Epstein Files
They want you to think the Epstein files are just about a sex trafficking ring. They're not. That's just the tip of the iceberg. The real reason they can't release them? Because, like the JFK, RFK, and MLK files… like the financial crimes of Sam Bankman-Fried and Ross Ulbricht… like the corruption investigations tied to Diddy… it all leads back to the same place.

A global blackmail and financial control networkone that traces through intelligence agencies, deep-state operatives, and the old power structures that have ruled from the shadows. The CIA, Mossad, the Nazis who fled to South America, and the Prussians entrenched in the Bank of England. This isn't a collection of isolated scandalsit's a worldwide Ponzi scheme of power and control.

The only way to release the truth is all at once. That's why they stall. That's why they cover up. Because if one domino falls, they all do.

And that moment is coming.
[url=https://x.com/TGonTheCouch/status/1898077734452314446/photo/1][/url]
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Must have been a cigarette butt thrown out of a passenger vehicle.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

From the "tolerant" and "mostly peaceful" political cult of communist Democrats....

No, you Marxist libtards are most certainly NOT tolerant and peaceful. You are highly intolerant and you are violent -- as seen from the recent riots by your foot soldiers in Antifa and BLM.

https://instagr.am/p/DHBu1rDRsFm


On MAGA's new January 6th Protest Scale this should rank as a "peaceful afternoon car shopping".


Oh yes, the J6ers whose "great crime" was peacefully "trespassing" and walking inside the capitol are "so much more violent" than Marxist Antifa terrorists who firebomb Teslas, burn down buildings, and loot businesses while "peacefully protesting".

Commie Libtards live in a totally inverted reality fantasy land. Everything you say is 180 degrees opposite of the truth. Your religion, your political cult is the WORSHIP OF LIES.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man, you jinxed me! Rough seas the first day, first port call canceled. It's a ten day deal though, hoping for better weather ahead.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Man, you jinxed me! Rough seas the first day, first port call canceled. It's a ten day deal though, hoping for better weather ahead.
Guessing you'll be in your cabin with a bottle of Dramamine close by. I spent part of 4-day cruise out of Puerto Rico this way a number of years back. I hope you have better luck!
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually, I've never really been bothered by seasickness. I've had three cocktails called The Ultimate Cooler tonight and about to grab another
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ha, that's it! Party!
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kudlow interview with Elon Musk.

By the way, why does Kudlow look like a midget here? Is he like 5'-4" tall or something?

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Actually, I've never really been bothered by seasickness. I've had three cocktails called The Ultimate Cooler tonight and about to grab another
Which cruise line and where are you going?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Princess, eastern Caribbean, heading down the windward islands
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmers, we love you
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
First Page Last Page
Page 350 of 534
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.