TRUMP 2024

4,957,526 Views | 34681 Replies | Last: 28 min ago by caryking
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

$450m across midterms, $150m in Texas. Talarico has raised $150m total. I got a number wrong, am capable of admitting it (unlike you on literally any subject). However, the point still stands - one man is matching an entire campaigns fundraising. Not really the dunk you seem to think this is


LOL- the next time you are right about anything will be the first.


Ok bud
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

$450m across midterms, $150m in Texas. Talarico has raised $150m total. I got a number wrong, am capable of admitting it (unlike you on literally any subject). However, the point still stands - one man is matching an entire campaigns fundraising. Not really the dunk you seem to think this is


LOL- the next time you are right about anything will be the first.


Ok bud


You are the perfect low information voter and I'm glad you are a democrat.
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

$450m across midterms, $150m in Texas. Talarico has raised $150m total. I got a number wrong, am capable of admitting it (unlike you on literally any subject). However, the point still stands - one man is matching an entire campaigns fundraising. Not really the dunk you seem to think this is


LOL- the next time you are right about anything will be the first.


Ok bud


You are the perfect low information voter and I'm glad you are a democrat.


Let it all out. Want a tissue for those tears?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

$450m across midterms, $150m in Texas. Talarico has raised $150m total. I got a number wrong, am capable of admitting it (unlike you on literally any subject). However, the point still stands - one man is matching an entire campaigns fundraising. Not really the dunk you seem to think this is


LOL- the next time you are right about anything will be the first.


Ok bud


You are the perfect low information voter and I'm glad you are a democrat.


Let it all out. Want a tissue for those tears?


Ok bud
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Emerging Red-Green Alliance: Where Political Islam Meets the Left

https://www.start.umd.edu/publication/emerging-red-green-alliance-where-political-islam-meets-radical-left


No matter how unlikely it may seem, radical Leftists and Islamists have come closer in recent years. Drawing on substantial ideological interchange, and operating at both state and non-state levels, the two movements are building a Common Front against the United States and its allies.
- - -

Today's Democrat Party
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Red-Green Alliance and the War against American Jewry, the American-Israel Alliance, and the Foundations of American Democracy

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26801115
- - -

When you vote democrat you also vote for this^
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Venezuelan oil from US-NABEP deal arrives in Texas, to be sold to Exxon, Citgo

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/first-venezuelan-oil-us-nabep-deal-arrives-texas-be-sold-exxon-citgo-2026-10-27/
- - -
WASHINGTON/CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, Oct 27 (Reuters) - The first cargo of Venezuelan crude under a deal between the US and producer NABEP unloaded in Texas on Tuesday and will be sold by the US government to refineries run by Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab and Venezuelan-owned Citgo Petroleum, a White House official said.
NABEP confirmed in a statement it supplied 1 million barrels of Venezuelan oil as part of the deal. President Donald Trump visited the port on Tuesday, where one of the vessels carrying the heavy crude served as a backdrop for his speech.
- - -

Much to the disappointment of democrats, President Trump removed a narco terrorist, kicked China/Russia out of the Western Hemisphere and will soon be lowering fuel costs.

All of these things are good for America but bad for the democrat party.
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Key word: heavy crude. I'm an engineer; and I happen to know a lot about this field. 30ish% refinement to gasoline from heavy crude. 50ish% from lighter crude elsewhere. Less yield, so overall costs more per exported gallon of crude.

Benefits are it's closer, less shipping. Negative is refinement costs go up, profits for refineries also go up (Exxon, Citgo).

1 million barrels lasts our country a total of 1 hour (rule of thumb).

Overall negligible impact, as the US still produces more oil than it needs, and oil still trades at market rate generally speaking.

Any other chemical engineers feel free to chime in, much more to it than this as well.
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/article/gas-prices-under-trump-20-are-now-higher-on-average-than-during-bidens-4-years-in-office-141656779.html

If I'm capable of correcting an error in a number I reported, hopefully other posters here are as well
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/article/gas-prices-under-trump-20-are-now-higher-on-average-than-during-bidens-4-years-in-office-141656779.html

If I'm capable of correcting an error in a number I reported, hopefully other posters here are as well


When I posted everything I said was true. This article is dated yesterday, not sure where the "gotcha" you are hoping for is?

Trump has two more years. Let's make a bet, $100 to savage Wolves, your great President Trump will finish his four year term with a national gas average less that Biden. Yes?
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/article/gas-prices-under-trump-20-are-now-higher-on-average-than-during-bidens-4-years-in-office-141656779.html

If I'm capable of correcting an error in a number I reported, hopefully other posters here are as well


When I posted everything I said was true. This article is dated yesterday, not sure where the "gotcha" you are hoping for is?

Trump has two more years. Let's make a bet, $100 to savage Wolves, your great President Trump will finish his four year term with a national gas average less that Biden. Yes?


Hell yeah. I'll take you up on that. Mostly because our Pack gets the benefit either way!
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

Gulfstream4 said:

wolfme said:

https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/article/gas-prices-under-trump-20-are-now-higher-on-average-than-during-bidens-4-years-in-office-141656779.html

If I'm capable of correcting an error in a number I reported, hopefully other posters here are as well


When I posted everything I said was true. This article is dated yesterday, not sure where the "gotcha" you are hoping for is?

Trump has two more years. Let's make a bet, $100 to savage Wolves, your great President Trump will finish his four year term with a national gas average less that Biden. Yes?


Hell yeah. I'll take you up on that. Mostly because our Pack gets the benefit either way!


On this, we agree.
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Trump could have waited until after the midterms. I'm sure his advisers told him that. There was a reason he chose to act right away. It had to be done and he did it.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Trump could have waited until after the midterms. I'm sure his advisers told him that. There was a reason he chose to act right away. It had to be done and he did it.

As always you live in the MAGA Neighborhood of Make Believe.

No, this didn't have to be done. Literally the only reason we attacked Iran is because after Venezuela, Trump was looking for another easy way to feel like a tough guy given what a sh** show his domestic political situation was becoming.

Bibi convinced Trump that Iran was completely defenseless (a.k.a. not a threat) and it would be easy peasy to kill their leaders and ignite a glorious revolution over a weekend. Of course that was stupid, and there was NO PLAN for what might happen if his weekend bender failed. He's been flailing to find a way out ever since, and unfortunately for him the only tool in his toolbox, the reality distortion machine that works so well at home, is pretty useless in foreign affairs.

wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Yep. And Biden badly screwed up leaving Afghanistan. We all overreacted to Covid with lockdowns.. etc etc.

Just rational thought
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Yep. And Biden badly screwed up leaving Afghanistan. We all overreacted to Covid with lockdowns.. etc etc.

Just rational thought

If you say so.
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/28/us/politics/alaska-dan-sullivan-conspiracy-peltola.html
wolfme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Genuinely do not understand why, in the current state of our economy, tax payers are left paying for this:

https://abcnews.com/International/brazilian-authorities-investigating-flvio-bolsonaro-fled-us-election/story?id=137618388

eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

DrummerboyWolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Wow, that is one offensive portrayal of Muslims... way to drum up the fear for xenophobes

So, none of these guys actually cast an illegal vote? Did you do your own research?

So all he did was expose that one poll worker oversimplified that the voucher "is the ID". A clarifying statement from her could've easily been edited out of that clip. MN law states the voucher can personally attest, under oath, that they know the person resides in the same precinct, ie proof of residence... not their citizenship or general eligibility.

Also, a big clarification is that unregistered does not mean ineligible. The voter must be a US citizen. It doesn't appear anywhere in the video that he presented the people he was vouching for as noncitizens.

I usually don't reply to people that I ignore. And I won't be replying to you or the others except right here.

Are you that stupid? It appears to be the case. Had any of them voted, then they would be criminals and could get arrested. The folly that someone can vote without ID and somebody vouching for them that they are a citizen and can vote is totally ridiculous. You are so blinded by your hate you can't even see that this makes no sense.

There are lots of Muslim people in Minnesota and he even said had he just dressed regularly he might have been more suspicious than when he had the Muslim clothing. There is no Xenophobic part of this. I have no problems with LEGAL American citizens voting. What I am not for is outright cheating and it happens everywhere. Sorry you are so offended by their clothing choice. Get over it Karen.

Do you want your elections run this way? Obviously you do. I don't care what you or any of your American hating cohorts say. To quote that great philosopher Han Solo..."LAUGH IT UP FUZZBALL! I won't be reading any of your BS. So now go home and cry that James O'Keefe exposed Minnesota voting laws for what they are. Complete and utter nonsense.


They would get arrested, you say? Interesting… almost like the system would work. If found ineligible, the vote would be disqualified.

Also, you must not have read my post because they cannot vouch for citizenship; just proof of residence. Again, get this to Trump immediately. He needs any evidence of voter fraud he can because he hasn't won a single case in the courts.

Less offended by the clothing choice, more so the minstrel style behavior. And it certainly strikes a chord for xenophobes. Why go as trans Muslim at all if the whole point was solely testing the voucher program?

O'Keefe exposed nothing and you ignored the facts from my post. Why do you have to resort to name calling? You sound juvenile


Let's check in on the situation…

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Trump could have waited until after the midterms. I'm sure his advisers told him that. There was a reason he chose to act right away. It had to be done and he did it.

As always you live in the MAGA Neighborhood of Make Believe.

No, this didn't have to be done. Literally the only reason we attacked Iran is because after Venezuela, Trump was looking for another easy way to feel like a tough guy given what a sh** show his domestic political situation was becoming.

Bibi convinced Trump that Iran was completely defenseless (a.k.a. not a threat) and it would be easy peasy to kill their leaders and ignite a glorious revolution over a weekend. Of course that was stupid, and there was NO PLAN for what might happen if his weekend bender failed. He's been flailing to find a way out ever since, and unfortunately for him the only tool in his toolbox, the reality distortion machine that works so well at home, is pretty useless in foreign affairs.




LOL-take your medication, loon.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.

That pitcher of margaritas with your fish taco lunch has caught up with you, I see.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOLOL

This cult of personality around a demented reality TV star loon will go down as the weirdest era of politics in US history.

I hope so anyway, I definitely don't care to ever see anything weirder.

TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope. Common sense… and I've said as much similar before, but there was still time then. I'm sure that it's probably the one single most "swing vote" issue out there.

Poor job on his part not realizing that… and making fun of it doesn't help whatsoever either.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

LOLOL

This cult of personality around a demented reality TV star loon will go down as the weirdest era of politics in US history.

I hope so anyway, I definitely don't care to ever see anything weirder.




…and yet this party STILL won in a landslide. CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?! That must really bother you to this very day, knowing democrats had no answer and now must endure two more years?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Oldsouljer said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Numbnuts thought the conservative candidate won in Brazil


Brazil elections: Merz, world leaders congratulate Lula on his win

https://www.dw.com/en/brazil-elections-merz-world-leaders-congratulate-lula-on-his-win/live-79755630
- - -

Left-wing incumbent Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva defeated Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of the far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro
It was a tight runoff, with Lula winning 51.7% of the vote against Bolsonaro's 48.2%, official results showed


- - -

After the Supreme Court kept election stations open for an additional two hours, enough votes were found for the far left candidate to "win" a fourth term.


Corruption is at the top of the ballot. Brazil election was precursor to that.



Blueprint for what the socialists here at home have planned for the rest of us.

LOLOLOL

There's only one party that tried their damndest to rig an election, and it ain't the libruls.

Nobody said anything about libruls.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfme said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Yep. And Biden badly screwed up leaving Afghanistan. We all overreacted to Covid with lockdowns.. etc etc.

Just rational thought

Which begs a question. Trump obviously didn't mind leaving ground forces in Afghanistan. I think they have to be committed here and now to Iran, and yet he's avoiding doing that. What's changed? Who knows?
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats doing democrat things to steal an election…

Peltola campaign under fire after report that it recruited second Dan Sullivan for Alaska Senate race

https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/peltola-campaign-fire-after-report-recruited-dan-sullivan/story?id=137646458
- - -

Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign is under fire after a New York Times report Wednesday that it played a role in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan -- a Republican who almost has the same name as incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan -- as part of an effort to sow confusion and ultimately benefit Peltola's campaign.

The Times report said it relied on 12 sources, text messages and documents that allegedly showed members of Peltola's campaign, lawyers for Peltola and senior aides at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee contributed to pushing Dan J. Sullivan, a Republican on Alaska's four-way ballot, to run.
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Democrats doing democrat things to steal an election…

Peltola campaign under fire after report that it recruited second Dan Sullivan for Alaska Senate race

https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/peltola-campaign-fire-after-report-recruited-dan-sullivan/story?id=137646458
- - -

Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign is under fire after a New York Times report Wednesday that it played a role in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan -- a Republican who almost has the same name as incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan -- as part of an effort to sow confusion and ultimately benefit Peltola's campaign.

The Times report said it relied on 12 sources, text messages and documents that allegedly showed members of Peltola's campaign, lawyers for Peltola and senior aides at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee contributed to pushing Dan J. Sullivan, a Republican on Alaska's four-way ballot, to run.


Coming from the NY Times has to sting the left really bad. If the NYT is reporting this, then the documents must be pretty damning.

Alaska has only Lisa Murkowski to blame for this ranked choice voting. It's a scam to get more leftists elected.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrummerboyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Democrats doing democrat things to steal an election…

Peltola campaign under fire after report that it recruited second Dan Sullivan for Alaska Senate race

https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/peltola-campaign-fire-after-report-recruited-dan-sullivan/story?id=137646458
- - -

Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign is under fire after a New York Times report Wednesday that it played a role in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan -- a Republican who almost has the same name as incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan -- as part of an effort to sow confusion and ultimately benefit Peltola's campaign.

The Times report said it relied on 12 sources, text messages and documents that allegedly showed members of Peltola's campaign, lawyers for Peltola and senior aides at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee contributed to pushing Dan J. Sullivan, a Republican on Alaska's four-way ballot, to run.


Coming from the NY Times has to sting the left really bad. If the NYT is reporting this, then the documents must be pretty damning.

Alaska has only Lisa Murkowski to blame for this ranked choice voting. It's a scam to get more leftists elected.


You know it's bad when the NYT is calling it out. They must know something? It show democrats will use every trick in the book to "win" an election.

Someone needs to face prosecution over this.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

wolfme said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Yep. And Biden badly screwed up leaving Afghanistan. We all overreacted to Covid with lockdowns.. etc etc.

Just rational thought

Which begs a question. Trump obviously didn't mind leaving ground forces in Afghanistan. I think they have to be committed here and now to Iran, and yet he's avoiding doing that. What's changed? Who knows?

No, Trump surrendered to the Taliban and handed them the keys, and then drew us down to an unsustainable token force that was scheduled to leave on a specific date. Nothing changed.

By the way, Trump left the actual pull out to Biden because there's no such thing as pulling out after 20 years and it not being at least a little messy. Of course MAGA was always planning to bawl about it, but all things considered it couldn't have gone much better.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

DrummerboyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Democrats doing democrat things to steal an election…

Peltola campaign under fire after report that it recruited second Dan Sullivan for Alaska Senate race

https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/peltola-campaign-fire-after-report-recruited-dan-sullivan/story?id=137646458
- - -

Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign is under fire after a New York Times report Wednesday that it played a role in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan -- a Republican who almost has the same name as incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan -- as part of an effort to sow confusion and ultimately benefit Peltola's campaign.

The Times report said it relied on 12 sources, text messages and documents that allegedly showed members of Peltola's campaign, lawyers for Peltola and senior aides at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee contributed to pushing Dan J. Sullivan, a Republican on Alaska's four-way ballot, to run.


Coming from the NY Times has to sting the left really bad. If the NYT is reporting this, then the documents must be pretty damning.

Alaska has only Lisa Murkowski to blame for this ranked choice voting. It's a scam to get more leftists elected.


You know it's bad when the NYT is calling it out. They must know something? It show democrats will use every trick in the book to "win" an election.

Someone needs to face prosecution over this.

LOL! I'm gonna have to buy a bigger vase to collect all of these tears.

Fun fact, there are 215 races in 2026 that have two candidates with the same name. It's legal. This is a dirty trick that Republicans have been doing for years. As a side note, during Peltola's primary Republicans added a socialist candidate to oppose her and fully bankrolled them. OMG PROSECUTE!!!

If Dems were involved then personally I'm thrilled that they're finally getting their heads in the game. And I'm still holding my breath for the "librul" NYT to do a deep dive on who was responsible for all of those Pennsylvania Dem precincts in 2024 getting shut down by bomb threats. I guess endless Republican cheating just isn't news.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You know what's not affordable? Playing Bethpage and Torrey Pines. Besides that, there was a much better plan led by Tom Doak that would've kept the mission of East Potomac, but that got squashed by Trump because he only knows resort courses so he hires the devil, Tom Fazio to do it



Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

DrummerboyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Democrats doing democrat things to steal an election…

Peltola campaign under fire after report that it recruited second Dan Sullivan for Alaska Senate race

https://abcnews.com/amp/Politics/peltola-campaign-fire-after-report-recruited-dan-sullivan/story?id=137646458
- - -

Alaska Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola's campaign is under fire after a New York Times report Wednesday that it played a role in recruiting Dan J. Sullivan -- a Republican who almost has the same name as incumbent GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan -- as part of an effort to sow confusion and ultimately benefit Peltola's campaign.

The Times report said it relied on 12 sources, text messages and documents that allegedly showed members of Peltola's campaign, lawyers for Peltola and senior aides at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee contributed to pushing Dan J. Sullivan, a Republican on Alaska's four-way ballot, to run.


Coming from the NY Times has to sting the left really bad. If the NYT is reporting this, then the documents must be pretty damning.

Alaska has only Lisa Murkowski to blame for this ranked choice voting. It's a scam to get more leftists elected.


You know it's bad when the NYT is calling it out. They must know something? It show democrats will use every trick in the book to "win" an election.

Someone needs to face prosecution over this.

LOL! I'm gonna have to buy a bigger vase to collect all of these tears.

Fun fact, there are 215 races in 2026 that have two candidates with the same name. It's legal. This is a dirty trick that Republicans have been doing for years. As a side note, during Peltola's primary Republicans added a socialist candidate to oppose her and fully bankrolled them. OMG PROSECUTE!!!

If Dems were involved then personally I'm thrilled that they're finally getting their heads in the game. And I'm still holding my breath for the "librul" NYT to do a deep dive on who was responsible for all of those Pennsylvania Dem precincts in 2024 getting shut down by bomb threats. I guess endless Republican cheating just isn't news.


First, why are you such an a s s h o l e? It is impossible to have a conversation with you.

Second, you make these wild accusations without ever proving a link. Why is that? Are we comparing apples to oranges?

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

wolfme said:

TheStorm said:

Let me be clear here. Trump definitely screwed the pooch with these gas prices. Going in and doing what needed to be done was one thing, but if you are going to start the job - you have to be committed to finishing the job.

Why he didn't is beyond me, but this situation with the mid-terms right now is 100% of his making - and it didn't have to be this way. If the gas prices weren't what they were (everything else cost wise feeds directly off of it), we wouldn't even be having to talk about these mid-terms.

He can think and say otherwise - but he's wrong this time.

There. I said it.


Yep. And Biden badly screwed up leaving Afghanistan. We all overreacted to Covid with lockdowns.. etc etc.

Just rational thought

Which begs a question. Trump obviously didn't mind leaving ground forces in Afghanistan. I think they have to be committed here and now to Iran, and yet he's avoiding doing that. What's changed? Who knows?

No, Trump surrendered to the Taliban and handed them the keys, and then drew us down to an unsustainable taken force that was scheduled to leave on a specific date. Nothing changed.

By the way, Trump left the actual pull out to Biden because there's no such thing as pulling out after 20 years and it not being at least a little messy. Of course MAGA was always planning to bawl about it, but all things considered it couldn't have gone much better.


You never had the nuts to be there and you talking out of your rear end, like usual.

Your guy was President and the buck stops with him.

I challenge you to watch this video. Give me ONE minute of your life, please.

Trump in meeting with Taliban: "If you harm a hair on a single American, I'm going to kill you"

First Page Last Page
Page 977 of 991 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.