Impressive video of this Brooklyn born native & former Obama voter.

“No,the average Trump supporter is not a white dude. The average Trump supporter is an American who cares about his country.”

“The New York Times,you guys are trash”

He says what we all want to say. Watch👇 pic.twitter.com/q9tU5dMWGZ

— 👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 (@TheEXECUTlONER_) May 28, 2024

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

Werewolf said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

Just when you think nothings been done about something, you find out things have already been addressed. Remember this comment, please.

---

A Wide Awake Message To Americans

“Donald Trump is convicted before anyone on Jeffrey Epstein’s client list. Okay.

We have politicians that go into office worth about $2, and now they're millionaires. Yet he's the one being funny with money? Okay.

You charge him for… pic.twitter.com/o7Vpdc5CIZ

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 31, 2024

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Absolutely ridiculous

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

And… the only one that didn't act on those demands was Trump.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

And… the only one that didn't act on those demands was Trump.

---

Correct he didn't but I think the point of the picture is his hard core followers.

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

caryking said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

ncsupack1 said:

---

WolfpackUSC said:

---

---

No you didn't…lol. It's popcorn time…

---

Yes he did... he's been trolling ever since he showed up here.

---

Folks need to lighten you. Sadly, there is some truth to that meme.

---

And… the only one that didn't act on those demands was Trump.

---

Correct he didn't but I think the point of the picture is his hard core followers.

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Absolutely ridiculous

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

---

Why?

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Absolutely ridiculous

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

---

Why?

---

Two term blue state governor. Has a chance to win with support. That's kind of the point of elections, to elect people who line up better with your presidential candidate and also the reason the RNC exists. But they don't have the funding to foot Trumps legal bills and elect republicans I guess.

---

BBW12OG said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

caryking said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Ncsufist said:

---

dogplasma said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

dogplasma said:

---

I haven't even attempted to follow the details of this thing. Trump was indicted by a grand jury that believed there was good enough evidence to do so. A trial jury picked by both sides unanimously found him guilty in less than two days based on that evidence. If it was "rigged", well, we've got an appeals process.

No, I'm definitely no Trump supporter. it's less about his politics and more about how he treats people. Knowing he screwed over small businesses and contractors for decades, this conviction seems like a bit of retribution by proxy. Do I think this conviction moves the political needle any? Of course not.

---

If you haven't followed in detail, then how do you know there was sufficient evidence? Assume you don't know the lead prosecutor was sent down from the DOJ, that the prosecutors did not provide the underlying felony charge to the defense team, tried a federal crime (the DOJ and FEC said wasn't a crime) in a NY state court and did not provide their witness list to the defense ahead of time. A judge that refused to let the defense team call a key witness from the FEC, overruled most defense objections, allowed testimony irrelevant to the accounting issue, told the defense their closing summary could not mention the laws and told the jurors they could select from a buffet of charges and a unanimous verdict was not required. All of these things and more are posted in this thread, but I assume you didn't bother reading about it.

But you're ok with retribution for things unrelated to this case. Sounds like TDS.

---

What is TDS? I'm sure that's not an insult, lol. No, I haven't been keeping up with this thread or the trial details and I thought I said that. You're arguing corruption and conspiracy, which is fine, but that seems like an awfully familiar take for any issue that doesn't go Trump's way. I'm saying, right or wrong, that I trust in the process that includes a grand jury, a jury, and an appeals court. Of course this trial had nothing to do with Trump's shady business practices in the past - that goes without saying. But because of those practices, the verdict in this unrelated case feels good on a more personal level. I really only opened up and posted in this thread because this is kind of an historic moment. We're probably going to have a convicted felon as the next POTUS. And we haven't even gotten to the classified docs trial or any of the other trials yet.

---

We won't. It will be overturned based on the jury instructions alone.

---

Exactly!!!! Only issue is the appeals process is very very slow.

Dogplasma, if you are serious about not knowingly what TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) is, you have been living under a rock or solely watching liberal news (although I have heard it on Liberal News on occasion).

---

I'm hearing that appellant court may be tougher than thought. Who, among the left leaning judges, would want to preside overturning the Trump decision. They all are colleagues with similar ideals. I believe they are all elected.

---

Have you seen the judges on the Appellate Court that will hear this case?????

LMAO.... A snowball has 1,000 more chances of survival in hell than President Trump has of winning in that court.

All 5 are African American women......

LOL... and anyone that says this wasn't a "rigged" trial from the get go and is stupid enough to say it out loud speaks volumes.

But... I see our admitted MARXIST is still here spouting off his nonsense.

Smarpty... I will tell you this... if you said half the stuff in person to many on here that you do on this board you'd be missing some teeth.

I for one would love that opportunity. And I don't give a crap how you take that.

---

Lol, "admitted". I think you hallucinated that, just like you hallucinated actually taking your bipolar meds.

---

You did.

As far as my "bi-polar meds" that is something that is very concerning on my end.

Do you take them?

I don't.

I was at the Doak tonight... went over to my former House and drank some beers, celebrated a win.

I see you were posting and concerned about me.

You are a mouthy one.

Please...enlighten us on your affiliation with NCSU.... I'm curious.

You DID admit that you subscribe to MARXISM over Capitalism. More than once.

You can keep your schtick going on here as long as you want. You are a clown... we all know this. Nothing you say will make any of us change our minds.

The fact you were posting during a Regional Playoff game tells us all we need to know about you..

Here is something.... Go F yourself Smarpty..... seriously.... you useless POS. Call me out... I don't care. You have single handedly proved that you are not worth the sweat that was produced to make you.

Have a good one panty waste.

---

packofwolves said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Absolutely ridiculous

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

---

Why?

---

Two term blue state governor. Has a chance to win with support. That's kind of the point of elections, to elect people who line up better with your presidential candidate and also the reason the RNC exists. But they don't have the funding to foot Trumps legal bills and elect republicans I guess.

---

How did you come to the conclusion of not enough funding? Based on that clip, I got the impression if funding is withheld it would be because of his statements.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Absolutely ridiculous

Kasie: Does the RNC support Hogan for Senate? 

Lara Trump: I don't support what he just said there. He doesn't deserve the respect of anyone in the Republican Party at this point. And quite frankly, anybody in America pic.twitter.com/npj9qRuokM

— Acyn (@Acyn) June 2, 2024

---

Why?

---

Two term blue state governor. Has a chance to win with support. That's kind of the point of elections, to elect people who line up better with your presidential candidate and also the reason the RNC exists. But they don't have the funding to foot Trumps legal bills and elect republicans I guess.

---

How did you come to the conclusion of not enough funding? Based on that clip, I got the impression if funding is withheld it would be because of his statements.

---

Maybe I'm old school, but I always thought the RNC's focus should be on winning elections.

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Trump was all like “If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone.” which is exactly how laws are supposed to work you dipshit

— Liam Nissan™ (@theliamnissan) June 1, 2024

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE CULTISTS IN THE BACK

---

So we can expect NY to go after Hilary next for funding the dossier and recording the funding as a legal expense. It was clearly intended to influence the 2016 federal election.

---

I've said a million times I do not care. Go after whoever you want.

Either they're crooked and we clean it up, or you look like idiots for repeatedly pursuing cases with weak or no good evidence and the legally spurious behavior corrects itself.

Neither of those outcomes harm America one iota.

---

You posted a tweet to take a dig at Trump and Republican supporters. Then you deflect with a bs reply when confronted with the fact the NY legal charges will not be brought against Clinton who did the same thing.

Who are you referring to by "go after whoever you want"? My reply wasn't talking about me, it was talking about the NY AG. Keep deflecting, it's what you do best.

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Trump was all like “If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone.” which is exactly how laws are supposed to work you dipshit

— Liam Nissan™ (@theliamnissan) June 1, 2024

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE CULTISTS IN THE BACK

---

So we can expect NY to go after Hilary next for funding the dossier and recording the funding as a legal expense. It was clearly intended to influence the 2016 federal election.

---

I've said a million times I do not care. Go after whoever you want.

Either they're crooked and we clean it up, or you look like idiots for repeatedly pursuing cases with weak or no good evidence and the legally spurious behavior corrects itself.

Neither of those outcomes harm America one iota.

---

You posted a tweet to take a dig at Trump and Republican supporters. Then you deflect with a bs reply when confronted with the fact the NY legal charges will not be brought against Clinton who did the same thing.

Who are you referring to by "go after whoever you want"? My reply wasn't talking about me, it was talking about the NY AG. Keep deflecting, it's what you do best.

---

You guys are completely and totally unable to discern what "same thing" means in any legal or practical terms that survive even the tiniest bit of scrutiny.

So no, the NY AG will not be pursuing charges against Hillary Clinton.

Because most importantly what she did and what Trump did to cover up hush money payments to keep his illicit sexual affair secret are not remotely the same thing, and for multiple other reasons.

But I am totally hoping that over the next few years Republican DA's try to bring a bunch of lawsuits against Democratic political figures. Them doing so will absolutely be win-win for us all.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Trump was all like “If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone.” which is exactly how laws are supposed to work you dipshit

— Liam Nissan™ (@theliamnissan) June 1, 2024

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE CULTISTS IN THE BACK

---

So we can expect NY to go after Hilary next for funding the dossier and recording the funding as a legal expense. It was clearly intended to influence the 2016 federal election.

---

I've said a million times I do not care. Go after whoever you want.

Either they're crooked and we clean it up, or you look like idiots for repeatedly pursuing cases with weak or no good evidence and the legally spurious behavior corrects itself.

Neither of those outcomes harm America one iota.

---

You posted a tweet to take a dig at Trump and Republican supporters. Then you deflect with a bs reply when confronted with the fact the NY legal charges will not be brought against Clinton who did the same thing.

Who are you referring to by "go after whoever you want"? My reply wasn't talking about me, it was talking about the NY AG. Keep deflecting, it's what you do best.

---

You guys are completely and totally unable to discern what "same thing" means in any legal or practical terms that survive even the tiniest bit of scrutiny.

So no, the NY AG will not be pursuing charges against Hillary Clinton.

Because most importantly what she did and what Trump did to cover up hush money payments to keep his illicit sexual affair secret are not remotely the same thing, and for multiple other reasons.

But I am totally hoping that over the next few years Republican DA's try to bring a bunch of lawsuits against Democratic political figures. Them doing so will absolutely be win-win for us all.

---

They are actually the same thing. What's interesting is the FEC found Clinton guilty and it ended up as a fine. The FEC said what Trump did is not a crime, but Bragg and the Biden's # 3 DOJ lawyer came up with bs charges.

---

Are you sure the feds didn't just shelf a Trump indictment because he was a sitting president? What did Michael Cohen do 13 months in prison for, again? 4 years before Bragg was elected to office!

---

packofwolves said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Trump was all like “If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone.” which is exactly how laws are supposed to work you dipshit

— Liam Nissan™ (@theliamnissan) June 1, 2024

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE CULTISTS IN THE BACK

---

So we can expect NY to go after Hilary next for funding the dossier and recording the funding as a legal expense. It was clearly intended to influence the 2016 federal election.

---

I've said a million times I do not care. Go after whoever you want.

Either they're crooked and we clean it up, or you look like idiots for repeatedly pursuing cases with weak or no good evidence and the legally spurious behavior corrects itself.

Neither of those outcomes harm America one iota.

---

You posted a tweet to take a dig at Trump and Republican supporters. Then you deflect with a bs reply when confronted with the fact the NY legal charges will not be brought against Clinton who did the same thing.

Who are you referring to by "go after whoever you want"? My reply wasn't talking about me, it was talking about the NY AG. Keep deflecting, it's what you do best.

---

You guys are completely and totally unable to discern what "same thing" means in any legal or practical terms that survive even the tiniest bit of scrutiny.

So no, the NY AG will not be pursuing charges against Hillary Clinton.

Because most importantly what she did and what Trump did to cover up hush money payments to keep his illicit sexual affair secret are not remotely the same thing, and for multiple other reasons.

But I am totally hoping that over the next few years Republican DA's try to bring a bunch of lawsuits against Democratic political figures. Them doing so will absolutely be win-win for us all.

---

They are actually the same thing. What's interesting is the FEC found Clinton guilty and it ended up as a fine. The FEC said what Trump did is not a crime, but Bragg and the Biden's # 3 DOJ lawyer came up with bs charges.

---

Are you sure the feds didn't just shelf a Trump indictment because he was a sitting president? What did Michael Cohen do 13 months in prison for, again? 4 years before Bragg was elected to office!

---

They didn't charge due to lack of evidence/findings (reasonable doubt).

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign "knowingly and willfully" violated campaign finance law when his former attorney Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to porn star Stormy Daniels to keep her from disclosing an alleged affair."

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

I thought it was interesting, but not relevant to the discussion about NY AG not going after Clinton. Both Trump and Clinton committed the same accounting misdemeanors. Clinton's intentions were clear.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Trump was all like “If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone.” which is exactly how laws are supposed to work you dipshit

— Liam Nissan™ (@theliamnissan) June 1, 2024

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE CULTISTS IN THE BACK

---

So we can expect NY to go after Hilary next for funding the dossier and recording the funding as a legal expense. It was clearly intended to influence the 2016 federal election.

---

I've said a million times I do not care. Go after whoever you want.

Either they're crooked and we clean it up, or you look like idiots for repeatedly pursuing cases with weak or no good evidence and the legally spurious behavior corrects itself.

Neither of those outcomes harm America one iota.

---

You posted a tweet to take a dig at Trump and Republican supporters. Then you deflect with a bs reply when confronted with the fact the NY legal charges will not be brought against Clinton who did the same thing.

Who are you referring to by "go after whoever you want"? My reply wasn't talking about me, it was talking about the NY AG. Keep deflecting, it's what you do best.

---

You guys are completely and totally unable to discern what "same thing" means in any legal or practical terms that survive even the tiniest bit of scrutiny.

So no, the NY AG will not be pursuing charges against Hillary Clinton.

Because most importantly what she did and what Trump did to cover up hush money payments to keep his illicit sexual affair secret are not remotely the same thing, and for multiple other reasons.

But I am totally hoping that over the next few years Republican DA's try to bring a bunch of lawsuits against Democratic political figures. Them doing so will absolutely be win-win for us all.

---

They are actually the same thing. What's interesting is the FEC found Clinton guilty and it ended up as a fine. The FEC said what Trump did is not a crime, but Bragg and the Biden's # 3 DOJ lawyer came up with bs charges.

---

Are you sure the feds didn't just shelf a Trump indictment because he was a sitting president? What did Michael Cohen do 13 months in prison for, again? 4 years before Bragg was elected to office!

---

They didn't charge due to lack of evidence/findings (reasonable doubt).

"The FEC voted 4-1 to close the inquiry after failing to find that Trump or his campaign "knowingly and willfully" violated campaign finance law when his former attorney Michael Cohen paid $130,000 to porn star Stormy Daniels to keep her from disclosing an alleged affair."

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/552271-fec-drops-investigation-into-trump-hush-money-payments/

I thought it was interesting, but not relevant to the discussion about NY AG not going after Clinton. Both Trump and Clinton committed the same accounting misdemeanors. Clinton's intentions were clear.

---

I think you're confusing the feds that put Cohen in jail with the FEC, a partisan Republican committee that very surprisingly stamped "nothing to see here" on their report.

---