TRUMP 2024

1,012,238 Views | 11875 Replies | Last: 7 min ago by packgrad
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:00a
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

Reply Quote
2
1 edit
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:04a
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!

Reply Quote
Cthepack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 11:04a
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
Reply Quote
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:06a

Reply Quote
1
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:07a
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?


Looks like after.
Reply Quote
El Lobo Loco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:07a
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
Reply Quote
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:09a
Hey, protectionism works!

Reply Quote
1
Cthepack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to El Lobo Loco • 11:10a
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.
Reply Quote
2
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:14a
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.
probably going to be rejected because it wasn't posted on Truth Social.
Reply Quote
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:18a
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.


Correct. And because hokie is mentally ill, he has to try to frame it as a negative for Trump. Trump's negotiations seem to go in the right direction if given time. The cheerleaders will kick and scream the whole time, then go on a milk carton when things work out.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
5
Cthepack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 11:18a
hokiewolf said:
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.
probably going to be rejected because it wasn't posted on Truth Social.
Now you are just being silly. With President Elon owning X you know it will be ok.
Reply Quote
3
Cthepack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 11:20a
packgrad said:
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.


Correct. And because hokie is mentally ill, he has to try to frame it as a negative for Trump. Trump's negotiations seem to go in the right direction if given time. The cheerleaders will kick and scream the whole time, then go on a milk carton when things work out.
Hokie posted after Friday that Zelensky should have just done what everyone knew he had to do. Basically what Zelensky posted today.
Reply Quote
2
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:30a
Cthepack said:
packgrad said:
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.


Correct. And because hokie is mentally ill, he has to try to frame it as a negative for Trump. Trump's negotiations seem to go in the right direction if given time. The cheerleaders will kick and scream the whole time, then go on a milk carton when things work out.
Hokie posted after Friday that Zelensky should have just done what everyone knew he had to do. Basically what Zelensky posted today.


Yes he did. He is not the "cheerleaders" in this instance, his mental illness aside.

I'm sure civ and smapty are devastated by the news today that their weekend hero has bent the knee.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
4
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 11:32a
Cthepack said:
packgrad said:
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.


Correct. And because hokie is mentally ill, he has to try to frame it as a negative for Trump. Trump's negotiations seem to go in the right direction if given time. The cheerleaders will kick and scream the whole time, then go on a milk carton when things work out.
Hokie posted after Friday that Zelensky should have just done what everyone knew he had to do. Basically what Zelensky posted today.
correct. This should have been the move on Friday.

Hope it works, but again I worry about Putin and not everyone else.
Reply Quote
1 edit
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 11:39a
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 11:43a
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


Yep I remember a poster here recently laughing about 2 conservatives having the exact same verbiage in a tweet.
Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 12:11p
jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


Yep I remember a poster here recently laughing about 2 conservatives having the exact same verbiage in a tweet.


Up to 23!!! Zero respect for their constituents. Wow!!

"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
3
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:16p
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


Yep I remember a poster here recently laughing about 2 conservatives having the exact same verbiage in a tweet.


Up to 23!!! Zero respect for their constituents. Wow!!

Lol what good little soldiers.
Reply Quote
3
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:18p
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


Yep I remember a poster here recently laughing about 2 conservatives having the exact same verbiage in a tweet.


Up to 23!!! Zero respect for their constituents. Wow!!



The combined IQ of that montage of cringe lunatics may hover around room temperature.

Where is Civ and super/smrpty??

I guess Civ is being a cuck somewhere and smrpty is trying to figure out which guy was banging his wife again this past weekend.

So many possibilities….

F'ing losers.
Reply Quote
5
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 12:18p
jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
jkpackfan said:



Apparently they're up to 14 (I did not verify this fwiw) posting the same verbatim message. They truly believe they can program their NPC constituents. Crazy.


Yep I remember a poster here recently laughing about 2 conservatives having the exact same verbiage in a tweet.


Up to 23!!! Zero respect for their constituents. Wow!!

Lol what good little soldiers.
Civ would fit in great with that crowd... every single one of them.
Reply Quote
4
packofwolves
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:36p
hokiewolf said:
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!



But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?
Reply Quote
3
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:37p
Just thinking about this whole Ukraine situation, and Covid, Dem response and the world responses, the parallels are incredible. Then to top it off, the Dem-bot message today.

Imagine if Elon didn't buy Twitter. They would be well on their way to usurping the presidency.

I've never really bought in to the new world order stuff, or hell really know anything about it now. But it sure is something seeing all these groups align for such evil causes. Maybe there is something to it.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
5
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packofwolves • 12:41p
packofwolves said:
hokiewolf said:
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!



But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?
Blows my mind that this would be a "line in the sand".
Reply Quote
3
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 12:46p
jkpackfan said:
packofwolves said:
hokiewolf said:
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!



But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?
Blows my mind that this would be a "line in the sand".
COALITION OF MISFITS. The only way they can ever win an election is to have every subgroup of crazies to vote for them 100%...

And even that stupid sht wasn't enough anymore this last time...
Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 12:48p
jkpackfan said:
packofwolves said:
hokiewolf said:
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!



But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?
Blows my mind that this would be a "line in the sand".


Civ and smapty have assured us that all of the transgender support is just right wing propaganda. Surely the minions couldn't have been duped again....
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
5
flylike44
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packofwolves • 12:50p
packofwolves said:
hokiewolf said:
Both parties doubling down on stupid these days. At least it's entertaining television!



But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?


A couple hundred plus democrats in both houses voted against keeping men out of women's sports. Hopefully Trump will shine a supernova-esque light on that fact in his speech tonight.
Reply Quote
3
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:50p
I don't think transgendered men should compete in women sports, but man, what a blown up issue for such a minuscule amount of the overall population. If you're trans, and you want to compete, then make a transgender only competition in addition to men's and women's sports.

If you're the only competitor, great! You get first place!
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:53p
I don't know... biological women are like 50% +/- of the overall population still last time I checked.
Reply Quote
3
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:56p
If it's such a minuscule amount of the population then it should be an easy one to vote for. I seriously cannot believe there's even a debate on this issue.
Reply Quote
1
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 12:58p
hokiewolf said:
I don't think transgendered men should compete in women sports, but man, what a blown up issue for such a minuscule amount of the overall population. If you're trans, and you want to compete, then make a transgender only competition in addition to men's and women's sports.

If you're the only competitor, great! You get first place!


I don't even think you do that. I think the answer is to stop enabling mental illness. If they want to compete, compete with the gender they are, not with whatever gender their mental illness tells them they are. The pussification of America needs to stop.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
3
DrummerboyWolf
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flylike44 • 1:25p
flylike44 said:
packofwolves said:

But will the Dems applaud when Trump points out that Senate Dems didn't vote in favor of a bill to keep transgenders out of women/girls sports?


A couple hundred plus democrats in both houses voted against keeping men out of women's sports. Hopefully Trump will shine a supernova-esque light on that fact in his speech tonight.
From what I have heard, there will be a young former volleyball player who has suffered a permanent brain injury at the Capitol tonight. She was hit with a spike from a male masquerading as a female. I believe she might be from Western North Carolina.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:41p
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jkpackfan • 1:54p
jkpackfan said:
If it's such a minuscule amount of the population then it should be an easy one to vote for. I seriously cannot believe there's even a debate on this issue.
I agree. We're talking about approximately 100 kids total in the entire country. The amount of time you guys spend hyperventilating about this is comical. Obviously the MAGA echo chamber you live in knows how to do its job.

But guess what? The NCAA already bans it! Any sports organization is free to ban it, no one is stopping them. Some states have outlawed it. Others don't want to.

Soooo, what happened to "states rights"? Or were you guys just pretending you want that when it suits you?
Reply Quote
1 edit
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to hokiewolf • 1:56p
hokiewolf said:
caryking said:
hokiewolf said:
caryking said:
hokiewolf said:
Exiting NATO is a terrible idea so it's probably going to happen. Seems to be par for the course.


I disagree!
of course you do Cary, why would we be in the business of protecting our interests in Europe, which has a higher GDP then Russia and China? I agree, those guys deserve what they get! They aren't thankful enough to the US!
We are NATO! Perhaps the others can protect themselves. It's time for the to step up. Let someone else foot the bills and soldiers…
They do. The US contributes around $572M, which is around 16% of the NATO budget. That's a pretty cheap investment in our allies.

There are around 150,000 active duty troops deployed outside of the US total, that's the whole world, not NATO countries. There are 100,000 active duty troops in NATO countries, mostly Germany, UK, and Italy. Again, I'd like to understand how we think the US provides more soldiers than all of the other NATO countries combined. Seems like they don't.


Zalenski appears to be wanting to rekindle talks with Trump. Why? He knows Europe doesn't have any cards to play. Hokie, the US holds all the cards, everyone knows thiss!

Now, I don't trust Zalensky at all! He's a tool looking to fatten his own pocketbook. When this is over, Zalensky will do a US media tour building his brand for his next venture.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cthepack • 1:59p
Cthepack said:
El Lobo Loco said:
Cthepack said:
hokiewolf said:
Full groveling. Maybe Trump accepts. Seems thankful enough personally to Trump, but who knows if it satisfies his ego.

When was this posted? Before or after US paused support?
After, based on the time stamp.
I had not opened it when I posted my reply. I assume he met with European leaders, they agree the war to have a positive outcome needs the US. He sees "cards" were played and realized he needs to do what the US/Trump wants.


Everyone knows the only cards to be played are by the US. Only Zalensky minion tools argue otherwise.
Reply Quote
1
First Page
Page 339 of 340 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.