TRUMP 2024

2,493,908 Views | 22259 Replies | Last: 20 min ago by FlossyDFlynt
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

"Extrajudicially executing" LOLOLOL.

The mentally ill has got it bad this morning.

I love how he honestly thinks anybody believes he is arguing on merit. It's just his latest crybaby outrage that per usual is based on zero fact.

Double tap second order argh!!

I would like to hear Civ's thoughts on what to do with these boats heading to our shores...
We are basically playing the same game of wack-a-mole that has been happening since the late 70s. America will declare victory and the cartels will adjust.

Prohibition doesn't work. Addiction is the problem. Pour the resources into treatment.


Are you willing to give more of your resources to treatment? Can we put you down for a specific tax hike, say 10% of your salary in addition to your normal taxes? You in?


LMAO….. he's NEVER worked a day in his life!

What he has his parents have given him. He has a "job" in title only.

He couldn't pour piss out of a boot with a week to study the instructions.

He's just being his normal BS lying self.

If he actually ever had to work he wouldn't be on this board day in and day during normal working hours.

Pathetic no life having loser.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Dave also said we couldn't stop immigration. It's been this way since the 70s. Look what happened. I think the unserious people like civ and Dave need to be ignored, which thankfully it seems this administration is doing.

Civ wants to jail special forces leaders for killing narco terrorists because he's mentally ill. These people no longer deserve a seat at the table.


LOL @ "wants to jail special forces leaders." Um, no.

It's like whack-a-mole in here.

This whole conversation started because y'all were tantruming that Congressional ex-servicemembers had the audacity to cite a portion of the UCMJ on video that reminded servicemembers of their right and obligation to follow the Constitution, and not illegal orders.

Then when only a couple of weeks later it became patently obvious why the Seditious 6 said what they did, when communication surfaced that pointed to Captain Underpants out there ordering extrajudicial double-taps on drug runners that posed no imminent threat to the US, y'all want to talk about "wanting to jail special forces leaders."

How about just "wanting Trump and GI Joe to not operate like they're above the law."



Captain Underpants? Extrajudicial double taps? Drug runners that pose no imminent threat? "LOLOLOL " But you're not mentally ill?

How about not pretending you have standards? We can just look at your posting history and it is very clear you don't, unless they are conservative.

Look how you've been on a milk carton about your "daddy" or Epstein. You're not much better than a Russian bot, programmed by someone in a faraway room to spout unfounded partisan rhetoric. Baaaaaa.
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

By no means am I advocating for decriminalizing drugs

I get that, but that was the line of thinking behind Oregon's decriminalization which failed miserably.
First Page Refresh
Page 637 of 637
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.