I thought I'd help #Sieve, #Nappy and #Gobbler out for a few minutes this afternoon. ;-)

BREAKING: Donald Trump to pay $354 million for fraud, Judge Engoron has ordered

If you vote MAGA, you’re a fucking loser. pic.twitter.com/72nS9p1Sq6

— Andrew Mercado (@RealAndyMerc) February 16, 2024

OK, I did my generous deed for the day, back to it.

🚨🚨💀BOMBSHELL ADMISSION OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD BY FULTON COUNTY DA FANI WILLIS:🚨🚨

“When I took out a bunch of money from my first campaign, I kept some of the cash from that.”

Fani Willis appears to have admitted to a campaign finance crime while testifying about why she… pic.twitter.com/jSknmyrCyO

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) February 15, 2024

Werewolf said:

---

I thought I'd help #Sieve, #Nappy and #Gobbler out for a few minutes this afternoon. ;-)

BREAKING: Donald Trump to pay $354 million for fraud, Judge Engoron has ordered

If you vote MAGA, you’re a fucking loser. pic.twitter.com/72nS9p1Sq6

— Andrew Mercado (@RealAndyMerc) February 16, 2024

---

Lol, wow, I just starred a Were post!

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

I thought I'd help #Sieve, #Nappy and #Gobbler out for a few minutes this afternoon. ;-)

BREAKING: Donald Trump to pay $354 million for fraud, Judge Engoron has ordered

If you vote MAGA, you’re a fucking loser. pic.twitter.com/72nS9p1Sq6

— Andrew Mercado (@RealAndyMerc) February 16, 2024

---

Lol, wow, I just starred a Were post!

---

Darn, I believe they've got him now! America First many have come to an end.

trump, by the numbers:
Impeachments: 2
Popular vote wins: 0
Fewer votes he got than Biden: 7,060,140
Classified documents stolen: Thousands
Indictments: 4
Felony counts: 91
Amount E. Jean Carroll won in rape case: $83 million
Amount fined for being a fucking fraud: $364 million pic.twitter.com/vR1yuuCnaB

— 😱 Scary Larry 😱 🇺🇦✊🏻🇺🇸🗽 (@aintscarylarry) February 16, 2024

Back in the day baby!!!

pic.twitter.com/tV4YITR7TN

— Dan Scavino Jr.🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) February 16, 2024

Trump just brought an auto worker on stage in Michigan

“Thank you President Trump, we got your back!” 🔥 pic.twitter.com/1UjEceSr56

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) February 18, 2024

Truckers be like👇💯 pic.twitter.com/z2cl2HDak2

— Liberacrat Media™️ (@Liberacrat_) February 17, 2024

Where's #daSieve?

Big line to see President Trump in Michigan pic.twitter.com/MRHIEJ3LqP

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) February 17, 2024

#DaSieve, #daNappy and #daGobbler, you've got him now!!

An activist judge ordered President Trump to pay more than $360 million in a case with no victims, no plaintiff, all loans being repaid and banks involved testifying in favor of the Trump Organization.

Trump wasn’t able to defense himself because of gag orders while… pic.twitter.com/frawKOtmLW

— Mercedes Schlapp (@mercedesschlapp) February 18, 2024

Bout that time..... Pick a side!

@realDonaldTrump brought down the house last night, but there was one surprise guest many weren’t expecting… Lee Majors! the 6 million dollar man himself with his stunning wife Faith. Awesome #leemajors#maralago #6milliondollarman pic.twitter.com/uFZT4LqKnQ

— Raven the Conservative Warrior (@raven_txwarrior) February 11, 2024

#daSIeve, folks are waking up 2 the truth....
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8KeWx68/

Unsurprisingly you seem to think I support all the NYC cases against Trump. I honestly don't. I think they shouldn't have been brought.

I think he's basically guilty and I have little personal sympathy for him given his contempt for the law, but the prosecutions are obviously political. I'm sorry if I don't fit your strawman.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

Is this a serious question? Inflating and/or undervaluing your assets to get favorable loan terms and favorable insurance premiums is called fraud, and yes, it's very illegal.

So you're saying that Trump paid the actual loan terms and insurance premiums he would have paid had he not lied? Somehow I doubt it.

And are you saying that if your average non-billionaire applies for business loans with grossly inflated assets and applies for insurance with grossly undervalued assets, then as long as they eventually pay their bogus loans it's no harm no foul? You don't think those folks are convicted all the time?

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

Is this a serious question? Inflating and/or undervaluing your assets to get favorable loan terms and favorable insurance premiums is called fraud, and yes, it's very illegal.

So you're saying that Trump paid the actual loan terms and insurance premiums he would have paid had he not lied? Somehow I doubt it.

And are you saying that if your average non-billionaire applies for business loans with grossly inflated assets and applies for insurance with grossly undervalued assets, then as long as they eventually pay their bogus loans it's no harm no foul? You don't think those folks are convicted all the time?

---

What I'm saying is that the banks he borrowed money from and the insurance companies he worked with were perfectly fine with the valuations of his properties. The Trump Organization then followed the terms of the loans. There was no aggrieved parties in this case.

So, I don't expect you average non-billionaire to be taken to court for grossly inflated assets and applying for insurance with grossly undervalued assets if there is no aggrieved party. Generally, someone has to bring forth a complaint for the State of NY to go after the average non-billionaire. In this case, the State of NY took it upon themselves to go and manufacture a case against the Trump Organization without an aggrieved party. If all parties agreed to the valuations, there is no fraud.

That my friend, is the difference here. If it wasn't for Trump being a lightning rod for political discourse, the State of NY would have never put forth a case. I expect this sham to be appealed and rejected at some point.

Again, as I stated above, I think he's basically guilty and I have little personal sympathy for him given his contempt for the law, but the prosecutions are obviously political.

I don't know who this Turley guy is, lol. Maybe some of the constitutional scholars here should tweet to him to help him out.

turley is a Democrat too.... a principled one too.....sparse and hard to find.

Gov. Hochul just assured businesses that there is “nothing to worry about” after the $355 million public execution of the Trump Corp. Drawing new businesses to the city is going to be about as easy as selling country estates during the French Revolution. https://t.co/W2sJ50xES0

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) February 18, 2024

I'm sure, even though I haven't looked it up, the NY AG department can bring charges against people, for crimes. In fact, Rudy brought the RICO charges against the Mob. Certainly, the NY AG can bring charges against Trump, for a crime. That said, who was the victim here?

All people, involved, were satisfied, according to them. Also, if the Trump organization inflated values, would they have been reflected in the tax value? If so, I'm sure the City, County, State, received more taxes on an inflated value.

I know, You know, Everyone knows, this is nothing more than a witch hunt! This will get overturned! In fact, not a single case, that Trump is facing, will end up in the losing category, for him.

You still may not like his politics and that's ok. I don't like some people's politics either. We just have a different world views!

Werewolf said:

---

I don't know who this Turley guy is, lol. Maybe some of the constitutional scholars here should tweet to him to help him out.

turley is a Democrat too.... a principled one too.....sparse and hard to find.

Gov. Hochul just assured businesses that there is “nothing to worry about” after the $355 million public execution of the Trump Corp. Drawing new businesses to the city is going to be about as easy as selling country estates during the French Revolution. https://t.co/W2sJ50xES0

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) February 18, 2024

---

Turley's opinion was published in The Hill. Don't know why you dismiss him as a Democrat. I have read/listened to some of his opinions in the past and they seemed fair.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4473974-obscene-award-against-trump-is-testing-the-new-york-legal-systems-integrity/

This will be overturned in one of the courts.

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

NY used a 70 year old civil fraud law, 63(12), that does not require someone be defrauded. The law has been used frequently, but it's the first time someone was prosecuted for which no one was defrauded. It was clearly a deliberate political hit against Trump. Now Hochul is saying not to worry, we won't come after any other business that defrauds no one.

packofwolves said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

I don't know who this Turley guy is, lol. Maybe some of the constitutional scholars here should tweet to him to help him out.

turley is a Democrat too.... a principled one too.....sparse and hard to find.

Gov. Hochul just assured businesses that there is “nothing to worry about” after the $355 million public execution of the Trump Corp. Drawing new businesses to the city is going to be about as easy as selling country estates during the French Revolution. https://t.co/W2sJ50xES0

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) February 18, 2024

---

Turley's opinion was published in The Hill. Don't know why you dismiss him as a Democrat. I have read/listened to some of his opinions in the past and they seemed fair.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4473974-obscene-award-against-trump-is-testing-the-new-york-legal-systems-integrity/

This will be overturned in one of the courts.

---

Lol, Turley is a "Democrat" the same way Tulsi Gabbard is... both slid down the rabbit hole to MAGA crazy town long ago. I guess being the "even Dems are saying this!" commentators makes them relevant.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

Is this a serious question? Inflating and/or undervaluing your assets to get favorable loan terms and favorable insurance premiums is called fraud, and yes, it's very illegal.

So you're saying that Trump paid the actual loan terms and insurance premiums he would have paid had he not lied? Somehow I doubt it.

And are you saying that if your average non-billionaire applies for business loans with grossly inflated assets and applies for insurance with grossly undervalued assets, then as long as they eventually pay their bogus loans it's no harm no foul? You don't think those folks are convicted all the time?

---

What I'm saying is that the banks he borrowed money from and the insurance companies he worked with were perfectly fine with the valuations of his properties. The Trump Organization then followed the terms of the loans. There was no aggrieved parties in this case.

So, I don't expect you average non-billionaire to be taken to court for grossly inflated assets and applying for insurance with grossly undervalued assets if there is no aggrieved party. Generally, someone has to bring forth a complaint for the State of NY to go after the average non-billionaire. In this case, the State of NY took it upon themselves to go and manufacture a case against the Trump Organization without an aggrieved party. If all parties agreed to the valuations, there is no fraud.

That my friend, is the difference here. If it wasn't for Trump being a lightning rod for political discourse, the State of NY would have never put forth a case. I expect this sham to be appealed and rejected at some point.

Again, as I stated above, I think he's basically guilty and I have little personal sympathy for him given his contempt for the law, but the prosecutions are obviously political.

---

Actually, the way NY state law works, the Attorney General does have standing to bring charges against billionaires, banks, etc, regardless of there being an aggrieved party... it's how they've dealt with the mob, shady investment banks (like DeutcheBank, the ****heads likely laundering Russian money and "loaning" it to Trump), and all sorts of other powerful bad actors.

This prosecution is only "political" in the sense that if Trump hadn't been such a crook and then ran for President these financial records (dug up during multiple criminal investigations) would probably never have found themselves in the Attorney General's lap, obligating her to act. Repeatedly lying to banks is illegal. Even if the bank is happy to look the other way for some reason. Also, selling crack to 14 year olds is illegal, even if both parties are happy with the arrangement.

So too bad. The lesson is if you're going to crime constantly, you probably should keep your head down and maybe not run for President.

---

Exactly.

If you don't want the scrutiny, don't run for President twice; don't be a colossally unlikeable asshat and make a ton of enemies; don't sex-assault and brag about it; don't bang porn stars and pay them hush money and then try to write that off as a business expense; don't obstruct the feds when they try to get back confidential docs that are obviously theirs; don't openly solicit insurrect...errrrr riots that obstruct the peaceful transfer or power; don't openly flout tax laws in NY ever since you and your siblings inherited half a billion dollars of property and paid taxes on 10% of that amount and laugh about it for decades; generally don't crime and get caught in other ways that bring negative attention to yourself; and on and on.

Trump wrote the playbook for how to bring unwanted attention to yourself legally.

He's lying in a bed that he's made himself over the last 50 years. He's not a victim of anything other than his own bad behavior and colossally poor judgment.

At this point I'm almost ready for him to be in office so he can start up his revenge tour. Either he actually finds criminal behavior by Biden and roots it out, or he and his worshipers are reminded that it takes a lot more than simply wanting to charge someone for crimes to get it done since you need some semblance of actual evidence.

Either way, America is better off in the end for his (likely completely inept and fruitless) vengeful efforts.

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

Is this a serious question? Inflating and/or undervaluing your assets to get favorable loan terms and favorable insurance premiums is called fraud, and yes, it's very illegal.

So you're saying that Trump paid the actual loan terms and insurance premiums he would have paid had he not lied? Somehow I doubt it.

And are you saying that if your average non-billionaire applies for business loans with grossly inflated assets and applies for insurance with grossly undervalued assets, then as long as they eventually pay their bogus loans it's no harm no foul? You don't think those folks are convicted all the time?

---

What I'm saying is that the banks he borrowed money from and the insurance companies he worked with were perfectly fine with the valuations of his properties. The Trump Organization then followed the terms of the loans. There was no aggrieved parties in this case.

So, I don't expect you average non-billionaire to be taken to court for grossly inflated assets and applying for insurance with grossly undervalued assets if there is no aggrieved party. Generally, someone has to bring forth a complaint for the State of NY to go after the average non-billionaire. In this case, the State of NY took it upon themselves to go and manufacture a case against the Trump Organization without an aggrieved party. If all parties agreed to the valuations, there is no fraud.

That my friend, is the difference here. If it wasn't for Trump being a lightning rod for political discourse, the State of NY would have never put forth a case. I expect this sham to be appealed and rejected at some point.

Again, as I stated above, I think he's basically guilty and I have little personal sympathy for him given his contempt for the law, but the prosecutions are obviously political.

---

Actually, the way NY state law works, the Attorney General does have standing to bring charges against billionaires, banks, etc, regardless of there being an aggrieved party... it's how they've dealt with the mob, shady investment banks (like DeutcheBank, the ****heads likely laundering Russian money and "loaning" it to Trump), and all sorts of other powerful bad actors.

This prosecution is only "political" in the sense that if Trump hadn't been such a crook and then ran for President these financial records (dug up during multiple criminal investigations) would probably never have found themselves in the Attorney General's lap, obligating her to act. Repeatedly lying to banks is illegal. Even if the bank is happy to look the other way for some reason. Also, selling crack to 14 year olds is illegal, even if both parties are happy with the arrangement.

So too bad. The lesson is if you're going to crime constantly, you probably should keep your head down and maybe not run for President.

---

Exactly.

If you don't want the scrutiny, don't run for President twice; don't be a colossally unlikeable asshat and make a ton of enemies; don't sex-assault and brag about it; don't bang porn stars and pay them hush money and then try to write that off as a business expense; don't obstruct the feds when they try to get back confidential docs that are obviously theirs; don't openly solicit insurrect...errrrr riots that obstruct the peaceful transfer or power; don't openly flout tax laws in NY ever since you and your siblings inherited half a billion dollars of property and paid taxes on 10% of that amount and laugh about it for decades; generally don't crime and get caught in other ways that bring negative attention to yourself; and on and on.

Trump wrote the playbook for how to bring unwanted attention to yourself legally.

He's lying in a bed that he's made himself over the last 50 years. He's not a victim of anything other than his own bad behavior and colossally poor judgment.

At this point I'm almost ready for him to be in office so he can start up his revenge tour. Either he actually finds criminal behavior by Biden and roots it out, or he and his worshipers are reminded that it takes a lot more than simply wanting to charge someone for crimes to get it done since you need some semblance of actual evidence.

Either way, America is better off in the end for his (likely completely inept and fruitless) vengeful efforts.

---

Except there is a zero percent chance he'd find criminal behavior by Biden, and a zero percent chance his worshipers, given the 600,000 teachable moments they've already been able to spin away, would learn any kind of lesson whatsoever that would make America better off.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

New York’s Democrat governor assures real estate developers that they won’t be targeted for real estate valuations like Trump. She just admitted it was a purely partisan political prosecution of Trump. h/t @JRobFromMN pic.twitter.com/IewoCboyuw

— @amuse (@amuse) February 18, 2024

---

Uh huh. Here's her actual quote:

"I think that this is really an extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about, because they're very different than Donald Trump and his behavior... by and large, they are honest people and they're not trying to hide their assets and they're following the rules."

---

Question for you - who was the actual aggrieved party here? From all that I've seen, none of the banks that Trump got loans from were part of the complaint, and they were paid back in full for the loans he took. What exactly was the rule the Trump organization broke?

---

Is this a serious question? Inflating and/or undervaluing your assets to get favorable loan terms and favorable insurance premiums is called fraud, and yes, it's very illegal.

So you're saying that Trump paid the actual loan terms and insurance premiums he would have paid had he not lied? Somehow I doubt it.

And are you saying that if your average non-billionaire applies for business loans with grossly inflated assets and applies for insurance with grossly undervalued assets, then as long as they eventually pay their bogus loans it's no harm no foul? You don't think those folks are convicted all the time?

---

What I'm saying is that the banks he borrowed money from and the insurance companies he worked with were perfectly fine with the valuations of his properties. The Trump Organization then followed the terms of the loans. There was no aggrieved parties in this case.

So, I don't expect you average non-billionaire to be taken to court for grossly inflated assets and applying for insurance with grossly undervalued assets if there is no aggrieved party. Generally, someone has to bring forth a complaint for the State of NY to go after the average non-billionaire. In this case, the State of NY took it upon themselves to go and manufacture a case against the Trump Organization without an aggrieved party. If all parties agreed to the valuations, there is no fraud.

That my friend, is the difference here. If it wasn't for Trump being a lightning rod for political discourse, the State of NY would have never put forth a case. I expect this sham to be appealed and rejected at some point.

Again, as I stated above, I think he's basically guilty and I have little personal sympathy for him given his contempt for the law, but the prosecutions are obviously political.

---

Actually, the way NY state law works, the Attorney General does have standing to bring charges against billionaires, banks, etc, regardless of there being an aggrieved party... it's how they've dealt with the mob, shady investment banks (like DeutcheBank, the ****heads likely laundering Russian money and "loaning" it to Trump), and all sorts of other powerful bad actors.

This prosecution is only "political" in the sense that if Trump hadn't been such a crook and then ran for President these financial records (dug up during multiple criminal investigations) would probably never have found themselves in the Attorney General's lap, obligating her to act. Repeatedly lying to banks is illegal. Even if the bank is happy to look the other way for some reason. Also, selling crack to 14 year olds is illegal, even if both parties are happy with the arrangement.

So too bad. The lesson is if you're going to crime constantly, you probably should keep your head down and maybe not run for President.

---

Exactly.

If you don't want the scrutiny, don't run for President twice; don't be a colossally unlikeable asshat and make a ton of enemies; don't sex-assault and brag about it; don't bang porn stars and pay them hush money and then try to write that off as a business expense; don't obstruct the feds when they try to get back confidential docs that are obviously theirs; don't openly solicit insurrect...errrrr riots that obstruct the peaceful transfer or power; don't openly flout tax laws in NY ever since you and your siblings inherited half a billion dollars of property and paid taxes on 10% of that amount and laugh about it for decades; generally don't crime and get caught in other ways that bring negative attention to yourself; and on and on.

Trump wrote the playbook for how to bring unwanted attention to yourself legally.

He's lying in a bed that he's made himself over the last 50 years. He's not a victim of anything other than his own bad behavior and colossally poor judgment.

At this point I'm almost ready for him to be in office so he can start up his revenge tour. Either he actually finds criminal behavior by Biden and roots it out, or he and his worshipers are reminded that it takes a lot more than simply wanting to charge someone for crimes to get it done since you need some semblance of actual evidence.

Either way, America is better off in the end for his (likely completely inept and fruitless) vengeful efforts.

---

Except there is a zero percent chance he'd find criminal behavior by Biden, and a zero percent chance his worshipers, given the 600,000 teachable moments they've already been able to spin away, would learn any kind of lesson whatsoever that would make America better off.

---

If there is no sweater string to pull with Biden, even better since Trump and his Bad News Bears attorneys will trip all over their dicks and embarrass themselves even more than they already have over the last several years.

Although we're back in a place where Trump is again holding the Republican party hostage, there is clearly more pushback now than there was during his first reign. Sane Republicans understand that his schtick is unique to him and Trump acolytes likley aren't going to be able to emulate his ability to capture enough of the party to be electorally viable, effectual leaders, especially when they don't have an electorally unpopular president like Biden to run against.

stickwolf said:

---

This may have been covered, as I don't visit here much. But help me believe in a system where "Intel community has 6 ways to Sunday" to "get back" at somebody. I really have a problem with this no matter who the victim is. And boy its become apparent that some that somebody could possibly be "getting back" at Trump. So somebody who believes in this kind of "justice" help me understand.


I preface this to say if I was at a service station and heard a cop utter these words about a citizen and then indictments started coming from all over, it would be a problem. Why is this different? Why is this OK?

---

What do you imagine the intelligence community has to do with any of Trump's current indictments?