TRUMP 2024

3,298,125 Views | 28302 Replies | Last: 14 sec ago by Gulfstream4
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Look at Civ's people. And they're wearing masks too. Typical.



We should definitely shoot them in the face.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.

Let's see...
  • It's not for national security reasons... we've had a treaty with Greenland since the 1950s that let's us do basically whatever we want there militarily. At the height of the Cold War we had 17 military bases there, now scaled down to 1.
  • It's not that China or Russia have been threatening Greenland, MAGA fan fiction aside. The vast majority of encounters recently have actually been around Alaska.
  • It's not that one of Trump's billionaire buddies (Ronald Lauder) put the idea in his head a while back that global warming will soon reveal a ton of rare earth metals that his buddies could exploit for themselves, because obviously gLoBal wARmiNg iS a HoAx.
Just kidding, it's definitely the last one.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Look at Civ's people. And they're wearing masks too. Typical.



We should definitely shoot them in the face.


The world would be a better place.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Lying propagandist,

Remember your words when Trump invokes the Insurrection Act.

I expect you to be the hypocrite you are when he does though.

FAFO, snowflake.

LOLOL. God you're so tough. I dream of being as alpha as you when I grow up.

Is your Stephen Miller poster still on your ceiling, or did your wife make you take it down again?

Ironically it may be an improvement to have actual well-trained troops on the ground that have to abide by the UCMJ, led by actual officers beholden to the same, instead of immature mall cops with guns that have been promised immunity for doing whatever the **** they want to do.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Lying propagandist,

Remember your words when Trump invokes the Insurrection Act.

I expect you to be the hypocrite you are when he does though.

FAFO, snowflake.

LOLOL. God you're so tough. I dream of being as alpha as you when I grow up.

Is your Stephen Miller poster still on your ceiling, or did your wife make you take it down again?

Ironically it may be an improvement to have actual well-trained troops on the ground that have to abide by the UCMJ, led by actual officers beholden to the same, instead of immature mall cops with guns that have been promised immunity for doing whatever the **** they want to do.


Truth hurts doesn't it, beta? Do you still creepily use women's restrooms to show support for transgenders?

Look forward to your hypocritical crying about whatever happens next, sheep.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, what ever happened to all of those Epstein Files that the DOJ is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE ALREADY RELEASED? Sure have been a lot of distractions lately to keep anyone from asking about it. I wonder who we'll invade next... Greenland? Philly?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.
Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Hey, what ever happened to all of those Epstein Files that the DOJ is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE ALREADY RELEASED? Sure have been a lot of distractions lately to keep anyone from asking about it. I wonder who we'll invade next... Greenland? Philly?


Why did Bill and Hillary fail to appear to talk about it?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Hey, what ever happened to all of those Epstein Files that the DOJ is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE ALREADY RELEASED? Sure have been a lot of distractions lately to keep anyone from asking about it. I wonder who we'll invade next... Greenland? Philly?


Why did Bill and Hillary fail to appear to talk about it?

I'm assuming to not fall into your bulls**t media trap of making it all about the Clintons. What does that have to do with our profoundly corrupt DOJ following the law?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?


How would Russia or China "get" a NATO nation's territory, exactly?

I love how we're to the insane point where just forcibly taking land from our NATO allies, to the extent they even consider us such anymore, is seen as something that's all upside.

Furthermore, what do we need it for again? What would we be able to do there if we "took" it, that we're not already able to do there?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Hey, what ever happened to all of those Epstein Files that the DOJ is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE ALREADY RELEASED? Sure have been a lot of distractions lately to keep anyone from asking about it. I wonder who we'll invade next... Greenland? Philly?


Why did Bill and Hillary fail to appear to talk about it?

I'm assuming to not fall into your bulls**t media trap of making it all about the Clintons. What does that have to do with our profoundly corrupt DOJ following the law?


Seems like the Clintons have made it all about the Clintons. What does Bill have to hide?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?


How would Russia or China "get" a NATO nation's territory, exactly?

I love how we're to the insane point where just forcibly taking land from our NATO allies, to the extent they even consider us such anymore, is seen as something that's all upside.

Furthermore, what do we need it for again? What would we be able to do there if we "took" it, that we're not already able to do there?


I think it was 2017 when their PM fly to China and asked for China to invest in Greenland. Airports, roads, bridges…etc. the government of Denmark shut it down just in time.

We have China/Russia on the west. They were building alliances in S.America. They want Greenland too. That would put us in a box.

It would keep China out of the western hemisphere. You HAD to pick…you must make a choice, would you rather we occupy Greenland or China/Russia?

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?

Man, you'll gobble up any pretext they feed you. Only in MAGA fantasy world was China/Russia trying to "box us in" in Venezuela and Greenland. I'd be happy to give you 20 reasons why, but we both know you're impervious to reality.

All Trump has managed to do is turn the United States into a lawless rogue state that is driving the world toward China.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?

Man, you'll gobble up any pretext they feed you. Only in MAGA fantasy world was China/Russia trying to "box us in" in Venezuela and Greenland. I'd be happy to give you 20 reasons why, but we both know you're impervious to reality.

All Trump has managed to do is turn the United States into a lawless rogue state that is driving the world toward China.


As usual, you offer nothing.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?


How would Russia or China "get" a NATO nation's territory, exactly?

I love how we're to the insane point where just forcibly taking land from our NATO allies, to the extent they even consider us such anymore, is seen as something that's all upside.

Furthermore, what do we need it for again? What would we be able to do there if we "took" it, that we're not already able to do there?


I think it was 2017 when their PM fly to China and asked for China to invest in Greenland. Airports, roads, bridges…etc. the government of Denmark shut it down just in time.

We have China/Russia on the west. They were building alliances in S.America. They want Greenland too. That would put us in a box.

It would keep China out of the western hemisphere. You HAD to pick…you must make a choice, would you rather we occupy Greenland or China/Russia?




For leftists like the ones crying on the board about this, it would depend entirely on who is president. If it's Trump, they would rather Russia or China have Greenland. If it was a Democrat leader; they would want the United States to have Greenland.

Party before country.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.
Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?
last time I checked, Denmark was a NATO country. So Russia and China aren't taking Greenland
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?


How would Russia or China "get" a NATO nation's territory, exactly?

I love how we're to the insane point where just forcibly taking land from our NATO allies, to the extent they even consider us such anymore, is seen as something that's all upside.

Furthermore, what do we need it for again? What would we be able to do there if we "took" it, that we're not already able to do there?


I think it was 2017 when their PM fly to China and asked for China to invest in Greenland. Airports, roads, bridges…etc. the government of Denmark shut it down just in time.

We have China/Russia on the west. They were building alliances in S.America. They want Greenland too. That would put us in a box.

It would keep China out of the western hemisphere. You HAD to pick…you must make a choice, would you rather we occupy Greenland or China/Russia?




For leftists like the ones crying on the board about this, it would depend entirely on who is president. If it's Trump, they would rather Russia or China have Greenland. If it was a Democrat leader; they would want the United States to have Greenland.

Party before country.

flylike44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/smiling-anti-ice-agitator-accused-punching-florida-trooper-desantis-asserts-this-not-minneapolis

The smirk on this one at the end before she's put in the car…Every time one of these useful idiots are arrested or an illegal is deported, an angel gets their wings. It's getting crowded up there lol.

I tell you what. I have young kids. If they grow up to be liberals, cool. That'll be their choice. However, I can absolutely guarantee that they will never behave like the lunatics we've been watching doing their best impressions of animals at the zoo flinging poop at each other. I'm guessing there will be spirited family discussions, but it will never end in violence, or anything close to violence, and the thought that rioting and assaulting cops as a reaction to political differences will never even occur to them as being a viable option.

You see, it doesn't "take a village". It takes good parents and a stable home. Most people that act out in this way missed out on one or both of those things. The democrat village spawned an army of poo flingers.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

packgrad said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?


How would Russia or China "get" a NATO nation's territory, exactly?

I love how we're to the insane point where just forcibly taking land from our NATO allies, to the extent they even consider us such anymore, is seen as something that's all upside.

Furthermore, what do we need it for again? What would we be able to do there if we "took" it, that we're not already able to do there?


I think it was 2017 when their PM fly to China and asked for China to invest in Greenland. Airports, roads, bridges…etc. the government of Denmark shut it down just in time.

We have China/Russia on the west. They were building alliances in S.America. They want Greenland too. That would put us in a box.

It would keep China out of the western hemisphere. You HAD to pick…you must make a choice, would you rather we occupy Greenland or China/Russia?




For leftists like the ones crying on the board about this, it would depend entirely on who is president. If it's Trump, they would rather Russia or China have Greenland. If it was a Democrat leader; they would want the United States to have Greenland.

Party before country.




Which flag are you flying this week? Palestine, Venezuela, Iran, or Denmark?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.


Would you rather Russia/China have it? We already have them on our western flank. They were expanding into South America (Venezuela) until your great President Trump stopped that. In time they would take Greenland too. All of that could box us in. Are you okay with that?

Tell me, how would your life change if we took Greenland. Tell me one single thing in your everyday life that would be different?

last time I checked, Denmark was a NATO country. So Russia and China aren't taking Greenland


Of course not.

This is example #156 of Trump being influenced to say or try something hair-brained, followed immediately by his minions scurrying around trying to reverse-engineer a remotely sensible justification to do whatever he wants to do, no matter how demented.
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

packgrad said:

Oh no. Lefties are going to have to get their Denmark flags soon. Trump has been superb for the flag economy.



Sooner or later, Denmark will realize that their government-provided everything will cause them to run out of money, and they'll gladly accept a U.S. cash infusion to keep their socialist scam going a little longer.

Why exactly does the US need to seize Greenland? Are there not better ways to spend $500-$700B (what I've seen as the minimum to "purchase" Greenland?

If this happens, I don't want to hear from anyone on this site ever again about government spending and deficits.

Can't answer that because I never said anything about seizing it, or even buying it. Rather, I was talking about Denmark's need to sell it. However, and by whatever means, the US can't allow China or Russia to get a toehold there. To any strategist worth their salt, that's indisputable.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A television network that routinely tells the truth, OANN.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think I saw where #Sieve said all the fraud was contrived manipulated information. Right, #Sieve?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Funny thing is the Minnesota State bird is the Loon.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regarding the mentions of the Insurrection Act, I'm fairly certain that the POTUS does not have to declare/announce publicly, the Insurrection Act has been invoked. It may have already been invoked.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 assaults on a federal law enforcement officer.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like a Drake Thomas plant.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Breaking into a federal law enforcement vehicle and stealing an FBI firearm ..and ammo.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, you could have done a better job of stealing the FBI firearm than that, couldn't you? You'd probably never get caught. Now don't claim that I gave you this GREAT IDEA ........
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some fun facts:

1. The Insurrection Act has been invoked 30 times by 17 different presidents.

2. In fact, 37% of American presidents have invoked the Insurrection Act.

3. It was invoked to deal with rebellions and uprisings.

What are rebellions and uprisings?

Examples:

- Armed groups openly defied federal law

- State or local authorities could not or would not enforce federal law

- Violence or organized resistance threatened the authority of the federal government

- Courts were blocked, taxes couldn't be collected, or officials were attacked

Look I just described Minnesota.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hilarious!!!!!!!!
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 687 of 809
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.