Gulfstream4 said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Ole Were spent a number of afternoons there back in the 1950's. Floating boats on an arm that went around in circle.......I remember it well.

---

It was a running joke on the other site for years. Two posters were going to throw down and the location was PP. Needless to say, nothing ever happened because one of the guys didn't show up.

---

Nothing like a bloody nose, skinned up knee and torn slacks.....LOL

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

The Poles got it right.

🚨 This is 300,000 polish patriots on the streets to declare Poland is a CHRISTIAN country.

Britain and the rest of Europe MUST take note and follow Poland's example. pic.twitter.com/o2TENWBxaI

— The British Patriot (@TheBritLad) October 29, 2025

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Ole Were spent a number of afternoons there back in the 1950's. Floating boats on an arm that went around in circle.......I remember it well.

---

It was a running joke on the other site for years. Two posters were going to throw down and the location was PP. Needless to say, nothing ever happened because one of the guys didn't show up.

---

Cal showed up. Would probably go the same way on this site if it happened.

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

Tell us more about "religion" beta that said "weird" and "Americas daddy". Not long ago you couldn't define gender and were crying about climate change. Oh yes, please tell us more about "religion", hypocrite.

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

You will learn in the coming weeks that Canada looked the other way as the CCP brought in 2020 ballots by the container. The Prime Minister is a Central Banker puppet and had been a minion of the Rothschilds for years. For starters...

Question for you; do Canada and other countries countries we trade with have tariffs on the US?

---

always the Jews. This is why no one takes you seriously. Who gives a **** about what other countries do. It's at a detriment to their citizens

You also didn't answer the question, so I will for you. There is no national security threat from Canada.

---

Hokie, I think this (bolded) is very narrow thinking. If other countries put tariffs on our goods going into their country, the (so-called) increase to their citizens would make our exports more expensive, right? If so, why would they buy our exports? They would look for an alternative source, thus hurting US business.

---

The irony in this argument is incredible. So the solution to Canadians not purchasing as many US goods is to raise prices on all goods for US consumers, domestic and foreign manufactured and to punish and to boast about how much the government is collecting in taxes?

Again, what is the national security threat that Canada imposes on the US?

What do I need to do to help fix? Do I write a letter to a Canadian family?

---

Hokie, the irony is really with your stance on this. Heck, I even gave you a position that should meet your thinking. Now, regarding National Security threats…. well, that border has been as open as the southern border, just on a smaller sample. National Security also means Economic Security. I've asked this before…. Does US business have the same even opportunity to sell into Canada as Canada does into the US, prior to tariffs?

Civilized said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

#SIeve, #Nappy & #Gobbler support the fleecing of America.

AMERICA HAS HAD ENOUGH

SNAP now burns $145 BILLION a year. That is $7.8 BILLION every single month.

Recipients spend TWICE what the average working American spends on groceries, because they aren’t spending their money; they are spending yours.

This isn’t “helping the poor.”… pic.twitter.com/VOZt4xAFlP

— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) October 29, 2025

---

Do that math for us, Were.

SNAP spending is around $100 billion/year, or around $180/month per participant.

In what world is a "normal working American" spending only $90/month on groceries?

You've got it flipped, as usual.

The average American spends $350 per person per month on groceries, DOUBLE what SNAP provides.

SNAP provides HALF of the amount spent by an average American, to those eligible.

---

Is it true that around 40-45 million people receive SNAP benefits?

hokiewolf said:

---

Also, who gets Snap benefits? Majority Illegals, right?

---

Close to 7 million people that race is unknown. That's hilarious…

Great to see sanity prevail on SNAP.

BREAKING: 15 Republican senators have now joined all 47 Democrats in backing legislation to extend SNAP benefits during the shutdown.

That means a clear bipartisan majority of the Senate just voted to keep food on the table for 40 million Americans, even as Trump and House…

— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) October 30, 2025

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

#SIeve, #Nappy & #Gobbler support the fleecing of America.

AMERICA HAS HAD ENOUGH

SNAP now burns $145 BILLION a year. That is $7.8 BILLION every single month.

Recipients spend TWICE what the average working American spends on groceries, because they aren’t spending their money; they are spending yours.

This isn’t “helping the poor.”… pic.twitter.com/VOZt4xAFlP

— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) October 29, 2025

---

Do that math for us, Were.

SNAP spending is around $100 billion/year, or around $180/month per participant.

In what world is a "normal working American" spending only $90/month on groceries?

You've got it flipped, as usual.

The average American spends $350 per person per month on groceries, DOUBLE what SNAP provides.

SNAP provides HALF of the amount spent by an average American, to those eligible.

---

Is it true that around 40-45 million people receive SNAP benefits?

---

Yes

hokiewolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Ole packgrad, can't refute an argument because populists have no convictions

---

ole Dave is a fake ass attention ***** living off his mommy and daddy's teats

---

nope. Don't be that guy too.

---

Dude, you're as fake as they come here. Don't tell me who to be. Maybe go and cry about the water cooler on the sports boards again trying to get likes while being the second highest poster on the water cooler. You're all about getting attention. I wonder why….

---

You respect Cary, no? Why don't you ask him about me, he's actually taken the time to get to know me.

---

Yes, Hokie is a good person. Yes, he and I had lunch together, Yes, he and I communicate with each other directly. Yes, he and I disagree on issues. That said, we agree on far more than we don't.

Guys, I'll give Hokie a hard time on issues we disagree on; however, I'm not going to say bad things about him personally, because he is a solid person!!

Furthermore, how can a person dislike the person that created the Tony Adams scale? LOL

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

#SIeve, #Nappy & #Gobbler support the fleecing of America.

AMERICA HAS HAD ENOUGH

SNAP now burns $145 BILLION a year. That is $7.8 BILLION every single month.

Recipients spend TWICE what the average working American spends on groceries, because they aren’t spending their money; they are spending yours.

This isn’t “helping the poor.”… pic.twitter.com/VOZt4xAFlP

— Amy Mek (@AmyMek) October 29, 2025

---

Do that math for us, Were.

SNAP spending is around $100 billion/year, or around $180/month per participant.

In what world is a "normal working American" spending only $90/month on groceries?

You've got it flipped, as usual.

The average American spends $350 per person per month on groceries, DOUBLE what SNAP provides.

SNAP provides HALF of the amount spent by an average American, to those eligible.

---

Is it true that around 40-45 million people receive SNAP benefits?

---

Yes

---

Not getting into the who and who isn't receiving those benefits; rather, that amount of people, in our country, receiving these benefits is staggering.

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

Ok, take a look at your boy Smapty…. He is full-on personal insults with people he thinks is beneath him, intellectually. Just ask him…

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

That is a passive insult to people that align with MAGA. Civ, that's just slaps you in the face from the post prior to this last one…

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

That is a passive insult to people that align with MAGA. Civ, that's just slaps you in the face from the post prior to this last one…

---

Hilarious that you think him or your boy Dave are consistent in their standards for themselves and others. Did you have lunch with Civ too?

Lol.

I was also supposed to be at your lunch with hokie, if you recall. It certainly speaks to your character that you continue to speak kindly of him considering how often he mocks you on this board. Good on you I guess. I'm not like that.

The light is being shown on the truth.

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed

In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of… pic.twitter.com/3FyXoCZHPt

— Camus (@newstart_2024) October 29, 2025

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

Ok, take a look at your boy Smapty…. He is full-on personal insults with people he thinks is beneath him, intellectually. Just ask him…

---

Civ has the patience of Job. Me not so much. I try, but I'm more than happy to point out when someone is a rage-filled moron spewing demonic, anti-American opinions and blindly nodding along to obvious cons.

Unfortunately I get daily opportunities around here.

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

You will learn in the coming weeks that Canada looked the other way as the CCP brought in 2020 ballots by the container. The Prime Minister is a Central Banker puppet and had been a minion of the Rothschilds for years. For starters...

Question for you; do Canada and other countries countries we trade with have tariffs on the US?

---

always the Jews. This is why no one takes you seriously. Who gives a **** about what other countries do. It's at a detriment to their citizens

You also didn't answer the question, so I will for you. There is no national security threat from Canada.

---

Hokie, I think this (bolded) is very narrow thinking. If other countries put tariffs on our goods going into their country, the (so-called) increase to their citizens would make our exports more expensive, right? If so, why would they buy our exports? They would look for an alternative source, thus hurting US business.

---

The irony in this argument is incredible. So the solution to Canadians not purchasing as many US goods is to raise prices on all goods for US consumers, domestic and foreign manufactured and to punish and to boast about how much the government is collecting in taxes?

Again, what is the national security threat that Canada imposes on the US?

What do I need to do to help fix? Do I write a letter to a Canadian family?

---

Hokie, the irony is really with your stance on this. Heck, I even gave you a position that should meet your thinking. Now, regarding National Security threats…. well, that border has been as open as the southern border, just on a smaller sample. National Security also means Economic Security. I've asked this before…. Does US business have the same even opportunity to sell into Canada as Canada does into the US, prior to tariffs?

---

the point should be, Canada, you have a tariff on X widget, let's negotiate something that benefits both countries, as opposed to Canada has a tariff on X widget, so we're going to put a blanket tariff on everything, thus hurting ourselves.

That's the crux of my concern

packgrad said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

That is a passive insult to people that align with MAGA. Civ, that's just slaps you in the face from the post prior to this last one…

---

Hilarious that you think him or your boy Dave are consistent in their standards for themselves and others. Did you have lunch with Civ too?

Lol.

I was also supposed to be at your lunch with hokie, if you recall. It certainly speaks to your character that you continue to speak kindly of him considering how often he mocks you on this board. Good on you I guess. I'm not like that.

---

you should've come.

Civilized said:

---

Great to see sanity prevail on SNAP.

BREAKING: 15 Republican senators have now joined all 47 Democrats in backing legislation to extend SNAP benefits during the shutdown.

That means a clear bipartisan majority of the Senate just voted to keep food on the table for 40 million Americans, even as Trump and House…

— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) October 30, 2025

---

Fake news.

packgrad said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

That is a passive insult to people that align with MAGA. Civ, that's just slaps you in the face from the post prior to this last one…

---

Hilarious that you think him or your boy Dave are consistent in their standards for themselves and others. Did you have lunch with Civ too?

Lol.

I was also supposed to be at your lunch with hokie, if you recall. It certainly speaks to your character that you continue to speak kindly of him considering how often he mocks you on this board. Good on you I guess. I'm not like that.

---

I think we should do lunch soon. Let's set it up. Who all is up for a lunch? Amedeo's?

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

You will learn in the coming weeks that Canada looked the other way as the CCP brought in 2020 ballots by the container. The Prime Minister is a Central Banker puppet and had been a minion of the Rothschilds for years. For starters...

Question for you; do Canada and other countries countries we trade with have tariffs on the US?

---

always the Jews. This is why no one takes you seriously. Who gives a **** about what other countries do. It's at a detriment to their citizens

You also didn't answer the question, so I will for you. There is no national security threat from Canada.

---

Hokie, I think this (bolded) is very narrow thinking. If other countries put tariffs on our goods going into their country, the (so-called) increase to their citizens would make our exports more expensive, right? If so, why would they buy our exports? They would look for an alternative source, thus hurting US business.

---

The irony in this argument is incredible. So the solution to Canadians not purchasing as many US goods is to raise prices on all goods for US consumers, domestic and foreign manufactured and to punish and to boast about how much the government is collecting in taxes?

Again, what is the national security threat that Canada imposes on the US?

What do I need to do to help fix? Do I write a letter to a Canadian family?

---

Hokie, the irony is really with your stance on this. Heck, I even gave you a position that should meet your thinking. Now, regarding National Security threats…. well, that border has been as open as the southern border, just on a smaller sample. National Security also means Economic Security. I've asked this before…. Does US business have the same even opportunity to sell into Canada as Canada does into the US, prior to tariffs?

---

the point should be, Canada, you have a tariff on X widget, let's negotiate something that benefits both countries, as opposed to Canada has a tariff on X widget, so we're going to put a blanket tariff on everything, thus hurting ourselves.

That's the crux of my concern

---

I don't think it's that simple. I believe Canada has certain restriction on US businesses on operating in Canada. Plus, some of the tariff is reported to be on their lack of support of the border. Help, or we cripple you. I'm ok with that.

Now, when Canada changes their tune, then we should remove the tariffs.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

Ok, take a look at your boy Smapty…. He is full-on personal insults with people he thinks is beneath him, intellectually. Just ask him…

---

Civ has the patience of Job. Me not so much. I try, but I'm more than happy to point out when someone is a rage-filled moron spewing demonic, anti-American opinions and blindly nodding along to obvious cons.

Unfortunately I get daily opportunities around here.

---

So, who do you equate that opinion with?

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

Kind of like when people hate the President even though they've never met him or spoken with him?

---

Met with him? What information would anyone gain from meeting or speaking with Trump that isn't completely outweighed by what we all know about him and his behavior?

If I introduced you to my buddy that you knew had bragged about sexually abusing women, was best friends for years with a convicted sex trafficker, had quite possibly participated in underage sex parties himself, mocked disabled people, cheated on three wives and paid some off, was found liable of sex assault, was accused of sex misconduct by dozens of women, cheated students trying to get an education, cheated his vendors out of money constantly...and also mentioned that I hadn't even touched on any of his potentially illegal behavior at his main job...what could he possibly say or do in that meeting that would make you respect him as a half-decent person?

And what does meeting Trump have to do with someone on a message board personally attacking hokie?

What did hokie do to packgrad or anyone else, other than have opinions packgrad doesn't like?

caryking said:

---

packgrad said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Civilized said:

---

It's positively wild how angry some people on here are, at total strangers, for no good reason.

And how they attack those strangers with personal insults online because they have a different political opinion.

This is a message board. It's not real life. We talking 'bout practice. Practice, man.

I'll never get it.

---

If it weren't for Internet forums and endless disinformation tweets/videos/podcasts, MAGA wouldn't exist. This *is* real life to them. And questioning their religion when they're not intellectually capable of defending any of it is a direct threat that must be shouted down.

---

It really is the new religion.

We'd all be a lot better off treating it as business and just making good business decisions for each other and the country, but I ain't trying to rob James of half his site visits.

---

That is a passive insult to people that align with MAGA. Civ, that's just slaps you in the face from the post prior to this last one…

---

Hilarious that you think him or your boy Dave are consistent in their standards for themselves and others. Did you have lunch with Civ too?

Lol.

I was also supposed to be at your lunch with hokie, if you recall. It certainly speaks to your character that you continue to speak kindly of him considering how often he mocks you on this board. Good on you I guess. I'm not like that.

---

I think we should do lunch soon. Let's set it up. Who all is up for a lunch? Amedeo's?

---

I'd be interested in driving up to have lunch with you, hokie and packgrad but have zero interest in meeting the other "intellectuals".